Contents contributed and discussions participated by lmacedopharmd
Fallon M, Forrest S. High-tech versus low-tech instructional strategies: a comparison o... - 1 views
-
http://top.sagepub.com/content/38/3/194.abstract
An article from the journal Technology of Psychology describes the use of clickers versus response cards in the classroom at Central Connecticut State University. This study showed that using clickers did not generally enhance test performance, reduce anxiety, or increase hope. Students unanimously preferred clickers to response cards, particularly for the anonymity that clickers afforded. They believed that classroom reviews were more effective when they involved clickers.
Munter M. Meeting technology: from low-tech to high-tech. Business Communication Quarte... - 1 views
-
An article that describes a series of low-tech and high-tech options for use in meeting management and summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of each tool. I found this to be a great resource to obtain more information on low-tech options including face-to-face meetings, with choices of flipcharts, non-electronic boards, electronic boards, handouts, etc.
Learning Styles Challenge -- Three-Year Update - 1 views
Leverage Twitter for Learning? #lrnchat - 1 views
-
Every Thursday evening, 8:30 ET, 5:30 PT, there's a great fun live gathering on Twitter called #lrnchat. It's a fast free-for-all organized around a theme, like instructional design, virtual worlds, social learning, or e-learning myths, structured around 3 general questions. Topics will range from instructional design, training, education, etc. Begin by typing #lrnchat into the Twitter search box. If you'd like to get a look at who's likely to be there, and how the conversation will go, you can check out the transcripts. This a great way to be part of a discussion on an educational topic and great opportunity to build your network with other eLearning experts in the field...during the chat the live stream of tweets fly fast and furious!
1 - 12 of 12
Showing 20▼ items per page