Skip to main content

Home/ DISC Inc/ Group items tagged SEO

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Rob Laporte

Google's Helpful Content Update: Predictions & Hypotheses | Seer Interactive - 0 views

  • Understand the questions in People Also Ask boxes. Notice how Google talks about having to search after a search to find answers? How else will you know what searchers ask for next?
  • Use trends, PAA clues, and news to drive your questions and ask them what they think.
  •  
    "How to Verify Your SEO Recommendations Using Chrome Dev Tools"
Rob Laporte

Entities In SEO: What Are They And Why Do They Matter? - 0 views

  • This concept can be scaled to create exceptionally strong pages by first breaking all the competing pages for a search phrase into a table showing the underlying entities and their relative importance to the main query.
  • A “binary scoring system” suggests that Google might decide that a document either IS or ISN’T about any given entity.
  • Later clues suggest that “salience” is now measured by Google on a sliding scale from 0 to 1 (for example, the scoring given in its NLP API).
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Some Research From A Googler
  • Decide on a “dead” term for each entity. I might choose “restaurant,” “Eiffel Tower,” and “distance” because distance has a valid meaning and article in Wikipedia. Cafe might be a suitable synonym for restaurant, as might “restaurants” in the plural. Aim to have all three entities in the header and first sentence. For example: “Restaurants a small distance from the Eiffel Tower.” Aim in the text to talk about the inter-relationship between these entities. For example: “The Jules-Verne restaurant is literally inside it.” Assuming “it” clearly refers to the Eiffel Tower in the context of the writing, it does not need to be written out every time. Keep the language natural.
  • Using Schema To Help Define Entities
  •  
    "a paper came out"
Rob Laporte

E-commerce SEO guide: New documentation from Google - 0 views

  •  
    "Share your product data with Google"
Rob Laporte

How to make better SEO reports for the C-suite - 0 views

  • This is perhaps the most crucial element when sending an SEO report to your CMO. Reports that fail to emphasize SEO’s influence on revenue can make the C-suite think the channel is unproductive.
  • Initialism: CWV, CSS, JS, API, GA4, XML, CTR, CMS, CPC, DA, LSI.
  • Corporate fluff: Circle back, touch base, agile working, low-hanging fruit, caveats, bandwidth, cascade to the wider business, take things on board, utilize all the tools in the box, results-driven, reinvent the wheel, etc.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Focus on creating a documented strategy closely aligned with the overall business strategy.
  • Relationships and training
  • "...[L]ack of 'what to do next'"' actions (with a why)
  • and the losses
  • Why it matters.
Rob Laporte

An SEO guide to understanding E-E-A-T - 0 views

  • Google recently added an extra “E” to the search quality standards of E-A-T to ensure content is helpful and relevant. The extra “E” stands for “experience” and precedes the original E-A-T concept – expertise, authoritativeness and trustworthiness. 
  • The Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab compiled 10 guidelines for building web credibility based on three-year research with over 4,500 participants. Make it easy to verify the accuracy of the information on your site. Show that there’s a real organization behind your site. Highlight the expertise in your organization and in the content and services you provide. Show that honest and trustworthy people stand behind your site. Make it easy to contact you. Design your site so it looks professional (or is appropriate for your purpose). Make your site easy to use – and useful. Update your site’s content often (at least show it’s been reviewed recently). Use restraint with any promotional content (e.g., ads, offers). Avoid errors of all types, no matter how small they seem. – Stanford Web Credibility Research If the above doesn’t scream, “Be a human, care about your users and your website experience,” I don’t know what does.
  • Experience is especially important in a digital world moving toward generative AI content
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • It’s probably no coincidence that Google announced the addition of “experience” in its search quality raters guidelines shortly after ChatGPT’s launch. 
  • Besides, expertise will build confidence with the human reading your content, so I would still consider adding: The author’s name. A descriptive bio containing: Their relevant qualifications. Links to their social media profiles. A Person schema with relevant properties for certifications or professions.
  • Authority can be demonstrated in three core ways:  Establishing a strong content architecture covering all aspects of a particular topic. Earning backlinks from other authoritative sites. Building a digital profile or personal brand as an expert in a particular topic.
  • Once again, the idea of publishing content that is truly helpful supports Standford’s web credibility guidelines: Make it easy to contact you. Make it easy to verify the accuracy of the information on your site. Design your site so it looks professional (or is appropriate for your purpose). Make your site easy to use – and useful. Update your site’s content often (at least show it’s been reviewed recently). Use restraint with any promotional content (e.g., ads, offers). Avoid errors of all types, no matter how small they seem.
  • Although they carry less weight than they used to, backlinks are still an indicator of an authoritative site.
  • Consider page experience
  • Show your humans with an About us or Team page
  • Link to authoritative sources
  • Build topical clusters
  • Use internal links
  • Include different content types
  • Engage experts
  • Encourage reviews
Rob Laporte

How to Get Bard to Show Your Local Business: Advice from the Source - Moz - 0 views

  • How much is Bard like Google search in a local use case?Would I be able to get any tips for local business inclusion in Bard?Do local SEOs need to change tactics to adjust for Bard
  • With only 3 of the restaurants appearing on both lists and all the others being different, Bard’s recommendations are only a 50% match for Google’s local finder results. Moreover, the ranking order of the individual entities is a 0% match. Look at La Carreta at the bottom of Bard’s recommendations, but the top of Google’s local rankings, for example.
  • I found Bard’s advice to be extremely interesting and worthy of sharing because it matches, almost point for point, the tips you’ll get from a good local SEO consultant: get listed in Google’s local environment, get positive reviews, invest in community involvement, offer a unique product, provide great customer service, and don’t expect instant results. Encouraged by Bard’s initial tips for performing within its ecosystem, I decided to shake the bottle to see if any Google local ranking secret sauce would come out:
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • A mini competitive audit of Bard vs Google’s favorite tacos
  • As for seeking Bardic inclusion, my first impression is that you’ll still be doing the same tasks: making your GBP as fully-filled out as possible, earning good reviews via good customer service, growing and optimizing your website on the basis of consumer research. You’ll notice that Bard’s recommendations for getting mentioned in its lists of favorites didn’t contain a single surprise or novel notion for how to create visibility for local businesses. In other words, I see nothing game-changing here, but I do see a ton of room for your own research if your business isn’t included and wants to be
« First ‹ Previous 441 - 460 of 2150 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page