Skip to main content

Home/ DISC Inc/ Group items tagged ROI

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Rob Laporte

Buying Sites? Use Trusts To Avoid Google Domain Demolitions | SEO ROI Services - 0 views

  • Buying Sites? Use Trusts To Avoid Google Domain Demolitions Author: Gabriel Goldenberg, May 9, 2008 submit_url = "http://seoroi.com/seo-roi-quality/buying-sites-use-trusts-beneficial-title/"; At the Domain Roundtable, Matt Cutts said that Google will cut down any sites that get sold back to zero ranking value. So after a site has built up SEO strength for a few years, the asset could be worthless on the search market because Google - which controls the overwhelming majority of North American and most Western search - makes the rules. This is clearly unfair to webmasters. Not to mention that the Fortune 500 are again on a different playing field, because their purchases are just mergers and acquisitions, not “site purchases”… Update: Apparently this treatment is reserved for sites that also change topics. The technique thus remains useful, but obviously the problem it resolves is narrowed to particular situations. Hat tip to Gustavo Cardial for pointing out the error. Lady Justice, blindfolded with scales and sword by California Criminal Defense Lawyer Rob Miller. In an effort to balance out the scales, I’m sharing a legal technique called “the trust.” My hope is that it will enable webmasters to buy sites and sell them without fear that their hard SEO work will go to naught.
Rob Laporte

What's the ROI on SEO? (Hint: SEO Experts Are Underpaid, Opportunity Abounds !) | SEO R... - 0 views

  • Update: In the comments, Antonio of Marketing de Busca shared the following great post with data straight from the horse’s mouth: Avinash Kaushik (consultant at Google) cites 86% of clicks as going to the organic results and 14% going to the sponsored listings.
Jennifer Williams

Tag Categories - 24 views

Hey Dale, I added that for you. If anyone else really thinks a new "tag" (category) is needed, post here to the forum. Don't forget to use these tags and make sure that they are spelled the same...

tags

Verilliance

Crafting an SEO Budget to Maximise ROI | SEOmoz - 0 views

  • experience says that the longer the tail, the closer the user is to the purchase journey.
Rob Laporte

E-Mail: Evaluating Dedicated vs. Shared IP Addresses - ClickZ - 0 views

  •  
    The downside to having a dedicated IP address is the cost. Most ESPs charge an initial set-up fee of $500 to $1,000 for a dedicated IP address; there's also often a $250 monthly fee for maintaining it. This directly impacts your e-mail ROI (define). For large quantity senders the additional cost is minimal, but for those sending small volumes of e-mail it can make a dent in your profit margin. A shared IP address is just what it sounds like -- you're sharing the IP address with other organizations. Every company sending from the IP address has the potential to impact, positively or negatively, its reputation. If your IP address neighbors are good guys, the reputation shouldn't be damaged. But if one of them (or if you) does something that raises a red flag, the IP address' reputation will be tarnished and all e-mail sent from it could be blacklisted. Why Might You Want to Share an IP Address? The ESP I spoke with recently raised another valid positive about shared IP addresses, at least for low-volume senders. When we talk reputation, we talk about positive, neutral, and negative. To get on the reputation radar, the IP address needs to be sending a certain amount of e-mail each month. If your sends are small, your dedicated IP address may be below the radar and never "qualify" for a positive or a negative reputation -- you'll be stuck with a "neutral" reputation or no reputation at all. This isn't all bad, but it's also not all good. By having companies share IP addresses, this ESP contends it is able to get enough volume to earn positive IP address reputations, which helps its customers' e-mail get to the inbox. This is a valid point, as long as everyone using the IP address behaves and avoids red flags. It's a calculated strategy, one which requires the ESP to provide education about e-mail best practices and closely monitor every IP address to ensure customers are in compliance. If you're sending from your own in-house system, these same pros and cons apply
  •  
    The downside to having a dedicated IP address is the cost. Most ESPs charge an initial set-up fee of $500 to $1,000 for a dedicated IP address; there's also often a $250 monthly fee for maintaining it. This directly impacts your e-mail ROI (define). For large quantity senders the additional cost is minimal, but for those sending small volumes of e-mail it can make a dent in your profit margin. A shared IP address is just what it sounds like -- you're sharing the IP address with other organizations. Every company sending from the IP address has the potential to impact, positively or negatively, its reputation. If your IP address neighbors are good guys, the reputation shouldn't be damaged. But if one of them (or if you) does something that raises a red flag, the IP address' reputation will be tarnished and all e-mail sent from it could be blacklisted. Why Might You Want to Share an IP Address? The ESP I spoke with recently raised another valid positive about shared IP addresses, at least for low-volume senders. When we talk reputation, we talk about positive, neutral, and negative. To get on the reputation radar, the IP address needs to be sending a certain amount of e-mail each month. If your sends are small, your dedicated IP address may be below the radar and never "qualify" for a positive or a negative reputation -- you'll be stuck with a "neutral" reputation or no reputation at all. This isn't all bad, but it's also not all good. By having companies share IP addresses, this ESP contends it is able to get enough volume to earn positive IP address reputations, which helps its customers' e-mail get to the inbox. This is a valid point, as long as everyone using the IP address behaves and avoids red flags. It's a calculated strategy, one which requires the ESP to provide education about e-mail best practices and closely monitor every IP address to ensure customers are in compliance. If you're sending from your own in-house system, these same pros and cons apply
Rob Laporte

Two Ways To Justify SEO In Uncertain Times - 0 views

  •  
    Oct 22, 2008 at 10:55am Eastern by Paul Bruemmer Two Ways To Justify SEO In Uncertain Times In House - A Column From Search Engine Land During uncertain economic times like these, our advice is to always stick with the fundamentals to maintain business efficiency and progress. No matter what your business model, performing the fundamentals will keep you on-track and in-line for leveraging future success. If the C-level executives in your company are having any doubts about the value of SEO and are hesitating to release more funding, it's time to perform a cost-benefit exercise. It's your job as an in-house SEO manager to reestablish their confidence in the value of SEO as well as your value and the value of your team. When funding gets in the way, having a narrow focus, putting it on the table, and describing company goals you are committed to are all very important. 1) Leverage Your Paid Search Data To demonstrate implicit value for SEO, start with a baseline. Show where your key terms currently rank in organic and multiply by the cost-per-click value. Run the numbers for the value of direct clicks with high search intent. One way to go about this is to calculate an Effective Cost-Per-Click (eCPC) for your organic listings: 1. Access the Keyword Tool within your Google AdWords account. 2. Type your best performing (for instance, 20) keywords. 3. Select descriptive words or phrases and synonyms. 4. Click Get Keyword Ideas. This will produce a report; select Exact within the "Match Type" field and click on Approx Avg Search Volume. 1. Look at the Cost-Per-Click column to acquire the CPC value (let's assume it's $2.00). 2. Go to your web analytics data and identify the number of organic clicks for these keywords (let's assume 20,000/month). 3. Multiply the two (CPC times the number of organic clicks (in this case $40,000/mo)). 4. Create a spreadsheet with your best performing keywords and make the statement, "if we
Rob Laporte

Internet Marketing and SEO Blog from Rank Magic - 0 views

  • Paid (PPC) Search versus SEO August 9, 2007 ::: Increasingly I read and hear about people in the Internet marketing business arguing over whether paid search (pay per click ads) is more valuable than organic SEO, and vice versa. While there are some fascinating and relevant arguments on either side, research shows that marketers are quite satisfied with both.   A report from the SEMPO State of the Market Survey from about 18 months ago shows that 83% of respondents were using PPC compared to only 11% using SEO. Other reports show that the value of SEO is rising as user sophistication increases (according to Chris Boggs in the Spring 2007 edition of Search Marketing Standard). Marketing Sherpa's 2005 report showed SEO conversion rates overtook PPC rates at 4.2% versus 3.6%. That's quite the opposite of what had been found the year before.   The Direct Marketing Association reported in 2005 on a list of "online marketing strategies that produce the best ROI that PPC and SEO were rated equally according to US retailers, behind only "having a website" and "using email marketing". A more recent study by Marketing Sherpa, though, showed SEO ahead of email marketing, with PPC a close third.   One thing seems to be true: if a given web site shows up in both the organic search engine listings and the PPC ads, that seems to super-validate it as a good choice, which increases the likelihood of a searcher clicking on one of those listings.
1 - 20 of 675 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page