Group items tagged

high degree of trust for teachers, administrators and district decision makers

Our regulations are meant to encourage equality and diversity, choice, opportunity, innovation – fundamental values in our society.

In contrast to many of the other countries represented, our Canadian context was unique in that the regulations (organizations, federations, policies, curriculum) imposed actually tie in Trust and Relationship building and partnerships as key factors to increase capacity building with a wide range of stakeholders.

We need our profession to be respected, which includes paying us well, treating us fairly, supporting us with resources, nurturing our learning and leadership opportunities

systems of education can achieve and can be highly ranked without the use of formalized testing

We need to feel safe to make mistakes because we too are learners, especially in a profession that is changing so drastically in the 21st Century

We need to feel trusted and with that, we want our skills, our education, our talents and our passions to be respected so we -together – can become the creators of our own pedagogies

these passionate and experienced leaders agreed that such tests don’t work when used to rate, or punish teachers

can even sometimes do more harm then good

such tests are not always authentic

First and foremost, teacher voice needs to be heard and respected

As principals, we need to empower our teachers and community

the importance of the teacher/principal relationship came up over and over and over

Trust – allows me to teach in my style, developing my own curriculum

I wonder if there is a correlation between that supportive, trusting principal and the fact that we have incredibly dynamic teachers here, at Van Leer from all over the globe

We too need to think different because change can start with us

We need to make our voices heard by be socially active

By sharing and reflecting our learning openly and even by sometimes being vulnerable and asking for help and challenging the status quo

we need to recognize that our learning environments are changing and are very different from how we were once trained and educated

We need to remind our leaders that we are not just teachers of academics but we teach the whole person

Many of us struggle, without supports – to help impoverished families, students with mental health disabilities, learning disabilities, students that speak a different language, large class sizes, violence, inequalities

you have to be willing to engage at a high level.

Our decisions, models, and innovations should be based, first, on learning.

learning-centered, data-rich, high-value pathways to your educational goal

not using technology

the learning-centered progression, one-on-one mentor model ensures that students and faculty engage on learning data early and often and that both regulate learning and navigate to completion

We in higher education should do the work to ensure that your learning is tied to the competencies expected in these career paths.

because of the rate of change in industry and society, we are probably preparing you for jobs that don't exist yet and life experiences you can't anticipat

A rise of mean global temperatures above 4 or 5 degrees Celsius would shift the atmosphere to pre-glacial/interglacial conditions, which dominated the Earth from about 34 million years ago (end-Eocene) (Zachos et al., 2008)

"students were using Facebook to increase the size of their social network, and therefore their access to more information and diverse perspectives. "

"Powerful new technologies provide great benefits, but they also change the way we live, and not always in ways that everyone likes. An example is the spread of air conditioning, which makes us more comfortable, but those who grew up before its invention speak fondly of a time when everyone sat on the front porch and talked to their neighbors rather than going indoors to stay cool and watch TV. The declining cost of information processing and communication represents a powerful new technology, with social networking as the most recent service to be provided at modest cost. It can be expected to bring pluses and minuses."

social networking technologies support and enable a new model of social life, in which people’s social circles will consist of many more, but weaker, ties

Social networking technologies provide people with a low cost (in terms of time and effort) way of making and keeping social connections, enabling a social scenario in which people have huge numbers of diverse, but not very close, acquaintances.

Lori Gottlieb, writing in The Atlantic last year, claimed that child-rearing in the current generation has been excessively focused on preserving self-esteem.  As an illustration of one symptom of this, Gottlieb quoted clinical psychologist Wendy Mogel as saying that parents are actually relieved to be told that their struggling children are learning disabled, so that today "every child is either learning disabled, gifted, or both – there's no curve left, no average."  To claim a learning disability is the only way to set legitimate lower benchmarks for performance.  Kids are never just bad at anything anymore, because that's seen as being more harmful to self-esteem.

But my worries about the individual effects of the death of aptitude are dwarfed by my concern for its effect on the institutions of higher learning that those individuals are entering.  College is not a one-directional relationship of dispensing knowledge to young people.  The entire institution gains or loses value on the basis of what its students put into it.  By telling students with low aptitude and low interest that they can, should, and must strive to accomplish the same things as their higher-achieving peers, I fear that we're saturating higher education with people who subtract value from their institutions by committing minimum effort and lowering whatever curve still exists for the measurement of performance.

We all seem to agree that standards for college readiness need to improve, but you'll hear virtually no one asserting that when those standards are not met, the student ought to leave off college altogether, or to defer it until they have acquired, by sheer will or by natural intellectual growth, the aptitude to be successful at the proper level.  Indeed, just as common in criticism of education is the sentiment that we must see to it that more children enter and complete college.  But if those children don't have the aptitude to do so, the goal of improving college curriculum contradicts the goal of college-for-all.

We can't keep pretending that there is no such thing as aptitude and that every child has equal cause to vie for the topmost positions of intellectual esteem.  It does a disservice to the student and the school in kind.

endeavored