Digital Literacy at Full Sail University

I feel this site is credible because it is a popular news source, it is current and easy to follow. The content seems accurate and the page loads quickly.

This article is credible because the content is serious, it was on cnn.com, and it was cited by actual news reporters.

I would rate this article as 65 poor, the information is not very consistent , no copyright info, no author,no citations, all seems to be lacking depth.  

100-exelent meets all criteria of evaluation scale Content,credibility,copyright and comparability

100-Exelent meets all criteria of evaluation scale most impresive is the comparability and writen article

Well presented article, easy to read and very credible, many sources to compare to and clear understanding of who the author is and date stamp. Conectivity, comparability and citations all present, multimedia and sharing options as well. in alll i thought this article to be very informative rating 100 Exelent

Very Colorful , informative and clear Rating 95 - Excellent for its connectivity,comparability ,context, credibility and copyright

having or involving several modes, modalities, or maxima

A hard definition to find, but definitely a thorough one.

is having the right and freedom to use all types of digital technology while using the technology in an acceptable and appropriate manner.

Great definition!

This is very important to know as I have three kids and we have been looking for ways to teach them digital responsibility.

The score for this article was an 81.2 based off of the criteria provided in the article "Ten C's for evaluating internet resources" by Richmond, Betsy; Everhart, Nancy; Auer, Nicole J. This is why this score was received: Currency (0 to 15 Points) The site has the date of last revision posted. Yes The site has been updated recently. Yes Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. No Total: 10 Content (0 to 15 Points) The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. No This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. No The information on the topic is thorough. No The information is accurate. Yes The purpose of the page is obvious. Yes The information is in good taste. Yes The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Yes Total: 8.6 I arrived at this by using 15 (total score) divided by 7 (number of questions) multiplied by 4 (number of criteria met) and rounded to the nearest tenth. I used this scoring system for all sections. Authority (0 to 10 Points) The authors are clearly identified. Yes The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. Yes There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. Yes You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Yes Total: 10 Navigation (0 to 10 Points) You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. Yes The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. Yes The links are easy to identify. No The links are logically grouped. No The layout is consistent from page to page. Yes There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. Yes The links are relevant to the subject. No The icons clearly represent what is intended. Yes Total: 6.3 Experience (0 to 10 Points) The page fulfills its intended purpose. Yes The page is worth the time. Yes The page's presentation is eye-catching. Yes The site engages the visitor to spend time there. Ye

The score for this article was an 82 based off of the criteria provided in the article "Ten C's for evaluating internet resources" by Richmond, Betsy; Everhart, Nancy; Auer, Nicole J. This is why this score was received: Currency (0 to 15 Points) The site has the date of last revision posted. Yes The site has been updated recently. Yes Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. No Total: 10 Content (0 to 15 Points) The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. Yes. This article is useful to me because I am originally from the city of Detroit and plan to use my career success as a resource to help promote change in my hometown. This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. No The information on the topic is thorough. No The information is accurate. Yes The purpose of the page is obvious. Yes The information is in good taste. Yes The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Yes Total: 10.7 Authority (0 to 10 Points) The authors are clearly identified. Yes The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. Yes There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. No You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Yes Total: 7.5 Navigation (0 to 10 Points) You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. Yes The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. Yes The links are easy to identify. Yes The links are logically grouped. No The layout is consistent from page to page. Yes There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. Yes The links are relevant to the subject. No The icons clearly represent what is intended. Yes Total: 7.5 Experience (0 to 10 Points) The page fulfills its intended purpose. Yes The page is worth the time. Yes The page's presentation is eye-catching. Yes The site engages the visitor to spend time there. Yes Total: 10 Multimedia (0 to 10

The score for this article was an 88.7-Good, based off of the criteria provided in the article "Ten C's for evaluating internet resources" by Richmond, Betsy; Everhart, Nancy; Auer, Nicole J. This is why this score was received:  Currency (0 to 15 Points)  The site has the date of last revision posted. Yes  The site has been updated recently. Yes  Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. No  Total: 10  Content (0 to 15 Points)  The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. Yes  This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. N/A  The information on the topic is thorough. Yes  The information is accurate. Yes  The purpose of the page is obvious. Yes  The information is in good taste. Yes  The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Yes  Total: 15  Authority (0 to 10 Points)  The authors are clearly identified. Yes  The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. Yes  There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. Yes  You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Yes  Total: 10  Navigation (0 to 10 Points)  You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. Yes  The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. Yes  The links are easy to identify. Yes, there is an abundance of links referencing topics directly related to the article.  The links are logically grouped. Yes  The layout is consistent from page to page. Yes  There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. Yes  The links are relevant to the subject. Yes  The icons clearly represent what is intended. Yes  Total: 10  Experience (0 to 10 Points)  The page fulfills its intended purpose. Yes  The page is worth the time. Yes  The page's presentation is eye-catching. Yes  The site engages the visitor to spend time there. Yes  Total: 10  Mul

The score for this article was an 76 -Average based off of the criteria provided in the article "Ten C's for evaluating internet resources" by Richmond, Betsy; Everhart, Nancy; Auer, Nicole J. This is why this score was received:  Currency (0 to 15 Points)  The site has the date of last revision posted. Yes  The site has been updated recently. Yes  Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. No  Total: 10  Content (0 to 15 Points)  The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. Yes  This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. No  The information on the topic is thorough. No  The information is accurate. Yes  The purpose of the page is obvious. Yes  The information is in good taste. Yes  The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Yes  Total: 10.7  Authority (0 to 10 Points)  The authors are clearly identified. Yes  The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. No  There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. No  You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Yes  Total: 5  Navigation (0 to 10 Points)  You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. Yes  The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. Yes  The links are easy to identify. Yes, on the physical page there are hyperlinks provided that correspond to different topics relating to the article.  The links are logically grouped. Yes  The layout is consistent from page to page. Yes  There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. Yes  The links are relevant to the subject. Yes  The icons clearly represent what is intended. Yes  Total: 10  Experience (0 to 10 Points)  The page fulfills its intended purpose. Yes  The page is worth the time. Yes  The page's presentation is eye-catching. Yes  The site engages the visitor to spend time there. Yes  Total: 10 

The score for this article was a 42.2 based off of the criteria provided in the article "Ten C's for evaluating internet resources" by Richmond, Betsy; Everhart, Nancy; Auer, Nicole J. This is why this score was received: Currency (0 to 15 Points)  The site has the date of last revision posted. Yes The site has been updated recently. Yes Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. No Total: 10 Content (0 to 15 Points)  The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. No This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. No The information on the topic is thorough. No The information is accurate. No The purpose of the page is obvious. No The information is in good taste. Yes The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Yes Total: 4.3 Authority (0 to 10 Points)  The authors are clearly identified. No The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. No There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. No You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. No Total: 0 Navigation (0 to 10 Points)  You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. No The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. Yes The links are easy to identify. No The links are logically grouped. No The layout is consistent from page to page. No There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. Yes The links are relevant to the subject. No The icons clearly represent what is intended. No Total: 2.5 Experience (0 to 10 Points)  The page fulfills its intended purpose. No The page is worth the time. No The page's presentation is eye-catching. Yes The site engages the visitor to spend time there. No Total: 2.5 Multimedia (0 to 10 Points)  Sound, graphics or video enhance the site's message. No Total: 0 Treatment (0 to 10 Points)  Any biases towards the subject matter can be easily identified. No