Skip to main content

Home/ Digital Literacy at Full Sail University/ Group items tagged source

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Eugene Stewart

CCCCCCC.CCC (ten Cs) for evaluating Internet resources: EBSCOhost - 0 views

  • 1. ContentWhat is the intent of the content? Are the title and author identified? Is the content "juried"? Is the content "popular" or "scholarly", satiric or serious? What is the date of the document or article? Is the "edition" current? Do you have the latest version? (Is this important?) How do you know?
  • 2. CredibilityIs the author identifiable and reliable? Is the content credible? Authoritative? Should it be? What is the purpose of the information, that is, is it serious, satiric, humorous? Is the URL extension .edu, .com, .gov or .org? What does this tell you about the "publisher"?
  • 3. Critical ThinkingHow can you apply critical thinking skills, including previous knowledge and experience, to evaluate Internet resources? Can you identify the author, publisher, edition, etc. as you would with a "traditionally" published resource? What criteria do you use to evaluate Internet resources?
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • 4. CopyrightEven if the copyright notice does not appear prominently, someone wrote, or is responsible for, the creation of a document, graphic, sound or image, and the material falls under the copyright conventions. "Fair use" applies to short, cited excerpts, usually as an example for commentary or research. Materials are in the "public domain" if this is explicitly stated. Internet users, as users of print media, must respect copyright.
  • 5. CitationInternet resources should be cited to identify sources used, both to give credit to the author and to provide the reader with avenues for further research. Standard style manuals (print and online) provide some examples of how to cite Internet documents, although standards have not vet been formally established.
  • 6. ContinuityWill the Internet site be maintained and updated? Is it now and will it continue to be free? Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? Some good .edu sites have moved to .com, with possible cost implications. Other sites offer partial use for free, and charge fees for continued or in-depth use
  • Is your discussion list "moderated"? What does this mean? Does your search engine or index look for all words or are some words excluded? Is this censorship? Does your institution, based on its mission, parent organization or space limitations, apply some restrictions to Internet use? Consider censorship and privacy issues when using the Internet.
  • If more than one user will need to access a site, consider each user's access and "functionality". How do users connect to the Internet and what kind of connection does the assigned resource require? Does access to the resource require a graphical user interface? If it is a popular (busy) resource, will it be accessible in the time frame needed? Is it accessible by more than one Internet tool? Do users have access to the same Internet tools and applications? Are users familiar with the tools and applications? Is the site "viewable" by all Web browsers?
  • Does the Internet resource have an identified comparable print or CD ROM data set or source? Does the Internet site contain comparable and complete information? (For example, some newspapers have partial but not full text information on the Internet.) Do you need to compare data or statistics over time? Can you identify sources for comparable earlier or later data? Comparability of data may or may not be important, depending on your project.
  • What is the context for your research? Can you find "anything" on your topic, that is, commentary, opinion, narrative, statistics and your quest will be satisfied? Are you looking for current or historical information? Definitions? Research studies or articles? How does Internet information fit in the overall information context of your subject? Before you start searching, define the research context and research needs and decide what sources might be best to use to successfully fill information needs without data overload.
  •  
    the 10 C's
Michael Fritzel

collaboration - Dictionary Definition : Vocabulary.com - 0 views

  • llaboration When you join a group of friends to build a huge sandcastle on the beach, your impressive structure is the result of collaboration, or working together toward a common goal. Working with another person — or a group of people — to make something together is collaboration. You can also describe the result of your work, like the elaborately decorated cake you made with your best friend, as a collaboration. During World War II, the word collaboration began being used to mean "working traitorously with an enemy," and became a very serious crime. DEFINITIONS OF: collaboration 1 n act of working jointly “they worked either in collaboration or independently” Synonyms: coaction Type of: cooperation joint operation or action n act of cooperating traitorously with an enemy that is occupying your country Synonyms: collaborationism, quislingism Type of: cooperation joint operation or action Learn Add to List... Launch WORD FAMILY collaborationcollaborationscollaborationismcollaboratecollaboratedcollaboratingcollaborationcollaborativecollaboratorthe "collaborate" family USAGE EXAMPLES I saw women head to the dressing ro
  •  
    "collaboration When you join a group of friends to build a huge sandcastle on the beach, your impressive structure is the result of collaboration, or working together toward a common goal. Working with another person - or a group of people - to make something together is collaboration. You can also describe the result of your work, like the elaborately decorated cake you made with your best friend, as a collaboration. During World War II, the word collaboration began being used to mean "working traitorously with an enemy," and became a very serious crime."
Katrina Quick

12 Sites and web based tools that shined in 2012 - 0 views

    • Katrina Quick
       
      She placed her First and last name on the page, as well as the year published. 
    • Katrina Quick
       
      She has job listings, and different tools for looking for employment.
  •  
    These are web based tools of 2012. I believe this source to be credible because you can contact her by phone number and she lists a whole bunch of different sources that she got her info from. 
chris mackie

LexisNexis® Academic: Document - 0 views

    • chris mackie
       
      1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. Incredibly so. It not only had links to the web article but also links and information on the entire company. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. Not directly but through links to the company's press releases. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. The time stamp on the article is March 12, 2014. It doesn't appear to be revised after that date. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. Not really. This one is pretty good because it covers not only basic information about the company but also links to the content I was looking for directly. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. No but it does have the page it is from. b. Can we see their job title or description? i. Not for the person who wrote the article but the financial institution that it came from. c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes from Reuters Knowledge Direct. 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. This site is often updated. In this case mostly in a timely fashion. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. It still isn't real time but it is pretty close. This article was uploaded just a couple days ago. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. Yes. At least as it relates to the discussion of gay rights. This article has more information on the whole company. 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. No. This article is factual instead of guiding towards a particular view. Because it focuses on the company as a whole and not the current debate it maintains its neutrality. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. Not within the scope of this article. Because this article just dic
  • March 12, 2014Heineken N.V. (ADR)Tweede Weteringplantsoen 21 AMSTERDAM 1017 ZD Netherlands
  • var myVar; function googleTranslateElementInit() { new google.translate.TranslateElement({ pageLanguage: 'auto' }, 'google_translate_element'); myVar=setInterval(function(){chkGoogle()},1000); } //Start: 4734642: SEC content seach causes screen to freeze: Nikhil function chkGoogle(){ var obj = $('.goog-te-combo')[0].value; if(obj!=null && obj!=""){ clearInterval(myVar); showHideOriginal(); obj.onchange = function(){showHideOriginal();} } } function showHideOriginal(){ var googleTranslateLang = $('.goog-te-combo')[0].value; if(googleTranslateLang!=null && googleTranslateLang!=""){ document.getElementById("showOrigBut").style.display = 'block'; } else{ document.getElementById("showOrigBut").style.display = 'none'; } } //End: 4734642: SEC content seach causes screen to freeze: Nikhil Copyright 2014 Thomson Financial, All Rights Reserved Reuters Knowledge Direct
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • TELEPHONE: Main Phone: 31-20-5239239, Contact Phone: 31-312-5239590 FAX: 31-20-6622640 URL: Home Page: http://www.theheinekencompany.com E-MAIL: investors@heineken.com OTHER URL:News Releases: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/media/media-releasesInvestor Relations: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/investorsFinancial Information: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/investors/reports-and-presentations?tab=financialsCorporate History/Profile: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/about-us/company-strategyExecutives: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/investors/governance/executive-boardProducts/Services: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/brandsEmployment Opportunities: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/careers
  • LOAD-DATE: March 12, 2014
  • Source [Reuters Knowledge Direct]
Dre Adams

Jennifer J. Preece | Maryland's iSchool - College of Information Studies - 0 views

    • Dre Adams
       
      Dr. Jennifer J. Preece, Professor & Dean of University of Maryland, and author of Etiquette Online: From Nice to Necessary
  • Research Interests: Computer-mediated communication, human-computer interaction, online communities, management and design of social media, motivation for participation in social media, mobile communication Her two most recent books are: Preece, J. (2000). Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Preece, J. Rogers, Y. & Sharp, H. (2007) Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. 2nd Edition. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  •  
    Jennifer J. Preece profile proving she's a credible source
Jose Nieves

What is Plagiarism - 1 views

  • to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : use (a created production) without crediting the source vi: to commit literary theft: present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source
  • unacceptable to copy something out of a book, newspaper, journal or any other printed source.
deborahnolan74

Shibboleth Authentication Request - 5 views

    • Jackie Davidson
       
      Twitter shares up-this article gave more content and information.
    • Joshua Whitley
       
      10 Currency-Not current, no updates, can be used in classroom setting 7 Content is credible. the story can be useful to students to educate. The information is valid.  8 Authority- Authors' names are at the top of article, no links to contact author, Authors' Occupation is visible 7 Navigation-No links relevant to topic. everything clear and readable,  10 Experience-Fulfills it's intended purpose.  very engaging to me.  0 Multimedia-no multimedia  7 Treatment- Bias toward Democrats,   6 Access-Easy to access page, no relevant links to help further investigate,    7 Miscellaneous-no per-use cost, no inquiring of private info, can be printed with no issues 
    • troy seaton
       
      WiTricity Corporation make devices that allows wireless charging.
  • WiTricity is also developing technology for wireless charging of electric vehicles and, later, for use in implanted medical devices like heart pumps, said Katie Hall, its chief technology officer.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • The technology is based on magnetic induction -- the process used to recharge electric toothbrushes. In the toothbrush, the base has a magnetic coil that generates a magnetic field. A second coil in the toothbrush captures some of that field, inducing an electric current.But electric toothbrushes transfer power only from the primary coil to the secondary one at very close range. Move the brush a short distance from the base, and it won't charge.
  • WiTricity has signed a technology transfer and licensing agreement with MediaTek, a semiconductor company in Taiwan, to collaborate on systems for wireless charging of mobile handsets, tablet computers, game controllers and other devices, Mr. Giler said.
    • troy seaton
       
      Other devices that are development
    • chris mackie
       
      1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. Yes, very much so. It paints a positive image on the tragedy. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. Yes, it focuses on information about the plane and the information surrounding its disappearance. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. This Article was updated 03/16/2014. There is no record of it being altered or revised since upload. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. No. Because this article was uploaded and published today the information is current. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes, Larry McShane b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No. But it is assumed that he is a reporter for the New York Daily News c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. New York Daily News, Page 5 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. Yes. This site is updated often to maintain the most accurate information. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. Yes. It may not be bleeding edge down to the second up to date, but it is at best only a few hours old. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. No. Not in the article itself. It does provide options to search for additional articles and provides a way to narrow your search 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. Yes, but not in a bad way. It was about how hope hasn't been lost in the search for the plane. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. Not currently. Because of how new the article is there isn't really any more information on it. If it included all the information available it would be come hard to read.
    • chris mackie
       
      1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. This article seems to be accurate and thorough. It's well written. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. This article answered basic questions on my topic but to the exact information I was looking for. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. September 26th, 2013 b. Is there information that could be updated? i. Yes there was, this article focused on more on Russian oil running low and how the Kremlin was looking towards Siberian shale to replenish it and not at all about the interactions of the US in that regard. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes. His name is Guy Chazan. b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No. c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. It originated in the Financial Times (London, England) 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. For the most part yes. It seems that it is often update but not current. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. No. It does update but not often enough to provide up-to-date information. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. Yes it does at least about the value of Russian oil. It doesn't contain anything about how people are reacting to the current foreign policy from President Obama. 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. No. It seems unbiased and direct in its point of view. It doesn't take either side, but still relates all the information properly. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. It didn't have any information on the actions or reaction of the US or the world.
    • chris mackie
       
      1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. Yes, very much so. It paints a positive image on the tragedy. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. Yes, it focuses on information about the plane and the information surrounding its disappearance. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. This Article was updated 03/16/2014. There is no record of it being altered or revised since upload. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. No. Because this article was uploaded and published today the information is current. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes, Larry McShane b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No. But it is assumed that he is a reporter for the New York Daily News c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. New York Daily News, Page 5 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. Yes. This site is updated often to maintain the most accurate information. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. Yes. It may not be bleeding edge down to the second up to date, but it is at best only a few hours old. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. No. Not in the article itself. It does provide options to search for additional articles and provides a way to narrow your search 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. Yes, but not in a bad way. It was about how hope hasn't been lost in the search for the plane. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. Not currently. Because of how new the article is there isn't really any more information on it. If it included all the information available it would be come hard to read.
  •  
    AFP - RELAXNEWS (English International Version) Two film stars, Michael Douglas and Paul Rudd, are to share the title role in the next film from "The World's End" director Edgar Wright, due 2015. After Robert Redford's stint in "Captain America: The Winter Soldier," Marvel has recruited another legendary actor for an upcoming blockbuster in Michael Douglas. The 69-year-old will become the face of Henry Pym and hand over the Ant-Man moniker to Scott Lang, the new hero played by Paul Rudd. Ant-Man first appeared in print in 1962 and has become the alter ego for a number of Marvel characters; the film sees Lang succeed Pym as the electronics whizz in charge of wearing the Ant-Man mantle, able to shrink, grow, and communicate with insects. Dated for July 31, 2015, "Ant-Man" should also result in the character's addition to the supporting cast of the next Avengers film, set for mid-2018.
  •  
    Adknowledge is a leading digital marketing company working with some of the worldâs top brands. Adknowledge designs, manages and measures campaigns for companies including Audi, Starbucks, LG, Disney and LâOréal to unlock digital audiences using multiple channels: social media, mobile, apps, email, display ads and audience engagement. A proprietary database of more than 600 million internet and mobile users steers Adknowledgeâs targeting; user preferences, online behavior and unsurpassed optimization ensure surgical message precision. In addition, Adknowledge helps publishers monetize their sites and lists effectively, with great attention to contextual relevance. Since it was founded 2004, Adknowledge has grown organically and through acquisitions. This includes a 2011 purchase of Toronto-based AdParlor, one of the first Facebook Strategic Preferred Marketing Developers (sPMD). Adknowledge is based in Kansas City, Missouri; it also has North American offices in San Francisco, New York Fort Myers and Toronto. It has overseas locations in London, Paris, Munich and Shanghai with sales presence in Australia and Brazil. Today, there are approximately 300 Adknowledge employees located around the world.
Stefanie Robinson

Obama administration clears banks to accept funds from legal marijuana dealers - The Wa... - 0 views

  • he banks could face a civil penalty if they do not strictly abide by the rules laid out in the guidance, said a senior Treasury official, who was not authorized to speak publicly.
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
      comparability/quoting un official official...can't id source
  • Frank Keating, president and chief executive of the American Bankers Association
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
      comparability/source verfible
  • Marijuana trafficking is illegal under federal law, and it’s illegal for banks to deal with marijuana sale proceeds under federal law. Only Congress can change these laws. The administration can’t change the law with a memo,
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
      context/historical info. Citiation/ source id
Stefanie Robinson

Reality show snake handler dies from snake bite - 0 views

  • John Bacon, USA TODAY 5:10 p.m. EST February 16, 2014
  • 6:01 p.m. EST February 16, 2014
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
      Content. author and title id date current.
  • ...4 more annotations...
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
      Critical Thinking Reference link owned by same company Gannett media. social networks linked/no id of publisher. using whois
  • Contribu
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
      no copyright listed/ public domain story
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
      connectivity/ busy site per fb shares and twit 
  • Friendly Atheis
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
      broken link
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
       Censorship/Discussion list not moderated on fb n twitter
  •  
    Story put together from research from 3 different sources
Joseph Rhodes II

Does the adoption of plagiarism-detection software in higher education redu...: EBSCOhost - 0 views

    • Joseph Rhodes II
       
      Note 1: Widespread access to the Internet and other electronic media has served as something of a double-edged sword with respect to plagiarism; the Web allows students to plagiarism with cut-and-paste ease, but also allows academics to more easily identify the source of the plagiarized material when plagiarism is suspected(Lyon, Barrett, and Malcolm 2006). Note 2: The Internet allow suspicious student writing to be more quickly compared to other sources using a standard internet search engine, leaving the detection of suspicious writing as the principle challenge. Note 3:  given that some systems now permit students to upload their own writing to check for plagiarism in advance of submitting assignments, rates of unintentional plagiarism may drop, making the remaining intentional plagiarism easier to detect. Note 4: Others argue that the adoption of a plagiarism-detection system will not only aid faculty in detecting plagiarism, but will serve as a deterrent to plagiarism in the first place. Note 5: For example, Kraemer (2008) has argued that students who are made aware that plagiarism-detection technologies are in use should, at a minimum, avoid intentionally copying from other sources because of the near certainty that they will be caught. Further, for those students who may unintentionally plagiarize out of ignorance about the rule of citation, the use of plagiarism-detection software may motivate them to better inform themselves about citations and to double-check their own papers for unintentional plagiarism.
Jazz Hedrick

http://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/academy/content/pdf/participant-papers/2012-02-bifef/T... - 0 views

    • Jazz Hedrick
       
      They used social networks as organization tools. They were quick, easy and accurate.
    • Jazz Hedrick
       
      The government believed that once it had placed restrictions on technology that the uprising would slow or halt effectively allowing them to gain control of the situation, however, the protesters rallied together and gained even more support despite the greatest efforts of the Mubarak government
    • Jazz Hedrick
       
      They used social media as alternative press: reporting on events on the ground, uploading text and video directly to the internet or feeding the information and videos to media outlets. 
  • ...1 more annotation...
    • Jazz Hedrick
       
      Social media networks were the main source of on the ground information during the uprising. Journalists identified key bloggers from before the protests broke out and used them as a way to verify the information the were gathering from other sources.
Darrell Moore

Twitter #Music wants to be your source for new tunes (hands-on) | The Verge - 0 views

    • Darrell Moore
       
      I think this source is good because the fonts are nice.
Katrina Quick

37signals: Why is web-based software the smart choice? - 0 views

    • Katrina Quick
       
      Name brand companies are using 37signals tools. 
  •  
    I believe this is a credible source because a lot of name brand businesses run with their products. 
william woods

etiquette - definition of etiquette by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encycl... - 0 views

    • william woods
       
      This is a credible source, the copyright and source is from a professional dictionary that is updated every few years, the most recent update for copyright is 2013
  •  
    The basic rules of being acceptable in an online environment based on morals or mass opinion
william woods

Etiquette Online -- Rules to IM Chat Etiquette - 0 views

    • william woods
       
      About.com is a reliable source, using people in certain professions to answer questions about a subject. Page is updated daily, proper links and connections to show sources.
Lisa Lowder

EBSCOhost: An Introduction and Guide to Enhancing Online Instruction with Web 2.0 Tool... - 0 views

  • Web 2.0 tools offer ways to personalize classes and demonstrate instructional presence.
    • Lisa Lowder
       
      This article is a credible source. It is published in a professional journal which is peer reviewed. It includes good information and uses good sources. It also contains a glossary.
  •  
    This article explains how web-based tools can improve education for the online learner. It suggests that faculty plays a large role in educating online learners about the tools available, the tools they will be using, and how the tools are used. Examples of web-based tools are blogs, wikis, RSS feeds, video and photo sharing, avatars, microblogging, social bookmarking, and social media.
Jon Lawson

United States Patent and Trademark Office - 3 views

  •  
    The United States Patent and Trademark Office website. Not the Copyright Office website, this is a particular source for trademarking and patenting products and trademarking.  
  •  
    This is a great resource, Jon. Thank you for posting.
Stefanie Robinson

Medicines Made in India Set Off Safety Worries - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • GARDINER HARRISFEB. 14
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
      Critical Thinking author id, publisher id,
  • © 2014 The New York Times Company
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
      copyright site
  • Denise Grady contributed reporting from Kampala, Uganda, and Hari Kumar from Srinagar, Kashmir.
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
      copyright contributor credited
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • largest exporter
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
      Connectivity this paragraph is jumping from being vertal to hozi
  • over-the-counter and prescription drugs to the United States
  • safety lapses, falsified drug test results and selling fake medicines
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
       credibility/reference .gov site for official documentation
  • recent lapses
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
      credibility/ .gov blog of the FdA
  • interview with an Indian newspaper
    • Stefanie Robinson
       
      Citation/ addition outside research sources are attached to the links
  • China is the source of some of the largest counterfeit manufacturing operations that we find globally,” said John P. Clark, Pfizer’s chief security officer
chris mackie

LexisNexis® Academic: Document - 0 views

    • chris mackie
       
      1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. This article seems to be accurate and thorough. It's well written. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. This article answered basic questions on my topic but to the exact information I was looking for. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. September 26th, 2013 b. Is there information that could be updated? i. Yes there was, this article focused on more on Russian oil running low and how the Kremlin was looking towards Siberian shale to replenish it and not at all about the interactions of the US in that regard. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes. His name is Guy Chazan. b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No. c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. It originated in the Financial Times (London, England) 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. For the most part yes. It seems that it is often update but not current. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. No. It does update but not often enough to provide up-to-date information. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. Yes it does at least about the value of Russian oil. It doesn't contain anything about how people are reacting to the current foreign policy from President Obama. 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. No. It seems unbiased and direct in its point of view. It doesn't take either side, but still relates all the information properly. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. It didn't have any information on the actions or reaction of the US or the world.
    • chris mackie
       
      1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. This article seems to be accurate and thorough. It's well written. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. This article answered basic questions on my topic but to the exact information I was looking for. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. September 26th, 2013 b. Is there information that could be updated? i. Yes there was, this article focused on more on Russian oil running low and how the Kremlin was looking towards Siberian shale to replenish it and not at all about the interactions of the US in that regard. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes. His name is Guy Chazan. b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No. c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. It originated in the Financial Times (London, England) 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. For the most part yes. It seems that it is often update but not current. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. No. It does update but not often enough to provide up-to-date information. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. Yes it does at least about the value of Russian oil. It doesn't contain anything about how people are reacting to the current foreign policy from President Obama. 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. No. It seems unbiased and direct in its point of view. It doesn't take either side, but still relates all the information properly. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. It didn't have any information on the actions or reaction of the US or the world.
chris mackie

LexisNexis® Academic: Document - 0 views

    • chris mackie
       
      1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. Yes. This article covers all the same information that I found in previous searches. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic? i. Yes. This article covers all the pertinent information. The problem is that they make light of the situation and put jokes in the article. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. March 12, 2014 was when this article was published. It does not look like it has been revised since then. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. It doesn't include the fact that he plead guilty and was fined $79 for it. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes. Tony Hicks b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No, but it is assumed that he is a reporter for the Constra Costa Times. c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. It the San Jose Mercury News (California) 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. Yes this site is maintained and updated regularly. Just not in real time. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. Yes. It is only a couple days old so other than a couple details it is still accurate. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. It does mostly. The comparable article I found was a little newer and covered his trail, plea, and fine. 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. Yes. The author tries to make jokes throughout the article ruining his credibility as a source. In a serious article jokes and whit are negatives. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. There is a few pieces of information that could have been covered that was found in the comparable article. Such as his plea and the fine. However this has the name of
  • March 12, 2014 Wednesday
  • San Jose Mercury News (California)March 12, 2014 Wednesday
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • March 12, 2014 Wednesday
  • Chris Pine arrested for alleged DUI in New ZealandBYLINE: Compiled by Tony Hicks Contra Costa TimesSECTION: BREAKING; News; Entertainment; GossipLENGTH: 203 words
  • San Jose Mercury News (California)
  • March 12, 2014 Wednesday
  • Copyright 2014 San Jose Mercury NewsAll Rights Reserved  
  • LOAD-DATE: March 12, 2014
1 - 20 of 73 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page