Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Group items tagged who

Rss Feed Group items tagged

45More

'We have the evidence ... Why aren't we providing evidence-based care?'; Mental illness... - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Sat May 23 2015
  • It's 4:30 on a Friday afternoon at her Sherbrooke, Que., clinic and Marie Hayes takes a deep breath before opening the door to her final patient of the day, who has arrived without an appointment. The 32-year-old mother immediately lists her complaints: She feels dizzy. She has abdominal pain. "It is always physical and always catastrophic," Dr. Hayes will later tell me. In the exam room, she runs through the standard checkup, pressing on the patient's abdomen, recording her symptoms, just as she has done almost every week for months. "There's something wrong with me," the patient says, with a look of panic. Dr. Hayes tries to reassure her, to no avail. In any case, the doctor has already reached her diagnosis: severe anxiety. Dr. Hayes prescribed medication during a previous visit, but the woman stopped taking it after two days because it made her nauseated and dizzy. She needs structured psychotherapy - a licensed therapist trained to bring her anxiety under control. But the wait list for public care is about a year, says Dr. Hayes, and the patient can't afford the cost of private sessions.
  • Meanwhile, the woman is paying a steep personal price: At home, she says, she spends most days in bed. She is managing to care for her two young children - for now - but her husband also suffers from anxiety, and the situation is far from ideal. Dr. Hayes does her best, spending a full hour trying to calm her down, and the woman is less agitated when she leaves. But the doctor knows she will be back next week. And that their meeting will go much the same as it did today. In its broad strokes, this is a scene that repeats itself in thousands of doctors' offices every day, right across the country. It is part and parcel of a system that denies patients the best scientific-based care, and comes with a massive price tag, to the economy, families and the health care system. Canadian physicians bill provincial governments $1-billion a year for "counselling and psychotherapy" - one third of which goes to family doctors - a service many of them acknowledge they are not best suited to provide, and that doesn't come close to covering patient need. Meanwhile, psychologists and social workers are largely left out of the publicly funded health-care system, their expertise available only to Canadians with the resources to pay for them.
  • ...42 more annotations...
  • Imagine if a Canadian diagnosed with cancer were told she could receive chemotherapy paid for by the health-care system, but would have to cough up the cash herself if she needed radiation. Or that she could have a few weeks of treatment, and then be sent home even if she needed more. That would never fly. If doctors, say, find a tumour in a patient's colon, the government kicks in and offers the mainstream treatment that is most effective. But for many Canadians diagnosed with a mental illness, the prescription is very different. The treatment they receive, and how much of it they get, will largely be decided not on evidence-based best practices but on their employment benefits and income level: Those who can afford it pay for it privately. Those who cannot are stuck on long wait lists, or have to fall back on prescription medications. Or get no help at all. But according to a large and growing body of research, psychotherapy is not simply a nice-to-have option; it should be a front-line treatment, particularly for the two most costly mental illnesses in Canada: anxiety and depression - which also constitute more than 80 per cent of all psychiatric diagnoses.
  • Why aren't we providing evidence-based care?" .. The case for psychotherapy Research has found that psychotherapy is as effective as medication - and in some cases works better. It also often does a better job of preventing or forestalling relapse, reducing doctor's appointments and emergency-room visits, and making it more cost-effective in the long run.
  • Therapy works, researchers say, because it engages the mind of the patient, requires active participation in treatment, and specifically targets the social and stress-related factors that contribute to poor mental health. There are a variety of therapies, but the evidence is strongest for cognitive behavioural therapy - an approach that focuses on changing negative thinking - in large part because CBT, which is timelimited and very structured, lends itself to clinical trials. (Similar support exists for interpersonal therapy, and it is emerging for mindfulness, with researchers trying to find out what works best for which disorders.) Research into the efficacy of therapy is increasing, but there is less of it overall than for drugs - as therapy doesn't have the advantage of well-heeled Big Pharma benefactors. In 2013, a team of European researchers collated the results of 67 studies comparing drugs to therapy; after adjusting for dropouts, there was no significant difference between the most often-used drugs - selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) - and psychotherapy.
  • The issue is not one against the other," says Montreal psychiatrist Alain Lesage, director of research at the Douglas Mental Health University Institute. "I am a physician; whatever works, I am good. We know that when patients prefer one to another, they do better if they have choice." Several studies have backed up that notion. Many patients are reluctant to take medication for fear of side effects and the possibility of difficult withdrawal; research shows that more than half of patients receiving medication stop taking it after six months. A small collection of recent studies has found that therapy can cause changes in the brain similar to those brought about by medication. In people with depression, for instance, the amygdala (located deep within the brain, it processes basic memories and controls our instinctive fight-or-flight reaction) works in overdrive, while the prefrontal cortex (which regulates rational thought) is sluggish. Research shows that antidepressants calm the amygdala; therapy does the same, though to a lesser extent.
  • But psychotherapy also appears to tune up the prefrontal cortex more than does medication. This is why, researchers believe, therapy works especially well in preventing relapse - an important benefit, since extending the time between acute episodes of illnesses prevents them from becoming chronic and more debilitating. The theory, then, is that psychotherapy does a better job of helping patients consciously cope with their unconscious responses to stress.
  • According to treatment guidelines by leading international professional and scientific organizations - including Canada's own expert panel, the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments - psychotherapy should be considered as a first option in treatment, alone or in combination with medication. And it is "highly recommended" in maintaining recovery in the long term. Britain's independent, research-guided scientific body, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, has concluded that therapy should be tried before drugs in mild to moderate cases of depression and anxiety - a finding that led to the creation of a $760million public system, which now handles therapy referrals for nearly one million people a year.
  • In 2012, Canada's Mental Health Commission estimated that only about one in three adults and one in four children are receiving support and treatment when they need it. Ironically, anti-stigma campaigns designed to help people understand mental illness may only make those statistics worse. In Toronto, for instance, putting up posters in subway stations in 2010 had the unexpected effect of spiking the volume of walk-ins at nearby emergency rooms by as much as 45 per cent in 12 months. Dr. Kurdyak treated many of them at CAMH. The system, he says, "has been conveniently ignoring this unmet need. It functions as if two-thirds of the people suffering won't get help." What would happen if the healthcare system outright "ignored" two-third of tumour diagnoses?
  • Essentially, argues Dr. Lesage, adding therapy into the health-care system is like putting a new, highly effective drug on the table for doctors. "Think about it," he says. "We have a new antidepressant. It works as well as many others, and it may even have some advantages - it works better for remission - with fewer side effects. The patients may prefer it. And [in the long run] it doesn't cost more than what we have. How can it not be covered?" ..
  • A heavy price This isn't just a medical issue; it's an economic one. Mental illness accounts for roughly 50 per cent of family doctors' time, and more hospital-bed days than cancer. Nearly four million Canadians have a mood disorder: more than all cases of diabetes (2.2 million) and heart disease (1.4 million) combined.
  • Mental illness - and depression, in particular - is the leading cause of disability, accounting for 30 per cent of workplace-insurance claims, and 70 per cent of total compensation costs. In 2012, an Ontario study calculated that the burden of mental illness and addiction was 1.5 times that of all cancers, and more than seven times the cost of all infectious diseases. Mental illness is so debilitating because, unlike physical ailments, it often takes root in adolescence and peaks among Canadians in their 20s and 30s, just as they are heading into higher education, or building careers and families. Untreated, symptoms reverberate through all aspects of life, routinely trapping people in poverty and homelessness. More than one-third of Ontario residents receiving social assistance have a mental illness. The cost to society is clearly immense.
  • Yet, when family doctors were asked why they didn't refer more patients to therapy in a 2008 Canadian survey, the main reason they gave was cost. For many Canadians, private therapy is a luxury, especially if families are already wrestling with the economic fallout from mental illness. Costs vary across provinces, but psychologists in private practice may charge more than $200 an hour in major centres. And it's not just the uninsured who are affected.
  • Although about 60 per cent of Canadians have some form of private insurance, the amount available for therapy may cover only a handful of sessions. Those with the best benefits are more likely to be higherincome workers with stable employment. Federal public servants, notably, have one of the best plans in the country - their benefits were doubled in 2014 to $2,000 annually for psychotherapy. Many of those who can pay for therapy are doing so: A 2013 consultant's study commissioned by the Canadian Psychological Association found that $950-million is spent annually on private-practice psychologists by Canadians, insurance companies and workers compensation boards. The CPA estimates t
  • These are the patients that family doctors juggle, the ones who eat up appointment time, and never seem to get better, the ones caught on waiting lists. Sometimes, they have already been bounced in and out of the system, received little help, and have become wary of trying again. A 40-something mother recovering from breast cancer, suffering from chronic depression post-treatment, debilitated by fear her cancer will return. A university student, struggling with anxiety, who hasn't been to class for three weeks and may soon be kicked out of school. A teenager with bulimia removed from an eatingdisorder program because she couldn't follow the rules. They are the ones dangling on waiting lists in the public system for what often amounts to a handful of talk-therapy sessions, who don't have the money to pay for private therapy, or have too little coverage to get the full course of appointments they need.
  • Canada's investment does not match that burden. Only about 7 per cent of health-care spending goes to mental health. Even recent increases pale when compared to other countries: According to a study by the Canadian Mental Health Association, Canada increased per-capita funding by $5.22 in 2011. The British government, meanwhile, kicked in an extra 12 times that amount per citizen, and Australia added nearly 20 times as much as we did. Falling off a cliff, again and again
  • In Winnipeg, Dr. Stanley Szajkowski watched for months as his patient, a woman in her 80s, slowly declined. Her husband had died and she was spiralling into a severe depression. At every appointment, she looked thinner, more dishevelled. She wasn't sleeping, she admitted, often through tears. Sometimes she thought of suicide. She lived alone, with no family nearby, and no resources of her own to pay for therapy. "You do what you can," says Dr. Szajkowksi. "You provide some support and encouragement." He did his best, but he always had other patients waiting.
  • hat 30 per cent of private patients pay out-ofpocket themselves. When the afflicted don't seek help, the cost isn't restricted to their own pocketbook. People with mental-health problems are significantly more likely to abuse drugs and alcohol, and to become physically sick, further increasing health-care costs. A 2014 study by Oxford University researchers found that having a mental illness reduced life expectancy by 10 to 20 years, roughly the same as did smoking and obesity. A 2008 Statistics Canada study linked depression to new-onset heart disease in the general population. A 2014 U.S. study found that women under the age of 55 are twice as likely to suffer or die from a heart attack, or require heart surgery, if they have moderate to severe depression. The result: clogged-up doctors' offices, ERs, and operating rooms. And an inexorable burden for the patients' families forced to fill the gaps in caregiving - or carry on when they lose a loved one.
  • Patients refer to it as falling repeatedly off a cliff. And they can only manage the climb back up so many times. Family doctors interviewed for this story admitted that they are often "handholding" patients with nowhere else to go. "I am making them feel cared for, I am providing a supportive ear that they may not get anywhere else," says Dr. Batya Grundland, a physician who has been in family practice at Toronto's Women's College Hospital for almost a decade. "But do I think I am moving them forward with regard to their illness, and helping them cope better? I am going to say rarely." More senior doctors have told her that once in a while "a light bulb goes off" for the patients, but often only after many years. That's not an efficient use of health dollars, she points out - not when there are trained therapists who could do the job better. However, she says, "in some cases, I may be the only person they have."
  • Family doctors aren't the only ones struggling to find therapy for their patients. "I do a hundred consultations a year," says clinical psychiatrist Joel Paris, a professor at McGill University and research associate at the Montreal Jewish General, "and one of the most common situations is that the patient has tried a few anti-depressants, they have not responded very well, and from their story it is obvious they would benefit from psychotherapy. But where do they go? We have community clinics here in Montreal with six-to-12-month waiting lists even for brief therapy." A fractured, inefficient system
  • "You fall into the role that is handed to you," says Antoine Gagnon, a family doctor in Osgoode, on the outskirts of Ottawa. He tries to set aside 20-minute appointments before lunch or at the end of the day to provide "active listening" to his patients with anxiety and depression. Many of them are farmers or self-employed, without any private coverage for therapy. "Five of those minutes are spent talking about the weather," he says, "and then maybe you get into the meat of the problem, but the reality is we don't have the appropriate amount of time to give to therapy, even to listen, really." Often, he watches his patients' symptoms worsen over several months, until they meet the threshold of a clinical diagnosis. "The whole system could save on productivity and money if people were actually able to get the treatment they needed."
  • But these issues aren't insurmountable, as other countries have demonstrated. Britain, for instance, has trained thousands of university graduates to become therapists in its new public program, following research showing that, as long they have the proper skills, people don't need PhDs to be effective therapists. Australia, which has created a pay-for-service system, also makes wide use of online support to cost-effectively reach remote communities.
  • Except for a small fraction of GPs who specialize in psychotherapy, few family doctors have the training - or the time - to provide structured therapy. Saadia Hameed, a GP in a family-health team in London, Ont., has been researching access to psychotherapy for an advanced degree. Many of the doctors she has interviewed had trouble even producing a clear definition of therapy. One told her, "If a patient cries, than it's psychotherapy." Another described it as "listening to their woes." A 2007 survey of 163 family doctors in Ontario found that almost four out of five had not received training in cognitive behavioural therapy, and knew little about it. "Do family doctors really need to do that much psychotherapy," Dr. Hameed asks, "when there are other people trained - and better trained - to do it?"
  • What further frustrates treatment for physicians and patients is lack of access to specialists within the system. Across the country, family doctors describe the difficulty of reaching a psychiatrist to consult on a diagnosis or followup with their patients. In a telling 2011 study, published in the Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, researchers conducted a real-world experiment to see how easily a GP could locate a psychiatrist willing to see a patient with depression. Researchers called 297 psychiatrists in Vancouver, and reached 230. Of the 70 who said they would consider taking referrals, 64 required extensive written documentation, and could not give a wait-time estimate. Only six were willing to take the patient "immediately," but even then, their wait times ranged from four to 55 days. Psychiatrists are in increasingly short supply in Canada, and there's strong evidence that we're not making the best use of these highly trained specialists. They can - and often do - provide fee-for-service psychotherapy in a private setting, which limits their ability to meet the huge demand to consult with family doctors and treat the most severe cases.
  • A recent Ontario study by a team at CAMH found that while waiting lists exist in both urban and rural centres, the practices of psychiatrists in those locations tend to look very different. Among full-time psychiatrists in Toronto, 10 per cent saw fewer than 40 patients, and 40 per cent saw fewer than 100 - on average, their practices were half the size of psychiatrists in smaller centres. The patients for those urban psychiatrists with the smallest practices were also more likely to fall in the highest income bracket, and less likely to have been previously hospitalized for a mental illness than those in the smaller centres.
  • And those therapy sessions are being billed with no monitoring from a health-care system already scrimping on dollars, yet spending a lot on this care: On average, psychiatrists earn $216,000 a year. There is nothing to stop psychiatrists from seeing the same patients for years, and no system to ensure the patients with the greatest need get priority. In Australia, Britain and the United States, by contrast, billing for psychiatrists has been adjusted to encourage them to reduce psychotherapy sessions and serve more as consultants, particularly for the most severe cases, as other specialists do.
  • As the Canadian system exists now, says Benoit Mulsant, the physician-in-chief at CAMH and also a psychiatrist, the doctors in his specialty "can do whatever they please. If I wanted, I could have a roster of actor patients who tell me entertaining stories, and I would be paid the same as someone who is treating homeless people. ... By treating the rich and famous, there is zero risk of being punched in the face by a patient." Left out in all this, by and large, are other professionals who can provide therapy. It doesn't help that the rules are often murky around who can call themselves psychotherapists. While psychologists and social workers are licensed under their professional associations, in some provinces a person can call himself a marriage counsellor or music therapist with no one demanding they be certified. In 2007, Ontario passed a law to regulate psychotherapists, requiring them to register with a provincial college that would set standards and handle complaints. Currently, however, the law is in limbo, although the government has said it will finally bring it into force by December. The brain keeps many secrets
  • Science, however, has yet to find depression's equivalent of insulin. Despite being scanned, poked and stimulated over and over and over again, the brain keeps its secrets. The "chemical imbalance" theory is now viewed as simplistic at best. It may not do much for patients, either: A 2014 study published in the journal Behaviour Research and Therapy suggested that, rather than reassuring them, focusing on the biological explanation for depression actually made patients feel more pessimistic and lacking in control. SSRIs work by increasing the amount of serotonin, a chemical that helps deliver messages within the brain and is known to influence mood. But researchers aren't sure why the drugs help some patients and fail with others. "Basically, it's like we have a bucket of water and we pour it over the patient's head," says Dr. Georg Northoff, the University of Ottawa's Michael Smith chair of Neurosciences and Mental Health. "But you want a drug that injects the water in a very specific brain regions or brain system, which we don't have."
  • Critics of therapy have argued that it's basically "good listening" - comparable to having a sympathetic friend across the kitchen table - and that in the real world of mercurial patients and practitioners of varying abilities, a pill just works better. That's true in many cases, especially when the symptoms are severe and the patients is suicidal: a fast-acting medication is safer, and may even be necessary before starting talk therapy. The staunchest advocates of therapy do not suggest it should be the first course of treatment for psychosis, or debilitating chronic depression, or mania - although, in those cases, there is evidence that psychotherapy and medication work well in tandem. (A 2011 meta-analysis found that patients with severe depression who received a combination approach had higher recovery rates and were less likely to drop out of treatment.) But drugs also don't work as well as the manufacturers would like us to think. Roughly one-third of patients given a drug will see no benefit (although they often respond to a second or third medication). In randomly controlled trials, drugs often perform only marginally better than sugar pills.
  • Yet it's talk therapy that the public often views most skeptically. "Until you go to a therapist, or a member of your family has a serious psychological problem, people are unsympathetic [about therapy]," says Dr. Paris, the Montreal psychiatrist. "They are very skeptical, and they don't believe the research. It's amazing, because pharmaceutical trials will get approval for a drug on the basis of two clinical trials that they paid for. And we have 100 clinical trials and no one believes us."
  • Dr. Ajantha Jayabarathan, an assistant professor at Dalhousie University's medical school, spent her early years as a family doctor in Spryfield, N.S., trying to manage an overload of mental-health cases. Most of her patients had little insurance; there was one reduced-cost counselling service in town, but the waiting lists were long. In 2000, her group practice became a test site for a shared-care project, which gave the doctors access to a mental-health team, including weekly in-person consultations with a psychiatrist. "It was transformative," she says. "We looked after everything in-house.
  • Over time, Dr. Jayabarathan says, she learned how to properly assess mental illness in patients, and how to use medication more effectively. "I just made it my business to teach myself what to do." It's the kind of workaround GPs are increasingly experimenting with, waiting for the system to catch up. Who would pay - and how?
  • The case for expanding publicly funded access to therapy is gaining traction in Canada. In 2012, the health commissioner of Quebec recommended therapy be covered by the province; it is now being studied by Quebec's science-based health body (INESSS), which is expected to report back next year. A new Quebec-based organization of doctors, researchers and mental-health advocates called the Coalition for Access to Psychotherapy (CAP) is lobbying the government.
  • In Manitoba, the Liberal Party - albeit well behind in the polls - has made the public funding of psychologists one of its campaign platforms for the province's spring 2016 election. In Saskatchewan, the government commissioned, and has since endorsed, a mental-health action plan that includes providing online therapy - though politicians have given themselves 10 years to accomplish it. Michael Kirby, the former head of the Canadian Mental Health Commission, has been advocating for eight annual sessions of therapy to be covered for children and youth in need.
  • There are significant hurdles: Which practitioners would provide therapy, and how would they be paid? What therapies would be covered, and for how long? Complicating every aspect of major mentalhealth change in Canada is the question of who should shoulder the cost: the provinces or Ottawa. In a written statement in response to questions from The Globe and Mail, federal Health Minister Rona Ambrose lobbed the issue back at her provincial counterparts, pointing out that the Canada Health Act does not "preclude provinces and territories from extending public coverage to other services or providers such as psychologists."
  • One result can be overloaded family doctors minimizing mental-health problems. "If you have nothing to offer someone," asks Dr. Anderson, "how much are you going to dig around to find out what is going on?" Some doctors also admit that the lack of resources can lead to physicians cherry-picking patients who don't have mental illness. And yet family physicians alone bill about $361million a year for counselling or psychotherapy in Canada - 5.6 million visits of roughly 30 minutes each. This is a broad category, and not always specifically related to mental health (some of it includes drug counselling, and a certain amount of coaching is a necessary part of the patient-doctor relationship). When it is psychotherapy, however, doctors admit it's often more supportive listening than actual therapy.
  • So how would Canada pay for access to such therapy? It wouldn't be cheap, in the short term. The savings would come from what Canadians would not have to spend in the long term: in additional medical and drug costs, emergency-room visits and hospital stays, and in unnecessary disability payments, to say nothing of better long-term health outcomes for patients given good care earlier. Some of the figures being tossed around sound staggering. Rolling out a version of Britain's centre-based program across Canada would cost $950-million. Michael Kirby's plan would amount to $1,000 annually per patient. A 2013 report commissioned by the Canadian Psychological Association calculated that, based on predicted need, and assuming no coverage from private health-care plans, providing an average of six sessions of therapy a year would cost an estimated $2.8-billion annually.
  • But any of those figures would still be a fraction of the roughly $210-billion that Canada spends annually on health care. Figuring out how to make the system most costeffective is, according to sources, currently delaying the INESSS report to the Quebec government. "You need to facilitate the government," says Helen- Maria Vasiliadis, a professor of community health at the University of Sherbrooke. "You can't be going to policymakers and showing them billions and billions of dollars. People start having heart attacks. With evidence in hand, we have to present possible solutions."
  • An insurance-based plan is the proposal that has emerged from the Quebec-based CAP group, which sent its proposal to Quebec's health minister last month. In its design, the system would work much like Quebec's public drug plan - Quebeckers not covered through work plans would contribute to a provincial insurance program for therapy. That would be similar to the system that Germany has used for decades. One step forward, one step back
  • Last year, the Sherbrooke clinic where Marie Hayes works received provincial funding for a part-time psychologist and a full-time social worker. With a roster of 25,000 patients, the clinic team laid out clear guidelines for the psychologist, who would consult on cases and screen patients, and be limited to a mere four sessions of actual counselling with any one patient. "We wanted to be careful she didn't become a waiting list - like everything in the system," says Dr. Hayes. The social worker helps guide patients into services such as housing and addiction counselling. They have also offered group sessions for depression management at the clinic. As stretched as those new professionals are in such a large practice, Dr. Hayes says the addition of that mental-health team is improving the care she can provide patients. Recently, for instance, the 32- year-old mother with anxiety attended sessions with the psychologist. "She is making progress," says Dr. Hayes, "slowly."
  • At Women's College Hospital in Toronto, Dr. Grundland is not so lucky. Asked to describe a difficult case, the family-practice physician mentions a patient suffering from depression after a lifechanging accident. Every month, doctor and patient would repeat the same conversation they'd already had more than a dozen times - and make little real headway. Her patient, says Dr. Grundland, needs a trained therapist: someone she can see regularly, to help her move past her frustration, counsel her about addiction, and ease the burden on her family.
  • But there's no extra money in the patient's budget for a psychologist. "I do my best," Dr. Grundland says, "but it's not my area of expertise." Meanwhile, the patient isn't getting better, and in the time that it takes to make it through one appointment with her, Dr. Grundland could see three other people with problems she was actually trained to treat. "But," says Dr. Grundland, "she has nowhere else to go." Erin Anderssen is a feature writer at The Globe and Mail. OPEN MINDS How to build a better mental health care system
  • The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health has purchased advertisements to accompany this series. While CAMH professionals are quoted in this story, the organization had no involvement in the creation or production of this, or any other story in the series. $20.7-billion The cost, according to a 2012 Conference Board of Canada report, of lost productivity each year due to mental illness. What else does $20-billion represent?
  • $20B: Canadian spending on national defence, 2012-13 $20B: Market valuation of Airbnb, 2015 $21B: Kitchener-CambridgeWaterloo region's GDP, 2009 $21B: Amount food manufacturing contributed to the economy, 2012
23More

"National Checkup" panel debates the pros, cons and questions surrounding a universal d... - 0 views

  • THE NATIONAL Thu Mar 19 2015,
  • WENDY MESLEY (HOST): All that medicine isn't cheap either. Canadians spent an estimated 22 billion dollars a year on prescriptions in 2013, almost twice what they spent in 2001. One in ten struggle to afford it. It's big business and big drug companies know it, spending billions marketing it right back to you. VOICE OF UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN (ANNOUNCER): (Advertisement) Ask your doctor if Lunesta is right for you. WENDY MESLEY (HOST):
  • So are we over- or under-medicated? Is the high cost of prescription drugs failing to help Canadians in need? And what should we be watching for next? So we'll start with that middle question, like, who is not covered? Who is falling through the cracks? You must all see this in your practices? Danielle, what are you seeing? DANIELLE MARTIN (FAMILY PHYSICIAN, WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL): In fact, millions of Canadians have no drug coverage whatsoever and millions more don't have adequate coverage for their needs. In my practice I see it all the time among the self-employed, people who are working in small businesses, people who are working part-time and don't have employer-based coverage. It's the taxi drivers, it's the people who are working in a part-time job, but it's also middle-income people who are consultants or working in small businesses who don't have coverage. So this isn't just a problem for the poor. It's a problem for people across socioeconomic lines.
  • ...20 more annotations...
  • WENDY MESLEY (HOST): It's funny, you know, we hear our health plan discussed in the United States and now you talk about our socialized medicine and it's sort of until you have a health problem, you assume everything is covered. But who falls through the cracks that you see, Samir? SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK): Yeah, I mean, I treat a lot of older patients and those who are 65 and older generally are covered by a provincial drug plan. But, you know, I'm seeing more and more, especially after the recent recession, we have people who are closer to that age who lose their jobs and if they lose their jobs and they were relying on private drug coverage plans, they are not covered. And then they find themselves they can't afford their medications, they get sicker and they literally have to wait and be sick until they can actually get their medications.
  • WENDY MESLEY (HOST): What are you seeing, David? DAVID HENRY (PROFESSOR, DALLA LANA SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO): I think this is right and it's a surprise to somebody from outside of Canada to find that in a country with a good comprehensive care system, there is not drug coverage. So patients with chronic disease, for instance diabetics, ironically in the city where insulin was discovered, are relying on free handouts from their physicians to provide what is really an essential medication; it's keeping them alive. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Who do you think is falling through the cracks? What are you seeing?
  • CARA TANNENBAUM (GERIATRIC PHYSICIAN, PHARMACY CHAIR, UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL): The vulnerable population in my mind are older adults with multiple medical conditions who are taking 5, 10, 15 medications at the same time and have to pay the deductible on that. And that adds up for a lot of them who don't have a lot of money to begin with, so they start making choices about will I take my drugs until the end of the month? Will I take every single medication that I have to? Do I really need those three medications for my high blood pressure, or can I let one go? And that could have effects on their health. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Well, you mentioned diabetes, David. We heard earlier on "The National" this week from a woman in B.C. She has diabetes. That's a life-threatening disease if it's not looked after. This is what she said.
  • SASHA JANICH (PHON.) (DIABETES PATIENT): Roughly about 600 to 800 bucks a month. I don't get any help until I spend at last 3500 a year and then they'll kick in, you know, whatever portion they decide to cover. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): So, David, that's really common? People on diabetes aren't fully covered?
  • DAVID HENRY (PROFESSOR, DALLA LANA SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO): Well, they're covered to a degree in B.C., but it's what we call the co- payment level that they have to make even under an insurance program. In Ontario, they don't have any insurance at all. They're going to pay the full market price if they don't have insurance through their employer, and they may lose that if they're out of work. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): What are you seeing? What's not covered? Give me an example. DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL):
  • Well, actually, one thing that I think is surprising to a lot of people is the variability in coverage among public drug plans in Canada. So something that's covered, even if you're covered under a public drug plan, for example if you have cancer and you have to take chemotherapy outside of the hospital, in many Canadian provinces that's taken care of. In Ontario, for example, it's not. And I think that many Canadians are surprised to discover, imagine the, you know, enormous stress of a cancer diagnosis, that on top of that you're going to have to pay out of pocket at least to very… sometimes to very, very high levels, in fact. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Samir? SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK): And even just the other day, I just was debating with a pharmacy about the cost of some vitamin D. I have a person who's under house, he's on social assistance, and they said: We'll give you a free blister pack, you know, so he can sort his meds. We'll give you this. And we were actually, you know, working out a pricing system so this guy could even afford something so that he wouldn't break bones and actually have a fracture down the road. So it's amazing how some of the basic things we think are important aren't even covered. WENDY MESLEY (HOST):
  • Well, we saw that the drug costs have almost doubled in the last 11, 12 years. Is part of the problem… there's only so much, it seems, money to go around for prescription drugs. Is part of the problem that there's too many… some drugs are too easily available while people who really need them are not getting them? And there's marketing playing into that. We see a lot of ads in the last ten years. Check this out. VOICE OF UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN (ANNOUNCER): (Advertisement) We know a place where tossing and turning have given way to sleeping, where sleepless nights yield to restful sleep. And Lunesta can help you get there.
  • UNIDENTIFIED MAN #1: (Advertisement) Anyone with high cholesterol may be at increased risk of heart attack. I stopped kidding myself. VOICE OF UNIDENTIFIED MAN #2 (ANNOUNCER): (Advertisement) Talk to your doctor about your risk. VOICE OF UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN (ANNOUNCER): (Advertisement) Ask your doctor if Lunesta is right for you.
  • DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL): Well, I think it's probably not divided properly and I also think that we need to be very mindful of the ways in which advertising and marketing, whether it's direct to patients or consumers as we often consume from the American media on our television screens, or whether it's direct to physicians. So, you know, in fact, even in the U.S. under the Affordable Care Act, physicians are now required to declare any amount of money that they take from the pharmaceutical industry. We have no such sunshine law here in Canada. Don't Canadian patients want to know if your doctor has had their vacation or their last meal or their speakers' fees paid by the company that makes the drug they have just prescribed for you? WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Well, we saw in those ads they'll say: Ask your doctor. Is there a lot of pressure and is that contributing to the number of pills on the market? SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK):
  • Well, it's a huge amount of pressure, I think, you know, for… you know, if you're a doctor that relies on information or supports from pharmaceutical representatives, for example, then there is that pressure that you're put under, there is that influence that you have. But also, we know that if your patient asks you specifically and says, you know, what about this medication, you may say, well, it's easier to prescribe you that medication if that's what you really want. But there's actually five things you can do to improve your sleep and actually avoid being on that medication, but we don't get asked for that. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): But I want to be like the lady with the wings.
  • SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK): And that's what I hear: Why can't I be like that? But I think it's important to think about the other options. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): David, what do you think? DAVID HENRY (PROFESSOR, DALLA LANA SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO): I would like to focus a little bit on the prices that are being paid. We talked about usage and whether drug use is appropriate. There's also the price that is paid. Canada is paying too much. And if we can just return for a second or two to the idea of a national program, there's a huge advantage in being the sole purchaser on behalf of 35 million people, as it would be with a national program in Canada. And we know from experience you can reduce drug prices by 30, 40 percent. That's billions of dollars a year. WENDY MESLEY (HOST):
  • That's a political debate that you have launched and I hope that it gets taken up by the politicians. Who is buying these drugs? We have seen that there are more people having trouble getting drugs, more people using drugs. Who is it? DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL): That are taking prescription drugs in Canada? WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Yeah. DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL):
  • Well, you know, interestingly over the last decade, we have seen an increase in prescription drug use in every single age category. So the answer is we all are. We're all taking more drugs than our equivalent people did a decade ago and I think… WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Teenagers? DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL): Absolutely, teenagers and the elderly and everybody in between. And so the question really becomes: Are we any healthier as a result? You know, in some cases we're talking about truly life-saving treatment that are medical breakthroughs and, of course, we all want to see every Canadian have unfettered access to those important treatments. In other cases we may actually be talking about overdiagnosis, overprescription and as you say, Cara, sort of chemical coping of all different kinds. And I think that's what we need to kind of get at and try to tease out. WENDY MESLEY (HOST):
  • Well, and the largest group of all on prescription drugs right now, Cara, are the seniors. CARA TANNENBAUM (GERIATRIC PHYSICIAN, PHARMACY CHAIR, UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL): The seniors, yes, and I'm very passionate about this topic because sometimes I see patients come into my office on 23 different drug classes, and that's when we don't talk about what drugs should we add but what drugs can we take away, and the concept of de-prescribing. And imagine if we could get people who are on unnecessary drugs, because as you get older you get added this drug and a second drug and this specialist gives you this and that specialist gives you that, but then there starts to be interactions between the different drugs that could cause side effects and hospitalization. And maybe it's time to start asking, well, what's the right drug for you at this time, at this age, with these medical conditions? And personalized medicine is something that we have been talking about. It would be nice if we could introduce that conversation into therapy and not just drug therapy, but all therapy. Maybe the drug isn't needed. Maybe physiotherapy is needed or a psychologist or better exercise or nutrition. So I think it's really a bigger question. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Samir?
  • SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK): Exactly. I mean, in my clinic the other day I had a patient who was on eight medications when she came with me, and… WENDY MESLEY (HOST): This is a senior? You deal with seniors as well. SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK): Absolutely. And when she left my office, she was thrilled because she was only on two medications, mainly because some of the medications are prescribed to treat the side effects of other medications, for example, or the indications for those medications were no longer valid in her. But we added some vitamins and we just balanced things out appropriately. And she was thrilled because, as Cara was saying before, the co-pays, the other payments that one needs to pay for medications you don't want to take, that's a problem as well. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): We're going to take a short break, but we have one more discussion area which is: What are the next challenges that Canadians might face with prescription drugs? We'll be right back.
  • (Commercial break) WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Welcome back to our "National Checkup" panel. Danielle Martin, Samir Sinha, Cara Tannenbaum and David Henry are all here to talk about the next frontier. So we're hearing all of this exciting new science marches on and there's all of these new drugs, new treatments. Everyone wants them or everyone who needs them wants them, but they're expensive, right, Danielle? DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL): They can be extremely expensive. So, you know, what we call these blockbuster drugs coming onto the market, some of them truly do represent breakthroughs in medical treatment and in some cases they can cost tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. So they really are very expensive. But what I think many people may not realize is that the number of drugs coming out, even the expensive ones that are truly breakthroughs, is still a very small portion of the drugs coming out on the market. Many, many drugs that are being released and are expensive are marginally, if at all, really any better than their predecessor. So just because it's new and fancy and costs a lot doesn't necessarily mean that it's all that much better.
  • WENDY MESLEY (HOST): So what's going to happen, David? DAVID HENRY (PROFESSOR, DALLA LANA SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO): We need to find a plan. These drugs may cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Nobody can afford that individually. Tens of thousands, rich people can afford them but the average person cannot. So there's really no way we can cope with these unless we've got a plan and, in my view, it has to be a national plan. And the advantage of that are that when you're buying or you're subsidizing on behalf of 35 million people, you're going to get better prices and your insurance pool that covers these costs is much greater. So the country can afford drugs that individuals can't.
  • WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Samir, what do you see as the new frontier here? SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK): I think the new frontier is going to be more personalized treatments in terms of how do we actually treat cancers, how do we treat certain rare conditions with more personalized treatments. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Because it's very exciting, right? You have this cancer that's not that common and then you hear that there's a treatment for it and you want it. SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK): And it has the possibility of alleviating a lot of suffering from unnecessary treatments that may not actually be… you know, be effective. But I think this is the challenge. If we want to be able to afford these, if we actually work together we're actually more able to afford them when we bulk-buy these medications. But the key is going to be that, you know, this is where the future is going and we're going to have to figure out a way to pay for them.
  • WENDY MESLEY (HOST): What are you looking forward to? CARA TANNENBAUM (GERIATRIC PHYSICIAN, PHARMACY CHAIR, UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL): I'm really looking forward to seeing all these new treatments that we have spent decades researching. You know what the investment in health research has been in order to find new targets for drugs, in order to increase quality of live, in order to cure cancer, and then to send a message, oh, sorry, we're not going to give them to you or you can't afford to pay for them, then I think there is a lack of consistency in the messaging that we're giving to Canadians around equity for health care. So you could get your diagnosis and you could see a physician, but we way not be able to afford treating you. So I think this is something we need to think about it. It's very exciting, I think we live in exciting times, and looking at different funding strategies to make sure that people get the appropriate care that they need at the right time to improve their health is really what we're going to be looking forward to. WENDY MESLEY (HOST):
  • Tricky, though. It's a provincial jurisdiction, you've got to get all the provinces to agree to a list, and the list is getting longer. DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL): Absolutely. I mean, I think actually one of the big myths out there about drug plans is that higher-quality plans are the ones that cover everything. And, in fact, that's not true. You know, we can use a national plan or a pan- Canadian plan or whatever you want to call it to target our prescribing and guide our prescribing in order to make it more appropriate, and that's another way that we're going to save money in the long run. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Well, I learned a lot tonight. I hope our audience did too. Thanks so much for being with us. DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL): Thank you.
10More

Public solicitation for organ donors: a time for direction in Canada - 0 views

  • CMAJ April 19, 2016 vol. 188 no. 7 First published February 29, 2016, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150964
  • The disparity between supply and demand for transplantable solid organs has resulted in strategies to drive increased organ donation, including public solicitations for living donors. Public organ solicitation occurs when a recipient or their representative solicits an organ for transplantation by public broadcast (e.g., social media or a public notice). The intended donor and recipient may not have a prior relationship. Lack of regulation of public solicitations for organ donation in Canada is a cause for concern. We call for careful screening of altruistic donors within a well-organized system that links willing donors with a maximum number of beneficiaries.
  • Public solicitation for organs offers an opportunity to find a living donor for potential recipients who do not have one within their social or familial network. Thus, solicitations are a way to redress a somewhat natural injustice, whereby some people have more friends or family members who are willing to donate than others. Accepting these donations does not discriminate1 nor does it disadvantage those on the waiting list.2 Solicitation leads to access to an organ that would not otherwise have been available for donation.3 In addition to being a benefit to the direct recipient, every transplant reduces the demand on the waiting list.2 Solicitation can also increase the awareness of organ shortages and may elicit more donors for other recipients.3
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • However, there are concerns. Organ solicitations have been criticized as unfair, because they enable donation to identified recipients rather than to a recipient on a waiting list. Celebrity status and access to resources clearly provide increased opportunities to find a donor. A person with a high profile or more appealing story may be perceived as getting ahead in the transplant system, which could influence the public against organ donation.4 Recipients who are computer literate, social media savvy or English-speaking have enhanced access to potential donors beyond their local community and are more likely to find a donor than those without these characteristics.2 Publicity surrounding personal stories involving organ solicitation can be misleading and encourage offers to the solicitor, without considering donations to those with greatest need.5 However, all living donation is inequitable in that the donor chooses to whom to donate — generally someone they know — without any requirement to donate to the wait-list recipient with the greatest need.
  • One concern with public solicitations for organs is the potential for exposure of the recipient to harms from a donor who is unknown to them, which may in turn damage the reputation of transplant programs.3 Canadian law requires a minimum donor age for living donors, voluntary consent and no exchange of goods for an organ.6 Public solicitation may increase the potential for exchange of valuable considerations for an organ, because the donor is unknown to the recipient.
  • Two recent, well-publicized Canadian cases focused attention on these issues. The owner of the Ottawa Senators hockey team, who needed a new liver, used his public profile to solicit an anonymous donor.7 In the other case, the family of a young girl who needed a liver transplant made a public appeal through a Facebook page.8 The solicitation was fuelled by media attention surrounding this touching story, whereby the child’s twin had received liver tissue donated by their father, who could only donate once. The solicitation received more than 500 responses from people willing to donate.8 These two public solicitations for organs received markedly different public responses: one faced criticism9 and the other garnered sympathy. The difference in public perceptions was likely due to the different recipient profiles. In both cases, anonymous donors came forward, were screened and donated a part of their livers.
  • There are no guidelines for public solicitation of organs in Canada. Canadian transplant programs have had to address this issue on a case-by-case basis, often without consensus. Within Canada, different responses to organ solicitation by potential donors may be producing inequity of access to organs. Transplant programs and their patients could benefit from guidance on how to address the challenges raised by public solicitations. Many transplant doctors would be comfortable with public solicitation only if the donor became a nondirected altruistic donor, by which the organ is allocated to the next suitable recipient on the waiting list rather than to the actual solicitor (unpublished survey data, July 2015). Transplant doctors consider the next best thing to be to ensure that a relationship existed between the recipient and the solicited donor before donation occurs.
  • Donors who respond to public solicitations should be considered for transplantation. However, transplant programs must ensure that the motivation for donation is based on altruism rather than secondary intention, and that donors meet medical and psychosocial criteria for living donors, provide informed consent and agree to meet the requirements of the program regarding contact with the recipient. Although they should not be dissuaded from donating to the intended recipient, solicited donors should be made aware of alternatives such as donating to the recipient with the greatest need. A model is Canada’s National Kidney Paired Donation program. This program is the best option for candidates who have living kidney donors who are willing to donate and medically able, but who are incompatible with their intended
  • recipient. The program coordinates a chain of multiple transplants so that a willing donor’s organ can find its way to a compatible recipient while the intended recipient also receives an organ.10 This system allows the most people in need of an organ to get one. Even if the solicited donor and recipient are compatible, they can still choose to enter the National Kidney Paired Donation program as a pair, to benefit the greater transplant community, because a critical number of pairs are required for the overall success of the program.10 Whether donors from a public solicitation should remain anonymous to their recipients is a decision best left to the transplant program.
  • Donations of living organs are valued. Solicited organ donation helps to identify willing donors. It is an important facet of living donation and should be promoted. However, solicited organ donors should be encouraged to consider anonymous nondirected organ donation within systems, such as the National Kidney Paired Donation program, to maximize the number of patients in need who receive a transplant from a willing altruistic donor.
10More

Charming, intelligent leader fell from grace; Multimillion-dollar McGill University Hea... - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Sat Jul 18 2015
  • When his death from cancer was announced earlier this month, people still doubted that Arthur Porter, the bow-tied former CEO of Montreal's McGill University Health Centre, had really died. After all, the "golden boy" with the silver tongue who was tarnished by a multimilliondollar fraud scandal had spent two years languishing in a notorious Panama prison as he fought extradition back to Canada. "If anyone could pull a fast one, why not the man who prided himself on his ability to make an environment suit him rather than the other way around? And so members of Quebec's anti-corruption unit trooped down to the tropical country to view the body, allaying the suspicions.
  • "Dr. Porter was 59 when he died in a Panamanian hospital on June 30, an ignominious, sad and lonely end for a man who had found success far from his birthplace in Sierra Leone. At Cambridge, he was a star medical student. In the United States, where he ran a major medical centre in Detroit, he was a self-declared Republican who in 2001 refused an offer from then-president George W. "Bush to become the next surgeon-general. In his 2014 memoir, The Man Behind the Bow Tie, Dr. Porter recalled getting a phone call soon after. ""Is that your final answer?" Mr. Bush reportedly asked him, lifting a line from Who Wants to be a Millionaire, at the time a popular TV game show.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • "Rotund, funny and occasionally pompous, Dr. Porter was everyone's friend and nobody's confidante, the life of the party and an agile dancer, both in political circles and around a ballroom floor. A member of Air Canada's board of directors, he travelled the world free. His former friend Prime Minister Stephen Harper had him sworn in as a member of the Privy Council so he could serve as chairman of the Security Intelligence Review Committee, or SIRC, the country's spy watchdog agency. "And he was close to Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard, a relationship that began in 2004 when the politician, a neurosurgeon by training, was provincial health minister. Like many of Dr. Porter's friendships, theirs ended with the news of the hospital's megacost overrun and a $22.5-million fraud inquiry connected to the MUHC's decision to award the construction contract to a consortium led by the Montreal-based engineering firm SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.
  • ""In a way, Arthur was like Icarus, who came crashing down to earth when his wax wings melted because he flew too close to the sun," Jeff Todd, an Ottawabased journalist who first met Dr. Porter in the Bahamas and co-authored the memoir, said. ""He told me that if he did anything wrong, it was to go way too fast," Mr. Todd continued. "There was never a peak he didn't want to climb and if there was a huge challenge, he always thought he would simply fly over it. But he couldn't always do that." "The first indication was in November, 2011, when the National Post revealed he had signed a commercial agreement the year before with Ari BenMenashe, a Montreal-based Israeli security consultant and arms dealer, all while he was head of both the MUHC and Canada's spy watchdog. Mr. BenMenashe was to secure a $120million grant from Russia for "infrastructure development" in Sierra Leone. In return, a company called the Africa Infrastructure Group, which was controlled by Dr. Porter's family, would manage what he wrote were "bridges, dams, ferries and other infrastructure projects" built with the Russian money.
  • "Within days, he was gone from SIRC. Less than a month later, he resigned from the MUHC, departing on the grounds that he had accomplished what he had set out to do in 2004: bring together a private-public partnership and get a long-dreamed-of facility built. "Unbeknownst to the public at the time, under his watch, a planned project deficit of $12million had somehow escalated to $115-million. "The following year, fraud charges were laid, but by then Dr. Porter was on to other projects and living in a gated community in the Bahamas, where he had maintained a home for years. After Interpol issued a warrant for his arrest, he and his wife, Pamela Mattock Porter, were detained June, 2013, by authorities at Tocumen International Airport in Panama City. "Despite claiming he could not be arrested because he was on a diplomatic mission for Sierra Leone, he was soon confined to overcrowded quarters in a wing reserved for foreigners in filthy La Joya prison. Toting an oxygen tank, he became known there as "Doc," ministering to inmates who included drug dealers and murderers. The man who had begun his ascent to the top as a doctor beloved by his patients would end at the bottom as a doctor beloved by his patients again.
  • "He was smart, perhaps too smart for his own good, and affable, with an ability to zero in on the most powerful person in the room with laser-like focus. His long-time friend and former teacher Karol Sikora, who partnered with Dr. Porter in a Bahamian medical clinic and is also the medical director of their joint private health-care company, Cancer Partners UK, said he was uncannily good at getting people together everywhere he touched down, even if they had opposing views. ""People like that are rare and they are very good at running big institutions," Dr. Sikora said. ""Arthur reached the peak of his career in 2010, when he was all glowing and bigger than sliced bread. Then it all went wrong." "Although Dr. Porter claimed the money from SNC was payment for other consulting work he'd done for them, his friend opined that the truth will probably never come out now. ""I'd like to think Arthur was never part of this monkey business, but we'll never know," he said.
  • "Others were not so kind. Responding to news of his death, the MUHC issued a terse statement that extended condolences to his family and offered no further comment, while Mr. Harper suspended the protocol that would have seen the Peace Tower flag fly at half-mast to mark the death of a Privy Council member. "In prison, living in unsanitary surroundings and denied proper treatment in a hospital for the cancer that many doubted he had, Dr. Porter, who leaves his father, sister, wife and four daughters, was outwardly still full of bravado until near the end. ""I just have to survive and make do," he told CBC reporter Dave Seglins in a phone interview in March that revolved around his treatment at the prison and his successful complaint to the United Nations torture watchdog that his human rights were being trampled on. ""[The] water, food, bedding and the fact that one has to urinate in a bucket shared by about 50 to 100 people ... for someone who has an illness and needs treatment, it was pretty obvious, I presume, the UN clearly found in my favour." "In addition, Dr. Porter continued, his raspy voice rising, he had not had a single court hearing in 22 months.
  • "I've never left here to go into the city. I have no idea what the inside of a courtroom looks like, not in Panama, Canada, the Bahamas or anywhere," he cried. "I've never been to court in my life." "In the end, though, he seemed to be aware that the stain on his reputation would not be erased, not even in death. ""My entire life has been devoted to climbing, winning and succeeding," he wrote in his memoir. "But with the end drawing near, it is inevitable that I, like anyone else, wonder if what I have accomplished truly matters. I wonder how I will be remembered." "To submit an I Remember: obit@globeandmail.com Send us a memory of someone we have recently profiled on the Obituaries page. Please include I Remember in the subject field.
  • "In his memoir, Dr. Porter said his life was 'devoted to ... winning.' " "Arthur Porter, left, chats with Stephen Harper at Montreal General Hospital in 2006. The Prime Minister had Dr. Porter sworn in as a member of the Privy Council.
13More

Why society's most valuable workers are invisible - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Mon Oct 31 2016
  • Economists have, traditionally, paid little attention to women such as Shireen Luchuk. A health-care assistant in a Vancouver long-term-care residence, she trades in diapers and pureed food for those members of society no longer contributing to the GDP. She produces care, a good that's hard to measure on a ledger. She thinks about cutting her patients' buttered toast the way she would for her own aging parents, and giving a bath tenderly so she doesn't break brittle bones. She often stays past her shift to change one more urine-soaked diaper because otherwise, she says, "I can't sleep at night."
  • Last week, a resident grabbed her arm so tightly that another care worker had to help free her. She's been bitten, kicked and punched. She continues to provide a stranger's love to people who can't say sorry. This past Monday, as happens sometimes, she did this for 16 straight hours because of a staff shortage.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • But let's not be too hard on those economists. The rest of us don't pay that much attention to workers such as Shireen Luchuk either - not, at least, until our families need her. And not until someone such as Elizabeth Tracey Mae Wettlaufer is charged with murdering eight residents in Ontario nursing homes. Then we have lots of questions: Who is overseeing the care of our seniors? Are our mothers and fathers safe? Will we be safe, when we end up there?
  • The question we might try asking is this: If the care that Luchuk offers is so valuable, why don't we treat it that way? Dr. Janice Keefe, a professor of family and gerontology at Mount Saint Vincent University and director of the Nova Scotia Centre on Aging, says "the emotion attached to these jobs removes the value."
  • Caregiving, Keefe says, is seen "as an extension of women's unpaid labour in the home." Those jobs are still overwhelmingly filled by women. And, while times are changing, the work they do is still mostly for women - whether it's the widows needing care who are more likely to outlive their husbands, the working moms who need child care or the adult daughters who are still most likely to carry the burden of aging parents.
  • Yet it's as if society wants to believe that professional caregivers should do their work out of love and obligation - as if care would be tainted by higher pay and better benefits. That's an argument you never hear for lawyers and accountants. It's certainly not one that Adam Smith, the founding father of political economy, made for the butcher or the baker.
  • In last year's book, Who Cooked Adam Smith's Dinner?, Swedish writer Katrine Marcal argued that the market, as Smith and his fellow economists conceived it, fails to accept an essential reality: "People are born small, and die fragile." Smith described an economy based on self-interest - the baker makes his bread as tasty as he can, not because he loves bread, but because he has an interest in people buying it. That way he can go to the butcher, and buy meat himself. But Smith missed something important. It wasn't the butcher who actually put the dinner on his table each night, as Marcal points out. It was his devoted mother, who ran Smith's household for him until the day she died.
  • Today, she'd likely be busy with her own job. But care - the invisible labour that made life possible for the butcher and the baker (and the lawyer and the accountant) - still has to be provided by someone. Society would like that someone to be increasingly qualified, regulated and dedicated, all for what's often exhausting, even dangerous, shift work, a few dollars above minimum wage. One side effect of low-paying, low-status work is that it tends to come with less oversight, and lower skills and standards. That's hardly a safe bar for seniors in residential long-term care, let alone those hoping to spend their last days being tended to in the privacy of their homes. We get the care we pay for.
  • It's not much better on the other end of the life cycle, where staff at daycares also receive low wages for long days, leading to high turnover. "I am worth more than $12 an hour," says Regan Breadmore, a trained early-childhood educator with 20 years experience. But when her daycare closed, and she went looking for work, that's the pay she was offered. She has now, at 43, returned to school to start a new career. "I loved looking after the kids. It's a really important job - you are leaving your infants with us, we are getting your children ready to go to school," she says. But if her daughter wanted to follow in her footsteps, "I would tell her no, just because of the lack of respect."
  • It's not hard to see where this is going. Young, educated women are not going to aspire to jobs with poor compensation, and even less prestige. Young men aren't yet racing to fill them. Families are smaller. Everyone is working. Unlike Adam Smith, we can't all count on mom (or a daughter, or son) to be around to take care of us. Who is going to fill the gaps to provide loving labour to all those baby boomers about to age out of the economy? Right now, the solution is immigrant women, who, especially outside of the public system, can be paid a few dollars above minimum wage. That's not giving care fair value. It's transferring it to an underclass of working-poor women. And it doesn't ensure a skilled caregiving workforce - all the while, as nurses and care assistants will point out, the care itself is becoming more complex, with dementia, mental illness and other ailments.
  • Ideally, in the future, we'll all live blissfully into old age. But you might need your diaper changed by a stranger some day.
  • Maybe robots can do the job by then. Rest assured, you'll still want someone such as Luchuk to greet you by name in the morning, to pay attention to whether you finish your mashed-up carrots. When she's holding your hand, she will seem like the economy's most valuable worker. Let's hope enough people like her still want the job.
18More

Doctors should collaborate with traditional healers - 0 views

  • CMAJ March 17, 2015 vol. 187 no. 5 First published February 9, 2015, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4989
  • Laura Eggertson
  • An Aboriginal doctor who testified in the case of a Mohawk girl whose family opted out of chemotherapy is urging physicians to work more collaboratively with traditional healers and to respect their practices.
  • ...15 more annotations...
  • Traditional medicine is a system of medicine in the same way that Western medicine is a system, in the same way naturopathic medicine is a system,” says Dr. Karen Hill, who shares a practice with traditional healer Elva Jamieson on the Six Nations of the Grand River First Nation in Ohsweken, Ont. “Because it doesn’t look the same, I think physicians don’t know how to receive it.”
  • Hill, who is Mohawk, believes a clash of cultures influenced the decision of doctors at the McMaster Children’s Hospital in Hamilton, Ont., to ask Judge Gethin Edward of the Ontario Court of Justice to compel cancer treatment for J.J, an 11-year-old Mohawk girl who has acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Although Hill neither confirmed nor denied that she and Jamieson are treating J.J., Hill did testify in the case. Edward ruled in November 2014 that J.J.’s mother, the girl’s substitute decision-maker, had a constitutionally guaranteed right to practise traditional medicine.
  • On Jan. 19, 2015, Makayla Sault, another 11-year-old Aboriginal girl with leukemia, died following a stroke. Makayla and her family, who are from the neighbouring Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation, had also stopped chemotherapy at McMaster. Makayla’s death has drawn international attention to the issue of consent to treatment and whether Aboriginal rights may potentially clash with a child’s best interests and right to life.
  • Both cases have also raised the question of how doctors should respond to an Aboriginal patient’s desire to pursue traditional or other types of medicine over Western medical treatment. “The big message is that this is not just about medical choice,” Hill told CMAJ. “This is about indigenous people reclaiming their wholeness as people. This isn’t about religion; it isn’t about choice. It’s about being who we are.”
  • Choosing one type of treatment over the other is not the only option, say Hill and Dr. Veronica McKinney, a Cree/Métis woman who is on the executive of the Indigenous Physicians Association of Canada.
  • “More and more people are coming to understand that you can have a blend (of treatments),” says McKinney, who is the director of Northern Medical Services at the University of Saskatchewan. “I have a number of patients where this is the case, and I support that.”
  • In J.J.’s case, McMaster made an effort to permit the family to pursue its traditional practices, says Daphne Jarvis, McMaster’s lawyer. “There was a ceremony that took place in the hospital that the family arranged and they seemed very appreciative of that,” she told CMAJ. “With respect to the use of traditional medicines, I think the caveat was: ‘as long as it doesn’t interfere with the chemotherapy’ — so that was perceived to be hierarchical, which it wasn’t intended to be.”
  • Hill, who graduated from McMaster University medical school, and Jamieson, who apprenticed with her mother on Six Nations, often work together with patients to plan a combination of traditional and Western medical treatment.
  • Practitioners need a trusting relationship with their patients that includes self-reflection, respect for other world views, and reciprocity that acknowledges the patient’s contribution to healing, says McKinney. “When you are the one making all the decisions aside from the patient, you’re going off-track. It doesn’t matter whether we’re talking cancer or high blood pressure ... that completely does not match patient-centred care.”
  • There are few medical institutions in Canada, McKinney says, that support the positive contributions of traditional medicine, which includes plant-based medicines, ritual and ceremonies, alongside efforts to establish mental, spiritual, emotional and physical balance.
  • Doctors continue to have a responsibility to report similar situations to child welfare authorities, says Jarvis. Those authorities should conduct sufficient investigation to satisfy themselves that families are pursuing a sincerely held practice of indigenous medicine, she adds. It’s up to child welfare authorities, not doctors, to determine how sincerely held are the beliefs in traditional medicine, she cautions.
  • It was clear during the hearing that J.J’s mother is a traditional Mohawk woman accessing indigenous medicines within the Six Nations community, Jarvis says. She calls media reports about the alternative treatment the family was pursuing at the Hippocrates Health Institute in Florida, “a red herring.” J.J.’s care in Florida was in addition to the traditional treatment she was getting on Six Nations, not instead of it, Jarvis says. Hill also visited the institute to help re-establish a connection to plant-based food, which is an important part of traditional healing.
  • Indigenous physicians can bridge the gap in understanding between the traditional and Western medical systems, says Hill. She hopes to help design a protocol for physicians about beginning that dialogue with patients and traditional healers.
  • Hill understands the angst both Makayla and J.J.’s cases have caused. But she hopes the medical community will understand that Makayla’s choice was about more than just medical treatment.
  • “It is about living and being Indigenous people, trusting our own medicines in the way we did for centuries before Western medicine. Behaving as indigenous people is what the mainstream finds difficult to understand and what the medical community needs to start working out in relationship with our people.”
9More

Doctors' watchdog can't police itself; College of Physicians slow to censure medical st... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Tue Apr 14 2015
  • We heard more rich evidence yesterday that the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario can't be trusted to police themselves. Case in point: Dr. George Doodnaught is still a doctor. He's not practising, since he's in jail for sexually assaulting no fewer than 21 patients who were strapped to operating tables and semi-conscious from the anesthetic he'd given them, before slipping his penis or tongue into their mouths or rubbing their breasts. After a 76-day trial, Superior Court Justice David McCombs found the evidence of his guilt "overwhelming," convicted him of 21 counts of sexual assault and sentenced him to 10 years in prison last year.
  • What has the college done? Nothing. Doodnaught has appealed the case, and the college is waiting for the outcome before scheduling its own hearing on whether or not Doodnaught should be stripped of his licence - which, by the way, is mandatory under the "zero tolerance" Regulated Health Professions Act. Does the college think its doctor-led panel will better understand the case than an Ontario Court judge? Two of Doodnaught's victims spoke before the two-member task force examining the sexual assault of patients, yet again, for the Ontario government. The downtown hotel conference room where the hearings are held was embarrassingly empty, again. The women who spoke were angry and upset.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • They were angry that victims like them had not been personally informed about the hearings (good point). They were upset that previous patient complaints of sexual assault about Doodnaught had not been investigated years before they were assaulted (also, good point). And they were furious that doctors who sexually assault their patients are treated differently than bakers who sexually assault their customers, or city staff who sexually assault their colleagues, or anyone else for that matter (I hear you sisters!). "Take it out of the hands of a group of doctors and contact the police like you would do for any other profession in the real world. Medical staff are not gods. They are being treated like gods," said Eli Brooks, who was assaulted by Doodnaught while undergoing liposuction in 2009. "What has happened over and over will continue to happen until they are made criminally responsible." Brooks had the publication ban on her lifted, so I can tell you her name. She believes naming herself as a sexual assault victim will help weaken the crime's stigma. I applaud her for that.
  • I can't tell you the second victim's name. During the preliminary hearings of Doodnaught's trial, she was known simply as D.S. Her case was not, in the end, included among the 21 charges, so has not been proven in court. She tells the story that was the trial's refrain: Doodnaught was the anesthesiologist during her surgery at North York General Hospital in 2009. A screen was raised at her midsection, preventing her from seeing the doctors and nurses working below, but also preventing them from seeing Doodnaught at her head. She was barely conscious when she protested him touching her breasts, she said. She awoke to the sight of his penis, she said.
  • During the trial, it emerged that no fewer than four of Doonaught's colleagues at North York General Hospital had received complaints from patients who said Doodnaught had sexually assaulted them while they were in semi-conscious states. The complaints started in 2006 - four years before Doodnaught was charged. The four were surgeons and anesthesiologists. Not one had reported the complaints to anybody - the head of the hospital, the police, the college. North York General's then-chief of anesthesiology, Dr. Stephen Brown, testified that when police came calling about Doodnaught in 2008, he didn't tell them about two previous complaints by patients. Once police finally laid charges, he sent out an email to staff, entered as evidence, that stated: "We have to support George in any way we can during the investigation." (He said in court he had not meant for them to interfere with the police probe.)
  • "He didn't protect us," D.S. said. "Had he come forward, we might have saved many of us." She called on the task force to implement penalties for bystanders - doctors who hear about the sexual assault of patients by other doctors, but do nothing. Brooks went further: "Anyone who covers it up should be legally charged with aiding and abetting a crime." Later, the task force's ever-patient chair, Marilou McPhedran, informed the still-barren room that such a provision already exists. Under the Regulated Health Professions Act of Ontario, health professionals with "reasonable grounds ... to believe that another member of the same or a different college has sexually abused a patient" must file a complaint to their college registrar within 30 days - unless they think the accused will continue sexually abusing patients. Then there is "urgent need for intervention."
  • The penalty for failing to do this is "not more than" $25,000 the first time. The second, it goes up to "not more than $50,000." So, were those four doctors fined by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, you might be wondering - particularly since they testified in criminal court about their failure to alert their college to patients' complaints about Doodnaught sexually assaulting them? No.
  • "The College has not commenced prosecutions ... in relation to a physician failing to make a mandatory report in this matter," CPSO spokesperson Prithi Yelaja wrote me in an email. In fact, in the history of the college, it has never prosecuted any physician for failing to make a mandatory report, she confirmed. Not once. See what I mean? The rules don't need to be changed, they simply have to be enforced by people who can be better trusted: the police. The task force hearings continue on May 8. Catherine Porter can be reached at cporter@thestar.ca.
100More

Senate Social Affairs Committee review of the health accord, Evidence, September 29, 2011 - 0 views

  • Christine Power, Chair, Board of Directors, Association of Canadian Academic Healthcare Organizations
  • eight policy challenges that can be grouped across the headers of community-based and primary health care, health system capacity building and research and applied health system innovation
  • Given that we are seven plus years into the 2004 health accord, we believe it is time to open a dialogue on what a 2014 health accord might look like. Noting the recent comments by the Prime Minister and Minister of Health, how can we improve accountability in overall system performance in terms of value for money?
  • ...97 more annotations...
  • While the access agenda has been the central focal point of the 2004 health accord, it is time to have the 2014 health accord focus on quality, of which access is one important dimension, with the others being effectiveness, safety, efficiency, appropriateness, provider competence and acceptability.
  • we also propose three specific funds that are strategically focused in areas that can contribute to improved access and wait time
  • Can the 2014 health accord act as a catalyst to ensure appropriate post-hospital supportive and preventive care strategies, facilitate integration of primary health care with the rest of the health care system and enable innovative approaches to health care delivery? Is there an opportunity to move forward with new models of primary health care that focus on personal accountability for health, encouraging citizens to work in partnership with their primary care providers and thereby alleviating some of the stress on emergency departments?
  • one in five hospital beds are being occupied by those who do not require hospital care — these are known as alternative level of care patients, or ALC patients
  • the creation of an issue-specific strategically targeted fund designed to move beyond pilot projects and accelerate the creation of primary health care teams — for example, team-based primary health care funds could be established — and the creation of an infrastructure fund, which we call a community-based health infrastructure fund to assist in the development of post-hospital care capacity, coupled with tax policies designed to defray expenses associated with home care
  • consider establishing a national health innovation fund, of which one of its stated objectives would be to promote the sharing of applied health system innovations across the country with the goal of improving the delivery of quality health services. This concept would be closely aligned with the work of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research in developing a strategy on patient oriented research.
  • focus the discussion on what is needed to ensure that Canada is a high performing system with an unshakable focus on quality
  • of the Wait Time Alliance
  • Dr. Simpson
  • the commitment of governments to improve timely access to care is far from being fulfilled. Canadians are still waiting too long to access necessary medical care.
  • Table 1 of our 2011 report card shows how provinces have performed in addressing wait times in the 10-year plan's five priority areas. Of note is the fact that we found no overall change in letter grades this year over last.
  • We believe that addressing the gap in long-term care is the single more important action that could be taken to improve timely access to specialty care for Canadians.
  • The WTA has developed benchmarks and targets for an additional seven specialties and uses them to grade progress.
  • the lack of attention given to timely access to care beyond the initial five priority areas
  • all indications are that wait times for most specialty areas beyond the five priority areas are well beyond the WTA benchmarks
  • we are somewhat encouraged by the progress towards standardized measuring and public reporting on wait times
  • how the wait times agenda could be supported by a new health accord
  • governments must improve timely access to care beyond the initial five priority areas, as a start, by adopting benchmarks for all areas of specialty care
  • look at the total wait time experience
  • The measurements we use now do not include the time it takes to see a family physician
  • a patient charter with access commitments
  • Efficiency strategies, such as the use of referral guidelines and computerized clinical support systems, can contribute significantly to improving access
  • In Ontario, for example, ALC patients occupy one in six hospital beds
  • Our biggest fear is government complacency in the mistaken belief that wait times in Canada largely have been addressed. It is time for our country to catch up to the other OECD countries with universal, publicly funded health care systems that have much timelier access to medical care than we do.
  • The progress that has been made varies by province and by region within provinces.
  • Dr. Michael Schull, Senior Scientist, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
  • Many provinces in Canada, and Ontario in particular, have made progress since the 2004 health accord following large investments in health system performance that targeted the following: linking more people with family doctors; organizational changes in primary care, such as the creation of inter-professional teams and important changes to remuneration models for physicians, for example, having a roster of patients; access to select key procedures like total hip replacement and better access to diagnostic tests like computer tomography. As well, we have seen progress in reducing waiting times in emergency departments in some jurisdictions in Canada and improving access to community-based alternatives like home care for seniors in place of long-term care. These have been achieved through new investments such as pay for performance incentives and policy change. They have had some important successes, but the work is incomplete.
  • Examples of the ongoing challenges that we face include substantial proportions of the population who do not have easy access to a family doctor when needed, even if they have a family doctor; little progress on improving rates of eligible patients receiving important preventive care measures such as pap smears and mammograms; continued high utilization of emergency departments and walk-in clinics compared to other countries; long waits, which remain a problem for many types of care. For example, in emergency departments, long waits have been shown to result in poor patient experience and increased risk of adverse outcomes, including deaths.
  • Another example is unclear accountability and antiquated mechanisms to ensure smooth transitions in care between providers and provider organizations. An example of a care transition problem is the frequent lack of adequate follow-up with a family doctor or a specialist after an emergency department visit because of exacerbation of a chronic disease.
  • A similar problem exists following discharge from hospital.
  • Poorly integrated and coordinated care leads to readmission to hospital
  • This happens despite having tools to predict which patients are at higher risk and could benefit from more intensive follow-up.
  • Perverse incentives and disincentives exist, such as no adjustment in primary care remuneration to care for the sickest patients, thereby disincenting doctors to roster patients with chronic illnesses.
  • Critical reforms needed to achieve health system integration include governance, information enablers and incentives.
  • we need an engaged federal government investing in the development and implementation of a national health system integration agenda
  • complete absence of any mention of Canada as a place where innovative health system reform was happening
  • Dr. Brian Postl, Dean of Medicine, University of Manitoba, as an individual
  • the five key areas of interest were hips and knees, radiology, cancer care, cataracts and cardiac
  • no one is quite sure where those five areas came from
  • There was no scientific base or evidence to support any of the benchmarks that were put in place.
  • I think there is much less than meets the eye when we talk about what appropriate benchmarks are.
  • The one issue that was added was hip fractures in the process, not just hip and knee replacement.
  • in some areas, when wait-lists were centralized and grasped systematically, the list was reduced by 30 per cent by the act of going through it with any rigour
  • When we started, wait-lists were used by most physicians as evidence that they were best of breed
  • That continues, not in all areas, but in many areas, to be a key issue.
  • The capacity of physicians to give up waiting lists into more of a pool was difficult because they saw it very much, understandably, as their future income.
  • There were almost no efforts in the country at the time to use basic queuing theory
  • We made a series of recommendations, including much more work on the research about benchmarks. Can we actually define a legitimate benchmark where, if missed, the evidence would be that morbidity or mortality is increasing? There remains very little work done in that area, and that becomes a major problem in moving forward into other benchmarks.
  • the whole process needed to be much more multidisciplinary in its focus and nature, much more team-based
  • the issue of appropriateness
  • Some research suggests the number of cataracts being performed in some jurisdictions is way beyond what would be expected to be needed
  • the accord did a very good job with what we do, but a much poorer job around how we do it
  • Most importantly, the use of single lists is needed. This is still not in place in most jurisdictions.
  • the accord has bought a large amount of volume and a little bit of change. I think any future accords need to lever any purchase of volume or anything else with some capacity to purchase change.
  • We have seen volumes increase substantially across all provinces, without major detriment to other surgical or health care areas. I think it is a mediocre performance. Volume has increased, but we have not changed how we do business very much. I think that has to be the focus of any future change.
  • with the last accord. Monies have gone into provinces and there has not really been accountability. Has it made a difference? We have not always been able to tell that.
  • There is no doubt that the 2004-14 health accord has had a positive influence on health care delivery across the country. It has not been an unqualified success, but nonetheless a positive force.
  • It is at these transition points, between the emergency room and being admitted to hospital or back to the family physician, where the efficiencies are lost and where the expectations are not met. That is where medical errors are generated. The target for improvement is at these transitions of care.
  • I am not saying to turn off the tap.
  • the government has announced, for example, a 6 per cent increase over the next two or three years. Is that a sufficient financial framework to deal with?
  • Canada currently spends about the same amount as OECD countries
  • All of those countries are increasing their spending annually above inflation, and Canada will have to continue to do that.
  • Many of our physicians are saying these five are not the most important anymore.
  • they are not our top five priority areas anymore and frankly never were
  • this group of surgeons became wealthy in a short period of time because of the $5.5 billion being spent, and the envy that caused in every other surgical group escalated the costs of paying physicians because they all went back to the market saying, "You have left us out," and that became the focus of negotiation and the next fee settlements across the country. It was an unintended consequence but a very real one.
  • if the focus were to shift more towards system integration and accountability, I believe we are not going to lose the focus on wait times. We have seen in some jurisdictions, like Ontario, that the attention to wait times has gone beyond those top five.
  • people in hospital beds who do not need to be there, because a hospital bed is so expensive compared to the alternatives
  • There has been a huge infusion of funds and nursing home beds in Ontario, Nova Scotia and many places.
  • Ontario is leading the way here with their home first program
  • There is a need for some nursing home beds, but I think our attention needs to switch to the community resources
  • they wind up coming to the emergency room for lack of anywhere else to go. We then admit them to hospital to get the test faster. The weekend goes by, and they are in bed. No one is getting them up because the physiotherapists are not working on the weekend. Before you know it, this person who is just functioning on the edge is now institutionalized. We have done this to them. Then they get C. difficile and, before you know, it is a one-way trip and they become ALC.
  • I was on the Kirby committee when we studied the health care system, and Canadians were not nearly as open to changes at that time as I think they are in 2011.
  • there is no accountability in terms of the long-term care home to take those patients in with any sort of performance metric
  • We are not all working on the same team
  • One thing I heard on the Aging Committee was that we should really have in place something like the Veterans Independence Program
  • some people just need someone to make a meal or, as someone mentioned earlier, shovel the driveway or mow the lawn, housekeeping types of things
  • I think the risks of trying to tie every change into innovation, if we know the change needs to happen — and there is lots of evidence to support it — it stops being an innovation at that point and it really is a change. The more we pretend everything is an innovation, the more we start pilot projects we test in one or two places and they stay as pilot projects.
  • the PATH program. It is meant to be palliative and therapeutic harmonization
  • has been wildly successful and has cut down incredibly on lengths of stay and inappropriate care
  • Where you see patient safety issues come to bear is often in transition points
  • When you are not patient focused, you are moving patients as entities, not as patients, between units, between activities or between functions. If we focus on the patient in that movement, in that journey they have through the health system, patient safety starts improving very dramatically.
  • If you require a lot of home care that is where the gap is
  • in terms of emergency room wait times, Quebec is certainly among the worst
  • Ontario has been quite successful over the past few years in terms of emergency wait times. Ontario’s target is that, on average, 90 per cent of patients with serious problems spend a maximum of eight hours in the emergency room.
  • One of the real opportunities, building up to the accord, are for governments to define the six or ten or twelve questions they want answered, and then ensure that research is done so that when we head into an accord, there is evidence to support potential change, that we actually have some ideas of what will work in moving forward future changes.
  • We are all trained in silos and then expected to work together after we are done training. We are now starting to train them together too.
  • The physician does not work for you. The physician does not work for the health system. The physician is a private practitioner who bills directly to the health care system. He does not work for the CEO of the hospital or for the local health region. Therefore, your control and the levers you have with that individual are limited.
  • the customer is always right, the person who is getting the health care
  • It is refreshing to hear something other than the usual "we need more money, we absolutely need more money for that". Without denying the fact that, since the population and the demographics are going to require it, we have to continue making significant investments in health, I think we have to be realistic and come up with new ways of doing things.
  • The cuts in the 1990s certainly had something to do with the decision to cut support staff because they were not a priority and cuts had to be made. I think we now know it was a mistake and we are starting to reinvest in those basic services.
  • How do you help patients navigate a system that is so complex? How do you coordinate appointments, ensure the appointments are necessary and make sure that the consultants are communicating with each other so one is not taking care of the renal problem and the other the cardiac problem, but they are not communicating about the patient? That is frankly a frequent issue in the health system.
  • There may be a patient who requires Test Y, X, and Z, and most patients require that package. It is possible to create a one-stop shop kind of model for patient convenience and to shorten overall wait times for a lot of patients that we do not see. There are some who are very complicated and who have to be navigated through the system. This is where patient navigators can perhaps assist.
  • There have been some good studies that have looked at CT and MRI utilization in Ontario and have found there are substantial portions where at least the decision to initiate the test was questionable, if not inappropriate, by virtue of the fact that the results are normal, it was a repeat of prior tests that have already been done or the clinical indication was not there.
  • Designing a system to implement gates, so to speak, so that you only perform tests when appropriate, is a challenge. We know that in some instances those sorts of systems, where you are dealing with limited access to, say, CT, and so someone has to review the requisition and decide on its appropriateness, actually acts as a further obstacle and can delay what are important tests.
  • The simple answer is that we do not have a good approach to determining the appropriateness of the tests that are done. This is a critical issue with respect to not just diagnostic tests but even operative procedures.
  • the federal government has very little information about how the provinces spend money, other than what the provinces report
  • should the money be conditional? I would say absolutely yes.
16More

FREE SPEECH; Speech therapy can prevent a lifetime of struggles, but an early start is ... - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Mon Aug 31 2015
  • Four-year-old Eddie Hopkins is focused on a game of I spy. The object of his attention is a tube of lipstick in a picture. Can he say what it is? "Lipstick," he says, but it sounds more like "lit-git." Maybe lipstick is too hard. Can he say stick?
  • "Sti-ck," he says, hesitating before the k sound. One more try. "Sti-ick!" he shouts confidently, dividing the word into two. It seems like a small accomplishment, but for Eddie, it's the first and major step toward speaking normally. Like tens of thousands of children in Ontario, Eddie is in need of speech therapy. He has problems pronouncing the hard k sound, known as an unvoiced velar stop. He often switches it with the voiced velar stop, which most people know as the soft g sound, bringing him from "stick" to "stig." He also switches his sh and s sounds, and has issues with pronouncing two consonants together, such as the "cl" in "clown."
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • The average number of people on wait lists as of May, 2015, is 611. Some regions have shorter wait lists, such as Toronto Central, which currently has zero. Others are in the four digits, such as the Central East CCAC, which stretches east from Victoria Park Avenue in Scarborough and north to Algonquin Park, and has 1,516 children waiting for speech therapy. Waiting that long can have a large impact on a child's ability to do well in school, according to Anila Punnoose, a director of Speech-Language and Audiology Canada. During the months or years children are waiting to get speech services, they can quickly fall behind in school, she said. A 1996 study found children with language deficits are more likely to experience social difficulties including interacting with their peers, which impacts their behaviour. Other studies have shown that children who don't get speech therapy early are at a greater risk of problems in their academic performance and mental health.
  • A lot of speech problems carry over to literacy, because a knowledge of speech sounds is crucial when learning to read, Punnoose said. "It's all about what you hear in those sounds. ... Do you know the beginning sounds in that word? A child who doesn't have good phonological awareness doesn't understand any of that," she said. When looking at school performance, Punnoose said early struggles carry through to later years. A child with speech problems who has difficulties learning in the early years won't be able to build on those lessons in later years as effectively as their peers, she said. Early intervention can mitigate and prevent those problems, she said. "If children are having severe difficulties with speech in kindergarten, it's a predictor that there's going to be academic difficulties, and especially reading and writing difficulties, by Grade 3," she said.
  • Jocelyn Fedyczko, Eddie's speech pathologist, has worked in a range that includes children from preschool all the way to teenagers. She said early intervention is crucial with young children such as Eddie. "The earlier you can help a child out, the more progress you see," she said. When a child gets to the top of the wait list, they get assessed again, and receive a block of treatment, usually around 10 or 12 sessions, says Peggy Allen, president of the Ontario Association of Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists (OSLA). That's often not enough to treat even minor to moderate issues such as Eddie's. Fedyczko said she can get through two to three sounds in that time, depending on the child. Many children have problems with more sounds than that, she said. But when a child finishes their block of treatment and needs more, because they haven't worked through all the sounds, for example, they go back to the bottom of the wait list, Allen said.
  • A spokesperson for the Toronto Central CCAC said they do not have an upper limit to the number of sessions per block assigned by a speech-language pathologist. The pathologist determines three goals for a child to achieve and assigns the number of sessions according to that. If after these sessions more goals are identified, the child is re-referred to the program, the spokesperson said. Parents who are worried about the impact waiting can have on their child can go to private clinics, if they have coverage or can afford the sessions out of pocket. Trish Bentley, Eddie's mother, decided to go for private therapy with Eddie's older brother Oliver. He was put on a six-month wait list for speech problems slightly more acute than Eddie's.
  • B.C.: Children's speech therapy is organized through the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Children and Family Development (MCFD) and through the Ministry of Education by way of school districts. Children are divided between preschool and school age. Preschool children go through regional health authorities. School-age children go through the school boards, but the pathologists there will often offer consultative services, rather than oneon-one speech therapy. B.C. also has a "no-wait-list" policy for children with autism, which translates to parents getting around $22,000 a year for therapy until the age of six, and $6,000 a year after that. Alberta: Health Services is in charge of speech therapy in that province. It offers both a preschool and a school program. The school program, unlike Ontario's, is done completely through the schools, with no CCAC-type system to refer out to. Saskatchewan: The school districts are responsible for speech therapy. Each school district divides up services slightly differently, though they all differentiate between children under three years, from three to five years, and from six to 18 years.
  • But the problems go deeper than a lack of funding, according to Allen. She said many of the issues in Ontario stem back to a series of agreements in the 1980s between the provincial Ministry of Long-Term Care, the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Community and Social Services. These agreements divided up who is in charge of different treatments, between the school boards and the CCACs. At the time of their creation, these agreements made sense, but times and needs have changed, she said. "It's difficult when ministries make agreements that are frozen in time. It's very difficult to provide the kind of services that we all expect and want Ontarians to receive," she said. Dividing up the services is necessary when trying to manage resources, but the fragmentation is hurting children more than it's helping, Punnoose said.
  • Dividing services by language issues and other issues doesn't make sense when treating a child, she said. "You shouldn't be splitting up the kid," she said. Punnoose said she wants to see speech therapy come together under one roof. It would mean co-operation from all three ministries, as well as a major reorganization of the funding, but she believes it would be a better model for children. "Students are in schools the better waking part of their lives. Why wouldn't we have the services right there in an authentic environment where it's totally accessible," she said. There are changes coming.
  • Last December, the Ontario government announced more funding for preschool speech and language programs, as well as efforts to integrate speech services better, through its Special Needs Strategy. Punnoose says it's a good step. "The government recognizes that the system was broken," she said. For now, the choice for parents in many CCACs will be between long wait lists and paying for private service. Hunter-Trottier said many parents, even those with coverage, don't know about the latter option. "We sometimes get parents here in tears, saying, 'Oh my goodness, the services here, I wish I had known about that a year ago,' " she said. Bentley said she won't be looking at public services for Eddie, as she's happy with the service she gets at Canoe. "I'd be open to it, but I'm not going to actively seek that out," she said.
  • For Eddie, what matters is the progress he makes. Within 10 minutes of his trouble saying "lipstick," he was opening up a treasure chest, with a key. With little prompting, he used the same technique as before, separating the sounds of the word. "Kuh-ey," he said. Could he try it all together? He pauses for a second. "Key," he says, almost flawlessly, beaming at his success. SPEECH THERAPY IN EACH PROVINCE
  • Speech therapy, like all healthcare matters, is regulated differently in each province and territory in Canada. Information on how each system works is difficult to come by. But generally, most provinces have very similar systems - and challenges - according to Joanne Charlebois, CEO of Speech-Language and Audiology Canada. Charlebois said Ontario's wait times are probably worse than those in other provinces, but she's spoken to people across Canada who tell her similar stories. Here's a breakdown of how it works across the country. Ontario: Speech therapy for children falls under the responsibility of three ministries: the Ministry of Long-Term Care, the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Community and Social Services. Children in Ontario are divided by age and by the nature of their speech problem. Children under school age qualify for Ontario's preschool speech and language program. Once in school, those children with language problems - major problems speaking or understanding words or sentences - go to a school speech pathologist, while any other problems, such as pronunciation, stuttering, voice and articulation are referred to the Community Care Access Centres, which employ contract speech pathologists.
  • Rather than wait those six months, Bentley took him to Canoe. "As time went on, we said enough of this, he's going to be past the point of catching the problem," she said. For families who don't have coverage and who can't afford private services, though, the only option is to wait. Finding the cause of the long waits is hard, but one thing is certain: It's not due to a lack of speech pathologists, according to Shanda Hunter-Trottier, the owner of S.L. Hunter Speechworks, another private clinic in Toronto. She used to have problems finding qualified speech pathologists, but now she's facing the opposite problem. "I've been practising for 26 years. ... In the last five years, [I] have more resumes than I can keep track of," she said. Rather, she says, it's a large web of problems that slows down the system. First among these is a lack of public funding. "There's a lot of speech pathologists that don't have jobs, but these places aren't hiring. The cutbacks have been atrocious," she said.
  • Manitoba: School districts are also in charge here. The inschool speech-language pathologists offer services from classroom-based programming to individual therapy. Quebec: The system here is more like Ontario's. Speechtherapy services are offered through the local community service centres (CLSC), similar to Ontario's CCACs. The CLSCs are not obliged to provide speech therapy in English, though some, especially in areas with a large anglophone population, usually do. Nova Scotia: The province has 28 speech and hearing centres, with 35 pathologists in total. They assess and provide treatment for children and adults. School boards in the province also have speech-language pathologists who also have a teacher's certificate.
  • Prince Edward Island: The province provides free speech services for children until they enter school. Northwest Territories: Speech therapists are only able to visit some remote communities once or twice a year. Instead, the province offers a service called Telespeech, where pathologists can help people without having to be physically present. Nunavut: The territory had no speech pathologists in 2013, according to Statistics Canada.
12More

Hospital re-admission rates debated - Infomart - 0 views

  • Smiths Falls EMC Thu Oct 8 2015
  • A union representing employees at the Perth and Smiths Falls District Hospital (PSFDH) is charging that re-admission rates have risen 16.5 per cent over the past several years. Hospital management, however, is disputing this, pegging the number much lower, at about seven per cent. During a press conference at the Smiths Falls branch of the Royal Canadian Legion on Tuesday, Sept. 29, Michael Hurley, president of the Ontario Council of Hospital Unions (OCHU), said that their statistics were drawn from information stretching from 2009 to 2014 from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, and focused specifically on the PSFDH but also the Brockville General Hospital too.
  • "A re-admission is a system failure," said Hurley. "People who were discharged were coming back in...in significant numbers." John Jackson, president of CUPE (Canadian Union of Public Employees) local 2119, who works at the Perth and Smiths Falls District Hospital, agreed.
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • "Where beds have been cut in the community, there has been a spike in re-admission rates," said Jackson. His own hospital saw 12 beds, six at each site, cut back in 2013. "I can't speak about individual cases," he added, but Mike Rodrigues, vice president of CUPE local 1974, who works at the Kingston General Hospital (KGH), has seen, first-hand, patients being sent home to free up beds at his workplace. "There are two huddles a day," said Rodrigues, where upper management and the hospital's chief executive officer confer at 9:15 a.m. and 2:15 p.m. to discuss "Who can go today? Who can we get out?" when there is "gridlock," at the hospital, such as long waiting room times. "It's difficult," Rodrigues said. But, "you tow the party line. They do what they are told."
  • He conceded that the doctors and nurses likely do a triage of who is best able, of all of the patients on the floor, to go home, but he has seen, in the last 10 years alone, women being sent home 10 to 12 hours after giving birth to a child, whereas, in 2005, that mother could have stayed three to four days in the hospital. Hurley said he has heard of patients who "are not well enough to be sent home...fighting with their doctors," who are trying to discharge them. "A lot of pressure is put on the family," from the hospital administration and doctors, Hurley added, with the hospital threatening to charge families as much as $300 to $1,000 a day for each additional day their loved one remains in hospital - something he says is illegal. He saw such a scenario with his own mother.
  • "She can't stay here," he was told. "'What're you going to do with her?' She died in hospital." Very often, according to Hurley, a patient may acquire a hospital-borne virus while recovering from a surgery, but "people are being moved through the system much more quickly," than they used to be, sometimes without sufficient recovery periods, and then, "the system has a second go at making them better." But this not only causes distress for the family and the health system, but also in the workforce too. "A huge number of people in Ontario do not have paid sick leave," said Hurley. "The personal cost to me (as a returning patient) is significant...It's a health setback, it's a psychological setback."
  • Hurley added that hospitals in both Kingston and Ottawa were experiencing similar re-admission rates. He added that he did not think that it was "entirely valid," to dismiss re-admission rates on the rising number of older people in the area, as Baby Boomers reach their retirement years. "They will try to downplay this," said Hurley, before adding that it was not a problem created at the Smiths Falls or Perth hospital sites themselves. "This is a system problem because they have been starved of funding." As for blaming the issue on the elderly, Hurley said that that was ageism.
  • Jackson lamented that while the hospital administration has tried its best to be as kind as it can with its cuts - with only one outright layoff - getting 12 beds cut from the local hospital system seems to be "how you get rewarded for efficiency." "It's time for the province to start funding the hospitals properly," said Hurley. One way that this could be addressed would be to raise the corporate tax rate. Administration response Later that week, in her office at the Great War Memorial Hospital site of the Perth and Smiths Falls District Hospital, president and chief administrative officer Bev McFarlane held a mini press conference of her own, alongside board chair Richard Schooley, to refute some of the union's allegations, starting with some of their numbers. "There is often another aspect of re-admissions," said Schooley during the interview on Thursday, Oct. 1. A patient could be, theoretically, discharged from hospital after recovering from heart surgery, then be re-admitted two weeks later after falling on some ice while shoveling snow from his driveway. Any admission to hospital within 30 days after a discharge would be counted as a re-admission - even if the cause was not directly related to the initial admission.
  • She hastened to add that her hospital was recently awarded the distinction of being one of the top five hospitals in the province for quick-time responses, for getting patients seen to and into an in-patient bed. According to the hospital's numbers, the occupancy rate for acute care hospital beds was as low as the high 60s per cent over the summer, and in the high 70s per cent this past spring. "You have to look at all of the other indicators," said Mc-Farlane. Schooley also noted that the hospital's admissions have gone up from more than 31,000 in 2009 to more than 37,000 in 2014-15, and that they estimate the real re-admission rate at about seven per cent.
  • How can you deal with more admissions with fewer beds?" asked McFarlane. "We are able to make you feel better in a shorter period of time." Gall bladder surgery used to require a seven-day stay in hospital, she said. Now, it is considered day surgery. "You aren't even admitted," she said. "The business of hospital care has changed over the years. The worst thing you can do is keep someone in an acute care bed when they don't need to be there." As for charging patients who refuse to leave the hospital because they do not believe that they are fully healed yet, Mc-Farlane did admit that "there is a rate that is charged, if there is a reasonable discharge plan and people refuse to leave," but she added that "I don't think we've ever done that here."
  • As for the union's assertion that the hospital had less money on hand, Schooley pointed out that gross hospital revenues rose from $43 million in 2010 to $51 million in 2015. In fact, the LHIN is giving the hospital more money as a type of efficiency bonus, having wrestled five years worth of deficits into a $1.2 million surplus in 2014, with a projected surplus of $1.6 million for 2015. "That's the cushion we are building," said Schooley, in anticipation of the LHIN providing them with less money in the coming years. "In case some of these funding change realities manifest themselves."
  • We have seen increases in our LHIN and Ministry of Health funding," added Schooley.
13More

Children's feeling strained; ER beset by equipment problems, staff shortages and long w... - 0 views

  • Montreal Gazette Wed Aug 19 2015
  • Nearly three months after it opened, the emergency room of the new Montreal Children's Hospital continues to be plagued by a wide array of problems - from a leaking ceiling in one of the treatment rooms to delays in routine blood tests - all of which is compromising patient care and infuriating parents, says an ER nurse with first-hand knowledge of the difficulties.
  • The nurse's account corroborates, in part, the complaints of parents who have said that they've waited for hours and hours to have their child treated only to be turned away because of a shortage of staff. Since it opened on May 24, the ER has often reported more than 200 children each morning who are waiting to be examined by a physician - 25 per cent more than average, according to statistics by the Quebec Health Department.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • The number of "medical incidents" - hospital jargon for treatment errors - has spiked, said the nurse, who agreed to be interviewed on condition that his or her name not be published for fear of reprisals. The nurse said the hospital has prohibited stafffrom speaking to journalists about problems in the ER. In perhaps the most glaring case, a patient who was "gushing blood" arrived by ambulance in the ER and was supposed to undergo a transfusion immediately, but the blood supply was not ready even though it had been ordered in advance 30 minutes earlier, the nurse said. The girl ended up dying because of the severity of her injuries, not the delay in receiving the blood transfusion, but the case nonetheless illustrates the risks involved, the nurse added.
  • A second source described other "botched" cases, including a boy with a badly fractured femur "who sat in the ER for (eight) hours without it being set until someone actually looked at the X-ray." The are multiple causes for the problems, said the ER nurse and the second source - a lack of staff and unfamiliarity with the new medical equipment, lab technicians who haven't been trained in processing pediatric blood samples, and glitches in the facilities. And all those problems have occurred amid cost-cutting imposed by the provincial government.
  • "It's a zoo, it's dangerous," the ER nurse told the Montreal Gazette. "Before we moved in, we were told three things: the new ER was going to be more patient-centred; the doctors, nurses and clerks would be working better together; and it was supposed to be more comfortable. I haven't seen any of those things. Nobody works together because we're all preoccupied with our own things. We're running around like dogs. For me, it's falling apart. Patients' lives are in danger."
  • Officials at the Montreal Children's denied that lives are in jeopardy, but acknowledged that there have been problems in the processing of lab samples, some staffing shortages as well as glitches. At the same time, the medical team has been treating an unseasonably high number of patients with serious illnesses, said Dr. Harley Eisman, director of the emergency department. "I think we all recognize that moving to a new house is a big deal for everybody, and actually, our emergency department has had some significant cases," Eisman said. "We've dealt with many sick children over the past couple of weeks. We've had pretty brisk numbers as well. It hasn't been a quiet summer for us."
  • Lyne St-Martin, nurse manager at the Children's ER, said although "we have occasional shortages (of nurses), for the most part our quotas are met and our nursing staffis rather stable." Still, St-Martin warned that staff and patients will have to make adjustments for months to come at the Glen site, following the Children's move there from its old address on Tupper St.
  • "I do want to highlight that we transitioned three months ago, and that in speaking to other hospitals that have actually moved as well, they spoke about a one-year transition time where there is a very steep adaptation, and it will continue for several months to come," St-Martin said. "So none of this is surprising." Among the problems identified by the ER nurse:
  • At one point, water started pouring from a pipe in the ceiling of one of the treatment rooms. Staff closed the room and protected the medical equipment, but the leak hasn't been repaired yet. In the meantime, staffcan't use the sinks in the adjoining rooms to wash their hands. Eisman said there are other treatment rooms available and the ER flow hasn't been hampered. An emergency psychiatric room for agitated adolescent patients - some of whom are suicidal - has a bathroom that locks from inside and can't be opened by staff, the nurse said. There have been two cases where patients locked themselves in the bathroom and security was called but the guards arrived late. Eisman said that there is now a protocol in place to post a guard next to the bathroom in such cases. He added that glitches like the bathroom lock are being addressed quickly, although some parts are on back order.
  • Some of the lab techs, who used to work at the old Royal Victoria Hospital, have not been trained fully to process blood samples for children, resulting in delays as long as four hours for medical issues that must be addressed immediately, the nurse said. Eisman responded that "when we opened we certainly raised issues about lab performance. We opened a line of communication with the lab and were immediately on it and the lab performance has improved dramatically."
  • The Children's ER is consistently understaffed by nurses, and yet more than a dozen have not yet been fully trained to perform all tasks in the department, and there have been delays "in working up infants for signs of meningitis," the nurse said. What's more, many ER nurses are assigned to accompany patients on other floors, resulting in longer waits for emergency patients. As a consequence, frustrated parents have ended up shouting at nurses in the ER. Some of the nurses have reacted by seeking solace in the bathroom and crying in private for up to half an hour.
  • St-Marin said the ER nurses have been trained to deal with parents who are in crisis, and added "that our numbers show that (patients) are not waiting longer. In fact, we're tending to our sicker patients faster." She did not cite any statistics. The ER nurse accused the McGill University Health Centre of mismanagement, saying it had been planning the Montreal Children's move for years but has not trained staffproperly in using some of the new equipment. For example, some X-ray technicians continue to use portable X-ray machines rather than the new equipment in the ER. The MUHC has also balked at paying nurses to work overtime, yet the ER has ordered great quantities of rarely-used IV filters at $500 a box that sit mostly unused on shelves, the nurse added. aderfel@montrealgazette.com twitter.com/Aaron_Derfel
15More

St. Michael's probes executive after role in fraud revealed; Hospital unaware of kickba... - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Tue Sep 15 2015
  • One of Canada's most prominent hospitals has launched a probe into the conduct of a top executive after a Globe and Mail investigation uncovered his involvement in a scheme to defraud a Toronto university. Toronto's St. Michael's Hospital said it is reviewing the tenure of Vas Georgiou - a senior executive hired in 2013 to oversee construction of the hospital's planned $300-million patient centre. The hospital said it was unaware when it hired Mr. Georgiou that, when he was working for Infrastructure Ontario, he had issued false invoices that were used in a kickback scheme at York University.
  • As a result of The Globe's inquiries, Infrastructure Ontario will also conduct an examination of Mr. Georgiou's six years at the provincial government procurement agency. One reason St. Michael's was unaware of Mr. Georgiou's involvement in the York fraud, The Globe's investigation has determined, is that, although at least one Infrastructure Ontario official knew about it, that information apparently was not shared with anyone. The hiring of Mr. Georgiou raises questions about whether former executives of Ontario's procurement agency withheld this vital information from officials who ought to have known - including Infrastructure Ontario's own board of directors.
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • Mr. Georgiou, 51, is a long-time senior public servant. Between 2006 and 2012, he held various executive positions at Infrastructure Ontario, the procurement agency that was set up to administer the McGuinty government's ambitious plans to restore the province's outdated infrastructure through public-private partnerships. He was a project manager on the construction of several major projects, including some of the facilities for this summer's Pan Am and Parapan Games, eventually rising to the role of chief administrative officer. How he ended up admitting he issued false invoices - and why that information was not passed on by at least one of his former colleagues at Infrastructure Ontario - dates back to 2009, after a whistleblower complained to management at York about questionable invoices.
  • Court records show the scheme required Mr. Georgiou to invoice the university, through two family-owned companies, for work that those companies never performed. After cashing York's cheques, he passed on about $40,000 of the total $65,000 paid by York to an intermediary who was connected to a facilities official at the university. Mr. Georgiou said he kept $25,000 to declare for income tax purposes. "Once these events came to light, I fully co-operated with the authorities and counsel for York University, and I assisted them with their investigation. In addition, I ensured that the party who requested the invoices, repaid the entire amount to York University," he said in the statement. He did not address questions about what he told St. Michael's, if anything, about his role in the scheme.
  • St. Michael's and Infrastructure Ontario have ordered forensic audits. "These swift and prudent actions have been taken by the Board of Directors and Management to preserve and protect the public trust invested in St. Michael's Hospital," a statement from St. Michael's said. In its own statement, Infrastructure Ontario said it was "very troubled" by some of the facts The Globe presented to four of its officials in an interview. "The activity in question goes against everything [Infrastructure Ontario] stands for," said Bert Clark, the agency's chief executive, and Linda Robinson, vice-chair of Infrastructure Ontario's board. Mr. Georgiou, who has been placed on a leave of absence from the hospital, said in an e-mail that The Globe had not provided him enough time to give proper answers to about 40 questions it e-mailed to him last Wednesday. In a statement, he said he never profited from the "exercise" at York and stressed that he was never charged criminally for his role in the false invoice scheme.
  • York investigated and concluded it had been the victim of a $1.2-million kickback scheme involving false invoices for nonexistent construction and maintenance work. A forensic audit determined that between 2007 and 2010, the university cut cheques to eight different companies for services that were never rendered. The York investigation found that two of those companies, Arsenal Facilities Consultants Inc. and Toronto Engineering Company, were connected to Mr. Georgiou. (He was the listed officer and director of AFC, and the other company was owned by his wife and her parents.) Mr. Georgiou and his lawyer, Gary Clewley, agreed to meet with auditors in February of 2011, and Mr. Georgiou admitted writing three false invoices totalling $64,800 between the two companies. The Globe has obtained a transcript of this meeting, which was marked "confidential" but included in court filings. Mr. Georgiou created paperwork showing that AFC did $22,000 worth of door lock repairs in November, 2007. In February, and then again in April, 2008, he drew up documents claiming that TECO completed a total of $42,800 worth of watermain work.
  • He wrote these invoices, he told investigators, at the request of a friend who had nothing to do with the university, a parking industry executive named Luigi Lato. According to Mr. Georgiou, Mr. Lato told him maintenance work had been performed and he was hoping Mr. Georgiou could create invoices for that work. But for reasons Mr. Lato never explained, Mr. Georgiou said, whoever did the work did not issue their own invoices. Mr. Georgiou said he believed Mr. Lato was doing a "favour" for a friend at York who needed to pay for the work. A lawyer and an auditor for York pressed Mr. Georgiou on why the companies that actually did this work would not, or could not, issue invoices, and Mr. Georgiou said he did not know.
  • "There were no details provided to me," he explained at one point. Pressed further, he said, "I didn't ask any questions." York paid AFC and TECO, but Mr. Georgiou told investigators he did not keep the money. He withheld about $25,000 to declare as income tax for both companies, which he said he paid. As for the rest of the money, he made two trips to see Mr. Lato in which he paid him a total of about $40,000 in cash. Mr. Lato could not be reached for comment.
  • William McDowell, a lawyer acting for York, asked Mr. Georgiou how the teller at his bank reacted when he withdrew $14,500 in cash for Mr. Lato's first instalment: "Doesn't your banker kind of squint when you go in and ask for $14,500 in cash?" Mr. Georgiou replied: "I didn't go into the bank and ask for $14,500 in cash, you know, like in one shot. I had, you know, some cash at home, went to the bank for some cash..." About a year later, on Jan. 26, 2012, York filed a statement of claim against all of the people and companies it believed had defrauded the university, including Mr. Georgiou. The same day, the university's general counsel, Harriet Lewis, met with a senior executive at Infrastructure Ontario, Bill Ralph, who at the time was the procurement agency's chief risk officer, both York and IO said in separate statements. Ms. Lewis informed Mr. Ralph that York had launched a lawsuit against Mr. Georgiou and others because of what the internal investigation uncovered.
  • Mr. Ralph did not respond to requests for comment. Two weeks after the meeting, Mr. Georgiou suddenly resigned. A few days later, the CEO of Infrastructure Ontario, David Livingston, announced in a company-wide e-mail that Mr. Georgiou was "leaving." The departure e-mail made reference to "various personal and family matters" Mr. Georgiou needed to address. "I know it was a tough decision for him, but I admire him for making it." Mr. Livingston did not respond to repeated requests for comment e-mailed to him and to his lawyer. After leaving IO, Mr. Livingston was appointed chief of staff in May, 2012, to Dalton McGuinty, then premier of Ontario. Mr. Livingston has been accused by Ontario Provincial Police of orchestrating a plan to purge government records after the controversial cancellation of two power plants. He has denied through his lawyer that he did anything wrong.
  • Employment lawyer Natalie MacDonald said a chief risk officer should give the board of directors any information that could damage the organization's reputation. A risk officer has a "duty to inform the board so it can make an informed decision," Ms. MacDonald said, speaking generally. But according to Infrastructure Ontario's organization chart, the chief risk officer reports directly to the CEO rather than to the board. In an interview last Wednesday, Ms. Robinson, the board vicechair, said the news that Mr. Georgiou had, at one time, been named a defendant in the lawsuit and admitted writing false invoices never made its way to the agency's board.
  • In April of 2012, Mr. Georgiou and Mr. Lato signed a settlement agreement with York that required them to pay restitution - the amount has not been disclosed in public documents - which Mr. Georgiou said in his statement to The Globe was covered by the "party" who requested the invoices. One of the conditions of the settlement is that York "shall not make any statements to the media" about the agreement or about allegations levelled in York's claim, except to say that Mr. Georgiou co-operated.
  • Seven months later, St. Michael's board meeting minutes show that it had identified a preferred candidate to replace its chief administrative officer, and in the New Year, Mr. Georgiou officially started his new job. In its statement, St. Michael's said an external search firm was enlisted to identify Mr. Georgiou, and a separate firm conducted reference interviews. The issues at York were "never disclosed by Mr. Georgiou," St. Michael's statement said.
  • In his statement to The Globe, Mr. Georgiou said he has led the hospital in securing government funding, as well as capital redevelopment funding. "During my tenure at St. Michael's we have achieved tremendous results for the hospital both in the excellence of our hospital's performance as well in the success of our redevelopment project."
7More

UN debates 'apocalyptic' threat of superbugs; Drug-resistant illnesses kill 700,000 peo... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Wed Sep 21 2016
  • Today in New York City, superbugs are taking over the United Nations. At the UN headquarters, the 71st General Assembly will devote an entire day to antimicrobial resistance - the fourth time in history a health topic has been discussed at the annual gathering. Other health issues that have reached this level of global attention include high-profile killers like HIV, Ebola and noncommunicable diseases, or NCDs, which include everything from diabetes to cancer. But the growing threat of superbugs - which now kill an estimated 700,000 people every year - has become an urgent priority requiring a global response, experts say.
  • "The resistance of bacteria to antibiotics has grown significantly, to the point where we now have infections in nearly every country that are not treatable," said Ramanan Laxminarayan, director of the Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy based in Washington, D.C. "At this point, it is an emergency." Antimicrobial resistance occurs when microbes - like bacteria, parasites, viruses and fungi - evolve to defeat the drugs that once killed them. The problem is especially pressing for antibiotics, which are becoming increasingly ineffective at treating everything from gonorrhea to tuberculosis.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • es," said Dr. Liz Tayler, senior technical adviser on antimicrobial resistance with WHO. There are many reasons why antibiotic resistance has struggled to gain traction as global priority, however. For one, it's a complex issue that can prove difficult to explain - a headache-inducing combination of molecular chemistry, evolutionary concepts, and bacteria with unpronounceable names. WHO has compared the problem to a "silent tsunami." Unlike
  • a high-profile killer like cancer, deaths caused by antibiotic resistance tend to be less obvious or visible. "It never goes on anyone's death certificate ... when someone has died of a nasty infection, the fact that it's resistant either wasn't known or hasn't been talked about," Tayler said. "And while it's a really big problem in developing countries, the labs there aren't very good and they don't have the resources to do the testing to find out (why someone died)." Antibiotic resistance is also considered a "tragedy of the commons," where the effectiveness of antibiotics has been depleted by people who prioritize their own interests over the public good. And everyone is culpable: patients who demand antibiotics unnecessarily and doctors who cave to their demands; farmers who feed their livestock antibiotics and consumers who demand cheap
  • meat; low-income countries that allow antibiotics to be widely sold without prescription, and wealthy nations that need to do more to help those countries improve the sanitary conditions that lead to high infection rates. All of this human activity is pouring unprecedented volumes of antibiotics into the environment - and placing evolutionary pressure on microbes to evolve new strategies for defeating them. "I think of this problem as a planetary change at a microscopic level - one that we don't even notice. We're changing microbial ecology in a very significant way," Laxminarayan said. "We need to protect antibiotics with the same seriousness as we protected the ozone layer through the Montreal protocol." Wednesday's UN meeting will likely see countries agreeing to a declaration on combating antimicrobial resistance. This step - while largely symbolic - will draw global attention to the issue, sketch out solutions, and place pressure on countries to address the problem within their own boundaries.
  • "It requires all of these folks to be paying attention that they are now on notice," Laxminarayan said. But the declaration won't be binding, nor will it contain specific targets. For Dr. Brad Spellberg, an antibiotic resistance expert with the University of Southern California, the UN meeting is just one step and "there's still a lot of heavy lifting that has to be done." Tackling antibiotic resistance will require work on multiple fronts, he said - everything from improving prevention efforts to reducing antibiotic use in livestock and fish farms. The world also needs to recognize that antibiotic resistance is a threat we will have to face for not just years, but centuries or millennia, he added.
17More

Family doctors weighing their options; Changes to Bill 20 are welcome, but the buzz amo... - 0 views

  • Montreal Gazette Sat May 30 2015
  • Montreal family physician Fahimy Saoud hated leaving her sick 5-year-old in someone else's care this week, but it was her turn to staffa walk-in clinic and she didn't want to let those patients down. But as the day wore on, Saoud kept hearing her daughter's plea when she left the house: "Who will take care of me?" So on Monday, after seeing everyone in the waiting room, Saoud left the clinic early; her daughter needed her as much as her patients did.
  • She went home thinking of her game plan as the provincial government prepares to pass Bill 20, the controversial carrot-and-stick health reform that Health Minister Gaétan Barrette would soften after alienating many of Quebec's doctors with the threat of clawing back 30 per cent of their salary if they failed meet a patient quota. Barrette announced this week that Bill 20's sanctions would not apply to family physicians for two years - taking the immediate sting out of the bill while keeping the onus on doctors to improve patient access. Which is small comfort to busy family doctors like Saoud.
  • ...14 more annotations...
  • "I go help mothers with their sick children while I leave mine at home," Saoud said. "I can't see how I can do more." Saoud has three young children. She devotes 60 per cent of her workweek to a Montreal hospital's emergency department - irregular hours that include evening and weekend shifts - while the rest of her schedule is split between a walk-in clinic and what's known as "dépannage," replacing doctors in Quebec's more remote regions at least once a month. What she wants is more time for her job as a mother - helping with their homework and sharing meals - and not have to meet "an impossible" quota of following 1,500 patients, as the original Bill 20 would have required of each family doctor.
  • I am already at my maximum," said Saoud. And so, she has applied for a licence to practise outside Quebec. Nearly 24 per cent of Quebecers are on a waiting list or desperately searching for a family doctor. The crisis is rooted in a 1990s provincial government plan to save money by encouraging doctors to retire early. Staffing shortages ensued, and family doctors were obliged to fill the gaps by working outside their clinics in hospitals and far-flung regions. Quebec has attempted, with little success, to improve primary care over the last two decades by expanding community health clinics (CLSCs) and creating pools of doctors known as Groupes de médecine de famille (GMF) but both limped along under budget constraints and heavy bureaucracy. Barrette contends that the province has more than enough physicians to meet its needs, but that a profound structural change is needed.
  • He presented Bill 20 last fall as his road map to ensure that every Quebecer has a regular doctor. But the bill's punitive measures sparked widespread discontent among doctors against what they called a one-size-fits all, state-controlled, conveyor-belt approach to medicine. Doctors were further incensed at Barrette's assertion that doctors are not productive enough - which they saw as being accused of laziness - and frustrated at being blamed for a broken health system.
  • Like Saoud, many doctors prepared exit plans - from retiring to leaving the province. Some med students, many of whom were actively recruited to shore up Quebec's supply of family doctors, began reconsidering family medicine - or simply leaving to do their residency out-of-province, according to the Fédération des médecins résidents du Québec. Saoud was heading home to her sick daughter on Monday when Barrette announced he had cut a deal with the provincial federation of family physicians to exempt them from Bill 20 - temporarily. There would be no quotas and no penalties, Barrette said, as long as family physicians were able to collectively ensure that 85 per cent of Quebecers had a family doctor by the end of 2017. But Saoud says the change will not keep her here. And she's not alone.
  • The buzz among disillusioned physicians is that "everyone has a Plan B." And while the bill's delay has eased tensions a notch, some doctors are saying the two-year delay simply means they now have until 2017 to prepare a better exit. Bill 20 remains a guillotine above the heads of doctors. "Most definitely, there are physicians investing in Ontario licences and poised to leave if Bill 20 passes. I myself may have to leave," family physician Maggie O'Dell, who works at the Wakefield Family Medical Centre near the Ontario border, said before the bill was modified. And after Barrette backtracked, she had this to say: "It's nice to have reprieve, so it's a relief - for now ... a reason for many to hold back on pulling up stakes in the short term."
  • Doctors are willing to do their part to improve access, O'Dell said, but the Health Department must make participation in the Groupes de médecine de famille (GMF) more attractive by funding electronic records and support staff, and boosting mental health services and long-term beds in nursing homes. Dr. Catherine Duong, president of a collective of 550 general practitioners known by the French acronym ROME, said that the biggest threat of exodus is among doctors who live near the Ontario border. Physicians in that neighbouring province earn, on average, 15 per cent more than those in Quebec, and pay lower income taxes.
  • The group's recent survey - 204 of its members responded - indicated that Bill 20's sanctions would backfire. While the survey was taken three days before Barrette modified Bill 20, Duong said the results reveal that doctors, in particular those whose mother tongue is English, are at risk of leaving the province. Among the 134 francophone doctors polled about their intentions if Bill 20 were applied, 32 per cent said they would resign from hospitals, 12 per cent said they would leave Quebec and another nine per cent would go into private care.
  • Among the 70 anglophone respondents, seven said they already sent letters of resignations to their hospitals (it's not clear whether they are keeping their office family practice) and among the remaining 63 doctors, 34 - more than half - said they planned to leave Quebec. Another seven said they would retire early, seven would move to the private system and three would stop working as family doctors. It's a small sample, Duong conceded, but the study is nonetheless alarming.
  • We are worried that doctors will leave," Duong said, noting that every year, more doctors are opting out of the provincial insurance board (RAMQ), meaning they are no longer on the public payroll, though it's not clear whether they went to private practice or left Quebec. RAMQ representative Marc Lortie confirmed this week that 246 family physicians dropped out of RAMQ between May 2014 and May 2015, up from 204 the previous year and 187 in 2012-2013.
  • In the wake of Monday's announcement to put offBill 20's sanctions, many doctors remain skeptical of Barrette's 85-per-cent target, Duong says, "because it's far too ambitious a goal." Whatever doctors' efforts, Duong says, the reform will fail if the government doesn't help them do their jobs - for example, by abolishing mandatory hospital work. Others suggest the crisis between the province's doctors and Quebec's health minister is over. Bill 20 was heavy-handed, they argue, but if it leads to doctors taking on more patients it will have been a successful negotiating tool. Dr. Yoanna Skrobik, a critical care researcher and adjunct professor at McGill University's department of medicine, is among those who wholeheartedly support the Barrette reform.
  • It's the most dramatic change in the history of Quebec's health system, and the best thing that's ever happened to patients," said Skrobik, who worked side by side with Barrette at Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital in the early 2000s, when Barrette was chief of radiology and she was an intensivecare physician. She said that if 85 per cent of Quebecers have a family doctor, the quality of health care in the province will be much improved. Doctors may be offended by Barrette's manner, and by what they see as an attack on their autonomy, Skrobik said, "but it's also true that he puts patient care in the forefront."
  • But Saoud also has priorities. She earned her first medical degree in Haiti, then had to obtain it again after emigrating to Montreal. There's a saying among those who work in the ER, she said: "We know when we go in, but we don't know when we will leave." Saoud, who won the Nadine St-Pierre Award for her research as a resident in family medicine in 2009, still loves being a doctor. "It can be frustrating, but it's really gratifying work. Helping someone is really the cherry on the sundae. But my priority is not that." She would rather not force the children to uproot, but she's skeptical doctors can meet the demands of the health reform. And possible sanctions in two years could force her to to make a tough choice.
  • "My male colleagues don't have that issue. The bill is discriminatory. I'm just asking for the right to be a mother and not simply a doctor." With her permit application process in motion, Saoud says she will go wherever her licence takes her. cfidelman@montrealgazette.com twitter.com/HealthIssues
  • Medical students from four major Quebec universities demonstrate against Bill 20 in March near the legislature in Quebec City. • VINCENZO D'ALTO, MONTREAL GAZETTE / Dr. Fanny Hersson-Edery, left, at a diabetes clinic she runs with nurse Jen Reoch. Hersson has a full schedule, from research to teaching and seeing patients.
17More

Fired workers caught in tangled web of loopholes; THIRD OF FOUR PARTS Ontario's outdate... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Mon May 18 2015
  • Showed up to work one day and got fired for no reason? Sorry about your luck. In Ontario, not a single worker is protected from wrongful dismissal under the Employment Standards Act. Hit with the flu and can't make it into the office? Consider sucking it up, because chances are you won't get paid. You'll be lucky to keep your job, in fact. Have to put in extra hours one week to get the job done? Whatever you do, don't expect overtime pay - or even to get paid at all.
  • Ontario's outdated employment laws, currently under review, were designed to create basic protections for the majority of the province's non-unionized workers. Instead, millions are falling through the gaps created by a dizzying array of loopholes, from the dangerous to the downright bizarre. Construction workers have no right to take breaks on the job. Care workers aren't entitled to time off between shifts. Vets aren't entitled to vacation pay. Janitors have no right to minimum wage. Cab drivers aren't entitled to overtime pay.
  • ...14 more annotations...
  • And dozens of occupations, some that you've never even heard of, are exempt from basic rights entirely. "Keepers of fur-bearing mammals" have no right to minimum wage. Sod layers have no limits on their daily hours of work. Shrub growers don't get a lunch break. The system is so complicated that the Ministry of Labour has developed a special online tool to help decipher who's entitled to what. But as the province reviews its antiquated Employment Standards Act, critics argue that its confusing web of exemptions makes it harder for the so-called precariously employed to defend their rights - and easier for bosses to ignore them.
  • "When you distil it down to what these exemptions are seeking to achieve, really they are to give employers more control over work and more control over wages," says Mary Gellatly of Parkdale Community Legal Services. "It sends the message to employers that they can get away without complying." The Act was first introduced in Ontario in 1968 to set basic work standards, especially for non-unionized employees who don't have a collective agreement to provide extra protections. But there are at least 45 occupations in Ontario that are exempt from a variety of its fundamental entitlements, many of them low-wage jobs in industries where precarious work is rife.
  • The Ministry of Labour says many of the exemptions are "long standing" and related to "the nature of the work performed." But York University professor Leah Vosko, who leads research into employment standards protections for the precariously employed, says exemptions have come at least in part from industry pressure, leaving the Act a "complex patchwork that is difficult for workers and even officials to comprehend." Even when there are clear violations, speaking out can come at a cost. Reprisal is illegal under the Act, meaning bosses can't penalize employees for exercising their workplace rights. But the Act gives workers no protection against wrongful dismissal. Employers do not have to give cause for firing someone.
  • Unionized employees are generally protected by their collective agreements, and workers can sue employers if they think they have been unfairly terminated. But most precarious, low-income employees are not unionized, and most do not have the money to take legal action against an employer, says Parkdale's Gellatly. "It's the big reason why many people can't do anything if they're in a workplace with substandard conditions, because they can get fired without cause." Linda Wang, who worked at a Toronto cosmetics manufacturer for four years, was fired less than two weeks after asking her employer for the extra pay she was owed for working a public holiday. She says no reason was given for her termination. Wang, a mother of two, claims her employer repeatedly bullied her and her colleagues, and says she believes she was dismissed for asking for the wages.
  • She has filed a reprisal complaint with the Ministry of Labour, but Wang cannot afford to take her employer to court. "I feel the system is against workers," she says. "It's in favour of employers." "Whatever job you have, you put so much of yourself into it," adds Gellatly. "The fact that employers can just fire you without a reason is incredibly devastating for folks." The Act also contains significant gaps when it comes to sick leave and overtime. The legislation provides most workers with 10 unpaid days of job-protected emergency leave, which means they can't be fired for taking a day off due to illness or family crisis. Critics call this measure subpar by most standards, since it still causes many workers to lose a day's income for being ill. An estimated 145 countries give employees some form of paid sick leave.
  • "Unfortunately, we stand out for our inadequacy," says Brock University professor Kendra Coulter. But the 10-day protected leave doesn't apply to almost one in three of the province's most vulnerable workers. An exemption that excludes employees in workplaces of fewer than 50 people from that right means 1.6 million workers in Ontario are not even entitled to a single, unpaid, job-protected sick day. Fast-growing, low-wage sectors such as retail, food services and health care are most likely to be exempt according to a recent report by the Workers' Action Centre. While many small businesses voluntarily give their employees paid sick days, the loophole leaves many workers - especially the precariously employed - exposed.
  • Toronto resident Gordon Butler asked his employer, a small construction company in Markham, for one day off work after he sliced his thumb open on the job. He says his boss told him not to come back. "I didn't believe him," says Butler, 44, who has an 8-month-old child. "I tried to plead with him, and he said 'No, too bad.'" "The way it's stacked up right now is there are very few options for people who are in low-wage and precarious work to actually take sick leave when they're sick," says Steve Barnes, director of policy at Toronto's Wellesley Institute, a health-policy think-tank. "They not only have to worry about lost income, but the potential for losing their jobs," adds Brock's Coulter. "It's unkind and unnecessary." The stress caused by the province's meagre sick-leave provisions is compounded by exemptions to overtime pay, to which around 1.5 million don't have full access.
  • As a rule, employees should get paid time and a half after 44 hours a week on the job, according to the Employment Standards Act. But in 2014, more than one million people in the province worked overtime, and 59 per cent of them did not get any pay whatsoever for it, Statistics Canada data shows. This, experts say, is partly because enforcement is poor. But in Ontario, a variety of occupations don't even have the right to overtime pay, including farmworkers, flower growers, IT workers, fishers and accountants. Managers are also not entitled to overtime. Vladimir Sanchez Rivera, a 45-year-old seasonal farmworker in the Niagara region, says he has worked 96-hour weeks doing back-breaking labour picking cucumbers and other produce.
  • We don't have access to protections when we are working in agriculture," he says. "And our employers tell us that." Low-wage workers are even more likely to be excluded from full overtime pay coverage, according to the Workers' Action Centre's research. Less than one third of low-income employees are fully covered by the Act's overtime provisions, compared to around 70 per cent of higher earners, because they are more likely to work in jobs that aren't eligible. Workplaces can also sign so-called "averaging provisions" with their employees, which allow bosses to average a worker's overtime over a period of up to four weeks. That means an employee could work 60 hours one week and 50 the next, but not receive any overtime as long as they don't work more than a total of 176 hours a month.
  • Critics say the measure means more work for less pay, and paves the way to erratic, unpredictable schedules. "That's a huge impact on workers and their families in terms of lost income and having to work extra hours," says Parkdale's Gellatly. "It's certainly not good for workers, for their families, and it's not good for creating decent jobs in terms of rebooting our economy," she adds. For many of the precariously employed, falling through the gaps ruins lives. "Even now, when I think about the working environment, I feel very depressed," says Wang, who, 10 months later, is still waiting for the Ministry of Labour to issue a ruling on her complaint. "I feel panic."
  • Sara Mojtehedzadeh can be reached at 416-869-4195 or smojtehedzadeh@thestar.ca. By the numbers 1.6 million non-unionized Ontario employees with no right to an unpaid, job-protected sick day 59%
  • of Ontario workers who worked overtime in 2014 did not get any pay whatsoever for it 71% of low-wage, non-unionized Ontario employees don't have full access to overtime pay 29%
  • of high-income employees don't have full access to overtime pay Sources: Workers' Action Centre, Statistics Canada Proposed solutions A recent report by the Workers' Action Centre makes a number of recommendations to rebuild the basic floor of rights for workers. The proposed reforms include: Amending the ESA to include protection from wrongful dismissal
  • Eliminating all occupational exemptions to ESA rights Repealing overtime exemptions and special rules Repealing overtime averaging provisions Repealing the emergency leave exemption for workplaces with less than 50 people Requiring employers to provide up to seven days of paid sick leave
6More

Study questions thousands of surgeries; Toronto-led researchers find many breast cancer... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Fri Aug 21 2015
  • As many as 60,000 North American women each year are told they have a very early stage of breast cancer - Stage 0, as it is commonly known - a possible precursor to what could be a deadly tumour. And almost every one of the women has either a lumpectomy or a mastectomy, and often a double mastectomy, removing a healthy breast as well. Yet it now appears that treatment may make no difference in their outcomes. Patients with this condition had close to the same likelihood of dying of breast cancer as women in the general population, and the few who died did so despite treatment, not for lack of it, researchers led by Dr. Steven A. Narod of the Women's College Research Institute in Toronto reported Thursday in JAMA Oncology. Working with Narod were Dr. Javaid Iqbal, Ping Sun and Victoria Sopik of Women's College and Dr. Javaid Iqbal and Vasily Giannakeas of the University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health. Their conclusions were based on the most extensive collection of data ever analyzed on the condition, known as ductal carcinoma in situ, or DCIS: 100,000 women followed for 20 years. The findings are likely to fan debate about whether tens of thousands of patients are undergoing unnecessary and sometimes disfiguring treatments for premalignant conditions that are unlikely to develop into life-threatening cancers.
  • The notion that most women with DCIS might not need mastectomies or lumpectomies can be agonizing for those, like Therese Taylor of Mississauga, who have already gone through such treatment. Four years ago, when she was 51, a doctor sent her for a mammogram, telling her he felt a lump in her right breast. That breast was fine, but it turned out she had DCIS in her left breast. A surgeon, she said, told her that "it was consistent with cancer" and that she should have a mastectomy. "I went into a state of shock and fear," Taylor said. She had the surgery. She regrets it. "It takes away your feeling of attractiveness," she said. "Compared to women who really have cancer, it is nothing. But the mastectomy was for no reason, and that's why it bothers me."
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Others drew back from that advice. Dr. Monica Morrow, chief breast cancer surgeon at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, said it made more sense to view DCIS as a cancer precursor that should be treated the way it is now, with a lumpectomy or mastectomy. She questioned whether those women who were treated and ended up dying of breast cancer anyway had been misdiagnosed. In some cases, pathologists look at only a small amount of tumour, Morrow said, and could have missed areas of invasive cancer. Even the best mastectomy leaves cells behind, she added, which could explain why a small number of women with DCIS who had mastectomies, even double mastectomies, died of breast cancer.
  • Brawley said the new study, by showing which DCIS patients were at highest risk, would help enormously in defining who might benefit from treatment. It could not show that the high-risk women - young, black or with tumours with ominous molecular markers - were helped by treatment because there were too few of them, and pretty much every one of them was treated. But Brawley said he would like to see clinical trials that addressed that question, as well as whether the rest of the women with DCIS, 80 per cent of them, would be fine without treatment or with anti-estrogen drugs like tamoxifen or raloxifene that can reduce overall breast cancer risk. But if DCIS is actually a risk factor for invasive cancer, rather than a precursor, it might be possible to help women reduce their risk, perhaps with hormonal or immunological therapies to change the breast environment, making it less hospitable to cancer cells, Esserman said. "As we learn more, that gives us the courage to try something different," she said. The stakes in this debate are high. Karuna Jaggar, executive director of Breast Cancer Action, an education and activist organization, said women tended not to appreciate the harms of overtreatment and often overestimated their risk of dying of cancer, making them react with terror.
  • "Treatment comes with short- and long-term impacts," Jaggar said, noting that women who get cancer treatment are less likely to be employed several years later and tend to earn less than before. There are emotional tolls and strains on relationships. And there can be complications from breast cancer surgery, including lymphedema, a permanent pooling of lymphatic fluid in the arm. "These are not theoretical harms," Jaggar said.
8More

Comprehensive care program gets praise, saves bucks; Each patient in St. Joseph's proje... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Mon Aug 31 2015
  • Imagine a health-care system where the clinician you meet before a surgery is the same person who cares for you while you're in hospital and after you make it home. Imagine that clinician being available to you 24/7 by phone or iPad to field pre-surgery questions or, during recovery, to listen to worries about that incision you found flaring up, or an unexpected amount of pain.
  • That kind of treatment sounds like an unlikely scenario - one that doctors can dream about, but rarely provide because of cuts to health care and the growing strains squeezing our system. But at St. Joseph's Healthcare in Hamilton, it's been a reality for patients enrolled in the hospital's Integrated Comprehensive Care Project since 2012. And so far, it's paying off.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Hospital stays for lung patients have been shortened by up to 33 per cent. Post-discharge emergency room visits for that same group have fallen by half, and rates of readmission within 60 days to any hospital have been slashed by 56 per cent. Plus, the program is saving up to $4,000 per patient.
  • Those results are so "dramatic," said St. Joseph's CEO Dr. Kevin Smith, that a call from the Ministry of Health and Long-term Care seeking others interested in adopting such an initiative has drawn about 50 expressions of interest. The program has nabbed a 20 Faces of Change Award - part of an Ontario-wide competition honouring systems that break new ground with innovative patient care - and praise from Health Minister Dr. Eric Hoskins. In a statement released to the Star, Hoskins called the program "a real leader."
  • "Real innovations in health-care funding, such as the St Joe's experience, happen when we adopt an evidence-based approach to patient care, prioritizing programs and interventions that deliver the highest standards of care," he said. "We are transforming the health-care system to put patients first, while making our health-care system more sustainable." But perhaps the biggest praise of all has come from patients, who usually find themselves shuffled from department to department or institution to institution, repeating the same questions and being given very different expectations with every move. The project gives each patient a care co-ordinator - usually a nurse or personal support worker - who becomes the main point of contact for patients, cutting out tussles over who to turn to for help. For 82-year-old Audrey Holwerda, who entered the hospital to have a cancerous mass removed from her lung, that co-ordinator is Anna Tran, a surgical nurse of about 20 years.
  • Any time I need her, day or not, I can call, and I have called her a few times and she has been great," Holwerda said. "I feel like I know her, and when I go to see the doctor, she is there. I feel like she's a friend." Holwerda said it's a big difference from the "poor" care her ailing sister experienced when she had a lung removed. Her daughter, Wendy, even compared her mother's treatment from Tran to "being in a hotel." "In the long run, it has made (mom's) recovery better," Wendy said.
  • And for Tran, it's provided a sense of autonomy and a pride in her work that is worth the calls in the middle of the night. "The good thing is, I'm not married," she said, laughing and teasing the other co-ordinators, who are parents and have had to find ways to juggle their children's baseball games with answering patient queries on an iPad from the stands. If all goes to plan, more co-ordinators will be added and the program will expand beyond its current focus on five types of patients - those with compromised lung functions, congestive heart failure and lung cancer, and those needing open-heart surgery or knee and leg procedures. There's no word on when that could happen, but Smith and others who are already raving about the program are keeping their fingers crossed it will be soon.
7More

Nursing home ills tied to heavy antibiotic use - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Thu Jul 2 2015
  • It has been known for some time that long-term care facilities use a lot of antibiotics. Earlier studies have suggested there is a significant amount of overuse in this sector of the healthcare system, with potentially between one-third and half of all use being inappropriate or unnecessary. Residents of these facilities are typically frail, elderly people with a variety of health concerns. They are at the point in life where their immune systems cannot fight off invaders easily.
  • her risk," said Dr. Nick Daneman, first author of the study. "Unlike other medication classes, which can harm the individual recipient of that medication, antibiotics have the capacity to do harm even beyond the individual that gets the medication." Daneman is an adjunct scientist at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and an internal medicine physician at Toronto's Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. The study appeared in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine, a publication of the American Medical Association.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Antibiotics are likely being overused in some nursing homes in Ontario - and that misuse is putting all residents of these facilities at risk, a study suggests. With most drugs, inappropriate use only threatens the health of the person who takes the medication. But with misuse of antibiotics, the problems that arise - drug-resistant bacteria, C. difficile infections - are not restricted to the people who have been taking the drugs. "[Nursing] homes with higher use put patients at hig
  • These people often live in close quarters and are cared for by staff who move from resident to resident. It's a situation that makes for efficient spread of bacteria and other pathogens that cause infections. For this study, Daneman and his co-authors looked at antibiotic use in 110,656 residents of 607 nursing homes in Ontario in 2010 and 2011. The nursing homes studied were divided into low, medium and high antibiotic-use categories. The differences were stark: antibiotic prescribing in high-use facilities was 10 times that of low-use homes. If high-use homes had residents who were significantly sicker and more frail, that might explain their heavy reliance on antibiotics. But the authors also did a comparison of the residents of the various facilities and found there were not major health differences among them. That suggests the increased use of antibiotics in the high-use homes likely is a result of the doctors who are prescribing at those facilities, said infectious diseases expert Dr. Andrew Simor, who was not involved in this study. Simor is head of microbiology at Sunnybrook.
  • He suggested this information could help change prescribing behaviours; facilities where antibiotic use is higher than the norm could be targeted with programs aimed at minimizing misuse of these critical drugs. The article, which Simor praised, also drew a line between high antibiotic use and higher rates of negative consequences of antibiotic use. Those side-effects included allergic reactions to antibiotics, developing antibiotic-related diarrhea, contracting C. difficile infection, or becoming infected with a drug-resistant bacteria. Daneman said the adverse events were generally serious enough to send these people to hospital. "If you live in a high antibiotic-use home versus a low antibiotic-use home, you had 25 per cent increased risk of one of these serious antibiotic-related adverse events," he said. Because of the way the study was designed, the authors could not tell if the antibiotics used were needed in each setting. So they cannot say that the low-use homes had hit the sweet spot for antibiotic use - not too much, but enough.
  • Still, Simor observed that when hospitals started to develop programs to cut back on unneeded use of antibiotics - it's called antibiotic stewardship - concerns were raised that some people who needed the drugs might not get them. That hasn't proven to be the case, he said. "So if you feel comfortable translating those findings into a nursing home setting, I think you'll find the same situation is true - that stewardship will not place patients at increased risk for not getting an antibiotic when they need it."
15More

Cultural Needs; Health-care providers across Canada are grappling with how far they sho... - 0 views

  • National Post Sat Jul 4 2015
  • As the adolescent girl underwent gynecological surgery at a western Canadian hospital, a doctor stood by to perform an unusual function. The physician was there, according to a source familiar with the incident, to sign a certificate verifying she remained a virgin - and was still marriageable in her immigrant community.
  • It was a stark example of an increasing preoccupation for Canada's health-care system: accommodating the sometimes unorthodox needs of ethnic and religious minorities in an evermore multicultural society. Hospitals grapple with requests for doctors of a specific sex or race; sometimes they disconnect fire alarms to allow sweetgrass burning, prolong life support for religious reasons and host clinics to treat fasting diabetics at Ramadan.
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • The gestures stem not only from the country's growing diversity, but a generally more patient-focused system - and a recognition treating solely physical ailments is not always enough. "If we don't engage in the (cultural) discussion, we won't fully understand their health needs and they won't get met," says Marie Serdynska, who heads a pioneering project in the field, the Montreal Children's Hospital's socio-cultural consultation and interpretation services.
  • So ultimately they will get sicker and be a greater cost to the health-care system." But with the topic being featured at national pediatric and bioethics conferences recently, medical professionals are debating a difficult question: is there is a point at which catering to cultural preferences crosses a moral - or even legal - line? While a physician in the neonatal intensive care unit at Toronto's SickKids hospital, Dr. Jonathan Hellman was sometimes asked by fathers from "patriarchal" cultures not to discuss a child's condition with the mother unless the husband was also present.
  • Some Halifax hospitals have convinced the fire marshal to allow smudging, aboriginal purification rituals in which sweetgrass is burned. Sometimes, this means adjusting the smoke detector in a patient's room temporarily so it doesn't set off an alarm, says Christy Simpson, a bioethicist at Dalhousie University in Halifax. Randi Zlotnik Shaul, director of bioethics at SickKids, said she's aware of a request for a drumming circle in a neonatal intensive care unit, a normally very quiet environment. Steps were taken to comply with the proposal - and not interfere with other tiny patients - but the need for an open fire eventually made it impossible, she said.
  • And it recently emerged that a Vancouver-area intensive-care unit was asked to keep a braindead patient on life support for days until he could be flown to his country of origin, the family's culture rejecting the concept of neurological death. Still, for every demanding request, there are dozens of positive incidents - even if they involve once-unheard-of accommodation, say ethicists, doctors and patient advocates.
  • Agreeing to such a request not only raises ethical and practical questions, he says, but might even violate Ontario's Health-Care Consent Act - unless the mother explicitly agreed to the arrangement. "It's challenging to the caregivers in that situation, when the mother is at the bedside and the father is able to visit only in the evenings," says Hellman. "And we believe that both equally have decision-making power, both should have information." Even hospitals that try to be sensitive to specific cultural groups, like Ontario's Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, with its aboriginal patient "navigator," can face vexing dilemmas. When two First Nations girls with leukemia decided to withdraw from chemotherapy at the facility and try native remedies, an emotional courtroom battle followed.
  • Yet fulfilling such appeals, often made for dying patients, can be a question simply of innovation and compromise, like when someone asks that a patient's bed face Mecca, she says. "Some might respond very categorically, 'Nope, in this place all beds face the same way,' "she says. "Someone oriented another way might say, 'Yeah, they are all faced that way, but maybe if we got an extension cord, there is actually something we can do.' " Serdynska says she knows of hospitals providing "mementos" of births to new mothers whose cultures traditionally require them to bury their placenta. Dr. Tara Kiran, a Toronto family physician, was taken aback when she first encountered patients from Bangladesh and Pakistan at an inner-city clinic who insisted on fasting between sunrise and sunset during Ramadan, despite health issues like diabetes that normally require strict regulation of diet and medication.
  • Her patients, however, happily embraced what they saw as the experience's beneficial, spiritual benefits. "It was an interesting challenge to my assumptions," says Kiran. "My gut reaction was that fasting has negative impacts on health." In London, Ont., St. Joseph's Health Centre runs a special clinic during Ramadan to help the city's estimated 3,000 diabetic Muslims. Muslim needs, including heightened privacy for female hospital patients instead of the usual, unannounced arrival of staff at the bedside, were once given short shrift, says Khadija Haffajee, spokeswoman for the National Council of Canadian Muslims. But the system has generally made great strides, adds Haffajee, who has addressed classes of nursing students on her faith's practices. "It's about reasonable accommodation and understanding," she says. "When people are ill, you're dealing with very vulnerable people, so empathy goes a long way."
  • Accommodation can sometimes simply be a case of bridging the cultural divide, says Montreal's Serdynska. Medical teams at her hospital once saw Vietnamese patients with unexplained bruising and immediately suspected child abuse. Further inquiry revealed the marks were the result of "capping," or "coining," a traditional southeast Asian treatment that involves scraping a smooth edge across the body in the belief it releases unhealthy elements. Her service now has cultural interpreters who will talk to immigrant parents when, for instance, drug treatment is not working. Sometimes, it relates to the side effects and contraindications spelled out on unfamiliar packaging, she says. "For some cultures who do not generally take pharmaceutical medication, this is very frightening." The institutional, impersonal nature of a hospital alone makes it a daunting place for aboriginal people, especially if they attended residential schools, says Margo Greenwood, academic leader at the National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health in Prince George, B.C. Hanging indigenous art, providing culturally appropriate prayer space and consulting local native communities all help alleviate that anxiety, as does being open to other forms of treatment.
  • You're dealing with two different systems of knowledge: one is what I learned when I went to university and one is what I learned in my community," she says. "People (are) saying ... 'I want the two to work together.' "But what are health-care providers to do when the request stemming from an ethnic or religious practice appears to breach their own ethical boundaries? Reports in 2013 of doctors in Quebec issuing virginity certificates earned a swift response from the province's medical regulatory body. Physicians must refuse to comply, insisted the College des Médecins, and explain such a service has nothing to do with health care. Less black-and-white, perhaps, is the patient asking for a doctor of a particular sex or, less commonly, of a specific race. On the surface, at least, the idea is a repudiation of fundamental human-rights principles, yet for some patients it could be a religious imperative or a fallout from past abuse.
  • Some hospitals say they will try as much as possible to provide a female doctor for Muslim women, for instance, when asked. In Montreal, about half the obstetrician-gynecologists are women, so supplying a female one is usually quite feasible, said Togas Tulandi, interim head of the McGill University medical school's obstetrics and gynecology department. More troublesome, say ethicists and physicians, are patients who insist they not be treated by a doctor or nurse of a certain race - typically Caucasians rejecting non-white workers in today's multi-hued medical workforce - or want one of their own colour. Ethicists at Toronto's University Health Network (UHN) published a nine-page paper on how to tackle "discriminatory" requests of this sort, suggesting the affected health-care worker should often have the final say.
  • "It's ugly, it's unfair," says Linda Wright, a bioethicist at UHN, of the potential impact on medical staff. "To ... have someone say you're not good enough because of the colour of your skin is offensive." How often Canadian hospitals have to deal with the dilemma is unclear. A 2010 U.S. study of emergency doctors, though, concluded the scenario is common, with hospitals frequently accommodating requests for race-specific practitioners. And that is not such a bad thing, argued U.S. law professor Kimani Paul-Emile in a provocative 2012 article. He cited evidence that having a "race-concordant" doctor can bring health benefits, especially for blacks and others who have historically faced prejudice. In the meantime, hospitals here are still more likely to encounter less-contentious culturally based issues, such as whether to loosen age-old restrictions on the number of well-wishers in a patient's room.
  • "In some cultures ... you have everybody there. You have all the aunts and all the uncles, and all the family members and friends," says Dalhousie's Simpson. "For me, that's been one of the really interesting changes. Why did we say it only had to be two? Why did we limit it so much? Because clearly there's value to having your loved ones around you."
10More

Voluntary caregivers: the invisible backbone of medicare - Infomart - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Mon Feb 9 2015
  • Four years ago, Michael Ignatieff presented himself as a smart, sophisticated patriot, eminently qualified to lead the nation. Voters perceived him as an aloof, self-absorbed academic who didn't understand the country or its people. His political career was mercifully brief.
  • But the former Liberal leader got one thing right: He recognized unpaid caregivers as the backbone of Canada's health-care system and offered them support. His "family care plan" would have given workers caring for a seriously ill family member six months of paid leave and offered those outside with no earnings a monthly allowance of $1,350. Ignatieff's proposal sank with him in the last federal election. The Liberals have not resurrected it.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • The only vestige that remains is a modest Conservative tax break. Seeking to undercut the Liberals on the eve of the 2011 campaign, Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced a family caregiver tax credit of less than $1 a day. It applies to just 18 per cent of the 2.7 million Canadians who sacrifice their income, career prospects and sometimes their health to care for loved ones. With another federal election approaching - and the baby boom generation entering retirement - caregivers have been pushed to the periphery of the federal agenda.
  • The provinces still talk about them - praising their dedication and selflessness - but don't provide enough home care or respite care to ease the physical burden or alleviate the loneliness of caring for a family member with dementia, severe disabilities or chronic illness. Advocacy groups lobby for seniors but seldom focus on the family members who feed, clothe, bathe and clean up after those who need round-the-clock care.
  • Only when caregivers burn out requiring medical attention do policy-makers pay attention. Ken Wong, a robotics engineer who quit his job to care for his wife, diagnosed seven years ago with early-onset dementia, wants to avoid that fate. Last week, he wrote a poignant letter to his MPP, Helena Jaczek (who represents Oak Ridges-Markham and serves as minister of community and social services), pleading for relief. With his permission, here are a few excerpts:
  • "Some days are very tough to get through. She (his 53-year-old wife Nada) frequently screams and becomes agitated - sometimes for hours on end, night and day. It is a very exhausting and challenging role. "It is a lonely job. For whatever reasons, most friends and family seem to have distanced themselves. Sometimes there is more compassion from strangers.
  • "I am keeping my promise to my wife to cherish and protect her for better or worse, in sickness and in health till death do us part. But it is a long goodbye." Wong didn't ask for much. He suggested that Ontario look at Nova Scotia's five-year-old caregiver benefit. Early research shows the $400-a month payment has reduced the probability of institutionalization by 56 per cent. He appealed to Jaczek to take the idea to the cabinet table for consideration in this spring's budget. He ended his letter with a heartfelt plea: "Caregivers need your support to be strong physically, emotionally and spiritually to endure the daily demands for many years."
  • They don't appear to be a high priority for Health Minister Eric Hoskins. His "action plan for health care," released last week, did not mention caregivers. (Officials in his department pointed out that families can request temporary respite care at their local community care access centre.) The federal outlook is cloudy-to-bleak. The Conservatives are content with the status quo. The Liberals have said nothing specific, although Justin Trudeau has talked about the overstretched sandwich generation (families with young children and elderly parents). Only the Democrats, who are running third in popular support, are offering tangible help. They would introduce a caregiver tax benefit modelled on the child disability benefit (which provides a monthly payment of up to $220 for parents caring for a severely impaired child).
  • For the most part, caregivers are out of sight and out of mind. They are easy to take for granted. They're quiet, steadfast and undemanding. They deplete their savings and sacrifice their freedom. Without them, the cost of health care would skyrocket. A smart government would safeguard such a vital asset. Carol Goar's column appears Monday, Wednesday and Friday.
1 - 20 of 1480 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page