This is a credible site that's very interesting. It's almost like an interactive timeline, so you can start from 5-10 million years ago, all the way till now. It helps me start the family tree from the beginning.
How did a group of ground-dwelling flightless dinosaurs evolve to a feathered animal capable of flying?
used its feathered limbs, along with a long, feather-fringed tail, to glide from tree to tree.
The six specimens were excavated from the rich fossil beds of Liaoning Province in northeastern China
dated at between 128 to 124 million
four feathered limbs,
birds are most closely related to dromaeosaurids
dromaeosaurs were small, feathered animals with forelimbs similar to those of Archaeopteryx, the oldest known bird at around 150 million years old, and feet with features comparable to modern tree-living birds.
Chinese stone quarry where the fossil was discovered
Dubbed Microraptor, the crow-sized fossil is one of the smallest dinosaurs ever found
Did it array its arm- and leg-mounted wings in the style of an early 20th-century biplane to produce high lift at low speed?
Did it use them to create a single lifting surface for efficient, swift gliding?
Or were the extra wings useless for flight and likely to have been for some other purpose, such as attracting a mate?
Artists have historically played an important role in paleontology by helping to reconstruct the appearance and behavior of ancient animals.
For years the debate has been a standoff between two camps—those who believe dinosaurs were the ancestors of birds, and those who do not.
Believers in the dinosaur-bird connection have generally assumed that flight must have begun from the ground up, with fast-running dinosaurs that eventually got airborne as feathered arms evolved into wings,
Skeptics of the bird-dinosaur link say it would have been physically impossible for running dinosaurs to overcome gravity and get off the ground.
Larry Martin
speaks out for the minority view that birds descended from non-dinosaur tree dwellers.
Microraptor is the unexpected missing link that has reignited the debate
This very interesting because it shows how people though that birds are decedents of dinosaurs. Then there are the non believers that do not believe that dinosaurs were the ancestors of birds. The four winged dinosaur Microraptor had brought up this debate again. Microraptor is the missing link that reignited this debate. This website is credible because at the bottom of the page it gives the name of the man who made the site and it is part of pbs.
Through this example, we see how caring chimps really are. Even in humans, females are stereo-typically the care-givers, but even male chimps can prove this stereotype wrong.
Humans, in general, are also respectful to their parents even once they've grown up and become an adult.
And she hears this and
she comes charging over, rushes up the tree, and hauls herself
on this melee of three enormous males. I think the two others
were so amazed that they stopped attacking Satan
Chimpanzees in Senegal make and sharpen spears with their teeth to go hunting. Like our own ancestors they have learned to use tools to kill their quarry more effectively.
Ape Genius - which gives a fascinating insight into the depth of intelligence of animals who share 99 per cent of human genes
.at15t_email {display:none !important;}
ul li.email span.at300bs {display:none !important;}
X Share & bookmark
Delicious
Facebook
Google
Messenger
Reddit
Twitter
Digg
Fark
LinkedIn
Google Buzz
StumbleUpon
http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&winname=addthis&pub=telegraphmedia&source=tbx-250&lng=en-US&s=buzz&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.telegraph.co.uk%2Fearth%2Fearthnews%2F3341339%2FApe-Genius-reveals-depth-of-animal-intelligence.html&title=Ape%2
Share:
Although they can be taught to recognise symbols and words they don't have the mental capacity to contribute to a 'conversation' - and they don't make small talk
And most important of all although they can imitate, they can't teach or build on the achievements others have made - unlike more successful humans.
But if apes have the power to reaso
n, learn skills, feel emotion and co-operate in a frenzied tree-top hunt for Colobus monkeys as chimpanzees do, why don't we have a planet of the apes?