Assume that there were salamanders living in some grasslands. Suppose, Lamarck argued, that these salamanders had a hard time walking because their short legs couldn't trample the tall grasses or reach the ground. Suppose that these salamanders began to slither on their bellies to move from place to place. Because they didn't use their legs, the leg muscles wasted away from disuse and the legs thus became small.
passed this acquired trait
legless salamanders evolved
no legs.
by inheriting the acquired characteristic of
Darwin's Background
o have extraordinary talents.
genius, did not at first appear
Darwin disliked school
d observing birds and collecting insects to study.
sent to medical school in Scotland
"intolerably dull
interested in attending natural history lectures.
university at Cambridge, England, in 1827.
Darwin be chosen for the position of naturalist on the ship the HMS Beagle.
to collect specimens, make observations, and keep careful records of anything he observed that he thought significant.
Principles of Geology by Charles Lyell,
In the Andes he observed fossil shells of marine organisms in rock beds at about 4,300 m.
One reason that Darwin was so eager to study life on land was that he suffered from terrible seasickness and couldn't wait to get off the Beagle.
thousands
trekked hundreds of miles through unmapped region.
catalog his specimens and write his notes.
praised by the scientific community.
experts for study.
bird specialist
Darwin's bird collections from the Galapagos Islands, located about 1,000 km west of South America.
13 similar
Other experts
believe that species change over time.
evidence f
In 1837 Darwin began his first notebook on evolution. For several years Darwin filled his notebooks with facts that could be used to support the theory of evolution.
fossils of similar relative ages are more closely related than those of widely different relative ages.
He ran his own breeding experiments and also did experiments on seed dispersal.
Very interesting document, it is a credible site, and has multiple pages of information about Darwin's Theory of Evolution. Helped me quite a bit for my TFAD assignment.
The conspirators summoned John Scopes, a
twenty-four-year
old general science teacher and part-time football coach, to the
drugstore
Dayton.
Darrow was not the first choice of the ACLU, who was concerned that
Darrow's
zealous agnosticism might turn the trial into a broadside attack on
religion
Nearly a thousand people, 300 of whom were
standing,
jammed the Rhea County Courthouse on July 10, 1925
Judge John
T. Raulston, the presiding judge in the Scopes Trial
William
Jennings Bryan, three-time Democratic candidate for President and a
populist, led a Fundamentalist crusade to banish Darwin's
theory of evolution from American classrooms
The proceedings opened, over Darrow's
objections,
to a prayer
Judge Raulston
and his entire family listened attentively from their front pew seats.
Judge Raulston
A
jury of twelve men, including ten (mostly
middle-aged)
farmers and eleven regular church-goers, was quickly selected
including ten (mostly
middle-aged)
farmers and eleven regular church-goers, was quickly selected
A
jury of twelve men
moved
to quash the indictment on both state and federal constitutional
grounds.
This move was at the heart of the defense strategy. The defense's
goal was not to win acquittal for John Scopes, but rather to obtain a
declaration
by a higher court--preferably the U.S. Supreme Court--that laws
forbidding
the teaching of evolution were unconstitutional
Judge Raulston denied the defense
motion.
As expected
titanic
struggle between good and evil or truth and ignorance
if evolution wins, Christianity goes.
The prosecution opened its case by asking
the
court
to take judicial notice of the Book of Genesis,
asked seven students in Scope's class
a series of questions about his teachings
When the facts don't neatly fit the theory, scientists have faith that time, discovery and the hard work of others will eventually prove the theory to be true. Theories are not always neat equations where all variables are explained, accounted for and even understood. We see this with both Darwin and Wegener.
Being German wasn't Wegener's only problem; the arguments he used to support his hypothesis crossed into
disciplines that were not his specialty.
Darwin's theory quickly came to dominate. Within 5 years,
Oxford University was using a biology textbook that discussed biology in the context of evolution by natural selection.
At Oxford, evolution by natural selection had gone from hypothesis to a priori
A priori means that something is accepted as true, knowledge that is known without having to investigate it. We use reason and deduction to know that X is true, so it is a priori.
Wegener
did not have an explanation for how continental drift could have occurred
little
challenge until the 1960's.
he drew from the fields of geology, geography,
biology and paleontolog
coal deposits, commonly associated
with tropical climates, would be found near the North Pole and why the plains of Africa
would show evidence of glaciation.
A radical new view on their discipline could be
a threat to their own authority.
"If we are to believe in Wegener's hypothesis we must forget everything
which has been learned in the past 70 years and start all over again."
The authorities in the various
disciplines attacked him as an interloper that did not fully grasp their
own subject.
The
reactions by the leading authorities in the different disciplines
was so strong and so negative that serious discussion of the concept
stopped
The world had to wait until the 1960's for a wide
discussion of the Continental Drift Theory to be restarted.
Alfred Wegener is one modern scientist
amongst many that demonstrate that new ideas threaten the
establishment, regardless of the century.
ontinental Drift Theory through the first few decades of
the twentieth century.
continents had once been joined, and
over time had drifted apart.
features in the bones and musculature of the human hand and wrist associated with specific gripping and manipulatory capabilities that are different from those of other extant great apes
confirmed Charles Darwin's speculation that the evolution of unique features in the human hand was influenced by increased tool use in our ancestors.
ow, researchers Dr Stephen Lycett and Alastair Key have shown that the hands of our ancestors may have been subject to natural selection as a result of using simple cutting tools
2.6 million years ago,
show that 'biometric' variation
Darwin proposed that the use of stone tools may have influenced the evolution of human hands.
Good work David. Be ready to explain why this is a credible web site.
Competition exists among individuals.
The organisms whose variations best fit them to the environment are the
ones who are most likely to survive, reproduce, and pass those desirable variations
on to the next generation.