Rubrics appeal to teachers and students for many reasons. First, they are powerful tools for both teaching and assessment. Rubrics can improve student performance, as well as monitor it, by making teachers’ expectations clear and by showing students how to meet these expectations. The result is often marked improvements in the quality of student work and in learning. Thus, the most common argument for using rubrics is they help define “quality.” One student actually didn’t like rubrics for this very reason: “If you get something wrong,” she said, “your teacher can prove you knew what you were supposed to do!”
Punishment or Negative Reinforcement? - 0 views
Game Based Learning in Secondary Education: Geographical Knowledge of Austria - 0 views
GarrisonAndersonArcher2000.pdf - 0 views
Teaching Adults: Is It Different? - 0 views
-
To be considered a distinct profession with a unique knowledge base (Merriam 2001), the field of adult education advances the idea that teaching adults is different than teaching children. The subject of much debate, this issue has generated assumptions, opinions, and re-search. This publication takes a look at all three in discerning myths and realities associated with the teaching of adults.
File or website link - MoodleDocs - 0 views
Resources - MoodleDocs - 0 views
Activities - MoodleDocs - 0 views
PDF.js viewer - 0 views
Understanding Rubrics by Heidi Goodrich Andrade - 1 views
-
Rubrics appeal to teachers and students for many reasons. First, they are powerful tools for both teaching and assessment. Rubrics can improve student performance, as well as monitor it, by making teachers' expectations clear and by showing students how to meet these expectations. The result is often marked improvements in the quality of student work and in learning. Thus, the most common argument for using rubrics is they help define "quality." One student actually didn't like rubrics for this very reason: "If you get something wrong," she said, "your teacher can prove you knew what you were supposed to do!"
Student peer assessment - 0 views
-
By judging the work of others, students gain insight into their own performance
-
An important role for self and peer assessment is providing additional feedback from peers while allowing teachers to assess individual students less, but better
-
double anonymity of assessors and assessees
- ...1 more annotation...
A guide for students by students - 0 views
Microsoft Word - shea7-03.doc - Teaching_Presence_in_the_SUNY_Learning_Network.pdf - 0 views
MODELS FOR ACTIVITIES AND COLLABORATION IN WIKI ENVIRONMENTS IN ACADEMIC COURSES - 1 views
-
Cooperation (1): the simplest collaborative model (Dillenbourg, 1999; Schneider et. al, 2003) and the basis for all the other models. In this model, most of the work is performed individually. Every student creates a Wiki page, writing and editing only his/her page and share his/her product with his peers.
-
Collaboration and Cooperation (2): in this model, the degree of collaboration is higher than in the previous model, because all students are required to work together on the same content, in groups or as one group, and to edit and improve it together (Dillenbourg, 1999; Schneider et. al, 2003).
-
Cooperation, Collaboration and Peer-Assessment (3): in the final model, the most complex of all, collaboration is implemented with respect to all dimensions: product, process and assessment. Students work in groups or alone, upload information to Wiki, edit each other’s products and provide peer feedback about the parts that they did not write (Dominick, Reilly & McGourty, 1997; Morgan & O’reilly, 1999).
« First
‹ Previous
121 - 138 of 138
Showing 20▼ items per page