I feel I have assembled the questions sufficiently in one post.
This is an attempt of you and yours to reverse time management to the user and save your time.
If you are over -extended. Start by owning up there.
Can't your users want an online semantic service without an academia mentality?
The idea of these services is "semantic" not "linear".
Way too heirarchal and professoral IMO.
Must you demand (through stark obtuseness) feedback to be sugar-coated and through a pipe-line?
Thanks Maggie.
Maggie Tsai wrote: > Thanks Daniel. > > Jay, as Daniel suggested - please post your questions here with appropriate subject title with tags. > > You can also email us directly to info at diigo dot com
Jay Peek wrote: > Maggie, > > I feel I have assembled the questions sufficiently in one post.
-Then i guess we should only need one forum?
> This is an attempt of you and yours to reverse time management to the user and save your time.
-Too many questions in one post will likely make it a bit harder to find the right answers.
> If you are over -extended. Start by owning up there.
-Is that another question?
> Can't your users want an online semantic service without an academia mentality?
-And another question?
> The idea of these services is "semantic" not "linear".
-Is that a question or a suggestion?
> Way too heirarchal and professoral IMO.
-An opinion i take it.
> Must you demand (through stark obtuseness) feedback to be sugar-coated and through a pipe-line?
-"Obtuseness"? Them's big words my friend! For someone who seems to have all the compliments in the world, i would try to choose them in a better way if i was looking for help.
> Thanks Maggie.
Yes, a big thanks to Maggie who has been and still is of much help to helping Diigo to grow.
Where do I go?
Maggie is no.1 contact in this group.
You can post your question here or p.m. her.
To your question about this forum i believe you must first subscribe to this group.
Jay, as Daniel suggested - please post your questions here with appropriate subject title with tags.
You can also email us directly to info at diigo dot com
I feel I have assembled the questions sufficiently in one post.
This is an attempt of you and yours to reverse time management to the user and save your time.
If you are over -extended. Start by owning up there.
Can't your users want an online semantic service without an academia mentality?
The idea of these services is "semantic" not "linear".
Way too heirarchal and professoral IMO.
Must you demand (through stark obtuseness) feedback to be sugar-coated and through a pipe-line?
Thanks Maggie.
Maggie Tsai wrote:
> Thanks Daniel.
>
> Jay, as Daniel suggested - please post your questions here with appropriate subject title with tags.
>
> You can also email us directly to info at diigo dot com
> Maggie,
>
> I feel I have assembled the questions sufficiently in one post.
-Then i guess we should only need one forum?
> This is an attempt of you and yours to reverse time management to the user and save your time.
-Too many questions in one post will likely make it a bit harder to find the right answers.
> If you are over -extended. Start by owning up there.
-Is that another question?
> Can't your users want an online semantic service without an academia mentality?
-And another question?
> The idea of these services is "semantic" not "linear".
-Is that a question or a suggestion?
> Way too heirarchal and professoral IMO.
-An opinion i take it.
> Must you demand (through stark obtuseness) feedback to be sugar-coated and through a pipe-line?
-"Obtuseness"? Them's big words my friend!
For someone who seems to have all the compliments in the world, i would try to choose them in a better way if i was looking for help.
> Thanks Maggie.
Yes, a big thanks to Maggie who has been and still is of much help to helping Diigo to grow.
To Top