I feel there is a lot of spammy content in this group. For it to retain its value, a slightly stronger moderation might be suitable. Thank you for your consideration.

Diigo is a gentle community and it's not much targeted by spammers. However, once in a while, bookmarks or topics appear that are off-topic. For these, a social feature 'flag as inappropriate' would be nice (cf LinkedIn groups). The desired behaviour would be that these flagged links are moved to a moderation queue for review.

Sandy - thanks for your consideration. As far as I'm concerned, I think the web needs more quality than quantity, and I see it as the role of a group manager to review and maintain bookmarks in his group. But I'm aware that you have many wishes to cater for, and if it's a lot of coding work, it may be better for group managers to simply delete these rogue bookmarks.

Recently on this diigo community, there have appeared a few of these spam links. My first inclination is always that I'd like to see these removed.

Diigo search works well on bookmarks, but only searches on urls, titles, annotations and comments. A full text search on the underlying pdf or webpage that is cached for premium users would be a very powerful feature, making diigo even more relevant for knowledge management. Thanks for your consideration.

Great. Thanks for pointing this out. And looking forward to the pdf search.

By the way, great search operators for the advanced search feature as well.

A bookmark in a group has a views counter. How are these views counted:
- clicks on the bookmark?
- visits to the "link to this item" page?

Thanks for clarifying.

The "related tags" bar is one of the many useful features that makes diigo such wonderful tool. In addition to have the 'full listing' option, it would also be nice to have statistics on the number of times a related tag is used in the context of the primary tag.

See the link http://groups.diigo.com/group/energy/content/tag/solar which shows bookmarks in the energy group tagged 'solar'.

The first 8 bookmarks have no such tag, so why are they listed?

This is not the only occurrence. Frequently, I observe bookmarks listed for a group tag, while the item has no such tag.

Sandy - I have now deleted the group tag 'solar' from all posts in the energy group. Yet, 17 bookmarks remain listed using the link http://groups.diigo.com/group/energy/content/tag/solar. None of these are duplicates in the group. Even if user philslade made a personal bookmark, tagged it 'solar' and then shared it to the group, I should be able - as group administrator - to overwrite the personal tag.

I've deleted the annotation by philslade to the first bookmark, yet it remains listed under the solar tag, despite that it doesn't show the tag solar on the linkto page:
http://groups.diigo.com/group/energy/content/solar-tower-will-power-las-vegas-at-night-cutting-edge-cnet-news-4161004

Is there a way to get totally rid of the 'solar' tag?

Thanks for a hint.

Sandy - I cannot find the feature or option 'premium group'. Could you point me to it.

Also I note that a significant portion of bookmarks in the energy group (http://groups.diigo.com/group/energy) are not cached, despite my premium member status.

Finally, how can we export group bookmarks? I don't find the option in the UI.

Thanks!

The functionality to manage group tags seems to have disappeared. It would however be very useful to have some basic features here, such as merging, deleting and moderating tags. Manually changing a tag on 100s of bookmarks is not the best use of a moderator's time.

Still have to change 345 times the tag 'solar' into 'renewables' and 325 times remove the useless tag 'energy' (sigh).

Meanwhile, another problem appears in the group tags. When listing the tag 'solar' (http://groups.diigo.com/group/energy/content/tag/solar), some items appear which are not tagged solar in the group.

One of the nice things about diigo is that it comes backed with nice features or attention to detail that are not instantly obvious, but become invaluable over time.

One of these that I've recently discovered is related to groups. The 'recent' queue in groups lists the most recenly posted or updated bookmarks, topics or both.

This means that if you edit an ancient bookmark, or if somebody likes it or comments on it, it will re-appear on top of the queue, while it was deeply buried before.

Nice going diigo.