A scientific article titled "Does promiscuity prevent extinction?" (http://www.physorg.com/news186327580.html) and a web facility article titled "Chatroulette offers random webcam titillation - CNN.com" (http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/02/22/chatroulette.random.chat) are being FORCED to "private" (even when the "offensive"!? words in the title are change to "unfaithfulness" and "interest"). Why is this? Will (a non-fig-leafed) image of Michelangelo's David be next? Who would one ask (for permission) to "fix" this?
Meta page it said "This link has been bookmarked by 2 people. It was first bookmarked on 25 Feb 2010, by someone privately."
I tried to bookmark it ... it's now public. Everybody see it?
But now that you've brought my attention to 'censor', I just noticed a bookmark that was set to private ... maybe because the title included 'naked' - but I could easily change it.
> an algorithm … will change the bookmark to private > automatically. However, the algorithm may do some false > judgement. Let me know the URLs which were converted to private > and we will try to figure out how to improve the algorithm.
Please add to that topic a note of the URLs that were converted to private.
I tried to bookmark it ... it's now public. Everybody see it?
But now that you've brought my attention to 'censor', I just noticed a bookmark that was set to private ... maybe because the title included 'naked' - but I could easily change it.
> an algorithm … will change the bookmark to private
> automatically. However, the algorithm may do some false
> judgement. Let me know the URLs which were converted to private
> and we will try to figure out how to improve the algorithm.
Please add to that topic a note of the URLs that were converted to private.
Thanks