Skip to main content

Home/ wicpsycho/ Group items tagged illusion

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Catherine Delisle

Mighty Optical Illusions - 0 views

shared by Catherine Delisle on 07 Feb 11 - Cached
    • Catherine Delisle
       
      LOOK AT "CAMOUFLAGE CANS BY LIU BOLIN" This optical illusion is very interesting because you don't notice anything until you look at the bottom of the photo and see the shoes. If you move up from there until about three quarters of this photo, you'll see the head, the neck and the hands. This is very interesting because we can see how our eyes can play tricks on us and then see something that they hadn't seen before.
    • trevor kearns
       
      The camouflage can illusion was mind blowing. I looked at the picture for at least a minute before realizing there was a person. I was amazed at how well the person could blend in to the background and wish they showed how the painter painted this.
    • anonymous
       
      Wow thats really amazing. The camouflage artist is extremely interesting. Liu Bolin completely camouflages into the background by just painting himself. I find this is extremely good optical illusion because we can see exactly how are eyes play tricks on us. I was very impressed with how well he actually blended in with the background.
  •  
    Such a cool optical illusion ! It's really incredible how well the person blends in with the cans... Such a talented artist !
  •  
    What optical illusions there are. Some are kind of silly however, there are certain ones that truly put things into perspective.
  •  
    This was very interesting! It's a really cool optical illusion...and I agree with Catherine that you don't notice anything at first until you look on the bottom and then it really clearly shows! It took me a while to realize there was a person in the picture!
Mason Brenhouse

scary_optical_illusion_count_faces.jpg 413×550 pixels - 1 views

  •  
    This is a rather perculiar optical illusion in which 2 things can be viewed, a large face or a man riding a horse. I cannot really verify the credibility of this site seeing as how it is just an image. 
  •  
    WOW this illusion is one of the most mind-boggling ones ive ever seen. Besides seeing a man's portrait, i also see a buunch of other things or people around or in his face as well as a second face portrayed into his face. Craziness.
trevor kearns

Opticle illusions - 4 views

shared by trevor kearns on 07 Feb 11 - Cached
  •  
    The site is credible because the illusions are explained by Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology in the American University in Washington DC. The site also allows you to alter the illusion to help you understand how it's formed.
  •  
    Wow, this illusion is crazy! I love how the site lets us explore the illusion in depth by giving us the tools to alter the illusion.
  •  
    my mind feels violated
steven bloom

Flower illsuion - 2 views

  •  
    This website was designed by someone who likes optical illusions. It basically ask you a question about an optical illusion and ask you for your answer in multiple choice format. Then it tells you if you are right or wrong and why.
  •  
    This one is very interesting although I have already seen it before. The only thing I don't like is the fact that the web site shows you what you are supposed to be seeing by flipping it upside down for us. I think it would have been much more interesting to look for it ourselves. All in all, it's very interesting.
Kayla Korman

eyetricks Image Gallery #2 - Optical illusions from eyetricks.com. - 2 views

shared by Kayla Korman on 08 Feb 11 - Cached
    • Kayla Korman
       
      this optical illusion really caught my attention because it was hard for me to understand the picture. You have to look at it many different ways, and its very fascinating when you figure it out!
  •  
    this is my optical illusion
jordana levine

Staff Picks: Optical Illusions | Exploratorium - 1 views

    • jordana levine
       
      This is a good website because it has a variety of optical illusions as well as the reason that our eye perceives these images in a certain way. It is a credible website because of the .edu domain. 
Emilie L

The Mind of the Narcissist - 0 views

    • Emilie L
       
      himself vs. reflection: major point
  • Some people explicitly state that they do not love themselves at all (they are ego-dystonic). Others confine their lack of self-love to certain of their traits, to their personal history, or to some of their behaviour patterns. Yet others feel content with who they are and with what they are doing (ego-syntonic). But one group of people seems distinct in its mental constitution – narcissists.
    • Emilie L
       
      * keyword: distinct mental constitution (that differs from all the different kinds of confidence kinda brain traits)
  • Some people explicitly state that they do not love themselves at all (they are ego-dystonic).
  • ...40 more annotations...
  • Narcissus is not in love with himself. He is in love with his reflection
  • Loving your True Self is healthy, adaptive, and functional. Loving a reflection has two major drawbacks: One depends on the existence and availability of the reflection to produce the emotion of self-love. The absence of a "compass", an "objective and realistic yardstick", by which to judge the authenticity of the reflection. In other words, it is impossible to tell whether the reflection is true to reality – and, if so, to what extent.
  • they direct their love to other people's impressions of them. He who loves only impressions is incapable of loving people, himself included.
  • If he cannot love himself – he must love his reflection
  • ut to love his reflection – it must be loveable
  • the narcissist is preoccupied with projecting a loveable image, albeit compatible with his self-image (the way he "sees" himself).
  • The more successful this projected image (or series of successive images) is in generating Narcissistic Supply (NS) – the more the narcissist becomes divorced from his True Self and married to the image.
    • Emilie L
       
      Meaning, the better he is capable of mentally creating better image for himself in the eyes of others (therefore his 'reflection') the more he becomes 'in love' with the idea of himself then who he truly is
  • he prefers his image
  • The narcissist, therefore, is not selfish – because his True Self is paralysed and subordinate
    • Emilie L
       
      * very good point
  • narcissist is not attuned exclusively to his needs. On the contrary: he ignores them because many of them conflict with his ostensible omnipotence and omniscience. He does not put himself first – he puts his self last. He caters to the needs and wishes of everyone around him – because he craves their love and admiration. It is through their reactions that he acquires a sense of distinct self. In many ways he annuls himself – only to re-invent himself through the look of others. He is the person most insensitive to his true needs.
  • rains himself of mental energy in this process. This is why he has none left to dedicate to others
    • Emilie L
       
      he is so focused in pleasing everyone else to this image that he has no time to dedicate himself to others = lack of empathy
  • Why should people indulge the narcissist, divert time and energy, give him attention, love and adulation? The narcissist's answer is simple: because he is entitled to it
  • Actually, he feels betrayed, discriminated against and underprivileged because he believes that he is not being treated fairly, that he should get more than he does
  • Clinical data show that there is rarely any realistic basis for these grandiose notions of greatness and uniqueness.
    • Emilie L
       
      meaning there is nothing really extravagant or particular about them that they should (or could even be really driven!!) to be narcissistic 
  • The narcissist is forced to use other people in order to feel that he exists
  • He is a habitual "people-junkie"
  • With time, he comes to regard those around him as mere instruments of gratification, as two-dimensional cartoon figures with negligible lines in the script of his magnificent life.
    • Emilie L
       
      bases his own happiness on what others are doing around him + their reflection of him
  • A personality whose very existence is a derivative of its reflection in other people's minds is perilously dependent on these people's perceptions. They are the Source of Narcissistic Supply (NSS). Criticism and disapproval are interpreted as a sadistic withholding of said supply and as a direct threat to the narcissist's mental house of cards.
  • The narcissist does not suffer from a faulty sense of causation. He is not oblivious to the likely outcomes of his actions and to the price he may have to pay. But he doesn't care.
  • he reacts to what he perceives to be a danger to the very cohesion of his self. Thus, every minor disagreement with a Source of Narcissistic Supply – another person – is interpreted as a threat to the narcissist's very self-worth.
    • Emilie L
       
      * big point
  • He would rather discern disapproval and unjustified criticism where there are none then face the consequences of being caught off-guard.
  • that the narcissist cannot take chances. He would rather be mistaken then remain without Narcissistic Supply
  • blames others for his behaviour
    • Emilie L
       
      again, lack of humility
  • The narcissist – wittingly or not – utilises people to buttress his self-image and to regulate his sense of self-worth. As long and in as much as they are instrumental in achieving these goals, he holds them in high regard, they are valuable to him
  • This is a result of his inability to love others: he lacks empathy, he thinks utility, and, thus, he reduces others to mere instruments
  • In 1977 the DSM-III criteria included: An inflated valuation of oneself (exaggeration of talents and achievements, demonstration of presumptuous self-confidence); Interpersonal exploitation (uses others to satisfy his needs and desires, expects preferential treatment without undertaking mutual commitments); Possesses expansive imagination (externalises immature and non-regimented fantasies, "prevaricates to redeem self-illusions"); Displays supercilious imperturbability (except when the narcissistic confidence is shaken), nonchalant, unimpressed and cold-blooded; Defective social conscience (rebels against the conventions of common social existence, does not value personal integrity and the rights of other people).
    • Emilie L
       
      1977 Criteria to Narcissistics * very interesting, gives personality traits + actions 
  • He sees them only through this lens.
  • The narcissist is portrayed as a monster, a ruthless and exploitative person. Yet, inside, the narcissist suffers from a chronic lack of confidence and is fundamentally dissatisfied. This applies to all narcissists. The distinction between "compensatory" and "classic" narcissists is spurious. All narcissists are walking scar tissue, the outcomes of various forms of abuse.
    • Emilie L
       
      strong on the outside, weak on the inside * contradicts with the other article I read earlier..
  • Freud (1915) offered a trilateral model of the human psyche, composed of the Id, the Ego, and the Superego.
    • Emilie L
       
      * find further research
  • According to Freud, narcissists are dominated by their Ego to such an extent that the Id and Superego are neutralised. Early in his career, Freud believed narcissism to be a normal developmental phase between autoeroticism and object-love. Later on, he concluded that linear development can be thwarted by the very efforts we all make in our infancy to evolve the capacity to love an object (another person).
  • The frustrated and abused child learns that the only "object" he can trust and that is always and reliably available, the only person he can love without being abandoned or hurt – is himself.
    • Emilie L
       
      ouuuu
  • This choice – to concentrate on the self – is the result of an unconscious decision to give up a consistently frustrating and unrewarding effort to love others and to trust them.
  • So, is pathological narcissism the outcome of verbal, sexual, physical, or psychological abuse (the overwhelming view) – or, on the contrary, the sad result of spoiling the child and idolising it (Millon, the late Freud)?
    • Emilie L
       
      What makes a narcissistic (i.e., triggers it?)
  • Overweening, smothering, spoiling, overvaluing, and idolising the child – are also forms of parental abuse.
    • Emilie L
       
      Too much love can apparently ruin a child
  • This is because, as Horney pointed out, the smothered and spoiled child is dehumanised and instrumentalised. His parents love him not for what he really is – but for what they wish and imagine him to be: the fulfilment of their dreams and frustrated wishes. The child becomes the vessel of his parents' discontented lives, a tool, the magic airbrush with which they seek to transform their failures into successes, their humiliation into victory, their frustrations into happiness. The child is taught to give up on reality and adopt the parental fantasies. Such an unfortunate child feels omnipotent and omniscient, perfect and brilliant, worthy of adoration and entitled to special treatment. The faculties that are honed by constantly brushing against bruising reality – empathy, compassion, a realistic assessment of one's abilities and limitations, realistic expectations of oneself and of others, personal boundaries, team work, social skills, perseverance and goal-orientation, not to mention the ability to postpone gratification and to work hard to achieve it – are all lacking or missing altogether. This kind of child turned adult sees no reason to invest resources in his skills and education, convinced that his inherent genius should suffice. He feels entitled for merely being, rather than for actually doing (rather as the nobility in days gone by felt entitled not by virtue of its merits but as the inevitable, foreordained outcome of its birth right). The narcissist is not meritocratic – but aristocratic.
    • Emilie L
       
      too much love explained: the child is smothered by love and thus thinks theres a reason for it nana the world revolves around me because mummy and Daddy think so I am there pride and joy, because I am in fact an angel... now look at me I am a narcissitic and it's like a legit mental disorder.
  • This is Millon's mistake. He makes a distinction between several types of narcissists. He wrongly assumes that the "classic" narcissist is the outcome of parental overvaluation, idolisation, and spoiling and, thus, is possessed of supreme, unchallenged, self-confidence, and is devoid of all self-doubt.
  • Yet, this distinction is both wrong and unnecessary. Psychodynamically, there is only one type of pathological narcissism – though there are two developmental paths to it. And all narcissists are besieged by deeply ingrained (though at times not conscious) feelings of inadequacy, fears of failure, masochistic desires to be penalised, a fluctuating sense of self-worth (regulated by NS), and an overwhelming sensation of fakeness.
    • Emilie L
       
      * much importanto: there is only reaaally one type of narcissism despite having two different paths to it i. too much love ii. not enough 
  • hey tend to ignore him – or actively abuse him – when these needs are no longer pressing or existent.
  • The narcissist's past of abuse teaches him to avoid deeper relationships in order to escape this painful approach-avoidance pendulum. Protecting himself from hurt and from abandonment, he insulates himself from people around him. He digs in – rather than spring out.
  • This shocking revelation deforms the budding Ego. The child forms a strong dependence (as opposed to attachment) on his parents. This dependence is really the outcome of fear, the mirror image of aggression. In Freud-speak (psychoanalysis) we say that the child is likely to develop accentuated oral fixations and regressions. In plain terms, we are likely to see a lost, phobic, helpless, raging child.
    • Emilie L
       
      child-like ego problems: strong dependence on parents creates a super vulnerable child
  •  
    "The World of the Narcissist (Essay)" - tons of information +lots to read through, primary resource! like a fountain of info on narcissists. Reliability: not many ads, written by a doctor (has his CV published online, http://samvak.tripod.com/cv.html), wrote two books- one of which is an "ebook"
Daryl Bambic

Nine Steps to Achieving Flow in Your Work | Greater Good - 0 views

  • Put simply, it’s a state of mind you achieve when you’re fully immersed in a task, forgetting about the outside world. It’s a concept proposed by positive psychologist Mihály Csíkszentmihályi, and these days you’re likely to read about it on blogs and in all kinds of magazines.
  • e the ability to single-task (as opposed to multi-task) is one of the keys to true productivity.
    • Daryl Bambic
       
      Why would "unitasking" as opposed to multitasking help produce more 'flow' experiences?  Answer in response to this sticky note and remember to bookmark it to the wicpsycho group.
    • Jordyn Shell
       
      I believe it would produced a flow in experience because your mind would be concentrated on one task at hand rather than trying to do a million little things at once. It also allows you to focus more and to have a better understanding of your work when you are doing one thing at a time.
    • Matthew Schaffer
       
      Uni-Tasking will produce more flow because when you focus on one task only, there are no distractions from other activities. While uni-tasking, you are able to focus on a single task, which then allows you to get it done without any stress. 
    • Chrissy Le
       
      Uni-tasking can help produce more "flow" because it means that your brain is concentrating on one single thing as opposed to being scattered everywhere. When you multitask your attention is cut short every time you switch over to your next activity, this will prevent you from completing your true ideas and will stop you from thinking them through.
    • Joe Inhaber
       
      Unitasking as opposed to multitasking would help produce more flow experience because when you are unitasking, you are focusing on only one thing, and you wouldnt be distracted by anything else. This would keep you on task making it more of a flow like experience
    • Emilie L
       
      Like this article suggests, "quality over quantity". When you're so focused on getting several things done, it becomes harder to focus because your main objective is to get it done-it doesn't matter to what degree or quality it is, just do it. What uni tasking allows is the utter focus on "doing" something, singular, without the hassle of trying to get one thing done after another. Unitasking allows your entire mind, and heart too, to go into this one task- hence, zen.
    • Marie-Lise Pagé
       
      Unitasking will help to produce the flow experience becaue you only focus on one thing so your mind will not be thinking about other things while you are working. When you focus on one thing it can be done faster.
    • mauromongiat
       
      It is because when unitasking your mind is focused on only a single task. So when you focus on a single task the brain does not need to think about other tasks as in the case of multitasking. We get more flow unitasking because we are not distracted by the other task in multitasking.
    • kelsey sazant
       
      Unitasking would be more productive and create flow because we can manage to concentrate on only that one thing. When we multitask, we cannot achieve flow because we are trying to concentrate on more than just one thing. Flow can only be centred around one thing at a time, not a multitude of things at once. 
    • vince chatigny-barbosa
       
      By focusing on one activity at a time, you not only produce better quality work, but it gives the illusion that your work load is not so great. When you try and multi-task, it seems as if the work is overwhelming. Doing one thing at a time seems more organized and realistic.
    • Lauren Ganze
       
      Unitasking allows the brain to focus on one thing, blocking out exterior noises and such. Concentrating on a single task would greatly reduce the number of things that successfully distract you, allowing you to achieve Flow and successfully completing a difficult task. Also, doing a single thing instead of switching between many the whole day will encourage actual important work.
    • Julian Pendenza
       
      I believe that unitasking helps produce more flow because it allows you to focus more on just one task. By doing this, you put more effort in that one task and it allows you to perform better. By focusing on just one task, its easier to block off everything around you and you are distracted as easily as you would be while multitasking.
    • Eli Michon
       
      When you focus on one thing, you can do that one thing better and not "half-assed" (pardon my french) As they say, Jack of all trades, master of none. If you are trying to do many things at once, each of those things is gonna be less well done than if you were just working towards one goal.
    • Giuliano Musacchio
       
      In my opinion unitasking would produce more flow because instead of focusing on many different situations, one will be more concentrated on a specific activity. It allows one to clear away from distractions, be satisfied with their work and helps us with our understanding
Julian Pendenza

BEATING THE ODDS - 1 views

  • Every state except Utah and Hawai'i permits some form of gambling.
  • Not surprisingly, gambling losses have skyrocketed. Every year, American consumers blow more money on gambling than we spend on music, movies, professional sports, theme parks, and cruises combined, says Dixon—an estimated $68 billion in 2002, according to one source.
    • Julian Pendenza
       
      Important fact
  • 1 percent
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • 3 percent in the last 20 years
  • they are hugely in debt...and their families are in a shambles.
    • Julian Pendenza
       
      One of the main problems of gambling
  • the most common treatment option for the problem, recorded a success rate of only 8 percent after two years of treatment. Therapy can boost the success rate considerably, but many people still don't respond well or simply don't have access to it.
    • Julian Pendenza
       
      This is a reason of why this is such a big problem in today society
  • First, he's set up a "casino room" in his lab. This room, equipped with a one-way mirror for observing subjects, has slot machines, a roulette wheel, a craps table, and a poker table. No money is used to play these games, only tokens, but the physical experience of gambling is otherwise the same. (Research subjects do sometimes get extra course credit or gift cards as incentives for participating.)
    • Julian Pendenza
       
      Procedure for expierement
  • • Immediate gratification.
  • • Irrational beliefs
  • Pathological gamblers "don't have rational discounting curves," says Dixon. "They would rather have smaller amounts of money immediately than more later.
  • Perceptions of winning and losing.
  • Impulsivity and the gambling environment.
  • The illusion of control
  • The fact that money isn't the only motivation for gambling is something that Dixon and his students know from the Gambling Intervention Program, which he began at SIUC in early 2005. This free eight-week program, closely modeled after a program developed by psychologist Nancy Petry at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine, is tailored to the individual.
    • Julian Pendenza
       
      justification
  •  
    Behaviour research and its relation with Gambling, written by Marilyn Davis. Based on the research done by a professor of behaviour analysis and therapy with SIUC's rehabilitation Institution. This is a credible site because it is a ''.edu'' site which means educational organization. There for its a site whose purpose is to educate. Also it is a site created for the Southern Illinois University.
Frankie Ferreira

The Adolescent Brain - 2 views

This website talks a lot about the teenager's brain and gives some useful stats about them, some are quite interesting.

Brain psychology adolescent teens illusions invisible mooseblog optical screenr span

Daryl Bambic

Why Seeing (The Unexpected) Is Often Not Believing : NPR - 0 views

  •  
    Seeing is not always believing
1 - 15 of 15
Showing 20 items per page