Demonstrating proficiency without doing the homework or practice makes me wonder about the homework assigned. If the skill can be demonstrated without the practice obviously the practice is not needed.
Homework should not be drudgery, however it has become that.
If the work is deemed essential to a student’s learning, that student should not have the option of taking a zero but instead should be required to complete the work.
This assumes the students has a reinforceable understanding of the skills and concepts. Otherwise, it's just doing something in the wrong way over and over.
It can teach students responsibility and maturity.
This is a self-fulfilling prophecy. The only reason it's "mature" to do homework is because students are given more as they get older.
Responsibility comes from setting and meeting deadlines, not from having deadlines set for you.
It can even sometimes be used as the saving grace for a student who isn’t a good “test-taker”.
I agree with the commenter's point, except for equating not doing homework with being lazy. If I already have mastery of a skill and I refuse to do 40 problems that I already have mastery of, it's not laziness, it's choosing to use my time doing something that interests me -- or perhaps learning a new skill.
The problem with homework is not homework itself, but how we have come to use it; not as a teaching tool but as a behavior modification tool.
In my opinion, equally important is that we're not grading the behavior of the student, we're focused on the students' "achievement of a clearly defined standard." If a student's grade reflects any number of missing assignments rather than a failure to understand the concept, are the assignments appropriate for that student, or is something else preventing the completion of the assignments?
Respect & pay attention to the kids
Give learners a voice
Hire learners to teach
Seize “almost” every opportunity to replace books with digital content (ouch)
Pursue 1:1 carefully, but urgently
Support the infrastructure
Make sure that the tech staff works for the teachers
The best thing we can teach our children today, is how to teach themselves
When you visit the school, be happy when you see learning. Be suspicious when you see too much teaching.
If the computer is connected to the office, meaning there won't be prinouts and wasted paper, then I'd say "sure, this is effective."
B. Students use concept mapping software to help them organize information for a research paper.
C. A first grade class practices math facts while playing Number Munchers in the computer lab.
If the technology is being used to support the learning, then I'd say "Yes." If it was "How can I use tech? If we play Number Munchers/use concept mapping software, then we'll find some way to make it learning" then I'd say "no." Learning comes first.
D. Students use the classroom computers to check their email and read the news at ESPN.com during their free time.
I'm going to say "yes" and defend it this way: #1 we *do not* own our students' time. Even when they are in school. The two examples Clif gives show students engaged in Literacy of their own making. That is great!
In some classes in school they let me listen to music and one teacher recognised it and got nostalgic.
It took me three days to figure out that there was another side to the tape. That was not the only naive mistake that I made; I mistook the metal/normal switch on the Walkman for a genre-specific equaliser, but later I discovered that it was in fact used to switch between two different types of cassette.
I *love* this paragraph! Talk about a digital divide.
Throughout my week using the Walkman, I came to realise that I have very little knowledge of technology from the past. I made a number of naive mistakes, but I also learned a lot about the grandfather of the MP3 Player.
professional learning community is simply another item to check off the list, rather than a powerful framework for redefining school in the twenty-first century. Schedules, agendas, tasks, and assignments are not necessarily bad things, but they are not sufficient for building vibrant professional learning community.
I think this is so important. We're all educators because we are pursuing our passions. The best PLC meeting I've been in all year is when I really saw those passions come out of people.
Loved the words "proximity, permanence, shared history, and shared vision." This is what a PLC really needs in my opinion. It will be so exciting next year when people are into their second year with the same people...in some cases. Having been with the same PLC two years in a row in the past, I proclaim :) that it makes a big difference!!! Proximity is a big deal too!!!