Participants overwhelmingly found smaller and more focused professional development opportunities were much more helpful than those offered on a broad level.
1More
1More
About | Open Syllabus Project - 4 views
1More
Breaking BAD to bridge the reality/rhetoric chasm | The Weblog of (a) David Jones - 1 views
1More
Harvard & MIT Sued for Lack of Online Video Captioning - 1 views
1More
You're 100% Wrong About Math Scores - 0 views
University of Nebraska's New Learning Commons a Vision of Next-Gen Study Time - 0 views
1More
Statisticians Found One Thing They Can Agree On: It's Time To Stop Misusing P-Values | ... - 1 views
« First
‹ Previous
41 - 60 of 83
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page
The guidelines, a one-page template letter, read a little like an ultimatum. The letter opens by asking a would-be publisher to confirm in writing that print books and accessible formats will be made available simultaneously, then launches into an explanation of how publishers should handle everything from digital rights management to authoring software.
Lennard J. Davis, professor of English at the University of Illinois at Chicago, said the letter is meant less to threaten a boycott and more as a public service announcement. Some authors may not budge from the demands in the letter, he said, but others are likely to use it as a way to spread awareness about accessibility.