When it comes to high school, both agreed that the current model is outdated. As Khan put it, "Kids get promoted because they were in a chair for four years." Duncan called it a "19th century model" and "neanderthal." Instead, they suggested a competency-based model for promotion through grades rather than one that is time-based.
In terms of content and standards, Duncan suggested adding subjects such as computer science, foreign language and financial literacy to the core curriculum. He adamantly defended the Common Core standards as a way for the U.S. to remain competitive globally and ensure requirements don't get dumbed down "to make politicians look good."
Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or urlBrilliant or Insane?: Eliminate grades: here's your 5-step blueprint - 0 views
School 2.0 | USA WEEKEND | usaweekend.com - 0 views
Education Leaders Say It's Time to Rethink What a College Degree Promises - US News - 0 views
Want high schoolers to succeed? Stop giving them fifth-grade schedules - The Hechinger ... - 0 views
Degrees Based on What You Can Do, Not How Long You Went - NYTimes.com - 0 views
2More
Degrees Based on What You Can Do, Not How Long You Went - NYTimes.com - 0 views
Everything that's wrong with traditional grading in one table | Dangerously I... - 0 views
New grade scale raises questions | Concord Monitor - 0 views
2More
Demand, Pay for STEM Skills Skyrocket - STEM Education (usnews.com) - 0 views
Student-Centered Learning: Knowing It When We See It - Learning Deeply - Education Week - 0 views
It's Time to Stop Averaging Grades - 0 views
Maintaining the Status Quo | Teaching as a dynamic activity - 0 views
« First
‹ Previous
121 - 140 of 145
Next ›
Showing 20▼ items per page