Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ University of Johannesburg History 2A 2023
zenethian

What_factors_shaped_British_press_coverage_of_the_reverses.pdf - 1 views

shared by zenethian on 20 Apr 23 - No Cached
  • By James West
    • zenethian
       
      Seems like a purely subjective paper by this author.
  • despised savages
    • zenethian
       
      James West displays utter disrespect and most importantly inhumanity for the Zulu people of South Africa by refering to them as "despised savages".
  • Although the political alignment of newspapers influenced coverage of the conflict, the most important single factor in shaping press reporting of the war was the innate imperialism of contemporary culture.
    • zenethian
       
      factual.
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • although the Anglo-Zulu War was initially of little interest to the British press, it was able to become a focus for popular imperialism, and a source of great national importance. These points impacted heavily on the reporting of the Anglo-Zulu War, and in reaction to defeat or in celebration of victory
  • ress coverage focused on providing reassurance that imperial values of bravery and heroism had been upheld.
    • zenethian
       
      The various press, here primarily focused on retaining and upholding the supposed imperial values of bravery and heroism.
  • ‘our devoted Spartans who checked the fierce raid of the Zulu hordes into Natal’. 7
    • zenethian
       
      Again: British Press portrays and almost boasts about their severe iniquities aimed at the Zulu people.
  • More detailed reports of Isandlwana, which followed in the subsequent months, were equally as emphatic in highlighting the bravery of the British troops.
    • zenethian
       
      There is nothing "brave" about cowardness and inhumanity.
  • emphasising the bravery of the British soldiers and heroic characteristics.
    • zenethian
       
      There is nothing good, about the British army. They aimed at exploiting the Zulu people.
  • show that British Valour has once again proved itself as true as of yore’.
  • our military prestige
    • zenethian
       
      Britain were merciless and only cared about retaining their "prestige".
  • restore imperial pride,
    • zenethian
       
      Britain were selfish.
  • For example, the paper asserted that ‘beyond the display of heroism on the part of the individuals there is nothing in this dismal business that can be regarded with complacency’, whilst simultaneously lambasting the army for allowing its officers to carry luxurious baggage on campaign, pleading that ‘in future it is to be hoped that when British armies invade savage States they will not take as their model the luxurious effeminacy of the Oriental’.
    • zenethian
       
      highlights just how heartless the British empire was.
  • The political alignment of different publications did shape their coverage of the AngloZulu War. Although the press was comparatively consistent in expounding general imperial values in its coverage, reporting was
    • zenethian
       
      This paper essentially displays various views of Newspaper Presses.
  • The Northern Echo takes a similar stance in its coverage of the campaign, in one instance reporting that ‘the responsibility for the slaughter of a British regiment in Zululand rests primarily upon the head of Sir Bartle Frere...But it lies also at the door of Her Majesty’s Ministers, whose half-hearted irresolute policy rendered it possible’
    • zenethian
       
      This coverage blames a person from British leadership for their loss.
  • Sir Bartle Frere
    • zenethian
       
      He is blamed.
  • s a result of this factor, newspapers, important instruments in creating the imperial identities of the late nineteenth century, covered the war in a nationalistic manner.
    • zenethian
       
      News to Britain was covered in a "nationalistic manner"
zenethian

Painting. The Defense of Rorke's Drift (Zulu War, 22--23 January 1879). on JSTOR - 4 views

  •  
    Painting. The Defense of Rorke's Drift (Zulu War, 22--23 January 1879). DATE: 1879 CREATOR: DUGAN W. H. (XIX century), artist DESCRIPTION: (Black warriors attacking British position.) Biography: DENEUVILLE Alphonse - Saint-Omer (FRANCE) 31 May 1835--19 May 1885 Paris (FRANCE). Inscriptions: Signed and dated.
sizomtshali2

Presbyterians and politics in Malawi: A century of interaction - 2 views

  • the Scottish missionaries found themselves under attack forallowing their converts too much authority and independence.
    • sizomtshali2
       
      This means that the missionaries from Scotland had no intentions of allowing their converts authority or independence.
makofaneprince

Use of guns in Zulu kingdom - 3 views

  • ‘The iqungo’, he told Stuart, ‘affects those who kill with an assegai, but not those who kill with a gun, for with a gun it is just as if the man had shot a buck, and no ill result will follow’
    • makofaneprince
       
      the zulu people believed that guns were interfering with their culture.
  • Zulu only gingerly made use of fi rearms and did not permit them to affect their way of warfare to any marked degree
    • makofaneprince
       
      even though the zulu people adopted the use of guns, they did so with great care that this practice doesn't disrupt their traditional methods used in wars. the zulu people still stand to be one of the tribes in South Africa that is proud of their culture.
  • In other words, as Lynn’s pithily expresses it, ‘armies fi ght the way they think’, and in the last resort that is more important in explaining their way of war than the weapons they might use. 3
    • makofaneprince
       
      this further elaborate the pride zulu people have in their culture and heritage.
  • ...24 more annotations...
  • The voracious one of Senzangakhona, Spear that is red even on the handle [. . .] The young viper grows as it sits, Always in a great rage, With a shield on its knees [. . .] 6
    • makofaneprince
       
      Shaka's words praising the use of spears as compared to guns.
  • Kumbeka Gwabe, a veteran of the Anglo-Zulu War of 1879, remembered how at the battle of Isandlwana he killed a British soldier who fi red at him with his revolver and missed: ‘I came beside him and stuck my assegai under his right arm, pushing it through his body until it came out between his ribs on the left side. As soon as he fell I pulled the assegai out and slit his stomach so I knew he should not shoot any more of my people’. 4 This was the weapon of the hero, of a man who cultivated military honour or udumo (thunder), and who proved his personal prowess in single combat
    • makofaneprince
       
      the use of a spear during wars symbolized braveness as compared to using a gun.
  • As we have already learned from Singcofela, killing at a distance with a gun was of quite a different order from killing with an ‘assegai’, the short-hafted, long-bladed iklwa or stabbing-spear
    • makofaneprince
       
      can it be that the zulu people saw this as an act of cowardness?
  • ‘The Zulu Nation is born out of Shaka’s spear. When you say “Go and fi ght,” it just happens’. 8
    • makofaneprince
       
      the quote explains how the Zulu men are fearless and always ready for a war.
  • As such, the traders owed him military service, and it quickly came to Shaka’s attention that they possessed muskets.
    • makofaneprince
       
      the period which Zulu people got exposed to firearms.
  • Shaka, as Makuza indicated, was very much taken up with muskets and their military potential.
    • makofaneprince
       
      Shaka was also impressed by the use of guns and the victories they can have in wars.
  • ‘to send a regiment of men to England who there would scatter in all directions in order to ascertain exactly how guns were made, and then return to construct some in Zululand’
    • makofaneprince
       
      Shaka did not only want to own guns but he also wanted his people to learn how to make them. this show the interest in learning new things and flexibility for innovation.
  • It suggests that the battle tactics the Zulu undoubtedly employed in the war of 1838 against the invading Voortrekkers, and against each other in the civil wars of 1840 and 1856, had already taken full shape during Shaka’s reign.
    • makofaneprince
       
      Shaka was the first zulu king to show blended tactics in his fighting strategies. he made use of guns at the same time planning his attack in a traditional way.
  • He warned that, hitherto, the Zulu ‘had used them only in their little wars but the king stated to me that should he fi nd himself unable to overcome his enemies by the weapons most familiar to his people he would then have recourse to them’.
    • makofaneprince
       
      Guns were also seen as alternatives and used also if the war is getting difficult.
  • Thus, when the Voortrekkers came over the Drakensberg passes in late 1837 and encamped in Zululand, Dingane knew that they and their guns posed a deadly threat to his kingdom. Dingane’s treacherous attempt, early in 1838, to take the Voortrekkers unawares and destroy them, was only partially successful. The Voortrekkers rallied, and proved their superiority over the Zulu army, as they had done previously over the Ndebele, when they repulsed them in major set-piece battles at Veglaer in August 1838, and Blood River (Ncome) in December, the same year. 23 The Zulu discovered that, because of the heavy musket fi re, in neither battle could they could
  • get close enough to the Voortrekkers’ laager to make any use of their spears or clubbed sticks in the toe-to-toe fi ghting to which they were accustomed. As Ngidi ka Mcikaziswa ruefully admitted to Stuart, ‘We Zulus die facing the enemy — all of us — but at the Ncome we turned our backs. This was caused by the Boers and their guns’. 2
    • makofaneprince
       
      after losing a war using guns the zulu people blamed the boers for exposing them to guns they believed if they sticked to their stick/spear methods they could have defeated their enemy.
  • The king ‘thereupon formed a regiment which he called Isitunyisa’ (isithunyisa is a Zulu word for gun). 26 Even so, when in January 1840 King Dingane unsuccessfully faced his usurping brother Prince Mpande at the battle of the Maqongqo Hills, both armies of about fi ve thousand men each were armed (as far as we know) almost entirely with spears and shields, and fought a bloodily traditional battle following Shaka’s hallowed tactics.
    • makofaneprince
       
      in the 1840 all of the Zulu armies had guns to use in wars
  • Spear and shield had again won the day, reinforcing the traditionalist Zulu military ethos, and wiping away memories of the disastrous war against the Voortrekkers.
    • makofaneprince
       
      despite the use of guns the spear and shield of the Zulu proved to be the effective way to use in a war.
  • By the early 1870s, it seems that a good third of Pedi warriors carried a fi rearm of some sort. 33 The Zulu perceived that they should not fall behind their African neighbours such as the Pedi in the new arms race, not least because their kingdom seemed endangered in the late 1860s, and early 1870s. 3
    • makofaneprince
       
      there was also a competition between the Kingdoms on which one have more guns, and possession of many guns in one kingdom meant power and a threat to other kingdoms.
  • However, because no Zulu man was permitted to leave the kingdom as he had to serve the king in his ibutho, Cetshwayo had to import fi rearms thorough traders. The enterprising hunter-trader John Dunn, who gained Cetshwayo’s ear as his adviser, cornered the lucrative Zulu arms market, buying from merchants in the Cape and Natal and trading the fi rearms (mainly antiquated muskets) in Zululand through
  • Portuguese Delagoa Bay to avoid Natal laws against gun traffi cking. 35 The Zulu paid mostly in cattle, which Dunn then sold off in Natal. 36
    • makofaneprince
       
      the zulu man were not allowed to leave their kingdom to work in the diamonds fields to buy more guns like other tribes. they had to serve their kingdom as ibutho, this led to a shortage of guns in the zulu kingdom
  • The Zulu had their own names for each of the bewildering varieties of fi rearms of all sizes and shapes and degrees of sophistication that came into their hands, and, in 1903, Bikwayo ka Noziwana recited a long list to Stuart that ranged from the musket that reached to a man’s neck (ibala) to the short pistol (isinqwana).
    • makofaneprince
       
      the zulu people also gave different guns different names
  • In this the Zulu were very different, for example, from the Xhosa who, between 1779 and 1878, fought nine Cape Frontier Wars against colonizers bearing fi rearms. During the course of this century of warfare, the Xhosa went from regarding fi rearms as mere ancillaries to their conventional weapons (as the Zulu still did) to making them central to the guerrilla tactics they increasingly adopted. By the time the Cape Colonial Defence Commission was taking evidence in September–October 1876, most witnesses were agreed that the Xhosa were skilled in their use of fi rearms, and made for formidable foes. 43
  • the best fi rearms went to men of high status
    • makofaneprince
       
      guns also symbolized nobility
  • fi rearms became increasingly essential for hunting,
  • one of the most important economic activities in southern Africa because of the international value placed on tusks, hides, and feathers. White hunters sold these items on the world markets and recruited and trained Africans in the use of fi rearms to assist them in obtaining them. 48 Ivory, in particular, was equally a source of wealth for the Zulu king, who was no longer content with his men killing elephants (as described by the hunter, Adulphe Delagorgue) by stabbing them with spears and letting them bleed to death, or driving them into pits fi lled with stakes. 49 The king required fi rearms for the task.
    • makofaneprince
       
      guns made hunting more easy and ensured wealth and many kingdoms.
  • Following the battle of Isandlwana, in which the Zulu captured about eight hundred modern Martini-Henry rifl es, Zulu marksmen, familiar through hunting with modern fi rearms, were able to make effective use of them in a number of subsequent engagements.
    • makofaneprince
       
      use of guns in hunting made it easy for the Zulu kingdom to know how to use guns in a war.
  • The Zulu believed that an overlap existed between this world and the world of the spirits that was expressed by a dark, mystical, evil force, umnyama, which created misfortune and could be contagious. 54 The Zulu, accordingly, were convinced that, when malicious witches (abathakathi) harnessed umnyama through ritual medicines (muthi), guns too could be made to serve their wicked ends.
    • makofaneprince
       
      guns were also associated with bad spirits. they believed those practicing witchraft could manipulate the guns.
  • He carried a breech-loading rifl e that he had taken at Isandhlwana [. . .] The Zulu army fl ed. He got tired of running away. He was a man too who understood well how to shoot. He shouted, ‘Back again!’ He turned and fi red. He struck a horse; it fell among the stones and the white man with it. They fi red at him. They killed him. 58
monyebodirt

Jstor.pdf - 1 views

shared by monyebodirt on 20 Apr 23 - No Cached
wendymoyo

Imperial Strategy and the Anglo-Zulu War of 1879 on JSTOR - 6 views

  •  
    Hi Wendy.All your articles say this is a preview, please access through your library. You need to link the actual article and do so through the UJ library. I spoke about this in Monday's lecture and sent out an announcement over the weekend about this. You are throwing away marks you could easily get.
« First ‹ Previous 1781 - 1800 of 1981 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page