Interesante: del punto (1) nuevas formas de evaluar la calidad, retos en un Open Scienca contexto; del (2) la referencia a un "upcoming copyright reform"(¿cuál?) del (3) padrísimo, el asunto de las licencias y el valor de CC, del (6) la liga al asunto del open research data y con el (7) lo legal
de (8) FAIR "findable" "accessible" "interoperable" "reusable"
todos los asuntos legales me hacen pensar en el meta lab,
en general, pensar en una profesión de "data manager"...
FAIR muy interesante en la perspectiva de cultura digital
En este link se habla de Creative Commons y las diferentes licencias que existen para poder moldear CopyRight y permitir la colaboración sin violar las leyes de CopyRight.
LINK a reporte de estudio
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4N_YJeByikgcUV3Ni1xWWZ0YkU
Un artículo del investigador Russell Smith que me pareció muy bueno. A pesar de que el contexto está dado en Australia, me parece que nos aporta algo porque cuestiona la forma de proteger las obras en Internet y menciona algunas de las posibles acciones que se pueden toar para regular las formas de distribuir contenidos en línea.
...de parte de London School of Economics and Political Science... presentación del reporte.
"A new report released by LSE's Media Department contradicts widespread claims about the decline of creative industries as a result of copyright infringement.
"The report shows that the gaming, film and publishing industries are growing and new business models are emerging based on digital sharing.
"For some in the creative industries, copyright infringement may actually be helping boost their revenues, the report finds. "
"Many people who find works that are covered by one of the following license want to do right and not upset the original creator of the work. Few people purposefully ignore a license and just do whatever they wish. But what do the little icons mean? And once I understand the icons, are there certain rules I need to follow?"
"3. Attribution does not make it right
Taking another person's image or graphic and giving them a "shout out," linkback, or any other type of attribution does not negate copyright infringement. Common sense may say that an artist wants exposure for their work, but we're talking about the law here and common sense doesn't always parallel. copyright law gives the copyright holder the right to decide where their work is published and maybe they don't want their work on your site, in your book, included in your newsletter or distributed to your social media network. It's not for us to question why they wouldn't want "exposure.""