Group items tagged

In this retrospective study, however, there was no record of any untoward side effect from Rigvir treatment or its discontinuation

Early observations of tumour regressions after virus infections have been published starting from the late 19th century

The present results show that in substage IB, IIA, IIB and IIC melanoma patients, Rigvir administration after surgery significantly (P<0.05) prolongs survival compared with patients who were managed according to current published guidelines

no value higher than grade 2 was recorded in Rigvir-treated patients. This is in contrast to most other cancer therapies, where grades 3 and 4 are frequently observed

Administration of virus induces the formation of neutralising antibodies that might potentially influence the efficiency of Rigvir

In 94 healthy adult participants tested, the titres were found to be low (1 : 20 to 1 : 62) 39,40. When tested in 155 adult cancer patients who had not been treated with Rigvir, neutralising antibodies against ECHO-7 were detected in ∼50% of the patients

the presence of ECHO-7 antibodies was shown to increase with age in children and level off to a plateau of around 75% in adults

Rigvir is an immunomodulator that affects both the humoral, antibody-mediated, and the cellular immune systems

neutralising antibodies do not affect efficacy when local or regional administration is used

it reduces the viability of melanoma, as well as pulmonary, gastric, pancreatic, bone, and breast cancer cell cultures

It is oncolytic in melanoma and rectum cancer patients

shown to improve the 5-year survival in rectum cancer patients

The five most common adult malignancies (colorectal, breast, prostate, melanoma and lung cancer)

n breast cancer, the optimal regimen(s) for cytotoxicchemotherapy in recurrent/metastatic disease are still notdefined, despite over 30 years of ‘research’ and a plethora of RCTs since the original Cooper regimen was published in1969

The five most ‘chemo-sensitive’ cancers,namely testis, Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lym- phoma, cervix and ovary

only 13 out of the 22 malignancies evaluated showed any improvement in 5-year survival, and theimprovement was greater than 10% in only three of those13 malignancies

the contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA

a benefit of less than 2.5% is likely to be applicable in other developed countries

  Overview The Contribution o

the benefit of cytotoxic chemotherapy may have been overestimated for cancers of oesophagus, stomach,rectum and brain.

this reflects the presentation of results as a ‘reduction in risk’ rather than asan absolute survival benefit[89,90]and by exaggerating theresponse rates by including ‘stable disease’

recent studies have documented impaired cognitive function inwomen receiving adjuvant treatment for breast cancer

the 5-year survival rate due solely to cytotoxicchemotherapy was 1.6%

the value of palliative chemotherapy has beenquestioned

“Intrinsic processes” include those that result in mutations due to random errors in DNA replication whereas “extrinsic factors” are environmental factors that affect mutagenesis rates (such as UV radiation, ionizing radiation, and carcinogens

intrinsic factors do not play a major causal role.

intrinsic cancer risk should be determined by the cancer incidence for those cancers with the least risk in the entire group controlling for total stem cell divisions

if one or more cancers would feature a much higher cancer incidence, for example, lung cancer among smokers vs. non-smokers, then this most likely reflects additional (and probably extrinsic) risk factors (smoking in this case)

Particularly, for breast and prostate cancers, it has long been observed that large international geographical variations exist in their incidences (5-fold for breast cancer, 25-fold for prostate cancer)14, and immigrants moving from countries with lower cancer incidence to countries with higher cancer rates soon acquire the higher risk of their new country

Colorectal cancer is another high-incidence cancer that is widely considered to be an environmental disease17, with an estimated 75% or more colorectal cancer risk attributable to diet

melanoma, its risk ascribed to sun exposure is around 65–86%

non-melanoma basal and squamous skin cancers, ~90% is attributable to UV

75% of esophageal cancer, or head and neck cancer are caused by tobacco and alcohol

HPV may cause ~90% cases in cervical cancer23, ~90% cases in anal cancer24, and ~70% in oropharyngeal cancer

HBV and HCV may account for ~80% cases of hepatocellular carcinoma

H pylori may be responsible for 65–80% of gastric cancer

While a few cancers have relatively large proportions of intrinsic mutations (>50%), the majority of cancers have large proportions of extrinsic mutations, for example, ~100% for Myeloma, Lung and Thyroid cancers and ~80–90% for Bladder, Colorectal and Uterine cancers, indicating substantial contributions of carcinogen exposures in the development of most cancers

onsistent estimate of contribution of extrinsic factors of >70–90% in most common cancer types. This concordance lends significant credibility to the overall conclusion on the role of extrinsic factors in cancer development

related to intracellular hydrogen peroxide generation

only be obtained by intravenous administration of AA

Preferentially kills neoplastic cells

Is virtually non-toxic at any dosage

Does not suppress the immune system, unlike most chemotherapy agents

Increases animal and human resistance to infectious agents by enhancing lymphocyte blastogenesis, enhancing cellular immunity, strengthening the extracellular matrix, and enhancing bactericidal activity of neutrophils and modulation of complement protein

Strengthens the structural integrity of the extracellular matrix which is responsible for stromal resistance to malignant invasiveness

1969, researchers at the NCI reported AA was highly toxic to Ehrlich ascites cells in vitro

In 1977, Bram et al reported preferential AA toxicity for several malignant melanoma cell lines, including four human-derived lines

Noto et al reported that AA plus vitamin K3 had growth inhibiting action against three human tumor cell lines at non-toxic levels

Metabolites of AA have also shown antitumor activity in vitro

The AA begins to reduce cell proliferation in the tumor cell line at the lowest concentration, 1.76 mg/dl, and is completely cytotoxic to the cells at 7.04 mg/dl

the normal cells grew at an enhanced rate at the low dosages (1.76 and 3.52 mg/dl)

preferential toxicity of AA for tumor cells. >95% toxicity to human endometrial adenocarcinoma and pancreatic tumor cells (ATCC AN3-CA and MIA PaCa-2) occurred at 20 and 30 mg/dl, respectively.

No toxicity or inhibition was demonstrated in the normal, human skin fibroblasts (ATCC CCD 25SK) even at the highest concentration of 50 mg/dl.

the use of very high-dose intravenous AA for the treatment of cancer was proposed as early as 1971

Cameron and Pauling have published extensive suggestive evidence for prolonged life in terminal cancer patients orally supplemented (with and without initial intravenous AA therapy) with 10 g/day of AA

AA, plasma levels during infusion were not monitored,

the long-term, oral dosage used in those experiments (10 g/day), while substantial and capable of producing immunostimulatory and extracellular matrix modulation effects, was not high enough to achieve plasma concentrations that are generally cytotoxic to tumor cells in culture

This low cytotoxic level of AA is exceedingly rare

5 — 40 mg/dl of AA is required in vitro to kill 100% of tumor cells within 3 days. The 100% kill levels of 30 mg/dl for the endometrial carcinoma cells and 40 mg/dl for the pancreatic carcinoma cells in Figure 2 are typical

normal range (95% range) of 0.39-1.13 mg/dl

1 h after beginning his first 8-h infusion of 115 g AA (Merit Pharmaceuticals, Los Angeles, CA), the plasma AA was 3.7 mg/dl and at 5 h was 19 mg/dl. During his fourth 8-h infusion, 8 days later, the 1 h plasma level was 158 mg/dl and 5 h was 185 mg/dl

plasma levels of over 100 mg/dl have been maintained in 3 patients for more than 5 h using continuous intravenous infusion

In rare instances of patients with widely disseminated and rapidly proliferating tumors, intravenous AA administration (10 — 45 g/day) precipitated widespread tumor hemorrhage and necrosis, resulting in death

Although the outcomes were disastrous in these cases, they are similar to the description of tumor-necrosis-factor-induced hemorrhage and necrosis in mice (52) and seem to demonstrate the ability of AA to kill tumor cells in vivo.

toxic effects of AA on one normal cell line were observed at 58.36 mg/dl and the lack of side effects in patients maintaining >100 mg/dl plasma levels

Although it is very rare, tumor necrosis, hemorrhage, and subsequent death should be the highest priority concern for the safety of intravenous AA for cancer patients.

Klenner, who reported no ill effects of dosages as high as 150 g intravenously over a 24-h period

Cathcart (55) who describes no ill effects with doses of up to 200 g/d in patients with various pathological conditions

following circumstances: renal insufficiency, chronic hemodialysis patients, unusual forms of iron overload, and oxalate stone formers

Screening for red cell glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, which can give rise to hemolysis of red blood cells under oxidative stress (57), should also be performed

any cancer therapy should be started at a low dosage to ensure that tumor hemorrhage does not occur.

patient is orally supplementing between infusions

a scorbutic rebound effect can be avoided with oral supplementation. Because of the possibility of a rebound effect, measurement of plasma levels during the periods between infusions should be performed to ensure that no such effect takes place

Every effort should be made to monitor plasma AA levels when a patient discontinues intravenous AA therapy.

tumor-associated antigens (TAs)

Proinflammatory cytokines secreted by inflammatory cells can contribute to tumor progression, and soluble factors produced by the tumor in response to nonspecific or tumor-specific signals, such as prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), adenosine, or TGF-β, downregulate functions of immune cells

they are largely ineffective in arresting tumor growth, although they can proliferate and mediate antitumor cytotoxicity on their removal from the tumor bed and ex vivo IL-2 activation.42

DCs (HLA-DR+CD86+CD80+CD14−) are nature’s best APCs

They are a common component of tumor immune infiltrates and are responsible for the uptake, processing, and cross-presentation of TAs to naive or memory T cells, thus playing a crucial role in the generation of tumor-specific effector T cells

DCs control the induction of Treg cells. In patients with cancer, cellular interactions between antigen-presenting DCs and T cells lead to expansion and accumulation of Treg cells at the tumor site and in the periphery

NK cells (CD3−CD56+CD16+), which mediate innate immunity and contain both perforin-rich and granzyme-rich granules, are well equipped to mediate lysis of tumor cells

B cells (CD19+, CD20+) are also rare in most human tumors, with the exception of breast cancer and melanoma

The initial acute inflammation involving the recruitment and influx of antitumor effector cells is replaced by chronic inflammation in later stages of tumor progression

Tissue hypoxia plays a major role in shaping the nature of immune infiltrates in tumors

IR also indirectly induces DNA damage by stimulating reactive oxygen species (ROS) production

IR is known to induce EMT in vitro

p53 is activated in response to IR-induced DNA damage

IR paradoxically also promotes tumour recurrence and metastasis

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs)

cancer cells undergoing EMT acquire invasive and metastatic properties

changes in the tumour microenvironment (TME)

IR seems to induce EMT and CSC phenotypes by regulating cellular metabolism

EMT, stemness, and oncogenic metabolism are known to be associated with resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy

Hanahan and Weinberg proposed ten hallmarks of cancer that alter cell physiology to enhance malignant growth: 1) sustained proliferation, 2) evasion of growth suppression, 3) cell death resistance, 4) replicative immortality, 5) evasion of immune destruction, 6) tumour-promoting inflammation, 7) activation of invasion and metastasis, 8) induction of angiogenesis, 9) genome instability, and 10) alteration of metabolism

EMT is a developmental process that plays critical roles in embryogenesis, wound healing, and organ fibrosis

IR is known to induce stemness and metabolic alterations in cancer cells

transforming growth factor-β [TGF-β], epidermal growth factor [EGF]) and their associated signalling proteins (Wnt, Notch, Hedgehog, nuclear-factor kappa B [NF-κB], extracellular signal-regulated kinase [ERK], and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [PI3K]/Akt

activate EMT-inducing transcription factors, including Snail/Slug, ZEB1/δEF1, ZEB2/SIP1, Twist1/2, and E12/E47

Loss of E-cadherin is considered a hallmark of EMT

IR has been shown to induce EMT to enhance the motility and invasiveness of several cancer cells, including those of breast, lung, and liver cancer, and glioma cells

IR may increase metastasis in both the primary tumour site and in normal tissues under some circumstance

sublethal doses of IR have been shown to enhance the migratory and invasive behaviours of glioma cells

ROS are known to play an important role in IR-induced EMT

High levels of ROS trigger cell death by causing irreversible damage to cellular components such as proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids, whereas low levels of ROS have been shown to promote tumour progression—including tumour growth, invasion, and metastasis

hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is involved in IR-induced EMT

Treatment with the N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a general ROS scavenger, prevents IR-induced EMT, adhesive affinity, and invasion of breast cancer cells

Snail has been shown to play a crucial role in IR-induced EMT, migration, and invasion

IR activates the p38 MAPK pathway, which contributes to the induction of Snail expression to promote EMT and invasion

NF-κB signalling that promotes cell migration

ROS promote EMT to allow cancer cells to avoid hostile environments

HIF-1 is a heterodimer composed of an oxygen-sensitive α subunit and a constitutively expressed β subunit.

Under normoxia, HIF-1α is rapidly degraded, whereas hypoxia induces stabilisation and accumulation of HIF-1α

levels of HIF-1α mRNA are enhanced by activation of the PI3K/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)

IR is known to increase stabilisation and nuclear accumulation of HIF-1α, since hypoxia is a major condition for HIF-1 activation

IR induces vascular damage that causes hypoxia

ROS is implicated in IR-induced HIF-1 activation

IR causes the reoxygenation of hypoxic cancer cells to increase ROS production, which leads to the stabilisation and nuclear accumulation of HIF-1

IR increases glucose availability under reoxygenated conditions that promote HIF-1α translation by activating the Akt/mTOR pathway

The stabilised HIF-1α then translocates to the nucleus, dimerizes with HIF-1β, and increases gene expression— including the expression of essential EMT regulators such as Snail—to induce EMT, migration, and invasion

TGF-β signalling has been shown to play a crucial role in IR-induced EMT

AP-1 transcription factor is involved in IR-induced TGF-β1 expression

Wnt/β-catenin signalling is also implicated in IR-induced EMT

Notch signalling is known to be involved in IR-induced EMT

IR also increases Notch-1 expression [99]. Notch-1 is known to induce EMT by upregulating Snail

PAI-1 signalling is also implicated in IR-induced Akt activation that increases Snail levels to induce EMT

EGFR activation is known to be associated with IR-induced EMT, cell migration, and invasion by activating two downstream pathways: PI3K/Akt and Raf/MEK/ERK

ROS and RNS are also implicated in IR-induced EGFR activation

IR has also been shown to activate Hedgehog (Hh) signalling to induce EMT

IR has been shown to induce Akt activation through several signalling pathways (EGFR, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 [CXCR4]/C-X-C motif chemokine 12 [CXCL12], plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 [PAI-1]) and upstream regulators (Bmi1, PTEN) that promote EMT and invasion

CSCs possess a capacity for self-renewal, and they can persistently proliferate to initiate tumours upon serial transplantation, thus enabling them to maintain the whole tumour

Conventional cancer treatments kill most cancer cells, but CSCs survive due to their resistance to therapy, eventually leading to tumour relapse and metastasis

identification of CSCs, three types of markers are utilised: cell surface molecules, transcription factors, and signalling pathway molecules

CSCs express distinct and specific surface markers; commonly used ones are CD24, CD34, CD38, CD44, CD90, CD133, and ALDH

Transcription factors, including Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, c-Myc, and Klf4,

signalling pathways, including those of TGF-β, Wnt, Hedgehog, Notch, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and JAK/STAT

microRNAs (miRNAs), including let-7, miR-22, miR-34a, miR-128, the miR-200 family, and miR-451

Non-CSCs can be reprogrammed to become CSCs by epigenetic and genetic changes

EMT-inducing transcription factors, such as Snail, ZEB1, and Twist1, are known to confer CSC properties

Signalling pathways involved in EMT, including those of TGF-β, Wnt, and Notch, have been shown to play important roles in inducing the CSC phenotype

TGF-β1 not only increases EMT markers (Slug, Twist1, β-catenin, N-cadherin), but also upregulates CSC markers (Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, Klf4) in breast and lung cancer cells

some CSC subpopulations arise independently of EMT

IR has been shown to induce the CSC phenotype in many cancers, including breast, lung, and prostate cancers, as well as melanoma

Genotoxic stress due to IR or chemotherapy promotes a CSC-like phenotype by increasing ROS production

IR has been shown to induce reprogramming of differentiated cancer cells into CSCs

In prostate cancer patients, radiotherapy increases the CD44+ cell population that exhibit CSC properties

IR also induces the re-expression of stem cell regulators, such as Sox2, Oct4, Nanog, and Klf4, to promote stemness in cancer cells

EMT-inducing transcription factors and signalling pathways, including Snail, STAT3, Notch signalling, the PI3K/Akt pathway, and the MAPK cascade, have been shown to play important roles in IR-induced CSC properties

STAT3 directly binds to the Snail promoter and increases Snail transcription, which induces the EMT and CSC phenotypes, in cisplatin-selected resistant cells

Other oncogenic metabolic pathways, including glutamine metabolism, the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), and synthesis of fatty acids and cholesterol, are also enhanced in many cancers

metabolic reprogramming

HIF-1α, p53, and c-Myc, are known to contribute to oncogenic metabolism

metabolic reprogramming

tumour cells exhibit high mitochondrial metabolism as well as aerobic glycolysis

occurring within the same tumour

CSCs can be highly glycolytic-dependent or oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS)-dependen

mitochondrial function is crucial for maintaining CSC functionality

cancer cells depend on mitochondrial metabolism and increase mitochondrial production of ROS that cause pseudo-hypoxia

HIF-1 then enhances glycolysis

CAFs have defective mitochondria that lead to the cells exhibiting the Warburg effect; the cells take up glucose, and then secrete lactate to 'feed' adjacent cancer cells

lactate transporter, monocarboxylate transporter (MCT)

nutrient microenvironment

Epithelial cancer cells express MCT1, while CAFs express MCT4. MCT4-positive, hypoxic CAFs secrete lactate by aerobic glycolysis, and MCT1-expressing epithelial cancer cells then uptake and use that lactate as a substrate for the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle

MCT4-positive cancer cells depend on glycolysis and then efflux lactate, while MCT1-positive cells uptake lactate and rely on OXPHOS

metabolic heterogeneity induces a lactate shuttle between hypoxic/glycolytic cells and oxidative/aerobic tumour cells

bulk tumour cells exhibit a glycolytic phenotype, with increased conversion of glucose to lactate (and enhanced lactate efflux through MCT4), CSC subsets depend on oxidative phosphorylation; most of the glucose entering the cells is converted to pyruvate to fuel the TCA cycle and the electron transport chain (ETC), thereby increasing mitochondrial ROS production

the major fraction of glucose is directed into the pentose phosphate pathway, to produce redox power through the generation of NADPH and ROS scavengers

HIF-1α, p53, and c-Myc, are known to contribute to oncogenic metabolism

regulatory molecules involved in EMT and CSCs, including Snail, Dlx-2, HIF-1, STAT3, TGF-β, Wnt, and Akt, are implicated in the metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells

HIF-1 induces the expression of glycolytic enzymes, including the glucose transporter GLUT, hexokinase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and MCT, resulting in the glycolytic switch

HIF-1 represses the expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK), which inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), thereby inhibiting mitochondrial activity

STAT3 has been implicated in EMT-induced metabolic changes as well

TGF-β and Wnt play important roles in the metabolic alteration of cancer cells

Akt is also implicated in the glycolytic switch and in promoting cancer cell invasiveness

EMT, invasion, metastasis, and stemness

pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2), LDH, and pyruvate carboxylase (PC), are implicated in the induction of the EMT and CSC phenotypes

decreased activity of PKM2 is known to promote an overall shift in metabolism to aerobic glycolysis

LDH catalyses the bidirectional conversion of lactate to pyruvate

High levels of LDHA are positively correlated with the expression of EMT and CSC markers

IR has been shown to induce metabolic changes in cancer cells

IR enhances glycolysis by upregulating GAPDH (a glycolysis enzyme), and it increases lactate production by activating LDHA, which converts pyruvate to lactate

IR enhances glycolysis by upregulating GAPDH (a glycolysis enzyme), and it increases lactate production by activating LDHA, which converts pyruvate to lactate

IR also elevates MCT1 expression that exports lactate into the extracellular environment, leading to acidification of the tumour microenvironment

IR increases intracellular glucose, glucose 6-phosphate, fructose, and products of pyruvate (lactate and alanine), suggesting a role for IR in the upregulation of cytosolic aerobic glycolysis

Lactate can activate latent TGF-

lactate stimulates cell migration and enhances secretion of hyaluronan from CAF that promote tumour metastasis

promote tumour survival, growth, invasion, and metastasis; enhance the stiffness of the ECM; contribute to angiogenesis; and induce inflammation by releasing several growth factors and cytokines (TGF-β, VEGF, hepatocyte growth factor [HGF], PDGF, and stromal cell-derived factor 1 [SDF1]), as well as MMP

tumours recruit the host tissue’s blood vessel network to perform four mechanisms: angiogenesis (formation of new vessels), vasculogenesis (de novo formation of blood vessels from endothelial precursor cells), co-option, and modification of existing vessels within tissues.

immunosuppressive cells such as tumour-associated macrophages (TAM), MDSCs, and regulatory T cells, and the immunosuppressive cytokines, TGF-β and interleukin-10 (IL-10)

immunosuppressive cells such as tumour-associated macrophages (TAM), MDSCs, and regulatory T cells, and the immunosuppressive cytokines, TGF-β and interleukin-10 (IL-10)

intrinsic immunogenicity or induce tolerance

cancer immunoediting’

three phases: 1) elimination, 2) equilibrium, and 3) escape.

The third phase, tumour escape, is mediated by antigen loss, immunosuppressive cells (TAM, MDSCs, and regulatory T cells), and immunosuppressive cytokines (TGF-β and IL-10).

IR can elicit various changes in the TME, such as CAF activity-mediated ECM remodelling and fibrosis, cycling hypoxia, and an inflammatory response

IR activates CAFs to promote the release of growth factors and ECM modulators, including TGF-β and MMP

TGF-β directly influences tumour cells and CAFs, promotes tumour immune escape, and activates HIF-1 signalling

MMPs degrade ECM that facilitates angiogenesis, tumour cell invasion, and metastasis

IR also promotes MMP-2/9 activation in cancer cells to promote EMT, invasion, and metastasis

IR-induced Snail increases MMP-2 expression to promote EMT

Radiotherapy has the paradoxical side-effect of increasing tumour aggressiveness

IR promotes ROS production in cancer cells, which may induce the activation of oncogenes and the inactivation of tumour suppressors, which further promote oncogenic metabolism

Metabolic alterations

oncogenic metabolism

elicit various changes in the TME

Although IR activates an antitumour immune response, this signalling is frequently suppressed by tumour escape mechanisms