Group items tagged

Reviews deductive-nomological (Popper, Hempel); statistical relevance (Salmon); causal mechanical; and unificationist (Friedman and Kitcher

Advances in the History of Psychology News & Notes from the Discipline, with Additional Relevant Resources

Apomediation is a new scholarly socio-technological term that characterizes the process of disintermediation (intermediaries are middlemen or "gatekeeper", e.g. health professionals giving "relevant" information to a patient, and disintermediation means to bypass them), whereby the former intermediaries are functionally replaced by apomediaries, i.e. network/group/collaborative filtering processes [Eysenbach, 2008 [WebCite] and 2007b]. The difference between an intermediary and an apomediary is that an intermediary stands "in between" (latin: inter- means "in between") the consumer and information/service, i.e. is absolutely necessary to get a specific information/service. In contrast, apomediation means that there are agents (people, tools) which "stand by" (latin: apo- means separate, detached, away from) to guide a consumer to high quality information/services/experiences, without being a prerequisite to obtain that information/service in the first place. The switch from an intermediation model to an apomediation model has broadimplications for example for the way people judge credibility, as hypothesized and elaborated in more detail elsewhere [

Windows 8 system operates on a compendium of processes and services. Services specifically are vital to execute a login session, as the important drivers and components are loaded through them. In the relevant interface, you can view more than a hundred listings of services.