Skip to main content

Home/ QN2019/ Group items tagged manifesto

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Aurialie Jublin

Draft for a Mutualism and Self-Management Manifesto | Commonfare.net - 0 views

  •  
    "In view of the European meeting of recovered factories and mutual societies, to be held in RiMaflow between next 12 and 14 April, we propose, in Italian and in English, a text on conflicting mutualism whose drafting was shared among all the realities that wanted to participate. The ambition is that this manifesto will concretely become a plural but common mobilization tool with which to face the challenges of the new phase. (The conference working group). "
Aurialie Jublin

Manifesto | Openbook social network - 0 views

  • 1. Honest. All of our code is open-source. This means it’s free for everyone to see, reproduce and contribute to. We’re transparent about how the social network works. Additionally, in partnership with FoundersPledge, we’ll be giving 30% of our revenue towards making the world a better place. For example, education, climate-change prevention, mental-health and sanitisation. It’s about time tech-companies benefit everyone.
  • We want to build Openbook together. We will create a special group where we encourage you to help us decide what we build next or what we should improve. Let’s build the best social network ever!
  • 3. Privacy-friendly and secure This is what drove us to build Openbook. The privacy and security of our users will always be at the core of everything we do. We don’t track anything you do, neither monetize your information nor share it without your explicit and informed consent.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Privacy by default All optional data sharing will be disabled by default, and it is up to you if you want to give that application more of your data instead of the other way around.
  • Our business model is not and will never be advertisements. We will have a transparent revenue model based on a generic way for people to securely transact physical and digital goods and services inside the network. This will be done through an atomic digital unit of value. Although this initially reflected as a marketplace, our ambitions go way beyond that.
  •  
    "Openbook will have the great things you'd expect from a social network: chats, posts, groups and events to name a few. Plus, it will be honest, personal, privacy-friendly, secure and fun ;-)."
Aurialie Jublin

Charter for Building a Data Commons for a Free, Fair and Sustainable Future | CommonsBlog - 0 views

  • 1. **Reflect on your intentions together** Discuss the core of your project again and again. Everybody involved should always feel in resonance with the direction in which it’s heading.
  • 2. **Make your community thrive** For the project to be successful, a reliable community is more important than anything else. Care for those who might support you when you need them most.
  • 3. **Separate commons and commerce** Mapping for the commons is different from producing services or products to compete on the map-market.
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • 4. **Design for interoperability** Think of your map as a node in a network of many maps. Talk with other contributors to the Data Commons to find out if you can use the same data model, licence and approach to mapping.
  • 5. **Care for a living vocabulary** Vocabularies as entry points to complex social worlds are always incomplete. Learn from other mappers‘ vocabularies. Make sure your vocabulary can be adjusted. Make it explicit and publish it openly, so that others can learn from it too.
  • 6. **Document transparently** Sharing your working process, learnings and failures allow others to replicate, join and contribute. Don’t leave documentation for after. Do it often and make it understandable. Use technologies designed for open cooperation.
  • 7. **Crowdsource what you can** Sustain your project whenever possible with money, time, knowledge, storing space, hardware or monitoring from your community or public support. Stay independent!
  • 8. **Use FLOSS tools** It gives you the freedom to further develop your own project and software according to your needs. And it enables you to contribute to the development of these tools.
  • 9. **Build upon the open web platform** Open web standards ensure your map, its data and associated applications cannot be enclosed and are prepared for later remixing and integration with other sources.
  • 10. **Own your data** In the short run, it seems to be a nightmare to refrain from importing or copying what you are not legally entitled to. In the long run, it is the only way to prevent you from being sued or your data being enclosed. Ban Google.
  • 11. **Protect your data** To own your data is important, but not enough. Make sure nobody dumps your data back into the world of marketization and enclosures. Use appropriate licenses to protect your collective work!
  • 12. **Archive your project** When it doesn’t work anymore for you, others still might want to build on it in the future.
  •  
    "Nations-States rely on constitutions. Common(er)s find common ground through a Charter. If you are part of the co-creation of a powerful Data Commons - through mapping, coding, data modelling or other activities - this is for you. It is an fundamental building-block for online and offline cooperation. The following is version 0.6 of what has been called in previously: Charter for Building a Data Commons of Alternative Economies or Mapping for the Commons Manifesto. We, the participants of the Intermapping meeting (March 2017 in Florence), hope to hereby publish a version that provides orientation to the countless mapping processes for a free, fair and sustainable world. We invite you to work together on the practical issues: how to implement the principles outlined in the Charter (see below)? Let's federate our efforts to make the Commons thrive!"
Aurialie Jublin

Ind.ie - Ethical Design Manifesto - 0 views

  • Technology that respects human rights is decentralised, peer-to-peer, zero-knowledge, end-to-end encrypted, free and open source, interoperable, accessible, and sustainable. It respects and protects your civil liberties, reduces inequality, and benefits democracy.
  • Technology that respects human effort is functional, convenient, and reliable. It is thoughtful and accommodating; not arrogant or demanding. It understands that you might be distracted or differently-abled. It respects the limited time you have on this planet.
  • Technology that respects human experience is beautiful, magical, and delightful. It just works. It’s intuitive. It’s invisible. It recedes into the background of your life. It gives you joy. It empowers you with superpowers. It puts a smile on your face and makes your life better.
Aurialie Jublin

Open source sustainability | TechCrunch - 0 views

  • Engineers around the world pour their sweat and frankly, their hearts into these passion projects that undergird all software in the modern internet economy. In exchange, they ask for nothing in return except for recognition and help in keeping their projects alive and improving them. It’s an incredible movement of decentralized voluntarism and represents humanity at its best.
  • Two years later, a new crop of entrepreneurs, open source maintainers, and organizations have taken Eghbal up on that challenge, developing solutions that maintain the volunteer spirit at the heart of open source while inventing new economic models to make the work sustainable. All are early, and their long-term effects on the output and quality of open source are unknown. But each solution offers an avenue that could radically change the way we think of a career in open source in the future.
  • Eghbal’s report two years ago summarized the vast issues facing open source maintainers, challenges that have remained essentially unchanged in the interim. It’s a quintessential example of the “tragedy of the commons.” As Eghbal wrote at the time, “Fundamentally, digital infrastructure has a free rider problem. Resources are offered for free, and everybody (whether individual developer or large software company) uses them, so nobody is incentivized to contribute back, figuring that somebody else will step in.” That has led to a brittle ecosystem, just as open source software reached the zenith of its influence.
  • ...22 more annotations...
  • Eghbal pointed to OpenSSL as an example, a library that powers a majority of encrypted communications on the web. Following the release of the Heartbleed security bug, people were surprised to learn that the OpenSSL project was the work of a very small team of individuals, with only one of them working on it full-time (and at a very limited salary compared to industry norms).
  • No one wants open source to disappear, or for maintainers to burnout. Yet, there is a strong cultural force against commercial interests in the community. Money is corrupting, and dampens the voluntary spirit of open source efforts. More pragmatically, there are vast logistical challenges with managing money on globally distributed volunteer teams that can make paying for work logistically challenging.
  • Kyle Mitchell, a lawyer by trade and founder of License Zero, says that there is an assumption that “Open source will continue to fall from the sky like manna from heaven and that the people behind it can be abstracted away.” He concludes: “It is just really wrong.”That view was echoed by Henry Zhu, who is the maintainer of the popular JavaScript compiler Babel. “We trust startups with millions of VC money and encourage a culture of ‘failing fast,’ yet somehow the idea of giving to volunteers who may have showed years of dedication is undesirable?” he said.
  • Mitchell believes that one of the most important challenges is just getting comfortable talking about money. “Money feels dirty until it doesn’t,” he said. “I would like to see more money responsibility in the community.” One challenge he notes is that “learning to be a great maintainer doesn’t teach you how to be a great open source contractor or consultant.” GitHub works great as a code repository service, but ultimately doesn’t teach maintainers the economics of their work.
  • Perhaps the greatest debate in sustaining open source is deciding who or what to target: the individual contributors — who often move between multiple projects — or a particular library itself.
  • Patreon is a crowdsourced subscription platform, perhaps best known for the creatives it hosts. These days though, it is also increasingly being used by notable open source contributors as a way to connect with fans and sustain their work. Aboukhadijeh launched his page after seeing others doing it. “A bunch of people were starting up Patreons, which was kind of a meme in my JavaScript circles,” he said. His Patreon page today has 72 contributors providing him with $2,874 in funding per month ($34,488 annually).
  • That may seem a bit paltry, but he explained to me that he also supplements his Patreon with funding from organizations as diverse as Brave (an adblocking browser with a utility token model) to PopChest (a decentralized video sharing platform). That nets him a couple of more thousands of dollars per month.
  • Aboukhadijeh said that Twitter played an outsized role in building out his revenue stream. “Twitter is the most important on where the developers talk about stuff and where conversations happen…,” he said. “The people who have been successful on Patreon in the same cohort [as me] who tweet a lot did really well.”
  • For those who hit it big, the revenues can be outsized. Evan You, who created the popular JavaScript frontend library Vue.js, has reached $15,206 in monthly earnings ($182,472 a year) from 231 patrons. The number of patrons has grown consistently since starting his Patreon in March 2016 according to Graphtreon, although earnings have gone up and down over time.
  • While Patreon is one direct approach for generating revenues from users, another one is to offer dual licenses, one free and one commercial. That’s the model of License Zero, which Kyle Mitchell propsosed last year. He explained to me that “License Zero is the answer to a really simple question with no simple answers: how do we make open source business models open to individuals?”
  • License Zero is a permissive license based on the two-clause BSD license, but adds terms requiring commercial users to pay for a commercial license after 90 days, allowing companies to try a project before purchasing it. If other licenses aren’t available for purchase (say, because a maintainer is no longer involved), then the language is no longer enforceable and the software is offered as fully open source. The idea is that other open source users can always use the software for free, but for-profit uses would require a payment.
  • Mitchell believes that this is the right approach for individuals looking to sustain their efforts in open source. “The most important thing is the time budget – a lot of open source companies or people who have an open source project get their money from services,” he said. The problem is that services are exclusive to a company, and take time away from making a project as good as it can be. “When moneymaking time is not time spent on open source, then it competes with open source,” he said.
  • Supporting individuals makes a lot of sense, but often companies want to support the specific projects and ecosystems that underpin their software. Doing so can be next to impossible. There are complicated logistics required in order for companies to fund open source, such as actually having an organization to send money to (and for many, to convince the IRS that the organization is actually a non-profit). Tidelift and Open Collective are two different ways to open up those channels.
  • Fischer and his team wanted to create a platform that would allow open source ecosystems to sustain themselves. “We felt frustrated at some level that while open source has taken over a huge portion of software, a lot of the creators of open source have not been able to capture a lot of the value they are creating,” he explained.Tidelift is designed to offer assurances “around areas like security, licensing, and maintenance of software,” Fischer explained. The idea has its genesis in Red Hat, which commercialized Linux. The idea is that companies are willing to pay for open source when they can receive guarantees around issues like critical vulnerabilities and long-term support. In addition, Tidelift handles the mundane tasks of setting up open source for commercialization such as handling licensing issues.
  • Tidelift initially launched in the JavaScript ecosystem around React, Angular, and Vue.js, but will expand to more communities over time. The company has raised $15 million in venture capital from General Catalyst and Foundry Group, plus former Red Hat chairman and CEO Matthew Szulik.
  • Fischer hopes that the company can change the economics for open source contributors. He wants the community to move from a model of “get by and survive” with a “subsistence level of earnings” and instead, help maintainers of great software “win big and be financially rewarded for that in a significant way.”
  • Where Tidelift is focused on commercialization and software guarantees, Open Collective wants to open source the monetization of open source itself.Open Collective is a platform that provides tools to “collectives” to receive money while also offering mechanisms to allow the members of those collectives to spend their money in a democratic and transparent way.
  • Xavier Damman, founder president of Open Collective, believes that this radical transparency could reshape how the economics of open source are considered by its participants. Damman likens Open Collective to the “View Source” feature of a web browser that allows users to read a website’s code. “Our goal as a platform is to be as transparent as possible,” he said.
  • Open Collective was launched in late 2015, and since then has become home to 647 open source projects. So far, Webpack, the popular JavaScript build tool, has generated the most revenue, currently sitting at $317,188 a year. One major objective of the organization is to encourage more for-profit companies to commit dollars to open source. Open Collective places the logos of major donors on each collective page, giving them visible credit for their commitment to open source.
  • Damman’s ultimate dream is to change the notion of ownership itself. We can move from “Competition to collaboration, but also ownership to commons,” he envisioned.
  • It’s unfortunately very early days for open source sustainability. While Patreon, License Zero, Tidelift, and Open Collective are different approaches to providing the infrastructure for sustainability, ultimately someone has to pay to make all that infrastructure useful. There are only a handful of Patreons that could substitute for an engineer’s day job, and only two collectives by my count on Open Collective that could support even a single maintainer full time. License Zero and Tidelift are too new to know how they will perform yet.
  • The change though can happen through all of us who work on code — every software engineer and product manager. If you work at a for-profit company, take the lead in finding a way to support the code that allows you to do your job so efficiently. The decentralization and volunteer spirit of the open source community needs exactly the same kind of decentralized spirit in every financial contributor. Sustainability is each of our jobs, every day. If we all do our part, we can help to sustain one of the great intellectual movements humanity has ever created, and end the oxymoron of open source sustainability forever.
  •  
    "Open source maintainers are exhausted and rarely paid. A new generation wants to change the economics."
Aurialie Jublin

[Internet]MIT research scientist David Clark has a 17-point wish list for how to fix th... - 0 views

  • In Designing an Internet, he presents a 17-point wish list for a better internet compiled from policy papers, speeches, and manifestos:Catalog of Aspirations The Internet should reach every person by some means. (Reach) The Internet should be available to us everywhere. (Ubiquity) The Internet should continue to evolve to match the pace and direction of the larger IT sector. (Evolution) The Internet should be used by more of the population. (Uptake) Cost should not be a barrier to the use of the Internet. (Affordable) The Internet should provide experiences that are sufficiently free of frustration, fears, and unpleasant experiences that people are not deterred from using it. (Trustworthy) The Internet should not be an effective space for lawbreakers. (Lawful) The Internet should not raise concerns about national security. (National Security) The Internet should be a platform for vigorous innovation and thus a driver of the economy. (Innovation) The Internet should support a wide range of services and applications. (Generality) Internet content should be accessible to all without blocking or censorship. (Unblocked) The consumer should have choices in their Internet experience. (Choice) The Internet should serve as a mechanism for the distribution of wealth among different sectors and countries. (Redistribution) The Internet (and Internet technology, whether in the public network or not) should become a unified technology platform for communication. (Unification) For any region of the globe, the behavior of the Internet should be consistent with and reflect its core cultural/political values. (Local values) The Internet should be a tool to promote social, cultural, and political values, especially universal ones. (Universal values) The Internet should be a means of communication between citizens of the world. (Global)
  • He categorizes the aspirations into three pragmatic buckets: utility, economics, and security. But the subtext of each aspiration is a longing for structures that would entice users to be better humans—an internet that is moral.
  • The notion of shutting down the internet to start anew is a fairytale. Any improvement will be incremental, hard-fought and deliberate. Clark notes that even the US Federal Communications Commission which regulates the country’s telecommunications and broadcast media industries isn’t interested in shaping the public character of the internet. Its solution is to encourage competition and hope for the best, as stated in its latest strategic plan. Clearly, the laissez-faire attitude hasn’t exactly worked out for the country.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • The problem—or the “fundamental tussle,” as Clark puts it—lies in the fact that private companies, not governments control the internet today, and relying on the good conscience of profit-driven technocrats offers little assurance. “That’s a pretty inconsistent hope to lean on,” he says. “Remember, on Facebook, you’re not the customer. You’re the product served to advertisers.”
  • Ultimately, improving the internet hinges on seeing it as public service first, instead of a money-making venture. Barring one global entity with the will and the resources to enforce this, fixing it will be a kind of community project, and one of the most urgent kind.
  •  
    "This refrain echoes across all corners of the internet, and has become a general, all-purpose complaint for all of the bad things we encounter online. Trolling, fake news, dark patterns, identity theft, cyber bulling, nasty 4Chan threads are just some of the symptoms of this corruption. But the first step to fixing the internet requires an understanding of what it actually is."
Aurialie Jublin

Chartes et manifestes numérique et éthique - HackMD - 0 views

  • En français Manifeste RESET - 2019 - FING Label territoire numérique inclusif-mars 2019 Orientations stratégiques cadrant le développement des projets numériques au Pôle Solidarité Citoyenneté Culture de Rennes métropole 1 Développer des services numériques nouveaux pour une accessibilité renforcée aux services publics 2 Lutter contre la fracture numérique (et l’intégrer dans le point numéro 1) 3 Impulser une culture collaborative (personnes morales, habitants, institutions, etc) 4 Faire place et donner à voir l’innovation et l’expérimentation 5 Accompagner en interne l’appropriation d’une culture du numérique dans la collectivité. Conception numérique responsable - Low tech - Green IT (eco-responsable) Charte territoire France connectée pour un numérique inclusif (décembre 2018 - Etat-Gironde) - il existerait un pdf en ligne :-) Déclaration de Montréal IA Responsable Charte sur l’usage de la donnée - Nantes métropole - juin 2019 Manifeste de la fabcity Manifeste pour une démocratie délibérative (civic tech-BlueNove) Projet de charte des smart cities (ADULLACT - juin 2019) Charte PrestaLibre pour les relations entre prestataires informatiques et collectivités (2018, Lorient et les Consometers). Charte de l’aidant numérique, ville de Paris Charte de l’aidant numérique, Grand Chambery CHARTE DE L’ACCOMPAGNEMENT NUMERIQUE DES RESEAUX LOCAUX D’INCLUSION NUMERIQUE, Stratégie Départementale d’Inclusion numérique des Pyrénées-Atlantique Kit et modèle de mandat de la CNIL pour les travailleurs sociaux Charte internationale des données ouvertes [Serment d’Hippocrate pour Data Scientist by Data For Good] Explications (https://www.hippocrate.tech/) Serment (https://framavox.org/g/Qtz0JHr9/dataforgood-serment) Charte qualité des données de Datatourisme Charte de l’IFLA sur Internet en bibliothèque Charte Biblib ABF (Association des bibliothécaire de France)
  •  
    "L'objectif est de recenser des ressources de type "charte" ou "manifeste" permettant de cadrer éthiquement les développements de projets/plateformes/services/médiations outillés par du numérique, notamment sur des territoires. L'idée est de ne pas se focaliser sur la performance, la précision, le passage à l'échelle de nouveaux services ou de processus optimisés, mais de fabriquer des territoires souhaitables, à l'aide du numérique (le numérique peut servir à "ralentir" ou "déconnecter" des espaces-temps, par exemple. Il peut respecter des principes, utiliser des méthodes éco-responsables, des valeurs comme la démocratie, etc)."
1 - 7 of 7
Showing 20 items per page