Skip to main content

Home/ Redshift Strategy/ Group items tagged Delivery

Rss Feed Group items tagged

David Astle

Ingesting video for multichannel delivery - 0 views

  •  
    Ingesting video for multichannel delivery
David Astle

IBC2012 - IBC2011 Innovation Award Winner - Content Delivery - 0 views

  •  
    IBC2011 Innovation Award Winner - Content Delivery
David Astle

Content Protection for your Streaming Video through your Content Delivery Network [CDN] - 0 views

  •  
    Content Protection through your Content Delivery Network [CDN]
Alex Street

Difference between progressive download and streaming online videos - 0 views

  • Streaming video requires access to a streaming media server.
  • When a video streams, it is being sent via UDP protocol to a player on the end users compter. The user will have the ability to fast forward or rewind the video.
  • video isn't being downloaded to the end users computer so it is less likely that the content will be stolen
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Most web hosting providers or Content Delivery Networks (CDN) will have streaming media servers available to use
  •  
    The biggest disadvantage of streaming over progressive download is if the user watches the same video over and over you will pay for the delivery of it each time. Videos are also streamed at what ever bit rate they are encoded at. Keep this in mind when creating HD quality video. 8Mbps video may sound and look great, but most homes can't sustain an 8Mbps connection. If you have really high bit rate video, consider delivering via HTTP. Most web hosting providers or Content Delivery Networks (CDN) will have streaming media servers available to use. Historically, Flash video was more expensive to deliver than other forms. Recently prices have compressed and you will find that it costs about the same to deliver Flash or Windows Media files. In the past I would have said if your video is more than 10 minutes in length deliver it via Stream and less do progressive. Since prices
David Astle

FT.com / UK - British TV groups weigh up web video delivery - 0 views

  • Some analysts question whether VoD can be as profitable as broadcast TV. The dual costs of piping internet video into the home and licensing content from producers - both paid out on a per-view basis - "may call into question the level of profits that can be made in the long term" from VoD, says David Cockram of Oliver & Ohlbaum, a media consultancy. "More people are taking more of the pie."
  • Broadcasters already have to pay companies providing "content delivery networks" to ensure their on-demand programming reaches viewers in good quality and without loading-time delays mid-video. Every time a programme is viewed online through their VoD services, the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and other broadcasters pay a CDN provider such as Akamai, Level 3 or, soon, BT.
  • Today, one half-hour programme costs between 2p and 5p to stream through a CDN every time it is viewed. That may not sound much, but with the BBC iPlayer serving up almost 60m TV shows in November, a broadcaster's CDN costs could already exceed £1m a month.
David Astle

Content Distribution | Enterprise Business | AT&T - 0 views

  •  
    Effectively Manage Content Delivery with a CDN
Alex Street

Ovum Research Store - Consumer Insights: Exploring the TV Apps Opportunity - 0 views

  • new use-cases
  • add value for consumers by augmenting and enhancing the TV user experience
  • overview of consumers' online activities by connected device type
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • long-form video-consumption on non-traditional viewing devices
  • elements of the mobile app store model can be effectively adapted for the implementation of TV apps.
  • opportunity to exploit TV apps as a marketing and distribution channel
  • grouping of TV apps into distinct categories
  • ew modes of content delivery and consumption.
  • marketing, distributing, and accessing online content or services has been instrumental in driving changes in consumer behaviour.
  • direct monetization potential
  • demand for multiscreen access to pay-TV services
  • online activity today is TV-related or video-centric
  • kind of TV apps might consumers be prepared to pay?
  • use cases for apps delivered only to TV set
  • mobile apps environment translate
  • web-based services and applications are consumers
Alex Street

What is Video Streaming? | LongTail Video | Home of the JW Player - 1 views

  • video delivery mechanisms
  • three widely used ways
  • Progressive Download, RTMP/RTSP Streaming, and Adaptive HTTP Streaming
  • ...24 more annotations...
  • Progressive Download is the most widely used
  • easiest to implement
  • Progressive Download is supported by Flash, HTML5 browsers
  • bandwidth is wasted on data downloaded but not watched
  • simplicity of Progressive Download also has its downsides.
  • inability to change the quality of the video mid-stream
  • For longer videos, the downsides start to impact playback too much
  • Progressive Download works fine for short clips (a few minutes).
  • RTSP/RTMP Streaming
  • RTMP/RTSP Streaming is widely used by professional media organizations like Hulu
  • only deliver the frames of a video the user is currently watchin
  • most widely solution is used is RTMP (Real Time Messaging Protocol)
  • HTML5 does not include a dedicated streaming protocol, nor does the iPad/iPhone
  • RTMP streaming can change video quality mid-stream
  • allows for optimal playback quality in the fullscreen and WiFi/3G scenarios
  • if the connection speed drops below the minimum bandwidth needed for the video, playback will be continuously interrupted.
  • has specific server and protocol requirements, which makes it less accessible and adds significant complexity and cost
  • Adaptive HTTP Streaming is a fairly new streaming format
  • Adaptive HTTP Streaming works by storing your videos on the server in small fragment
  • daptive HTTP Streaming leverages standard webservers, it is supported by webhosters and CDNs alike.
  • none of the Adaptive HTTP Streaming implementations work with regular MP4 files.
  • Adaptive HTTP Streaming will likely become the single video streaming method over time
  • live streaming is not possible,
  • o data is downloaded in advance and data a user has seen is immediately discarded.
David Astle

TelecomTV | Groups | | BT Collaborates with Cisco on Video CDN - 0 views

  • nd, security concerns are reduced as content delivery will take place within a private network, avoiding the int
Alex Street

BBC - BBC Internet Blog: Introducing the all new BBC iPlayer (This time it's personal) - 0 views

  • simpler to use, personalised and social.
  • iPlayer V2,
  • main problems we had to solve were largely technical things like:
  • ...64 more annotations...
  • Twitterverse is becoming the tastemaker.
  • available i
  • ideo quality
  • reliability of video delivery
  • dealing with massive peak loads
  • iPlayer V2 hosting platform was also designed to scale across multiple platforms
  • Actual Availability,
  • scaling to 1.5 million users,
  • 15 million page views delivering over 1.1 billion(!) minutes of video each month
  • Two years ago when we launched iPlayer our goals and challenges were largely technical - scalability, reliability, video encoding
  • next set of challenges was not so much technical as social
  • "As people begin moving from television to the web, what happens to the role of the linear TV scheduler as the tastemaker
  • platform capable
  • the scheduler is the leading tastemaker.
  • iPlayer does a fine job of satisfying the time-shifted desires
  • BBC schedulers create the desire to watch a programme; iPlayer lets you see it at a time that's convenient to you
  • what if you no longer watched linear TV? Who becomes the tastemaker then?
  • largely theoretical problem
  • iPlayer home page that feels almost more like an application than a traditional web site
  • in the world of YouTube where there is no master scheduler who can shape demand.
  • clear evidence that linear TV created the demand while iPlayer satisfied it.
  • wanted it to become a driver of demand, s
  • The question then is, in a world which cannot be driven by schedulers
  • if schedulers are going to be augmented by your friends as drivers of consumption in the future, the challenge for the team was to integrate friends and social into the iPlayer
  • delights both early adopters and the mainstream audience.
  • folded your personal experience into the fabric of the main site
  • o integrate with Facebook and other social networks
  • make the recommendations and social graph visible within iPlayer,
  • addition of course to any external activity.
  • solution we came up with was to create a BBC login - known as BBC iD
  • can then connect with Facebook, Twitter
  • expandable Favourites zone
  • designed Favourites to be like your mail Inbox, showing the total number of items, how many are newly arrived,
  • rely on Favourites to give me a constant stream of things to watch
  • ll your favourites and other settings can roam across all the devices on which you use iPlayer.
  • So now if I'm bored sitting in a train on the way home, I can look for new programmes to watch, add them to my Favourites,
  • Personalised iPlayer home page
  • default view that everyone sees to something that's, well, just for you.
  • iPlayer traffic is doubling each year, it still only accounts for 2-3% of linear TV viewing.
  • Featured and Most Popular
  • For You and Friends:
  • iPlayer homepage into the tastemaker of your choice
  • connect iPlayer to your Facebook and/or Twitter social graph
  • Player home page to meet the needs of a mainstream audience looking for editorialised
  • My Categories
  • he iPlayer server will keep a lookout for any new content in your selected categories
  • big increase in live TV viewing in iPlayer - and with the upcoming World Cup being a huge driver of live online viewing
  • new Live Viewing page
  • fuel for the Friends drawer on the iPlayer home page
  • something that for some will be the killer feature of the new site
  • sync your iPlayer with theirs
  • Shout button - a
  • shouts only go to your Messenger friends who are in iPlayer right now
  • Watch with Friends is being added to the site in the next few weeks - stay tuned!
  • adaptive bitrate system
  • ch automatically adjusts
  • Adobe's upcoming Flash 10.1 release with H.264 hardware acceleratio
  • New iPlayer Desktop
  • Series Downloads and live radio & TV.
  • favourite programmes already downloaded to your computer ready to view when you're offline
  • Player Desktop will now automatically download every future episode for you
  • new feature in iPlayer Desktop for live TV
  • BBC's 17 network and national radio stations..
  • I am moving on to become CTO of Project Canvas, and this is the last major piece of work
Alex Street

BlackArrow - Decision Suite - 0 views

  • esigned to run in any cable headend or data center,
  • BlackArrow Ad Decision Service (ADS)
  • CPM, campaign performance, frequency capping and metering among others to maximize yield while managing campaign commitments
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • Real-time placement
  • Ad Decision Service
  • algorithms optimize
  • SCTE 130-3 compliant
  • placement opportunity decision engine
  • program attributes, daypart, geography
  • addressability criteria
  • BlackArrow’s Request Decoration Services enhance addressability
  • ntegration of content and subscriber data into the ad decisioning process
  • internal or third-party data sources
  • Optional local caching of data
  • dynamic ad delivery across any on-demand platform
Alex Street

Videonet - News and Analysis - Broadcasters must dominate synchronized companion apps - 0 views

  • synchronise content around a programme so that what appears on the tablet or smartphone
  • never.no interactivity suite is directly coupled with the broadcast playout systems and ‘listens’ to events in the live broadcast and fires off triggers to a Content Delivery Network to determine what functionality the second screen will show at any time
  • ompanion devices, because they are IP-based and are personal by nature, introduce the interactivity and addressability that broadcasters cannot get via the television alone.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • hese could also be synchronised in real-time so that the third-party can sell advertising inventory that coincides with the advertising breaks during the show or live event.
  • reater engagement, greater understanding of the audience and increased advertising potential
  • IBC: Impact of second screen apps proven with TV 2 Tour de France
  • Never.no provided the Synchronized Companion App Framework, which is part of the company’s Interactivity Suite (IS), a framework for connecting fragmented media technologies like TV, mobile and socia
1 - 17 of 17
Showing 20 items per page