Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ Phdchat
Ailsa Haxell

An ethnography by any other name - 1 views

Agar, M. (2006). An ethnography by any other name... Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/a...

ethnography

started by Ailsa Haxell on 09 Jan 11 no follow-up yet
Heather Davis

http://metatheoria.com.ar/Index.php/m/article/viewFile/32/16 - 5 views

  •  
    The nature and structure of scientific theories, Moulines, 2010
  •  
    Thanks for posting this Heather, I found it useful in clarifying what is/isnt theory, and differentiating between theories that get referred to as weak or strong
Heather Davis

Understanding Diagrams - 0 views

  •  
    RT @brendam: Diagrammatica: a collection of graphic images that show another way to see theoretical arguments http://bit.ly/eAhECW #phdchat
Heather Davis

Feudalism and academia: UK academics' accounts of research culture - International Jour... - 0 views

  •  
    [Article] Feudalism & academia: UK academics' accounts of research culture http://is.gd/k72Ae (Int J Qual Studies in Education) #KM $
Jane Davis

Phdchat 24 November 2010 - 1 views

  •  
    Phdchat archive 24th November 2010
Jane Davis

YouTube - Grounded theorists and some critiques of grounded theory - 0 views

  •  
    A simple outline of criticisms of grounded theory. Mainly a lack of practicality for Phd students, institutional requirements and non-adherence
Jane Davis

YouTube - Grounded Theory - Core Elements. Part 1 - 0 views

  •  
    Very straightforward introduction to Grounded Theory in standard lecture mode
Jane Davis

How big is my topic? | Brains - 2 views

  •  
    Really interesting post on the 'concept' ...
Heather Davis

The concept of 'researcher as research instrument' within the hinterlands of research - 1 views

  •  
    The notion of researcher as research instrument is a central one to most qualitative inquiry. This is a blog and readings I posted after giving a presentation to the QI SIG at RMIT in May 2009.
Bex Hewett

Qualitative blog diaries - 2 views

  •  
    Using blogs as a diary in research
  •  
    Thanks for this Bex, it's always good to get references to this sort of material. I have had a research blog since Nov 2008 and see it as a way to strengthen 'the researcher as research instrument' that is me. I wrote a guest post on thethesiswhisper.wordpress.com blog a couple of months ago on social media and the phd and there are a few more references in that. See http://thethesiswhisperer.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/social-media-and-your-phd
E Jackson

Home - 0 views

  •  
    Research Methods Knowledge Base
E Jackson

Positivism & Post-Positivism - 1 views

  • Positivism & Post-Positivism
    • E Jackson
       
      This has been a useful short article for me - research philosophy is something that I "struggle" to get to grips with. Decided to spend Xmas trying(!) to understand it all...
  • The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure. Knowledge of anything beyond that, a positivist would hold, is impossible.
  • We use deductive reasoning to postulate theories that we can test.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • The positivist believed in empiricism -- the idea that observation and measurement was the core of the scientific endeavor.
  • post-positivism is a wholesale rejection of the central tenets of positivism
  • One of the most common forms of post-positivism is a philosophy called critical realism.
  • Positivists were also realists. The difference is that the post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable.
  • the critical realist is critical of our ability to know reality with certainty
  • Because all measurement is fallible, the post-positivist emphasizes the importance of multiple measures and observations, each of which may possess different types of error, and the need to use triangulation across these multiple errorful sources to try to get a better bead on what's happening in reality.
  • The post-positivist also believes that all observations are theory-laden and that scientists (and everyone else, for that matter) are inherently biased by their cultural experiences, world views, and so on.
  • post-positivism rejects the relativist idea of the incommensurability of different perspectives, the idea that we can never understand each other because we come from different experiences and cultures.
  • Most post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it. Because perception and observation is fallible, our constructions must be imperfect.
  • Post-positivists reject the idea that any individual can see the world perfectly as it really is. We are all biased and all of our observations are affected (theory-laden). Our best hope for achieving objectivity is to triangulate across multiple fallible perspectives!
Bex Hewett

The value of a PhD - Plenty of Room Blog | Nature Publishing Group - 1 views

  •  
    Why the value of a PhD is much more than the salary you earn at the end of it!
  •  
    I completely agree with this article - if you're doing a PhD just to get a bigger salary at the end of it then you're probably doing it for the wrong reasons!
  •  
    I think the value of a PhD is "personal growth" and improvement (no matter how slushy that sounds). For me that's been the most noticeable thing and by far the best. Bex, I agree - I doubt the financial rewards (if any) would keep me going!
Bex Hewett

Synopsis of "That's Interesting!" by Murray Davis - 0 views

  •  
    Paper about what makes a social theory "interesting" from 1971
« First ‹ Previous 81 - 100 of 126 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page