Skip to main content

Home/ Phdchat/ Group items tagged as

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Michelle A. Hoyle

How I Talk About Searching, Discovery and Research in Courses « Easily Distra... - 0 views

  •  
    "I recently boiled down some of the advice I try to give students about how to carry out searches and formulate research questions, which I'll reproduce here. I start with the basic insight that I've picked up from Swarthmore's library staff, that the point where many students struggle in research is not with finding credible or authoritative sources once they've settled on a topic but with understanding what is researchable or knowable within the constraints of the assignment, the resources, the disciplinary framework and so on. I feel as if too many of my colleagues are still focused on the former issue rather than the latter one, still too worried that students aren't finding the "right" sources that have scholarly legitimacy in favor of Wikipedia or whatever they can find on as full-text at 2 a.m. I don't think this is a big issue both because I have a much higher opinion of Wikipedia and such than many of my colleagues and because I find that students actually have fairly good skills for finding properly authoritative sources and material. As long as they've gotten the research framed correctly at the outset, that is. So what I focus on is processes of discovery that students should use to find out what's known and knowable, how researchable a particular question is, what the shape or character of information about that question looks like, and how to make smart decisions about where to invest labor and time in developing a research assignment. "
Bex Hewett

Qualitative blog diaries - 2 views

  •  
    Using blogs as a diary in research
  •  
    Thanks for this Bex, it's always good to get references to this sort of material. I have had a research blog since Nov 2008 and see it as a way to strengthen 'the researcher as research instrument' that is me. I wrote a guest post on thethesiswhisper.wordpress.com blog a couple of months ago on social media and the phd and there are a few more references in that. See http://thethesiswhisperer.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/social-media-and-your-phd
Heather Davis

The concept of 'researcher as research instrument' within the hinterlands of research - 1 views

  •  
    The notion of researcher as research instrument is a central one to most qualitative inquiry. This is a blog and readings I posted after giving a presentation to the QI SIG at RMIT in May 2009.
Jane Davis

Getting started - 6 views

Glad you're more familiar with this than some of us Liz! I think there will be some very funny moments as we wander around this area trying things out ...

Michelle A. Hoyle

Why Can't I Finish? :: Tips :: The 99 Percent - 1 views

  •  
    "As a time management life coach, I've found that many of my clients have a dread of finishing that they keep hidden away-hoping that no one will ever notice that they get a lot of little things done while never quite completing the really important stuff. Whether it's due to a rabid perfectionism, an aversion to criticism, or just an inability to maintain enthusiasm for the long haul, we all have challenges and fears we must overcome to produce work that matters. But pretending they don't exist won't get us anywhere. Here's a guide to diagnosing and treating what I've found to be four of the most common barriers to completion:"
  •  
    Ph.D. students are particularly prone to some of these behaviours, I think, so perhaps this will help someone.
Heather Davis

http://metatheoria.com.ar/Index.php/m/article/viewFile/32/16 - 5 views

  •  
    The nature and structure of scientific theories, Moulines, 2010
  •  
    Thanks for posting this Heather, I found it useful in clarifying what is/isnt theory, and differentiating between theories that get referred to as weak or strong
E Jackson

Positivism & Post-Positivism - 1 views

  • Positivism & Post-Positivism
    • E Jackson
       
      This has been a useful short article for me - research philosophy is something that I "struggle" to get to grips with. Decided to spend Xmas trying(!) to understand it all...
  • The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure. Knowledge of anything beyond that, a positivist would hold, is impossible.
  • We use deductive reasoning to postulate theories that we can test.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • The positivist believed in empiricism -- the idea that observation and measurement was the core of the scientific endeavor.
  • post-positivism is a wholesale rejection of the central tenets of positivism
  • One of the most common forms of post-positivism is a philosophy called critical realism.
  • Positivists were also realists. The difference is that the post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable.
  • the critical realist is critical of our ability to know reality with certainty
  • Because all measurement is fallible, the post-positivist emphasizes the importance of multiple measures and observations, each of which may possess different types of error, and the need to use triangulation across these multiple errorful sources to try to get a better bead on what's happening in reality.
  • The post-positivist also believes that all observations are theory-laden and that scientists (and everyone else, for that matter) are inherently biased by their cultural experiences, world views, and so on.
  • post-positivism rejects the relativist idea of the incommensurability of different perspectives, the idea that we can never understand each other because we come from different experiences and cultures.
  • Most post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it. Because perception and observation is fallible, our constructions must be imperfect.
  • Post-positivists reject the idea that any individual can see the world perfectly as it really is. We are all biased and all of our observations are affected (theory-laden). Our best hope for achieving objectivity is to triangulate across multiple fallible perspectives!
1 - 7 of 7
Showing 20 items per page