Group items tagged Sharepoint - Open Web

MSOffice Finally Embraces SharePoint in 2010 - 0 views

ccsblog.burtongroup.com/...braces-sharepoint-in-2010.html

moss MSOffice-productivity msoffice-2010

shared by Gary Edwards on 28 Oct 09 - Cached

Gary Edwards on 28 Oct 09

Review of SharePoint-Office 2010 integration. MSOffice access and integration with SharePoint "content" has been improved and expanded. Templates, forms and reports have been moved to the SharePoint center. Or should i say "the many possible SharePoint centers". There is also an interesting integration of the tagging system, with smart-tags becoming Bing enriched. Good-bye Google. Good-bye RDF - RDFa. excerpt: Many enterprises buy into Microsoft's integrated vision of collaboration because they assume their products work well together. While in the case of SharePoint and Office this is technically true (more so with the 2007 versions), many of these integrations are either not used by or not visible to the average Office user. However, integrations introduced in SharePoint and Office 2010 may change this perception because they are exposed in menus and dialogs used by nearly every Office user. Perhaps supporting SharePoint Online and having SharePoint provide the basis of Office Live Workspaces is encouraging the SharePoint and Office planners to take a more user-centric perspective. In any case, here are some of the new integrations between SharePoint and Office 2010 that you should look for.

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Review of SharePoint-Office 2010 integration. MSOffice access and integration with SharePoint "content" has been improved and expanded. Templates, forms and reports have been moved to the SharePoint center. Or should i say "the many possible SharePoint centers". There is also an interesting integration of the tagging system, with smart-tags becoming Bing enriched. Good-bye Google. Good-bye RDF - RDFa. excerpt: Many enterprises buy into Microsoft's integrated vision of collaboration because they assume their products work well together. While in the case of SharePoint and Office this is technically true (more so with the 2007 versions), many of these integrations are either not used by or not visible to the average Office user. However, integrations introduced in SharePoint and Office 2010 may change this perception because they are exposed in menus and dialogs used by nearly every Office user. Perhaps supporting SharePoint Online and having SharePoint provide the basis of Office Live Workspaces is encouraging the SharePoint and Office planners to take a more user-centric perspective. In any case, here are some of the new integrations between SharePoint and Office 2010 that you should look for.</div>

...

Cancel

Zoho Office For Microsoft SharePoint, Online Collaboration, Online Word Processor, Onli... - 0 views

www.zoho.com/sharepoint

zoho-sharepoint on-line-editing office20 collaboration

shared by Gary Edwards on 23 Jun 09 - Cached

Gary Edwards on 23 Jun 09

Collaborate and Edit documents with Zoho, Store and Manage in Microsoft® SharePoint®. Zoho is onto something here. The video is well worth the watching. Anthony Ha of Venture Beat ahd this to say: "As online office software tries to move into big corporations, it's starting to work more closely with entrenched solutions - which often means technology built by Microsoft. In the latest example, Zoho just announced plans to offer its collaboration services as an add-on for SharePoint, Microsoft's server and software for collaboration and document management." "Basically, that means you can use Zoho Office as the interface for collaborative editing of documents, while the documents themselves sit safely on the SharePoint server, behind the corporate firewall. The add-on brings a more web-like interface to SharePoint; rather than having to check documents in and out as they work on them, multiple users can jump into a document and edit it at once, and also send instant messages back-and-forth within their application using Zoho Chat." "This is a smart way to get Zoho into companies that wouldn't consider making the full jump into online office applications, but want to experiment with these kinds of tools without sacrificing security or throwing away existing hardware. The financial investment is small, too - a 30-day trial period, followed by $2 per user per month if companies pay for a year, or $3 per user per month if companies pay by month."

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Collaborate and Edit documents with Zoho, Store and Manage in Microsoft® SharePoint®. Zoho is onto something here. The video is well worth the watching. Anthony Ha of Venture Beat ahd this to say: "As online office software tries to move into big corporations, it's starting to work more closely with entrenched solutions - which often means technology built by Microsoft. In the latest example, Zoho just announced plans to offer its collaboration services as an add-on for SharePoint, Microsoft's server and software for collaboration and document management." "Basically, that means you can use Zoho Office as the interface for collaborative editing of documents, while the documents themselves sit safely on the SharePoint server, behind the corporate firewall. The add-on brings a more web-like interface to SharePoint; rather than having to check documents in and out as they work on them, multiple users can jump into a document and edit it at once, and also send instant messages back-and-forth within their application using Zoho Chat." "This is a smart way to get Zoho into companies that wouldn't consider making the full jump into online office applications, but want to experiment with these kinds of tools without sacrificing security or throwing away existing hardware. The financial investment is small, too - a 30-day trial period, followed by $2 per user per month if companies pay for a year, or $3 per user per month if companies pay by month."</div>

...

Cancel

Constructing A SharePoint History: Microsoft SharePoint Team Blog - 0 views

blogs.msdn.com/...sharepoint-history.aspx

sharepoint msoffice moss msoffice-2010

shared by Gary Edwards on 08 Oct 09 - Cached

Rechal Morin liked it

it was clear customers wanted a more integrated and comprehensive solution from us. As just one example, they told us like they liked the WYSWIG HTML editing of SharePoint Team Services and the Web Part declarative and reusable editing of SharePoint Portal but wanted to use both models on the same site?
...

Cancel
On the application side, we were hearing customers wanted Office to go beyond personal productivity to organizational productivity and we had to decide whether Microsoft would invest in content management, portals, unified communications, business intelligence and many other new scenarios.
...

Cancel
we made sure SharePoint was an open platform and worked with vendors across the industry on a variety of integration approaches including published APIs and protocols.
...

Cancel
...1 more annotation...
to enable customers to build business process integration and business intelligence portals, we added Excel Services and InfoPath Forms Services. Besides being exciting features, we gained invaluable learning for the team how to have an architecture that worked in the rich Office client and on the server with web access with high fidelity, round tripping, etc.
...

Cancel

Gary Edwards on 08 Oct 09

Wow. Why fight over the editing of Wikiword when you can make up your own history? The Microsoft Office - SharePoint Blog team is busy trying to reshape history from the inside out. This bookmark is going to require a ton of highlights and comments.

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Wow. Why fight over the editing of Wikiword when you can make up your own history? The Microsoft Office - SharePoint Blog team is busy trying to reshape history from the inside out. This bookmark is going to require a ton of highlights and comments.</div>

...

Cancel

Microsoft May Be Inflating SharePoint Stats - 0 views

slashdot.org/...-Be-Inflating-SharePoint-Stats

Microsoft Sharepoint marketing

shared by Paul Merrell on 20 Oct 09 - Cached

"Taking a page out of McDonalds 'billions and billions served,' Microsoft says it reaps $1.3 billion a year from more than 100 million users of its SharePoint collab app. But some suggest that the figures are consciously inflated by Microsoft sales tactics in order to boost the appearance of momentum for the platform, reports Computerworld. A recent survey suggests that less than a fourth of users licensed for SharePoint actually use it. SharePoint particularly lags as a platform for Web sites, according to the same survey, a situation Microsoft hopes to fix with the upcoming SharePoint 2010."
...

Cancel

Google Sites API opens Microsoft SharePoint - Techworld.com - 1 views

news.techworld.com/...api-opens-microsoft-sharepoint

Google Sharepoint Lotus Notes Google Sites

shared by Paul Merrell on 30 Sep 09 - Cached

Gary Edwards liked it

Signaling an intent to compete with giants in the collaboration software space, Google unveiled an API to extend the Google Sites collaborative content development tool, featuring a capability to migrate files from workspace applications such as Microsoft SharePoint and Lotus Notes to Sites. One application already built using the Google Sites API is SharePoint Move for Google Apps, developed by LTech for migrating data and content from SharePoint to Sites. Google Sites is a free application for building and sharing websites; it is described by Google as a collaborative content creation tool to upload file attachments, information other Google applications such as Google Docs, and free-form content.
...

Cancel

MacroView DMF™ (Document Management Framework) - 0 views

www.macroview.com.au/...cumentManagementFramework.aspx

DCMS SharePoint MacroView DMF

shared by Gary Edwards on 26 Aug 10 - Cached

Gary Edwards on 26 Aug 10

From the NOT So OpenWeb department, MacroView provides a folder based hierarchy view of MSOffice, OutLook and PDF documents/messages. Note that the metadata information is held at the server level - it is not part of of the document container! Which is another way of saying that while the document might be portable, the metadata and layered components/relationships involving that document are not. SharePoint only. I doubt google Search will be able to access and read this metadata. intro: Enable full function document management in Microsoft® SharePoint® 2007 and 2010 - save, browse and search from the applications that you use every day with MacroView DMF™ v7 (formerly known as MacroView WISDOM DMF)

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">From the NOT So OpenWeb department, MacroView provides a folder based hierarchy view of MSOffice, OutLook and PDF documents/messages. Note that the metadata information is held at the server level - it is not part of of the document container! Which is another way of saying that while the document might be portable, the metadata and layered components/relationships involving that document are not. SharePoint only. I doubt google Search will be able to access and read this metadata. intro: Enable full function document management in Microsoft® SharePoint® 2007 and 2010 - save, browse and search from the applications that you use every day with MacroView DMF™ v7 (formerly known as MacroView WISDOM DMF)</div>

...

Cancel

Box.net Gets 48 million more to build enterprise platform | ZDNet - 0 views

www.zdnet.com/...1886

box.net sursen cloud-computing cloud-DMS

shared by Gary Edwards on 24 Feb 11 - No Cached

Gary Edwards on 24 Feb 11

In taking this next step Box are closing some acquisition doors in electing to attempt to become a core piece of enterprise infrastructure rather than be swallowed up into someone else's larger offering. It's a brave and interesting move that will see them attempting to penetrate on-premise document and project management opportunities that are currently dominated by entrenched vendors, notably Sharepoint. Box's collaboration and work flow tools are currently adequate but unremarkable, and while the user interfaces are well done and unintimidating, they are now attempting to enter the areas of business steeped in document versioning and email inefficiencies that have been so lucrative to Microsoft, who can't be blamed for not cannibalizing their licensing golden geese of Office, Sharepoint and Exchange yet, and probably made 48 million as you read this sentence. Addressing the inefficiencies of these old ways of working are at the core of the modern collaborative enterprise, and it is primarily focusing on business purpose and performance from participants that ultimately unlocks the greater efficiencies possible with 2.0 technologies. The challenge for Box will be to avoid becoming a larger document and content graveyard while providing greater business agility, and this requires some cultural shifts in their offerings to target customers.

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">In taking this next step Box are closing some acquisition doors in electing to attempt to become a core piece of enterprise infrastructure rather than be swallowed up into someone else's larger offering. It's a brave and interesting move that will see them attempting to penetrate on-premise document and project management opportunities that are currently dominated by entrenched vendors, notably Sharepoint. Box's collaboration and work flow tools are currently adequate but unremarkable, and while the user interfaces are well done and unintimidating, they are now attempting to enter the areas of business steeped in document versioning and email inefficiencies that have been so lucrative to Microsoft, who can't be blamed for not cannibalizing their licensing golden geese of Office, Sharepoint and Exchange yet, and probably made 48 million as you read this sentence. Addressing the inefficiencies of these old ways of working are at the core of the modern collaborative enterprise, and it is primarily focusing on business purpose and performance from participants that ultimately unlocks the greater efficiencies possible with 2.0 technologies. The challenge for Box will be to avoid becoming a larger document and content graveyard while providing greater business agility, and this requires some cultural shifts in their offerings to target customers.</div>

...

Cancel

Gray Matter : Open XML and the SharePoint Conference - 0 views

blogs.technet.com/...the-sharepoint-conference.aspx

Open-Web MSOffice ge

shared by Gary Edwards on 17 Oct 09 - Cached

Gary Edwards on 17 Oct 09

excerpt: The trend in Office development is the migration of solutions away from in-application scripted processing toward more data-centric development. Of course this is a primary purpose of Open XML, and it is great to see the amount of activity in this area. We've seen customers scripting Word in a server environment to batch process / print documents or for other automation tasks. In reality Word isn't built to do that on a large scale, it is better to work directly against the document rather than via the application whenever possible. The Open XML SDK unlocks a "whole nuther" environment for document processing, and gets you out of the business of scripting client apps on servers to do the work of a true server application (not to mention the licensing problems created by installing Office on a server). comment: Gray makes a very important point here. The dominance of the desktop based MSOffice Productivity Environment was largely based the embedded logic driving "in-process" documents that was application and platform (Win32 API) specific. Tear open any of these workgroup-workflow oriented compound documents and you find application specific scripts, macros, OLE, data bindings, security settings and other application specific settings. These internal components are certain to break whenever these highly interactive and "live" compound documents are converted to another format, or application use. This is how MSOffice documents and the business processes they represent become "bound" to the MSOffice Productivity Environment. What Gray is pointing to here is that Microsoft is moving the legacy Productivity Environment to an MSWeb based center where OpenXML, Silverlight, CAML, XAML and a number of other .NET-WPF technologies become the workgroup drivers. The key applications for the MS WebStack are Exchange/SharePoint/SQL Server. To make this move, documents had to be separated from the legacy desktop Productivity Environment settings. Note th

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">excerpt: The trend in Office development is the migration of solutions away from in-application scripted processing toward more data-centric development. Of course this is a primary purpose of Open XML, and it is great to see the amount of activity in this area. We've seen customers scripting Word in a server environment to batch process / print documents or for other automation tasks. In reality Word isn't built to do that on a large scale, it is better to work directly against the document rather than via the application whenever possible. The Open XML SDK unlocks a "whole nuther" environment for document processing, and gets you out of the business of scripting client apps on servers to do the work of a true server application (not to mention the licensing problems created by installing Office on a server). comment: Gray makes a very important point here. The dominance of the desktop based MSOffice Productivity Environment was largely based the embedded logic driving "in-process" documents that was application and platform (Win32 API) specific. Tear open any of these workgroup-workflow oriented compound documents and you find application specific scripts, macros, OLE, data bindings, security settings and other application specific settings. These internal components are certain to break whenever these highly interactive and "live" compound documents are converted to another format, or application use. This is how MSOffice documents and the business processes they represent become "bound" to the MSOffice Productivity Environment. What Gray is pointing to here is that Microsoft is moving the legacy Productivity Environment to an MSWeb based center where OpenXML, Silverlight, CAML, XAML and a number of other .NET-WPF technologies become the workgroup drivers. The key applications for the MS WebStack are Exchange/SharePoint/SQL Server. To make this move, documents had to be separated from the legacy desktop Productivity Environment settings. Note th</div>

...

Cancel

Windows Phone 7: An In-depth Look at the Features and Interface - PCWorld - 0 views

www.pcworld.com/...he_features_and_interface.html

BPOS Windows-7 Office-Hub People-Hub Sharepoint

shared by Gary Edwards on 15 Feb 10 - Cached

Microsoft's hardware partners include Dell, HTC, Garmin ASUS, LG, Samsung, SE, Toshiba, HP and Qualcomm. NVIDIA, which provided the Tegra chip in the Zune HD hardware, is noticeably absent. Microsoft had no comment.
- Gary Edwards on 15 Feb 10
  
  This is interesting! Nvidia not invited to Microsoft's Windows 7 coming out? Things must be heating up on the gaming platform.
  
  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">This is interesting! Nvidia not invited to Microsoft's Windows 7 coming out? Things must be heating up on the gaming platform. </div>
  
  ...
  
  Cancel
...

Cancel

Gary Edwards on 15 Feb 10

The Barcelona World Mobility Conference is under way, and Microsoft is making a show of force. They are hitting with features that support both "Social Network Hubs" (People Hub) and "Productivity Hubs" (Office Hub). The key to Microsoft's Windows 7 Smartphone success is not that of new and exciting features competitive with Apple and Google smartphones. No, the key feature that Microsoft owns is that of integration into legacy desktop productivity business systems based on the MSOffice productivity platform, and, more importantly, integration into the emerging Web centered but proprietary Microsoft Business Productivity Platform. Stay tuned. excerpt on the new Windows 7 feature set: The Office Hub lets you easily sync your documents between your phone and your PC. Office Hub comes with OneNote, for notetaking, Documents and Sharepoint for presentation collaboration. Users will also have access to an Outlook Mail application which gives similar features, like flagging important e-mails, that you'd find on the desktop version.

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">The Barcelona World Mobility Conference is under way, and Microsoft is making a show of force. They are hitting with features that support both "Social Network Hubs" (People Hub) and "Productivity Hubs" (Office Hub). The key to Microsoft's Windows 7 Smartphone success is not that of new and exciting features competitive with Apple and Google smartphones. No, the key feature that Microsoft owns is that of integration into legacy desktop productivity business systems based on the MSOffice productivity platform, and, more importantly, integration into the emerging Web centered but proprietary Microsoft Business Productivity Platform. Stay tuned. excerpt on the new Windows 7 feature set: The Office Hub lets you easily sync your documents between your phone and your PC. Office Hub comes with OneNote, for notetaking, Documents and Sharepoint for presentation collaboration. Users will also have access to an Outlook Mail application which gives similar features, like flagging important e-mails, that you'd find on the desktop version.</div>

...

Cancel

Google Buzz: Forget Twitter, Microsoft's SharePoint is a bigger target | Between the Li... - 0 views

blogs.zdnet.com/BTL

Google Buzz Sharepoint

shared by Paul Merrell on 15 Feb 10 - Cached

Google launched its new social Gmail experiment dubbed Buzz and the “Twitter killer” comments will be a dime a dozen. But from an enterprise perspective, Google Buzz has a far larger target in mind: Microsoft’s SharePoint.
...

Cancel

Businesses deploying Office 2010 five times faster than previous version | WinRumors - 1 views

www.winrumors.com/s-faster-than-previous-version

MS-Office2010 SharePoint Live.com MS-Cloud-Productivity

shared by Gary Edwards on 16 Jun 11 - No Cached

Gary Edwards on 16 Jun 11

Not sure what to make of this news. XP continues to rule the desktop, Office 2003-2007 the productivity sweet spot. I have used and researched Office 2010 and emphatically insist that it is a honey-trap for SharePoint and Live.com cloud-computing. The MS-Cloud becomes THE default hard drive for Office 2010, with social networking-Facebook like contagion based on shared documents, crap collaboration and in-your-face insistent Live.com/Hotmail eMail. Everytime i wanted to do something in Office 2010, there were 20 road blocks and hurdles MS put in the path forcing their Facebook-virus on my associates and myself. Incredibly anti-productive. Yet it's the only cloud-productivity solution capable of easing the difficult transition from desktop to cloud productivity environments. Office 2010 does this by integrating into legacy desktop productivity systems just enough that users will not realize until it's too late that a mine filed of hurdles and gotchas lies ahead. excerpt: Businesses are now deploying Office 2010 five times faster than they deployed Office 2007. Office 2010 is also the fastest-selling version of Office in history. "Nearly 50 million people worldwide use Office Web Apps to view, edit, and share their documents from anywhere with a browser and an Internet connection," added Numoto. Microsoft previously revealed in October that the company had sold six million copies of Office 2010. The company didn't reveal any additional sales figures on Wednesday but reaffirmed that the software is selling well. Office is currently used by more than 750 million users worldwide according to Microsoft.

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Not sure what to make of this news. XP continues to rule the desktop, Office 2003-2007 the productivity sweet spot. I have used and researched Office 2010 and emphatically insist that it is a honey-trap for SharePoint and Live.com cloud-computing. The MS-Cloud becomes THE default hard drive for Office 2010, with social networking-Facebook like contagion based on shared documents, crap collaboration and in-your-face insistent Live.com/Hotmail eMail. Everytime i wanted to do something in Office 2010, there were 20 road blocks and hurdles MS put in the path forcing their Facebook-virus on my associates and myself. Incredibly anti-productive. Yet it's the only cloud-productivity solution capable of easing the difficult transition from desktop to cloud productivity environments. Office 2010 does this by integrating into legacy desktop productivity systems just enough that users will not realize until it's too late that a mine filed of hurdles and gotchas lies ahead. excerpt: Businesses are now deploying Office 2010 five times faster than they deployed Office 2007. Office 2010 is also the fastest-selling version of Office in history. "Nearly 50 million people worldwide use Office Web Apps to view, edit, and share their documents from anywhere with a browser and an Internet connection," added Numoto. Microsoft previously revealed in October that the company had sold six million copies of Office 2010. The company didn't reveal any additional sales figures on Wednesday but reaffirmed that the software is selling well. Office is currently used by more than 750 million users worldwide according to Microsoft. </div>

...

Cancel
Paul Merrell on 16 Jun 11

I wonder about those numbers. 6 million copies of Office 2010 sold; total of 750 million users of all versions. That makes 0.8 per cent of Office users who had upgraded between June and October of 2010? Five times faster than Office 2007 would make Office 2007 sales in the same period of its release cycle 0.16 per cent of the 750 million, assuming the number of users had remained constant. I suspect there are some apples and oranges in that wood pile, to mix a metaphor. E.g., retail sales that exclude sales to OEMs?

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">I wonder about those numbers. 6 million copies of Office 2010 sold; total of 750 million users of all versions. That makes 0.8 per cent of Office users who had upgraded between June and October of 2010? Five times faster than Office 2007 would make Office 2007 sales in the same period of its release cycle 0.16 per cent of the 750 million, assuming the number of users had remained constant. I suspect there are some apples and oranges in that wood pile, to mix a metaphor. E.g., retail sales that exclude sales to OEMs?</div>

...

Cancel

Can Microsoft turn SharePoint into a Web contender? - 0 views

www.computerworld.com/...arePoint_into_a_Web_contender_

Microsoft Sharepoint market penetration

shared by Paul Merrell on 20 Oct 09 - Cached

Rechal Morin liked it

According to an IDC survey in July of 262 American corporate IT users, just 8% of respondents said they were using SharePoint for their Web sites, compared to 36% using it for internal portals and 51% using it for collaborative team sites
...

Cancel

AppleInsider | Microsoft takes aim at Google with online Office suite - 0 views

www.appleinsider.com/..._with_online_office_suite.html

msoffice sharepoint moss msoffice-2010

shared by Gary Edwards on 13 Jul 09 - Cached

Gary Edwards on 13 Jul 09

Microsoft has announced the next generation of MSOffice, and it turns out to be SharePoint at the center of the deep connected MSOffice "rich client" desktop productivity environment, and, an online Web version of MSOffice. Who would have guessed that one of the key features to MOSS would be universal accessibility to and collaboration on MSOffice documents - without loss of fidelity? No doubt the embedded logic that drive BBP's (Bound Business Processes) is also perfectly preserved. Excerpt: "Office Web Applications, the online companion to Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote applications, allow you to access documents from anywhere. You can even simultaneously share and work on documents with others online," Microsoft says on its Office 2010 Technical Preview site. "View documents across PCs, mobile phones, and the Web without compromising document fidelity. Create new documents and do basic editing using the familiar Office interface."

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Microsoft has announced the next generation of MSOffice, and it turns out to be SharePoint at the center of the deep connected MSOffice "rich client" desktop productivity environment, and, an online Web version of MSOffice. Who would have guessed that one of the key features to MOSS would be universal accessibility to and collaboration on MSOffice documents - without loss of fidelity? No doubt the embedded logic that drive BBP's (Bound Business Processes) is also perfectly preserved. Excerpt: "Office Web Applications, the online companion to Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote applications, allow you to access documents from anywhere. You can even simultaneously share and work on documents with others online," Microsoft says on its Office 2010 Technical Preview site. "View documents across PCs, mobile phones, and the Web without compromising document fidelity. Create new documents and do basic editing using the familiar Office interface."</div>

...

Cancel

FeedHenry Secures $9M Funding Led By Intel Capital To Feed Boom in Mobile Enterprise | ... - 0 views

techcrunch.com/...feed-boom-in-mobile-enterprise

FeedHenry Mobile-Application-Platform Integrated-Cloud BaaS

shared by Gary Edwards on 02 May 13 - No Cached

Gary Edwards on 02 May 13

FeedHenry provides a cloud Mobile Application Platform that simplifies the development, integration, deployment and management of secure mobile apps for business. This mobile platform-as-a-service (PaaS) allows apps to be developed in HTML5, JavaScript, and CSS and deployed to multiple mobile devices from a single code base. The node.js backend service offers a complete range of APIs designed to simplify and secure the connectivity of mobile apps to backend and third party systems. The platform can be deployed to private, public or hybrid clouds. FeedHenry's PaaS offers developers speed of development, instant scalability, device and cloud independence, and the ability to easily integrate to backend information. ................................ If, say, a company uses both Sharepoint and Salesforce inside a mobile app, to get that data into one app they need multiple levels of API integration. Because of the enormous boom in mobile and tablet apps, so-called 'back-end as a service' (BaaS) platforms like FeedHenry - which solve these problems - are hugely expanding. Thus, today FeedHenry has secured $9M (€7M) in a funding round led by Intel Capital, alongside a "seven figure" investment from existing investor Kernel Capital. Other existing investors VMware Inc., Enterprise Ireland and private investors also participated and were joined by new investment from ACT Venture Capital. The funds will be used on an international roll out. FeedHenry's mobile application platform - built between Ireland and the U.S. - helps businesses build mobile apps that integrate securely to their business through the cloud. This is a competitive market that includes StackMob, Usergrid, Appcelerator, Sencha.io, Applicasa ,Parse, CloudMine , CloudyRec , iKnode, yorAPI, Buddy and ScottyApp.

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">FeedHenry provides a cloud Mobile Application Platform that simplifies the development, integration, deployment and management of secure mobile apps for business. This mobile platform-as-a-service (PaaS) allows apps to be developed in HTML5, JavaScript, and CSS and deployed to multiple mobile devices from a single code base. The node.js backend service offers a complete range of APIs designed to simplify and secure the connectivity of mobile apps to backend and third party systems. The platform can be deployed to private, public or hybrid clouds. FeedHenry's PaaS offers developers speed of development, instant scalability, device and cloud independence, and the ability to easily integrate to backend information. ................................ If, say, a company uses both Sharepoint and Salesforce inside a mobile app, to get that data into one app they need multiple levels of API integration. Because of the enormous boom in mobile and tablet apps, so-called 'back-end as a service' (BaaS) platforms like FeedHenry - which solve these problems - are hugely expanding. Thus, today FeedHenry has secured $9M (€7M) in a funding round led by Intel Capital, alongside a "seven figure" investment from existing investor Kernel Capital. Other existing investors VMware Inc., Enterprise Ireland and private investors also participated and were joined by new investment from ACT Venture Capital. The funds will be used on an international roll out. FeedHenry's mobile application platform - built between Ireland and the U.S. - helps businesses build mobile apps that integrate securely to their business through the cloud. This is a competitive market that includes StackMob, Usergrid, Appcelerator, Sencha.io, Applicasa ,Parse, CloudMine , CloudyRec , iKnode, yorAPI, Buddy and ScottyApp.</div>

...

Cancel

Overview of apps for Office 2013 - 0 views

msdn.microsoft.com/...jj220082(v=office.15)

MSOffice-Web-Apps MSCloud-Developer

shared by Gary Edwards on 25 Aug 12 - No Cached

Gary Edwards on 25 Aug 12

MSOffice is now "Web ready". The Office apps are capable of running HTML5-JavaScript apps based on a simple Web page model. Think of this as the Office apps being fitted with a browser, and developers writing extensions to run in that browser using HTML5 and JavaScript. Microsoft provides an Office.js library and, a developer "Web App/Page Creator" Visual Basic toolset called "Napa" Office 365 Development Tools. Lots of project templates. Key MSOffice apps are Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Outlook. Develop for Office or SharePoint. Apps can be hosted on any Web Server. excerpt: Microsoft Office 2013 Developer Environment with HTML5, XML and JavaScript. Office.js library. "his documentation is preliminary and is subject to change. Published: July 16, 2012 Learn how to use apps for Office to extend your Office 2013 Preview applications. This new Office solution type, apps for Office, built on web technologies like HTML, CSS, JavaScript, REST, OData, and OAuth. It provides new experiences within Office applications by surfacing web technologies and cloud services right within Office documents, email messages, meeting requests, and appointments. Applies to: Excel Web App Preview | Exchange 2013 Preview | Outlook 2013 Preview | Outlook Web App Preview | Project Professional 2013 Preview | Word 2013 Preview | Excel 2013 Preview In this article What is an app for Office? Anatomy of an app for Office Types of apps for Office What can an app for Office do? Understanding the runtime Development basics Create your first app for Office Publishing basics Scenarios Components of an app for Office solution Software requirements"

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">MSOffice is now "Web ready". The Office apps are capable of running HTML5-JavaScript apps based on a simple Web page model. Think of this as the Office apps being fitted with a browser, and developers writing extensions to run in that browser using HTML5 and JavaScript. Microsoft provides an Office.js library and, a developer "Web App/Page Creator" Visual Basic toolset called "Napa" Office 365 Development Tools. Lots of project templates. Key MSOffice apps are Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Outlook. Develop for Office or SharePoint. Apps can be hosted on any Web Server. excerpt: Microsoft Office 2013 Developer Environment with HTML5, XML and JavaScript. Office.js library. "his documentation is preliminary and is subject to change. Published: July 16, 2012 Learn how to use apps for Office to extend your Office 2013 Preview applications. This new Office solution type, apps for Office, built on web technologies like HTML, CSS, JavaScript, REST, OData, and OAuth. It provides new experiences within Office applications by surfacing web technologies and cloud services right within Office documents, email messages, meeting requests, and appointments. Applies to: Excel Web App Preview | Exchange 2013 Preview | Outlook 2013 Preview | Outlook Web App Preview | Project Professional 2013 Preview | Word 2013 Preview | Excel 2013 Preview In this article What is an app for Office? Anatomy of an app for Office Types of apps for Office What can an app for Office do? Understanding the runtime Development basics Create your first app for Office Publishing basics Scenarios Components of an app for Office solution Software requirements"</div>

...

Cancel

This 32-Year-Old Entrepreneur Is Bent On Beating One Of Microsoft's Largest Businesses - 1 views

www.sfgate.com/...article.cgi

Huddle

shared by Gary Edwards on 08 Dec 11 - No Cached

Gary Edwards on 08 Dec 11

Good in depth article about Huddle, and their challenge to Microsoft SharePoint. We met these guys at the 2006 and 2007 Office 2.0 conference in San Fran. Lengthy conversations about the Windows Productivity Environment and how Microsoft built that platform. Need to take a closer look at how far they have come. The Cloud is a greaqt opportunity for a new Productivity Platform.

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Good in depth article about Huddle, and their challenge to Microsoft SharePoint. We met these guys at the 2006 and 2007 Office 2.0 conference in San Fran. Lengthy conversations about the Windows Productivity Environment and how Microsoft built that platform. Need to take a closer look at how far they have come. The Cloud is a greaqt opportunity for a new Productivity Platform.</div>

...

Cancel

How would you fix the Linux desktop? | ITworld - 0 views

www.itworld.com/...ow-would-you-fix-linux-desktop

Linux-desktop Brian-Proffitt productivity-environment Cloud-Computing Cloud-Productivity-Platform

shared by Gary Edwards on 20 Sep 12 - No Cached

VB integrates with COM
...

Cancel
QL Server has a DCE/RPC interface. 
...

Cancel
MS-Office?  all the components (Excel, Word etc.) have a COM and an OLE interface.
...

Cancel

Gary Edwards on 20 Sep 12

Comment posted 1 week ago in reply to Zzgomes ..... by Ed Carp. Finally someone who gets it! OBTW, i replaced Windows 7 with Linux Mint over a year ago and hope to never return. The thing is though, i am not a member of a Windows productivity workgroup, nor do i need to connect to any Windows databases or servers. Essentially i am not using any Windows business process or systems. It's all Internet!!! 100% Web and Cloud Services systems. And that's why i can dump Windows without a blink! While working for Sursen Corp, it was a very different story. I had to have Windows XP and Windows 7, plus MSOffice 2003-2007, plus Internet Explorer with access to SharePoint, Skydrive/Live.com. It's all about the business processes and systems you're part of, or must join. And that's exactly why the Linux Desktop has failed. Give Cloud Computing the time needed to re-engineer and re-invent those many Windows business processes, and the Linux Desktop might suceed. The trick will be in advancing both the Linux Desktop and Application developer layers to target the same Cloud Computing services mobility targets. ..... Windows will take of itself. The real fight is in the great transition of business systems and processes moving from the Windows desktp/workgroup productivity model to the Cloud. Linux Communities must fight to win the great transition. And yes, in the end this all about a massive platform shift. The fourth wave of computing began with the Internet, and will finally close out the desktop client/server computing model as the Web evolves into the Cloud. excerpt: Most posters here have it completely wrong...the *real* reason Linux doesn't have a decent penetration into the desktop market is quite obvious if you look at the most successful desktop in history - Windows. All this nonsense about binary driver compatibility, distro fragmentation, CORBA, and all the other red herrings that people are talking about are completely irrelevant

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Comment posted 1 week ago in reply to Zzgomes ..... by Ed Carp. Finally someone who gets it! OBTW, i replaced Windows 7 with Linux Mint over a year ago and hope to never return. The thing is though, i am not a member of a Windows productivity workgroup, nor do i need to connect to any Windows databases or servers. Essentially i am not using any Windows business process or systems. It's all Internet!!! 100% Web and Cloud Services systems. And that's why i can dump Windows without a blink! While working for Sursen Corp, it was a very different story. I had to have Windows XP and Windows 7, plus MSOffice 2003-2007, plus Internet Explorer with access to SharePoint, Skydrive/Live.com. It's all about the business processes and systems you're part of, or must join. And that's exactly why the Linux Desktop has failed. Give Cloud Computing the time needed to re-engineer and re-invent those many Windows business processes, and the Linux Desktop might suceed. The trick will be in advancing both the Linux Desktop and Application developer layers to target the same Cloud Computing services mobility targets. ..... Windows will take of itself. The real fight is in the great transition of business systems and processes moving from the Windows desktp/workgroup productivity model to the Cloud. Linux Communities must fight to win the great transition. And yes, in the end this all about a massive platform shift. The fourth wave of computing began with the Internet, and will finally close out the desktop client/server computing model as the Web evolves into the Cloud. excerpt: Most posters here have it completely wrong...the *real* reason Linux doesn't have a decent penetration into the desktop market is quite obvious if you look at the most successful desktop in history - Windows. All this nonsense about binary driver compatibility, distro fragmentation, CORBA, and all the other red herrings that people are talking about are completely irrelevant</div>

...

Cancel

Two Microsofts: Mulling an alternate reality | ZDNet - 0 views

www.zdnet.com/n-alternate-reality-7000016916

Microsoft microsoft-monopoly Judge-Thomas-Penfield-Jackson

shared by Gary Edwards on 19 Jun 13 - No Cached

Judge Jackson had it right. And the Court of Appeals? Not so much
...

Cancel
Judge Jackson is an American hero and news of his passing thumped me hard. His ruling against Microsoft and the subsequent overturn of that ruling resulted, IMHO, in two extraordinary directions that changed the world. Sure the what-if game is interesting, but the reality itself is stunning enough. Of course, Judge Jackson sought to break the monopoly. The US Court of Appeals overturn resulted in the monopoly remaining intact, but the Internet remaining free and open. Judge Jackson's breakup plan had a good shot at achieving both a breakup of the monopoly and, a free and open Internet. I admit though that at the time I did not favor the Judge's plan. And i actually did submit a proposal based on Microsoft having to both support the WiNE project, and, provide a complete port to WiNE to any software provider requesting a port. I wanted to break the monopolist's hold on the Windows Productivity Environment and the hundreds of millions of investment dollars and time that had been spent on application development forever trapped on that platform. For me, it was the productivity platform that had to be broken.
...

Cancel
I assume the good Judge thought that separating the Windows OS from Microsoft Office / Applications would force the OS to open up the secret API's even as the OS continued to evolve. Maybe. But a full disclosure of the API's coupled with the community service "port to WiNE" requirement might have sped up the process. Incredibly, the "Undocumented Windows Secrets" industry continues to thrive, and the legendary Andrew Schulman's number is still at the top of Silicon Valley legal profession speed dials. http://goo.gl/0UGe8 Oh well. The Court of Appeals stopped the breakup, leaving the Windows Productivity Platform intact. Microsoft continues to own the "client" in "Client/Server" computing. Although Microsoft was temporarily stopped from leveraging their desktop monopoly to an iron fisted control and dominance of the Internet, I think what were watching today with the Cloud is Judge Jackson's worst nightmare. And mine too. A great transition is now underway, as businesses and enterprises begin the move from legacy client/server business systems and processes to a newly emerging Cloud Productivity Platform. In this great transition, Microsoft holds an inside straight. They have all the aces because they own the legacy desktop productivity platform, and can control the transition to the Cloud. No doubt this transition is going to happen. And it will severely disrupt and change Microsoft's profit formula. But if the Redmond reprobate can provide a "value added" transition of legacy business systems and processes, and direct these new systems to the Microsoft Cloud, the profits will be immense.
...

Cancel
...1 more annotation...
Judge Jackson sought to break the ability of Microsoft to "leverage" their existing monopoly into the Internet and his plan was overturned and replaced by one based on judicial oversight. Microsoft got a slap on the wrist from the Court of Appeals, but were wailed on with lawsuits from the hundreds of parties injured by their rampant criminality. Some put the price of that criminality as high as $14 Billion in settlements. Plus, the shareholders forced Chairman Bill to resign. At the end of the day though, Chairman Bill was right. Keeping the monopoly intact was worth whatever penalty Microsoft was forced to pay. He knew that even the judicial over-site would end one day. Which it did. And now his company is ready to go for it all by leveraging and controlling the great productivity transition. No business wants to be hostage to a cold heart'd monopolist. But there is huge difference between a non-disruptive and cost effective, process-by-process value-added transition to a Cloud Productivity Platform, and, the very disruptive and costly "rip-out-and-replace" transition offered by Google, ZOHO, Box, SalesForce and other Cloud Productivity contenders. Microsoft, and only Microsoft, can offer the value-added transition path. If they get the Cloud even halfway right, they will own business productivity far into the future. Rest in Peace Judge Jackson. Your efforts were heroic and will be remembered as such. ~ge~
...

Cancel

Gary Edwards on 19 Jun 13

Comments on the latest SVN article mulling the effects of Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's anti trust ruling and proposed break up of Microsoft. comment: "Chinese Wall" Ummm, there was a Chinese Wall between Microsoft Os and the MS Applciations layer. At least that's what Chairman Bill promised developers at a 1990 OS/2-Windows Conference I attended. It was a developers luncheon, hosted by Microsoft, with Chairman Bill speaking to about 40 developers with applications designed to run on the then soon to be released Windows 3.0. In his remarks, the Chairman described his vision of commoditizing the personal computer market through an open hardware-reference platform on the one side of the Windows OS, and provisioning an open application developers layer on the other using open and totally transparent API's. Of course the question came up concerning the obvious advantage Microsoft applications would have. Chairman Bill answered the question by describing the Chinese Wall that existed between Microsoft's OS and Apps develop departments. He promised that OS API's would be developed privately and separate from the Apps department, and publicly disclosed to ALL developers at the same time. Oh yeah. There was lots of anti IBM - evil empire stuff too :) Of course we now know this was a line of crap. Microsoft Apps was discovered to have been using undocumented and secret Window API's. http://goo.gl/0UGe8. Microsoft Apps had a distinct advantage over the competition, and eventually the entire Windows Productivity Platform became dependent on the MSOffice core. The company I worked for back then, Pyramid Data, had the first Contact Management application for Windows; PowerLeads. Every Friday night we would release bug fixes and improvements using Wildcat BBS. By Monday morning we would be slammed with calls from users complaining that they had downloaded the Friday night patch, and now some other application would not load or function properly. Eventually we tracked th

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Comments on the latest SVN article mulling the effects of Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's anti trust ruling and proposed break up of Microsoft. comment: "Chinese Wall" Ummm, there was a Chinese Wall between Microsoft Os and the MS Applciations layer. At least that's what Chairman Bill promised developers at a 1990 OS/2-Windows Conference I attended. It was a developers luncheon, hosted by Microsoft, with Chairman Bill speaking to about 40 developers with applications designed to run on the then soon to be released Windows 3.0. In his remarks, the Chairman described his vision of commoditizing the personal computer market through an open hardware-reference platform on the one side of the Windows OS, and provisioning an open application developers layer on the other using open and totally transparent API's. Of course the question came up concerning the obvious advantage Microsoft applications would have. Chairman Bill answered the question by describing the Chinese Wall that existed between Microsoft's OS and Apps develop departments. He promised that OS API's would be developed privately and separate from the Apps department, and publicly disclosed to ALL developers at the same time. Oh yeah. There was lots of anti IBM - evil empire stuff too :) Of course we now know this was a line of crap. Microsoft Apps was discovered to have been using undocumented and secret Window API's. <a href="http://goo.gl/0UGe8" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://goo.gl/0UGe8</a>. Microsoft Apps had a distinct advantage over the competition, and eventually the entire Windows Productivity Platform became dependent on the MSOffice core. The company I worked for back then, Pyramid Data, had the first Contact Management application for Windows; PowerLeads. Every Friday night we would release bug fixes and improvements using Wildcat BBS. By Monday morning we would be slammed with calls from users complaining that they had downloaded the Friday night patch, and now some other application would not load or function properly. Eventually we tracked th</div>

...

Cancel

Does It Matter Who Wins the Browser Wars? Only if you care about the Future of the Open... - 1 views

www.bnet.com/...4-16236

ge OpenWeb OpenWeb-Productivity-Platform Browser-Wars

shared by Gary Edwards on 07 Aug 10 - Cached

Gary Edwards on 07 Aug 10

The Future of the Open Web You're right that the browser wars do not matter - except for this point of demarcation; browsers that support HTML+ and browser that support 1998 HTML. extensive comment by ~ge~ Not all Web services and applications support HTML+, the rapidly advancing set of technologies that includes HTML5, CSS3, SVG/Canvas, and JavaScript (including the libraries and JSON). Microsoft has chosen to draw the Open Web line at what amounts to 1998-2001 level of HTML/CSS. Above that line, they provision a rich-client / rich-server Web model bound to the .NET-WPF platform where C#, Silverlight, and XAML are very prominent. Noticeably, Open Web standards are for the most part replaced at this richer MSWeb level by proprietary technologies. Through limited support for HTML/CSS, IE8 itself acts to dumb down the Open Web. The effect of this is that business systems and day-to-day workflow processes bound to the ubiquitous and very "rich" MSOffice Productivity Environment have little choice when it comes to transitioning to the Web but to stay on the Microsoft 2010 treadmill. Sure, at some point legacy business processes and systems will be rewritten to the Web. The question is, will it be the Open Web or the MS-Web? The Open Web standards are the dividing line between owning your information and content, or, having that content bound to a Web platform comprised of proprietary Microsoft services, systems and applications. Web designers and developers are still caught up in the browser wars. They worry incessantly as to how to dumb down Web content and services to meet the limited functionality of IE. This sucks. So everyone continues to watch "the browser wars" stats. What they are really watching for though is that magic moment where "combined" HTML+ browser uptake in marketshare signals that they can start to implement highly graphical and collaboratively interactive HTML+ specific content. Meanwhile, the greater Web is a

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">The Future of the Open Web You're right that the browser wars do not matter - except for this point of demarcation; browsers that support HTML+ and browser that support 1998 HTML. extensive comment by ~ge~ Not all Web services and applications support HTML+, the rapidly advancing set of technologies that includes HTML5, CSS3, SVG/Canvas, and JavaScript (including the libraries and JSON). Microsoft has chosen to draw the Open Web line at what amounts to 1998-2001 level of HTML/CSS. Above that line, they provision a rich-client / rich-server Web model bound to the .NET-WPF platform where C#, Silverlight, and XAML are very prominent. Noticeably, Open Web standards are for the most part replaced at this richer MSWeb level by proprietary technologies. Through limited support for HTML/CSS, IE8 itself acts to dumb down the Open Web. The effect of this is that business systems and day-to-day workflow processes bound to the ubiquitous and very "rich" MSOffice Productivity Environment have little choice when it comes to transitioning to the Web but to stay on the Microsoft 2010 treadmill. Sure, at some point legacy business processes and systems will be rewritten to the Web. The question is, will it be the Open Web or the MS-Web? The Open Web standards are the dividing line between owning your information and content, or, having that content bound to a Web platform comprised of proprietary Microsoft services, systems and applications. Web designers and developers are still caught up in the browser wars. They worry incessantly as to how to dumb down Web content and services to meet the limited functionality of IE. This sucks. So everyone continues to watch "the browser wars" stats. What they are really watching for though is that magic moment where "combined" HTML+ browser uptake in marketshare signals that they can start to implement highly graphical and collaboratively interactive HTML+ specific content. Meanwhile, the greater Web is a</div>

...

Cancel

In Mobile, Fragmentation is Forever. Deal With It. - washingtonpost.com - 0 views

www.washingtonpost.com/...AR2010030402374.html

webkit-html5 OpenWeb-Standards Web-apps OpenWeb-Productivity-Platform

shared by Gary Edwards on 04 Mar 10 - Cached

Gary Edwards on 04 Mar 10

I disagree with the authors conclusions here. He misses some very significant developments. Particularly around Google, WebKit, and WebKit-HTML5. For instance, there is this article out today; "Google Really is Giving Away Free Nexus One and Droid Handsets to Developers". Also, Palm is working on a WiMAX/WiFi version of their WebOS (WebKit) smartphone for Sprint. Sprint and ClearWire are pushing forward with a very aggressive WiMAX rollout in the USA. San Francisco should go on line this year! One of the more interesting things about the Sprint WiMAX plan is that they have a set fee of $69.00 per month that covers EVERYTHING; cellphone, WiMAX Web browsing, video, and data connectivity, texting (SMS) and VOIP. Major Sprint competitors, Verizon, AT&T and TMobile charge $69 per month, but it only covers cellphone access. Everything else is extra adn also at low speed/ low bandwidth. 3G at best. WiMAX however is a 4G screamer. It's also an open standard. (Verizon FIOS and LTE are comparable and said to be coming soon, but they are proprietary technologies). The Cable guys are itneresting in that they are major backers of WiMAX, but also have a bandwidth explosive technology called Docsis. There is an interesting article at TechCrunch, "In Mobile, Fragmentation is Forever. Deal With It." I disagree entirely with the authors conclusion. WebKit is capable of providing a universal HTML5 application developers layer for mobile and desktop browser computing. It's supported by Apple, Google, Palm (WebOS), Nokia, RiMM (Blackberry) and others to such an extent that 85% of all smartphones shipped this year will either ship with WebKit or, an Opera browser compatible with the WebKit HTML5 document layout/rendering model. I would even go as far as to say that WebKit-HTML5 owns the Web's document model and application layer for the future. Excepting for Silverlight, which features the OOXML document model with over 500 million desktop develop

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">I disagree with the authors conclusions here. He misses some very significant developments. Particularly around Google, WebKit, and WebKit-HTML5. For instance, there is this article out today; "Google Really is Giving Away Free Nexus One and Droid Handsets to Developers". Also, Palm is working on a WiMAX/WiFi version of their WebOS (WebKit) smartphone for Sprint. Sprint and ClearWire are pushing forward with a very aggressive WiMAX rollout in the USA. San Francisco should go on line this year! One of the more interesting things about the Sprint WiMAX plan is that they have a set fee of $69.00 per month that covers EVERYTHING; cellphone, WiMAX Web browsing, video, and data connectivity, texting (SMS) and VOIP. Major Sprint competitors, Verizon, AT&T and TMobile charge $69 per month, but it only covers cellphone access. Everything else is extra adn also at low speed/ low bandwidth. 3G at best. WiMAX however is a 4G screamer. It's also an open standard. (Verizon FIOS and LTE are comparable and said to be coming soon, but they are proprietary technologies). The Cable guys are itneresting in that they are major backers of WiMAX, but also have a bandwidth explosive technology called Docsis. There is an interesting article at TechCrunch, "In Mobile, Fragmentation is Forever. Deal With It." I disagree entirely with the authors conclusion. WebKit is capable of providing a universal HTML5 application developers layer for mobile and desktop browser computing. It's supported by Apple, Google, Palm (WebOS), Nokia, RiMM (Blackberry) and others to such an extent that 85% of all smartphones shipped this year will either ship with WebKit or, an Opera browser compatible with the WebKit HTML5 document layout/rendering model. I would even go as far as to say that WebKit-HTML5 owns the Web's document model and application layer for the future. Excepting for Silverlight, which features the OOXML document model with over 500 million desktop develop</div>

...

Cancel

Group items tagged