Skip to main content

Home/ Netpolitique/ Group items tagged public

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Arnault Coulet

10 principles for a Public Administration 2.0 (via @fondapol) - 0 views

  • A decalogue like a work in progress, to promote the idea and the principles of a new Public Administration more able to act and operate in the era of the Nets. This is the “Manifesto Amministrare 2.0”
  • The Venetian event permitted to collect a lot of ideas and suggestions useful to the writing of the document. First of all, anyway, it was very important to understand that many italian Administrations, and inside them politicians, managers and civil servants, are strongly convinced that the Public Administration need to embrace, at least partially, that “web 2.0 philosophy” who is changing the web and, more important, the life of organizations, enterprises and millions of people
  • The role of politics Politicians must be able to take responsibility of their choices. The organizational dimension Public Administrations must change their organization and their procedures, pursuing a new idea of relationship with citizens and abandoning the self-approach. The Net as a right The access to the Net, specially to broadband, must be easy and cheap everywhere. Beyond the cultural divide Citizens must be helped to develop a new digital culture. The involvement of citizens There’s no Public Administration 2.0 without a strong intervention in favour of participation. The multi-channel approach as opportunity Service are really tailored if there’s attention to the channels more appropriate for the different users’ target. Disintermediation to better act To promote a Public Administration no more “one way” and finally “2.0” is important to foster a bigger disintermediation between institutions and citizens. Re-start form the semantics of public contents The semantics presentation of public information, services and contents must be conceived with the final users and open to folksonomies. Software as enabling factor Software used in public sector must be open and re-usable by other administrations. Foster the development of active communities User groups and social networks must be considered as a fundamental stimulus to design public web services, starting from their desires and indications.
Rem Palpitt

Building Social Media Infrastructure to Engage Publics (Twitter Vote Report) - 0 views

  •  
    Since early 2008, American University's Center for Social Media has been producing a series of field reports that profile innovative media for public knowledge and action. Published as part of the Center's Ford Foundation-supported Future of Public Media project (www.futureofpublicmedia.net), these case studies are designed to explore how publics form around participatory and multiplatform media projects. In this report, Nina Keim and Jessica Clark examine two linked projects related to the 2008 presidential election: Twitter Vote Report (TVR) and Inauguration Report '09 (IR09).
stan mag

Speech on Building Britain's Digital Future | Number10.gov.uk - 0 views

  • We’re determined that government websites should be efficient and meet people’s needs - easy to find, easy to use, and fully accessible. And in our relentless drive to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the way we use websites to meet this goal, we have already closed 900 now unnecessary government websites, with plans to close nearly 500 more. And we will set new challenging standards of quality and accountability for government websites - including a requirement that each one allows feedback and engagement with citizens themselves.  From today no new website will be allowed unless it fully meets these requirements.
  • We’re determined that government websites should be efficient and meet people’s needs - easy to find, easy to use, and fully accessible. And in our relentless drive to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the way we use websites to meet this goal, we have already closed 900 now unnecessary government websites, with plans to close nearly 500 more. And we will set new challenging standards of quality and accountability for government websites - including a requirement that each one allows feedback and engagement with citizens themselves.  From today no new website will be allowed unless it fully meets these requirements.
  • We’re determined that government websites should be efficient and meet people’s needs - easy to find, easy to use, and fully accessible. And in our relentless drive to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the way we use websites to meet this goal, we have already closed 900 now unnecessary government websites, with plans to close nearly 500 more. And we will set new challenging standards of quality and accountability for government websites - including a requirement that each one allows feedback and engagement with citizens themselves.  From today no new website will be allowed unless it fully meets these requirements.
  • ...17 more annotations...
  • We’re determined that government websites should be efficient and meet people’s needs - easy to find, easy to use, and fully accessible. And in our relentless drive to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the way we use websites to meet this goal, we have already closed 900 now unnecessary government websites, with plans to close nearly 500 more. And we will set new challenging standards of quality and accountability for government websites - including a requirement that each one allows feedback and engagement with citizens themselves.  From today no new website will be allowed unless it fully meets these requirements.
  • With Mygov, citizens will be in control - choosing the content relevant to them and determining their level of engagement. And their feedback will in turn help us to improve services
  • With Mygov, citizens will be in control - choosing the content relevant to them and determining their level of engagement. And their feedback will in turn help us to improve services
  • We know that for every transaction with a public service that is done online rather than over the telephone we can save around £3.30 in administration and staffing costs.  And using the internet rather than filling in paper forms or writing letters can typically save £12 each time
  • We know that for every transaction with a public service that is done online rather than over the telephone we can save around £3.30 in administration and staffing costs.  And using the internet rather than filling in paper forms or writing letters can typically save £12 each time.
  • We know that for every transaction with a public service that is done online rather than over the telephone we can save around £3.30 in administration and staffing costs.  And using the internet rather than filling in paper forms or writing letters can typically save £12 each time.
  • We know that for every transaction with a public service that is done online rather than over the telephone we can save around £3.30 in administration and staffing costs.  And using the internet rather than filling in paper forms or writing letters can typically save £12 each time.
  • We know that for every transaction with a public service that is done online rather than over the telephone we can save around £3.30 in administration and staffing costs.  And using the internet rather than filling in paper forms or writing letters can typically save £12 each time.
  • Revitalising our politics, our governance and our democracy means going beyond simply increased openness about previously secret information - it requires the policy-making monopoly of ministers and the civil service to be challenged - where practicable - through a step change in the opportunities for people to engage with and interact with government in its policy proposals
  • Revitalising our politics, our governance and our democracy means going beyond simply increased openness about previously secret information - it requires the policy-making monopoly of ministers and the civil service to be challenged - where practicable - through a step change in the opportunities for people to engage with and interact with government in its policy proposals
  • The web and the internet offers us a chance to reinvent “deliberative democracy” for the modern age.
  • The web and the internet offers us a chance to reinvent “deliberative democracy” for the modern age.
  • Ultimately this can provide the basis for them to participate in deliberative processes to formulate policy - setting off a historic shift in the way public policy is made.
  • This includes opening more policy development to wider scrutiny, for example through the use of e-petitions and deliberative events
  • Since it was established at the end of 2006, the number 10 e-petitions service has received more than 70 thousand petitions. There have been more than 12 million signatures placed and the Government has replied with more than 8 million e-mail responses. Each week I record a podcast and use twitter most days. Number10.gov.uk carries out daily conversations with more than 1.7 million followers. There have been almost 2 million views of our images on flickr and 4.3 million views of our films and videos on YouTube.
  • identify the far wider scope for deliberative engagements with the public, specifiying the outcome expected from such engagement
  • giving people a greater say over the policies that affect their lives and the services on which they depend.
  •  
    "We're determined that government websites should be efficient and meet people's needs - easy to find, easy to use, and fully accessible. And in our relentless drive to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the way we use websites to meet this goal, we have already closed 900 now unnecessary government websites, with plans to close nearly 500 more. And we will set new challenging standards of quality and accountability for government websites - including a requirement that each one allows feedback and engagement with citizens themselves. From today no new website will be allowed unless it fully meets these requirements."
stan mag

Seven Theses on Dictator's Dilemma | technosociology - 0 views

  • The capacities of the Internet that are most threatening to authoritarian regimes are not necessarily those pertaining to spreading of censored information but rather its ability to support the formation of a counter-public that is outside the control of the state
  • Dissent is not just about knowing what you think but about the formation of a public. A public is not just about what you know. Publics form through knowing that other people know what you know–and also knowing that you know what they know.
  • Thus, social media can be the most threatening part of the Internet to an authoritarian regime through its capacity to create a public(ish) sphere that is integrated into everyday life of millions of people and is outside the direct control of the state partly because it is so widespread and partly because it is not solely focused on politics. How do you censor five million Facebook accounts in real time except to shut them all down?
stan mag

Gov.uk marks the start of new way to deliver public services | Public Leaders Network |... - 0 views

  •  
    Gov.uk : un portal gouvernemental vraiment user-centric
stan mag

23 Examples of Good Social Media in the Public Sector - 0 views

  •  
    23 Examples of Good Social Media in the Public Sector
Arnault Coulet

Régionales: pourquoi Twitter n'est pas forcément hors-la-loi (via @fondapol) - 0 views

  • Obsolète, mais aussi relativement obscur. Comme l'affirme Bernard Maligner, expert en droit électoral, "en réalité, deux textes sont en choc frontal sur cette question". Le premier, c'est l'article L52-2 du code électoral. Il prévoit que, "en cas d'élections générales, aucun résultat d'élection, partiel ou définitif, ne peut être communiqué au public par la voie de la presse ou par tout moyen de communication au public par voie électronique, en métropole, avant la fermeture du dernier bureau de vote sur le territoire métropolitain". Les contrevenants sont potentiellement passibles d'une amende de 3750 euros.
  • Cela paraît clair, sauf que les premières tendances, disponibles à 18h, ne sont pas à proprement parler des "résultats" : ce sont des sondages sortis des urnes. Des sondages dont la publication, en toute logique, devrait donc être régie par la loi du 19 juillet 1977. Cette dernière interdit "par quelque moyen que ce soit, la publication, la diffusion et le commentaire de tout sondage tel que défini à l'article 1er". Ceux qui enfreignent cette disposition sont passibles d'une amende qui pourrait aller jusqu'à 75.000 euros. Oui, mais... "Ce ne sont pas les sondages sortis des urnes, ni ceux faits à partir des bureaux test à 18h qui sont visés par cet article 1er, explique-t-on à la commission des sondages, mais les sondages d'intention de vote faits les jours qui précèdent le scrutin". Du coup, les estimations qui circulent à partir de 18h sur le web semblent flotter dans une espèce de vide juridique. "Le législateur doit se saisir de cette question", indique-t-on à la commission des sondages.
  • Au ministère de l'Intérieur, dès le mois de juin dernier, on indiquait en effet que le code électoral allait être modifié pour les présidentielles de 2012. Mais, plusieurs mois plus tard, le dossier ne semble pas avoir avancé.
Arnault Coulet

Comment éviter les fuites de résultats électoraux sur Internet ? (@stephanedr... - 0 views

  • Quelles sont-elles ? Selon l’article 12 de la loi 19 juillet 1977 relative à la publication et à la diffusion de certains sondages d'opinion, ainsi que l’article L. 52-1 du code électoral associé à la sanction pénale définie par l’article L. 90-1 du même code, la publication la veille et le jour du scrutin de sondages est punie d’une amende de 75.000 €. Cette interdiction frappe donc aussi les sondages « sortie des urnes », élaborées à partir d’enquêtes réalisée à la sortie des bureaux de vote. Par ailleurs, selon l’article L. 52-2 du code électoral, dont l'infraction est sanctionnée par l’article L. 89 du même code, prohibe la publication « de résultat d'élection, partiel ou définitif (…) par la voie de la presse ou par tout moyen de communication au public par voie électronique, en métropole, avant la fermeture du dernier bureau de vote sur le territoire métropolitain ».
  • Cette interdiction concerne donc les estimations publiés à 18h30, projections calculées par les instituts de sondages à partir des résultats d’un certain nombre de bureaux test ayant des comportements de vote semblables au reste de la France. Sans que l’on comprenne bien pourquoi, la sanction est dans ce cas beaucoup plus légère que dans le premier cas : 3.750 €. « Il y a un peu d’ordre à mettre dans tout cela, constate Marie-Eve Aubin, présidente de la Commission de sondages. D’autant que nos pouvoirs et notre champ d’intervention sont limités ». « Il faudra préciser les moyens de la commission des sondages », confirme Jean-Pierre Sueur, sénateur PS du Loire, chargé, avec Hugues Portelli, sénateur UMP du Val d’Oise, d’un rapport pour la Commission des lois du Sénat sur la question des sondages, qui doit être rendu en juin ou en septembre prochains.
  • Peut-être proposeront-ils également une surveillance accrue du Net. En 2007, la Commission de contrôle de la campagne et la Commission des sondages avait en effet mis en place un dispositif de surveillance sur Internet afin de repérer les infractions au code électoral.
stan mag

The White House - Blog Post - Transparency and Open Government - 0 views

  • phases: Brainstorming, Discussion, and Drafting.
  • weblog in a discussion phase. On June 15th, we will invite you to use a wiki
  • Regulations.gov Exchange
  •  
    Thursday, May 21st, 2009 at 1:00 pm Transparency and Open Government Vivek Kundra, our Chief Information Officer, and Beth Noveck, Deputy Chief Technology Officer for Open Government, explain the Open Government Initiative On January 21, 2009, his first full day in office, the President issued a Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government and called for recommendations for making the Federal government more transparent, participatory, and collaborative. As Valerie Jarrett, Senior Advisor to the President says in the video below, we are proud "to announce an important next step in this historic call to action - one that will help us achieve a new foundation for our government - a foundation built on the values of transparency, accountability and responsibility." The Administration is committed to developing those recommendations in an open fashion. Consistent with the President's mandate, we want to be fully transparent in our work, participatory in soliciting your ideas and expertise, and collaborative in how we experiment together to use new tools and techniques for developing open government policy. Today we are kicking off an unprecedented process for public engagement in policymaking on the White House website. In a sea change from conventional practice, we are not asking for comments on an already-finished set of draft recommendations, but are seeking fresh ideas from you early in the process of creating recommendations. We will carefully consider your comments, suggestions, and proposals. Here's how the public engagement process will work. It will take place in 3 phases: Brainstorming, Discussion, and Drafting. Beginning today, we will have a brainstorming session for suggesting ideas for the open government recommendations. You can vote on suggested ideas or add your own. Then on June 3rd, the most compelling ideas from the brainstorming will be fleshed out on a weblog in a discussion phase. On June 15th, we will invite you to use a wiki t
stan mag

Harnessing the Power of Digital Data for Science and Society Report - 0 views

  •  
    The report furthers the goals of President Obama's open government policy, including the need to "disclose information rapidly in forms that the public can readily find and use" and represents a step forward in the Data.Gov concept of Federal CIO Vivek Kundra to "democratize data and give data access to the public.
stan mag

Open Declaration on Public Services 2.0 published in draft for public review | techPres... - 1 views

  •  
    As previously blogged, we are building an Open Declaration on Public Services 2.0 (http://eups20.wordpress.com), to be presented in Malmo at the EU ministerial conference. We have now published the draft version of the declaration, which tries to
Arnault Coulet

Mapping Iran's Online Public: Politics and Culture in the Persian Blogosphere | Berkman... - 0 views

  •  
    mapping Iran's online public, persian blogosphere
Arnault Coulet

MerciServicePublic se suspend face à l'afflux de messages injurieux - 0 views

  • Lancé en décembre 2009, le site MerciServicePublic.com s'était donné pour but de recueillir le mécontentement des usagers du service public. Suite à la chronique de Guy Birenbaum sur Europe 1, le site a été pris d'assaut et vient d'être suspendu temporairement.
  • Pour se prémunir contre tout procès en diffamation, les conditions générales d'utilisation précisaient que tout message personnel ou trop virulent serait supprimé. Or, visiblement, le créateur du site - qui travaille dans la communication - a été pris de cours après le buzz déclenché par la chronique de Guy Birenbaum sur Europe 1 puisque le site a été suspendu face à l'afflux "de messages injurieux".
stan mag

À quel canal Twitter s'abonner quand on anime un compte d'un organisme public... - 1 views

  •  
    "À quel canal Twitter s'abonner quand on anime un compte d'un organisme public ?"
stan mag

How ePetitions could improve public engagement with Parliament - 0 views

  • The ePetitions system has two aims. The first is to deal at a micro level with the issues that individual petitioners might wish to raise, and the second is the macro objective of deepening public engagement with the democratic process.
  • Parliament is currently experiencing a mild version of the internet-enabled disruption that sectors of the economy such as publishing and music have already experienced
stan mag

Bourse d'innovation de la Maison Blanche - 0 views

  •  
    La maison blanche cree un systeme d'innovations en duo public-prive> Simple et audacieux 
1 - 20 of 74 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page