A student in one of my classes mentioned this site; I'm sure many teachers who view education as primarily about the management of information as a protected resource would be quite upset about the site.
The points students bring up are thought-provoking. However, I'm most impressed by the questions they ask one another. They clarify and ask follow-up questions. They make inferences. They ask connecting questions and critical thinking questions. It's a messy process, but it's beautiful messy. It's art.
As long as a question is respectful, I want students to question their world. This applies to analyzing mathematical processes, thinking through social issues, making sense out of a text or analyzing the natural world for cause and effect.
Three times a week, we do inquiry days, where students begin with their own question in either social studies or science and they research it, summarize it and then ask further questions. While my initial goal involved teaching bias, loaded language and summarization, I soon realized that students were growing the most in their ability to ask critical thinking questions.
I require students to ask questions before, during and after reading.
Sometimes I'll ask a really lame question and then say, "Someone tell my why that question sucked?" or I'll ask a deeper question and say, "Why was that a hard question to answer?" The goal is to get them to see deeper questions and to also think about why a question is deep or shallow.
Feedback on questions: I highlight their questions in Google Docs and leave comments on their blogs with very specific feedback.
Some students have a really hard time with questioning strategies.
I teach students about inquiry, clarifying, critical thinking and inference questioning.
Students sometimes ask me questions. Other times they ask partners or small group questions. Still other times they ask the questions to the whole class.
Technology allows students to take their time in crafting a question while having access to the questions of their peers.
the transition from physical manuals to embedded help has been slow, steady, and apparently benign, like the proverbial tide that lifts all boats—who would argue against help after all?
What if university instruction were re-imagined in such a way: Provide just-in-time help for skills on the job in order to address needs at the time they occur?