Group items tagged

"A major study into maths attainment has found that boys and girls perform equally in the subject, dispelling long-held myths around gender and education. The first UK-wide research of its kind for 13 years was carried out by Keith Topping, Professor of Educational and Social Research at the University of Dundee, and education assessment company Renaissance found differences in maths attainment between girls and boys to be almost negligible. The study also found that regular and high-quality maths practice improves outcomes across the board and that primary pupils outperformed secondary students, with better attainment scores."

Originally posted in 2010 and reconsidered from the perspective of recent international study on science aptitude of boys and girls, makes the point that, minus exceptional aptitude, girls and boys have equal potential and demonstrate equivalent success in math

Examining the evidence behind guidelines for encouraging girls into math and science and confronting stereotypes

Study of two Indian tribes, one a partilineal society, the other matrilineal, to discover ability to solve a spatial reasoning task

Essays and commentaries (full text access requires subscription)

Describes a mentoring program for middle school girls to encourage interest in math and science and engineering

"A research team led by Carnegie Mellon University's Robert Siegler has identified a major source of the gap -- U. S. students' inadequate knowledge of fractions and division. Although fractions and division are taught in elementary school, even many college students have poor knowledge of them. The research team found that fifth graders' understanding of fractions and division predicted high school students' knowledge of algebra and overall math achievement, even after statistically controlling for parents' education and income and for the children's own age, gender, I.Q., reading comprehension, working memory, and knowledge of whole number addition, subtraction and multiplication. Published in Psychological Science, the findings demonstrate an immediate need to improve teaching and learning of fractions and division."

After an 11-year interval math still tops the overall poll, though results vary by gender, educational attainment and political ideology

today hindi news,today news talmi,hindi news www.killdo.de.gg

From the abstract: "This research examined the effects of the objectifying gaze on math performance, interaction motivation, body surveillance, body shame, and body dissatisfaction. In an experiment, undergraduate participants (67 women and 83 men) received an objectifying gaze during an interaction with a trained confederate of the other sex. As hypothesized, the objectifying gaze caused decrements in women'smath performance but notmen's. Interestingly, the objectifying gaze also increased women's, but notmen's,motivation to engage in subsequent interactions with their partner. Finally, the objectifying gaze did not influence body surveillance, body shame, or body dissatisfaction forwomen or men. One explanation for themath performance and interaction motivation findings is stereotype threat. To the degree that the objectifying gaze arouses stereotype threat, math performance may decrease because it conveys that women's looks are valued over their other qualities. Furthermore, interaction motivation may increase because stereotype threat arouses belonging uncertainty or concerns about social connections. As a result, the objectifying gazemay trigger a vicious cycle in which women underperform but continue to interact with the people who led them to underperform in the first place. Implications for long-term consequences of the objectifying gaze and directions for future research are discussed." (Full text available online (.pdf) )for now) ) (Winner of the 2011 Georgia Babladelis Best Paper Award)

Wow, what an amazing study!

Collaborative network seeking to further female participation in STEM through maximization of public and private resources, also through the work of regional chapters

A publisher of academic and scholarly monographs in the humanities and social sciences, including African Studies, American History, American Literature, Anthropology/Archaeology, Art History, Asian Studies, Biblical Studies, Catholicism, Classics, Communications, Criminology, Drama, East European/Slavic Studies, Eastern Religion, Economic Development, Economics, Education, Ethics, European History, Foreign Languages, Gender/Women's Studies, Geography/Environment, Higher Education, Hispanic/Latin American Studies, International Studies, Judaic Studies, Labor Studies, Legal Studies, Linguistics, Literature, Middle Eastern Studies, Military Studies, Minorities in Education, Minorities in Politics, Minority Studies, Organizations and Leadership, Peace/Conflict Studies, Philosophy, Political Science, Psychology, Public Health, Religious Studies, Research in Education/Social Sciences, Sociology, Urban Studies, US Public Policy, World History

Who created mathematics? Where did it begin? To answer these questions, we need to think about what mathematics is. In their work on ethnomathematics, Borba (1990) and D'Ambrosio (1990) define the compnonents of ethnomathematics as the follows: ethnos - within a cultural environment mathema - explaining and understanding in order to transcend, managing and coping with reality in order to survive and thrive. tics - techniques such as counting, ordering, sorting, measuring, weighing, ciphering, classifying, ordering, inferring and modeling.