This is empirical because it uses data from 1200 adults in two different areas. Though it might be subjective because not everyone tells the truth about cheating at anything
The data is empirical, although the validity of the claims may not be that soild. They took the latest poll results for each state and translated them into probabilities.
Shows the odds of the Boston Red Sox making the playoffs as the season goes on and then in the final days of the collapse. Most of this data is empirical probability
Non-native Burmese pythons introduced to Florida 30 years ago are likely causing mammal decline in the area (the probabilities presented in the article are subjective).
Interprets the variance in a batter's average on a year to year basis and tries to determine how much of an effect a hitter's and pitcher's relative skills have on balls in play.
Uses empirical probability methods with batting averages.
Totally subjective. Fighter gambling stats are based partially on numbers, and mostly on what will make UFC the most money. If the stats were legitimate, which they're not, then it would be axiomatic (assuming they just use the discrete values of wins to losses)