Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ Long Game
anonymous

Kurzweil still doesn't understand the brain - 0 views

  •  
    "Ray Kurzweil has responded to my criticisim of futurist fortune-telling. It really just compounds the problems, though, and gullible people who love Ray will think he's answered me, while skeptical people who see through his hocus-pocus will be unimpressed. It's kind of pointless to reply again, but here goes." (By PZ Meyers at Pharyngula on August 21, 2010)
anonymous

Dilbert Creator Scott Adams Tries to Build an Eco-Friendly House - 0 views

  • So the architect—and later your building engineer, too—each asks you to sign a document saying you won't sue them when beavers eat a load-bearing wall and your entire family is crushed by forest debris. You make the mistake of mentioning this arrangement to your family, and they leave you. But you are not deterred because you're saving the planet, damn it. You'll get a new family. A greener one.
  • Conclusion: Photovoltaic systems are a waste of money. But I'd do it again in a heartbeat, because I love the Earth, damn it. In my defense, the price of your future photovoltaic system will never come down unless idiots like me pay too much today. You're welcome.
  •  
    "No one said it would be easy to build the greenest house on the block. Scott Adams on perplexing energy bills, ugly lawns and the true meaning of 'green'" (By Scott Adams at the Wall Street Journal on August 22, 2010)
anonymous

They Still Don't Get It - 0 views

  • The art of the "big lie" is to repeat something often enough, and with a powerful enough megaphone, such that your distortions are not challenged.
  • By trying to rewrite the narrative of the economic cataclysm we have lived through, the deniers are attempting to challenge the common-sense conclusions that flow from an accurate understanding of history.
  • Greenberg was removed as CEO of AIG by his own board—of its own volition—after his refusal to answer questions about his involvement in fraudulent reinsurance contracts that his company had created. Five people were convicted by a jury in Connecticut in 2008 for their role in these frauds. The federal prosecutor, in his summation, called Greenberg an unindicted co-conspirator in the scheme. In New York, the judge who will hear the case based on these facts, brought by the state when I was attorney general, called the case "devastating" and referred to AIG as a "criminal enterprise." AIG as a corporate entity settled the case with my office in 2006 by restating its financial results and paying a fine of $1.6 billion. Shareholders are now awaiting judicial approval of an additional $750 million settlement to compensate them for damages they suffered from these accounting frauds.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • What does it mean that supposedly thoughtful voices in the corporate world continue to deny the simple fact that irresponsible behavior should be addressed head on, and the rules of conduct altered sufficiently to permit a sound foundation for future economic growth?
  • Schwarzman recently compared the attempt to tax the often astronomical fees earned by private equity managers as ordinary income—as they should be—to Hitler's invasion of Poland. This horrific statement, from someone who spent millions of dollars on his own birthday party, is an unfortunate reminder of the mind-set of at least some pockets of our corporate leadership. It is time for more enlightened voices in the corporate world to use their own megaphones.
  •  
    "Some people on Wall Street, and at the Wall Street Journal, speak as if the financial crisis never happened." By Eliot Spitzer at Slate Magazine on August 22, 2010.
anonymous

Objectivism & "Metaphysics," Part 5 - 0 views

  • Rand defined in axiom as “a statement that identifies the base of knowledge and of any further statement pertaining to that knowledge, a statement necessarily contained in all others, whether any particular speaker chooses to identify it or not.”
  • The big three axioms in Objectivism are those of existence, consciousness, and identity.
  • Yet, irreducible and primary as they may be, they do rest on something else which Rand somehow fails to identify: namely, memory.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Any sort of analysis, including the analysis that yields the Objectivist axioms of existence, consciousness, and identity, presupposes the reliability of memory.
  • People tend to accept any argument, no matter how suspect, when it is used to defend core beliefs. To argue that a principle is “self-evident” and “axiomatic” because it cannot be “denied” without first assuming it involves presuppositions that can easily be doubted and challenged.
  • Knowledge neither requires, nor can be justified, in logic or “self-evidence.” Foundationalism is as unnecessary as it is false and empty. Knowledge can only be justified (provisionally) either in daily practice or (better yet) through rigorous empirical (i.e., scientific) tests.
  •  
    By Greg Nyquist at Ayn Rand Contra Human Nature on August 22, 2010.
anonymous

Russia's Food Security Challenge - 0 views

  • This would be an extraordinary development considering that Russia accounts for 17 percent of global grain output and exported 20 percent of its nearly 100 million ton production last year to major markets in the Middle East and North Africa. Some estimates have Russian grain harvests falling to as little as 60 million tons this year, and the projections seem to drop precipitously every week.
  • Making sure that its population is fed is one of the fundamental policy challenges for Moscow. In Russia, food security and state security are practically indistinguishable.
  • Russian cities are essentially islands of dense populations dependent on grain-producing regions that can be quite far away.
    • anonymous
       
      It would be an interesting exercise to compare US grain supporting regions to that of Russian. Americans are often unaware that the *reason* their government doesn't control food production to such an extent isn't because of some innate political superiority, but the fact that such control is uneeded.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • The free market is a luxury Russia simply cannot afford when it comes to food production. Instead, it must adopt a nonmarket mechanism — one that is enforced by the security apparatus if need be.
  • The most recent threat of a grain crisis has therefore seen Moscow revert to a number of strategies highly reminiscent of those employed by Soviet and Tsarist Russia.
  • First, the Kremlin has banned all exports until the end of the year
  • the Kremlin has put the Federal Security Service in charge of overseeing the grain distribution in the region
  • the Kremlin has directed the regional offices of the ruling United Russia party to oversee all grain distribution and price setting across the entire country
  • Russia has used the grain crisis to further strengthen its position within its periphery
  •  
    "The Moscow Times reported on Thursday that the severe drought in the Russian grain belt could make the country a net importer of grain, marking the first time in more than a decade that Moscow has been forced to import the commodity." By StratFor on August 20, 2010.
anonymous

Islam, Secularism and the Battle for Turkey's Future - 0 views

  •  
    "A deep power struggle is under way in the Republic of Turkey. Most outside observers see this as the latest phase in the decades-long battle between Islamism and Kemalist secularism. Others paint it as traditional Anatolia's struggle against modern Istanbul, egalitarianism versus economic elitism or democracy's rise against authoritarianism. Ultimately, the struggle boils down to a fight over a single, universal concept: power." By StratFor on August 23, 2010
anonymous

How do Millennials think about international relations? - 0 views

  • 1)  An early childhood of peace and prosperity -- a.k.a., the Nineties; 2)  The September 11th attacks; 3)  Two Very Long Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq; 4)  One Financial Panic/Great Recession; 5)  The ascent of China under the shadow of U.S. hegemony. 
  •  
    "I wonder whether the current generation of millennial twentysomethings will develop a worldview about international relations that transcends party and clique. If that happened, it would profoundly shape the contours of American foreign policy starting next decade." By Daniel W. Drezner at Foreign Policy on August 23, 2010.
anonymous

High Fructose Corn Syrup: Tasty Toxin or Slandered Sweetener? - 0 views

  •  
    "High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) has, over the past few decades, gradually displaced cane and beet sugar as the sweetener of choice for soft drinks, candy and prepared foods. In recent years, there have been a growing number claims that HFCS is a significant health risk to consumers, responsible for obesity, diabetes, heart disease and a wide variety of other illnesses. " By Jim Laidler at Science-Based Medicine on August 23, 2010.
anonymous

Exploiting the Flood - 0 views

  • With a humanitarian crisis in Pakistan which dwarfs the combined devastation of the 2004 Asian tsunami, the earthquake in Pakistan in 2005, and the 2010 Haiti earthquake, the lack of media attention that the flooding has received is surprising.
  •  
    "Whereas the destruction wrought by the Haitian earthquake, for example, brought millions of dollars in donations as well as public campaigns by prominent American figures to raise money for Haiti's reconstruction, the latest humanitarian crisis in Pakistan has brought little of the same sympathy or support." By Jeb Koogler at Foreign Policy Watch on August 26, 2010.
anonymous

Ten things I know about the mosque - 0 views

  •  
    "#1. America missed a golden opportunity to showcase its Constitutional freedoms. The instinctive response of Americans should have been the same as President Obama's: Muslims have every right to build there. Where one religion can build a church, so can all religions." At Roger Ebert's Journal on August 19, 2010.
anonymous

"Were You Born on the Wrong Continent?": America's misguided culture of overwork - 0 views

  • even before the recession, American workers were already clocking in the most hours in the West. Compared to our German cousins across the pond, we work 1,804 hours versus their 1,436 hours – the equivalent of nine extra 40-hour workweeks per year. The Protestant work ethic may have begun in Germany, but it has since evolved to become the American way of life.
  • Aren’t we at least more productive by virtue of the amount of time we’re putting in? No. Look at their productivity rates. They’re like ours.
  • How did Germany become such a great place to work in the first place? The Allies did it. This whole European model came, to some extent, from the New Deal. Our real history and tradition is what we created in Europe.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Despite the numbers, social democracy really does work and delivers the goods and it’s the only model that an advanced country can do to be competitive in this world.
  • You know, it’s 50,000 dollars for tuition at NYU and it’s zero at Humboldt University in Berlin. So NYU adds catastrophic amounts of GDP per capita and Humboldt adds nothing.
  • So much of the American economy is based on GDP that comes from waste, environmental pillage, urban sprawl, bad planning, people going farther and farther with no land use planning whatsoever and leading more miserable lives
  •  
    "Germany's workers have higher productivity, shorter hours and greater quality of life. How did we get it so wrong?" By Alex Jung at Salon.com on August 25, 2010.
anonymous

Sarah Palin and the apocalypse, Part II - 0 views

  •  
    "Very few sensed a moment of pivotal change when Sarah Palin was announced as John McCain's vice presidential candidate in late summer 2008. Most followed the assessment of The Washington Post's Kathleen Parker, who wrote in the National Review: "If Palin were a man we'd all be guffawing." But the market crashed unexpectedly barely a month later. Some felt it was a sign from God as it fell 777 points on the eve of Rosh Hashanah." By Bernie Quigley at The Hill on August 30, 2010.
anonymous

Whoa; capitalism is like The Matrix, dude - 0 views

  • The latest book in the wave of economics-for-the-layman texts, piggybacking on the global sense of “WTF just happened?” in the wake of the subprime collapse and its ripples, is 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism from Cambridge economist Doctor Ha-Joon Chang, who apparently manages to play a currently popular theme (“free markets are bad”) with a less-popular counterpoint (“the welfare state should be expanded”)
  • Kudos to any pundit honest enough to admit that they don’t have a silver bullet in the breech.
  •  
    "I'd agree that what are usually described as "free markets" are indeed broken (there's too much evidence to ignore), but I remain to be convinced that those markets are truly "free" in any way that Adam Smith himself would have recognised. I'm no economics boffin, of course, and as such I'm not going to state with certainty that truly free markets would be the solution to all our economic woes… but I think it's fair to say that regulation is never going to prevent disasters and abuses in a system wherein certain groups and individuals are given (or simply invent for themselves) ways of avoiding or circumventing such." By Paul Raven at Futurismic on August 30, 2010.
anonymous

'Ground Zero mosque'? The reality is less provocative - 0 views

  • When I heard about it – in passing, in a soundbite – I figured it was a US example of the sort of inanely confrontational fantasy scheme Anjem Choudary might issue a press release about if he fancied winding up the tabloids for the 900th time this year. I was wrong. The "Ground Zero mosque" is a genuine proposal, but it's slightly less provocative than its critics' nickname makes it sound. For one thing, it's not at Ground Zero. Also, it isn't a mosque.
  •  
    "Things seem awfully heated in America right now; so heated you could probably toast a marshmallow by jabbing it on a stick and holding it toward the Atlantic. Millions are hopping mad over the news that a bunch of triumphalist Muslim extremists are about to build a "victory mosque" slap bang in the middle of Ground Zero." By Charlie Brooker at The Guardian on August 23, 2010.
anonymous

Man Already Knows Everything He Needs To Know About Muslims - 0 views

  • "I almost gave in and listened to that guy defend Islam with words I didn't want to hear," Gentries said. "But then I remembered how much easier it is to live in a world of black-and-white in which I can assign the label of 'other' to someone and use him as a vessel for all my fears and insecurities."
  •  
    "Local man Scott Gentries told reporters Wednesday that his deliberately limited grasp of Islamic history and culture was still more than sufficient to shape his views of the entire Muslim world." At The Onion on August 30, 2010.
anonymous

The Feeling Of Power (by Isaac Asimov) - 0 views

  •  
    "Aub said, "Three plus two makes five, you see, so the twenty- one becomes a fifty-one. Now you let that go for a while and start fresh. You multiply seven and two, that's fourteen, and one and two, that's two. Put them down like this and it adds up to thirty-four. Now if you put the thirty-four under the fifty-one this way and add them, you get three hundred and ninety-one, and that's the answer." There was an instant's silence and then General Weider said, "I don't believe it. He goes through this rigmarole and makes up numbers and multiplies and adds them this way and that, but I don't believe it. It's too complicated to be anything but horn-swoggling." "
anonymous

Objectivism & "Metaphysics," Part 6 - 0 views

  • When we say that some object such as a cat or dog exists, we mean that they have a substantive, independent existence “in reality."
  • When Objectivists insist that “existence exists,” in what sense do they mean it? In the cat and dog sense, or in the unicorn sense?
  • it seems that Objectivism endorses the cat and dog sense of existence. Existence exists becomes merely a pithy way of saying reality exists.
    • anonymous
       
      Isn't this a tautology?
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • If we examine all this from a foundationalist mindset (a mindset which Objectivists must honor if they wish to remain consistent), it is clear that the Objectivist axiom of existence fails to deliver what it promises.
  • While all sane people believe that existence exists in the cat and dog sense of the term, this belief is not “validated” by direct perceptual observation.
  • It is only when we have brought intelligence and our practical sense of things (which is based on memory, the “validity” of which is deeply problematical and hardly self-evident) to bear on this observation that we can determine that it is far from real.
  • it struck me how similar Rand's whole style of argumentation is to Lenin's, and I don't mean in the academic terms delineated in Sciabarra's "Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical." Rather, I'm referring to Lenin's own misreadings, fallacies, and all around bad faith displayed toward his political and philosophical opponents and rivals. Of course, Lenin was revolutionary seeking real power, so no trick was too dirty or underhanded when it came to realizing his goals.What's Rand's excuse?
  •  
    "Rand's axioms: Existence exists. Now lets examine the Objectivist axioms, beginning with the axiom of existence. The Objectivist axioms are very instructive as to the dangers of an overly-speculative, rationalistic, largely verbal philosophy. Rand uses the vagueness of her axioms to confuse their tautological meaning with other more problematic meanings. This confusion is at the very heart of the Objectivist axioms." By Greg Nyquist at Ayn Rand Contra Human Nature on August 29, 2010.
anonymous

Obama Wants Us To Forget The Lessons Of Iraq - 0 views

  • The plan was to give Saddam a good spanking, make sure all concerned knew who was boss, and go home.  Operation Desert Storm didn’t turn out that way.
  • By the time Barack Obama had ascended to the presidency, this second phase of the Iraq war—its purpose now inverted from occupation to extrication—was already well-advanced.
  • One thing alone we can say with assurance:As far as Americans are concerned, Iraqis now own their war. “Like any sovereign, independent nation,” President Obama recently remarked, “Iraq is free to chart its own course.” The place may be a mess, but it’s their mess not ours. In this sense alone is the Iraq war “over.”
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • As U.S. forces have withdrawn, they have done so in an orderly fashion. In their own eyes, they remain unbeaten and unbeatable. As the troops pull out, the American people are already moving on: Even now, Afghans have displaced Iraqis as the beneficiaries of Washington’s care and ministrations. Oddly, even disturbingly, most of us—our memories short, our innocence intact—seem content with the outcome. The United States leaves Iraq having learned nothing.
  •  
    "For those Americans still persuaded that everything changed the moment Obama entered the Oval Office, let's provide a little context. The event that historians will enshrine as the Iraq war actually began back in 1990 when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, Iraq's unloved and unlovable neighbor." By Andrew J. Bacevich at The New Republic on August 31, 2010.
anonymous

Many say the peer review system is broken. Here's how some journals are trying to fix it. - 0 views

  • But several journals, including Biology Direct, where Kaplan is an editor, have decided to eliminate anonymity from the peer review process altogether. “Under the Biology Direct model, everything is transparent, and everything is in the open,” says Eugene Koonin, one of the journal’s editors-in-chief.
  •  
    "It's become adversarial," agrees molecular biologist Keith Yamamoto of the University of California, San Francisco, who co-chaired the National Institutes of Health 2008 working group to revamp peer review at the agency. With the competition for shrinking funds and the ever-pervasive "publish or perish" mindset of science, "peer review has slipped into a situation in which reviewers seem to take the attitude that they are police, and if they find [a flaw in the paper], they can reject it from publication." By Jef Akst at I Hate Your Paper on August 1, 2010.
anonymous

The West Bank Attack and Israel's Negotiating Strategy - 0 views

  • As the Tuesday attack illustrated, Abbas cannot control the Palestinian militant landscape whether he wants to or not. In other words, if Israel and the United States are really seeking peace with the Palestinians, they need to open a dialogue with Hamas.
  • The Palestinian territories are split geographically and politically between Hamas and Fatah, with no leader, political faction or militant group able to speak on behalf of the territories as a whole. Neither Israel nor the United States is blind to this reality.
  • The more interesting question in our mind is what is compelling Israel to oblige with the U.S. wish for peace talks. Israel and the United States have been on rough footing since Obama took office, mainly due to Netanyahu’s failed attempt to pressure Washington into aligning with Israeli policy toward the Palestinians and Iran early on in the Obama presidency.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • The cost on Tuesday was four Israeli lives, but on the strategic level, Hamas gave Israel exactly what it was seeking in the lead-up to Thursday’s peace talks: the status quo.
  •  
    "Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrived in Washington on Tuesday for peace talks to be held on Thursday with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Just three hours prior to his arrival, Palestinian gunmen opened fire on a car at the entrance of the Jewish settlement Kiryat Arba near the West Bank city of Hebron. Four Israelis - two men and two women (one of whom was pregnant) - were killed in the attack." At StratFor on September 1, 2010.
« First ‹ Previous 581 - 600 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page