School on board with expanding the programme so that others may benefit. This also show that the teachers are in support of the programme. Domino affect.
The investment in the equipment might be fine but what about the investment in those that would be using them to teach? Sometimes when you are given the tools to implement, doesn't mean you know how to use them.
Meant to extend and suggest that training on using the equipment and the time to find how it would be implemented into the curriculum. The teacher using the curriculum is one thing but using it to teach and then assessing the students use of the technology after the scaffolding from the teacher. Does this make sense?
As teachers, how are we to differentiate the between using ICT's as a tool or for the delivery of a lesson. A snippet from the introduction quotes "The educational effectiveness of ICTs depends on how they are used and for what purpose, like any other educational tool or mode of education delivery, ICTs do not work for everyone, everywhere in the same way."