Group items tagged

This article describes how oil has become less elastic through the past years. It also discusses the balance between the scarcity of oil and the demand being supplied and the quantity demand. Oil is still in the ground, and it has been supplied frequently the past ten years, but there is some economical decisions to make to set the standard for the future of oil.

The demand of oil has been increasing over the past year which is playing a role on the demand and supply balance. Because the demand in oil is increasing, the price of the oil would also increase. It takes longer for oil to be drilled from the ground which causes the oil to take longer time and a change to the response in price. "In economic terms, the oil supply is becoming less elastic as new oil supplies come increasingly from unconventional oil." The demand for oil reflects on how much we need oil in our everyday life. Individual people can reduce the amount of oil they use by using public transportation, if where you want to go is close by. This saves gas and oil because you do not need your car and the bus would carry a lot of people.

This article describes the change in oil prices on the population. The article states that the supply of oil is becomming less elastic and therefore there is a increase in price. The way to win oil becomes harder, because deeper holes have to be made to extract it from the earth. The article furthermore looks into changes from an economical point of view. It looks at examples of what can be changed and where changes have been made.

the article talks about a change in the income tax paid by the highest bracket of the English economy; this means that all the money earned above £130,000 will have to pay 50p per pound (50%) rather than 40p per pound. Economists predict that the income change will not have any effect on the earnings as the income elasticity of the bracket of economy is 0.46.

This article discusses how the car sales have been hurt in the past due to the recession. The article talks about how the private sector has become a bigger target for the car companies. The elasticity of supply has grown to fit this curve, causing the car companies to gain some more profit that they had in the past. The companies also began to target people that care more about the environment, selling many more low emission type cars. They had to adapt to what the demand was, causing their elasticity of supply to grow to fit many wants.

The article says that the number of cars sold in the past has decreased. However the market for cars has recovered. The articled shows how companies adapted to the changing needs of customers. Customers now want more fuel efficient cars and often buy them on the private market. This causes the elasticity of supply of these companies to increase because they quickly had to adapt to the new situation.

Here we have an uncanny case of a company that has little to no competition, yet its market share is actually dropping. Sony has been constantly ignoring the price elasticity of it products so much so that they refuse to recognize their fall from favor in the market war. "Our initial expectation is that sales should double at a minimum," Jack Tretton, chief executive of Sony Computer Entertainment America, said in an interview [at the time]. "We've gotten our production issues behind us on the PlayStation 3, reaching a position to pass on the savings to consumers, and our attitude is the sooner the better." As a result Sony has kept its prices constant.

This article goes over the supply elasticities of many products seeing shortages after the hurricane in New York and New Jersey. It talks about the inelasticity of the PES for hotel rooms. The determinant for this is time period. More hotel rooms are needed, but they can't be built in a week. The article also talks about the price of gas, and how the demand for gas is almost perfectly inelastic, meaning that gas can be sold for a huge price. The article asks the question, should the scarce resources go to those who can pay the most for them, or those in line first? This goes with the moral question asked in the discussion of the reading.

This bring cross elasticity to a whole new level. Now that the elections in the US are done, it's sometimes hard to remember just how crazy campaigning can get. Candidates will grab at whatever statistics or new bits of knowledge that tell them how they're doing in the polls and or what they need to do to get ahead. This year, one of their focuses is...what kind of soda we drink? That's right, because cross elasticity is all about how two product correlate and the correlation between the president elect and your favorite soda has only like, what, 20, 30 degrees of separation? And you'd be surprised just how many other details of your life they'll look at to see where their target audience is. And these guys aren't the only ones trying to get an edge from such seemingly irrelevant information...

The article talks about how the company experiences extreme losses in revenue as they supplied a smaller quantity of flights. This can be related to elasticity of supply since as supply decreased, revenue did too.

The profit of the Microsoft decreased as people started buying more smart phones and tablets. This is related to elasticity as people will buy more tablets since they are cheaper than PCs. Therefore, the demand of the PCs and Microsoft is elastic since it is not a necessity and people are buying substitute products

The article shows that that oil has a big influence on a lot of products. In this case it increased the price of sugar by 20%. This might seem a lot so you would expect the demand for sugar to decrease. However since sugar does not cost a lot, a 20% increase in the price will not make a big difference. An increase of a few cents of the consumers bill will also hardly be noticed. The price elasticity in this example is very low.

This article talks about how the oil prices are very elastic. Due to Venezuela having a "shortfall"in their production, OPEC decided to take advantage of this. They saw this as a "a legitimate excuse to increase output". Therefore, this allowed them to increase the prices a little more and still be able to sell more oil, causing a greater profit for OPEC. In other words, because Venezuela had a shortage in their oil production, other countries were able to take advantage of this and allow the elasticity of their product to create the greatest profit possible.

This article talks about the risks of lowering prices in hope of increasing demand. It mentions the effects of price elasticity on this as well, it states, "If we assume the products' price elasticity is at the lower end of that range [...] then price promotions become even riskier". This is because it requires a big change in price to get even close to a substantial increase in demand. If the change is not huge, the effect on demand will be negligible.

This article describes how a hotel manager is changing the plan to achieve a higher total revenue, as the hotel no longer offers what is demanded the most. Competitors may have these facilites that are demanded, and one could make a graph on the cross elasticity of demand with this hotel and a competitor if one had the right numbers.

In this article it talks about the poor economy in Indonesia and the little income some of its citizens have. Due to so little income some people cannot buy proper food for their families resulting in malnutrition. This is a huge problem for the economy as it cannot get back on its feet if people do not spend money, but if there is no money to spend then what can one do?

This article tells us that because the prices of foods as increased, there is poverty and malnutrition is countries like Indonesia. Two different types of surveys was taken in Indonesia before 1996 and immediately after the economics crisis in 1999. The result was that some food nutrients like iron and calcium was more than usual during the crisis years and and food nutrient like Vit C was almost nothing.

These article talks about how people spend less of their income for charity. This could be income elasticity, since people would spend their income or something they would find more necessary (such as food for their families or just buy necessary things for their own good). Therefore, there is no more demand for charities and people do not offer their money to charities anymore.

The strong dollar and increasing competition present a barrier for McDonald's effort to increase its profit. McDonald's used to have inelastic demand, since it did not have much competition and changes in price would not affect total revenue. If they wanted to increase total revenue, they just raised the prices. However, nowadays, as competition takes place, their demand is becoming more and more elastic, because of the more substitutes offered by competition.

For the past century or so, cigarettes have been an inelastic product. Due to their addictive properties, changes in the price have had a minimal effect on market demand, allowing tobacco companies to rake in boat loads of cash. In the early 1900s, big tobacco hit its peak in sales with the ability to advertise in color and through whole new mediums (newspaper, radio, TV, etc.) It was at this time that the American public and many other nations, although I don't which, started to recognize the dangers of smoking and the government begin creating restrictions. Though cigarrettes now have prices that fluctuate like gas, can't have ads on radio or television, and can't be sold to minors, consumer demand has still remained for them because of how powerful the addictive effects of nicotine are on the human brain. However, now there is an alternative to conventional smoking which replaces deadly secondhand smoke with clean water vapor. E-cigarettes are a trend that is sure to build demand and will cigarettes and cigars as elastic as a rubber band.

This article talks about Lenovo's vision of growing demand for their 7-inch tablets. It suggests combinations of substitutes and complement goods, which has to do with the value of XED. They see tablets as competitors for large-screen smartphones (like Samsung S3), but also as something that will not replace traditional computers. So, value of XED in combination tablets - smartphones is positive, meaning that these two goods are substitutes, whereas the value of XED in combination tablets - computers is negative, meaning that these two goods are complements. Lenovo also suggests that they are prepared for the steady supply of high-resolution touch screens for which they see a bright future as components of computers. So, it is also about non-determinant of supply - expectation for future prices.

This is a great show of how the government needs money and so, not out of spite for any business but out of a need for funding, they are considering putting a tax on a local Enterprise Car Rental franchise. Obviously, the owners are not happy with this and say that price would hurt them and the customers, which would only consist of out-of-towners and not the locals who want the downtown renovated in the first place. The suggestion they made, which seems fair to me, is to put an even smaller percentage tax on all restaurant's goods and services. This way there is less harm done to any single producer, because restaurants as a whole have a much lower inelasticity than car rentals in a single town, and any given customer, of which there would be many more for a restaurant, would not feel they were losing as much money to this tax. Plus, a tax on restaurants would force those citizens that wanted their community to look nicer to pitch in a little.

according to the article, increasing excise taxes, encouraging smoke-free public places,and reducing salt and trans fat in food might help decrease deaths from noninfectious diseases. It would make sense because, if excise taxes are imposed, demand will slightly fall. Also if smoke-free places are encouraged, non-smokers will not have to be exposed to smoke all the time.

Gas being an inelastic product, has a small change in demand if the price is increased. It was a good time to increase the price of oil because "The improvement in the nation's economic health has increased demand for oil" so there would be an increase in revenue if the price was increased.