healthcare regulation and scandals

This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.

Concern about doctors on probation practicing. Parenthetically, Halstead, one of the best surgeons in American history was a habitual cocaine (stimulant) and then morhpine (depressant) user. 

The takeaway is that doctors on the Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts show partiality while claiming to protect the public. 

It took 10 years of litigation to address the corruption and dishonesty of the state medical board. The state medical board members used the state's authority to pursue strictly personal agendas and they maliciously deprived Alan J. Mishler, MD, the good neurosurgeon of his constitutional rights. 

This article provides novel insight into the quality of medical regulation by the Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts. This article raises critical questions about the efficacy and integrity of a state medical board and suggests that further study is needed to evaluate the extend of regulatory misconduct.

The 2011 UMKC Pathology Breast Cancer Scandal was a cover-up of the prolonged, unsafe, ischemic times provided to women with breast cancer in the UMKC-TMC Pathology Department. Reports of unsafe patient care went neglected by the pathology chair, an attending, the residents, the DIO. I reported this to the ACGME in 2011 and in 2014 I discovered that the UMKC-Graduate Medical Education office lied to the ACGME about months of breast cancer care.

Healthcare scandals along with the related relevant medical and scientific literature highlighting why the actions are considered a scandal. Regulatory medicine, healthcare, health policy, and patient safety. Doctor Brett Snodgrass, MD has a particular interest in transparency in healthcare and policy suggestions that regulators can consider in order to prevent things such as the VA Scandal, the UMKC Pathology Breast Cancer Scandal of 2011, and many others including the Stem Cell Scandal of South Korea in 2006.

Healthcare scandals along with the related relevant medical and scientific literature highlighting why the actions are considered a scandal. Regulatory medicine, healthcare, health policy, and patient safety. Doctor Brett Snodgrass, MD has a particular interest in transparency in healthcare and policy suggestions that regulators can consider in order to prevent things such as the VA Scandal, the UMKC Pathology Breast Cancer Scandal of 2011, and many others including the Stem Cell Scandal of South Korea in 2006.

Healthcare scandals along with the related relevant medical and scientific literature highlighting why the actions are considered a scandal. Regulatory medicine, healthcare, health policy, and patient safety. Doctor Brett Snodgrass, MD has a particular interest in transparency in healthcare and policy suggestions that regulators can consider in order to prevent things such as the VA Scandal, the UMKC Pathology Breast Cancer Scandal of 2011, and many others including the Stem Cell Scandal of South Korea in 2006.

Healthcare scandals along with the related relevant medical and scientific literature highlighting why the actions are considered a scandal. Regulatory medicine, healthcare, health policy, and patient safety. Doctor Brett Snodgrass, MD has a particular interest in transparency in healthcare and policy suggestions that regulators can consider in order to prevent things such as the VA Scandal, the UMKC Pathology Breast Cancer Scandal of 2011, and many others including the Stem Cell Scandal of South Korea in 2006.

Healthcare scandals along with the related relevant medical and scientific literature highlighting why the actions are considered a scandal. Regulatory medicine, healthcare, health policy, and patient safety. Doctor Brett Snodgrass, MD has a particular interest in transparency in healthcare and policy suggestions that regulators can consider in order to prevent things such as the VA Scandal, the UMKC Pathology Breast Cancer Scandal of 2011, and many others including the Stem Cell Scandal of South Korea in 2006.

Healthcare scandals along with the related relevant medical and scientific literature highlighting why the actions are considered a scandal. Regulatory medicine, healthcare, health policy, and patient safety. Doctor Brett Snodgrass, MD has a particular interest in transparency in healthcare and policy suggestions that regulators can consider in order to prevent things such as the VA Scandal, the UMKC Pathology Breast Cancer Scandal of 2011, and many others including the Stem Cell Scandal of South Korea in 2006.

Accurate medical knowledge is a key to safe and effective patient care. Comments are made on Case 02-1491 HA, and then the full case is presented.

Interesting and complex case. Surgical privileges at hospitals vary markedly from most other physician privileges

too painful to read. torture of physicans for reporting bad doctors.

In 1993, the Arizona Supreme Court overturned all the of the AZ Medical Board's claims v. Dr. Mishler with prejudice. The Board's actions against Dr. Mishler constituted a disturbing abuse of its power.

In 1993 Dr. Mishler, a neurosurgeon was forced to go to court against the Arizona Board of Medical Examiners secondary to their unscrupulous and unethical conduct. The Arizona Medical Board obstructed peer

The Nevada state medical board demonstrated egregious abuse of its power and placed patient safety at risk in doing so.

The quality of research about medical education is too low to be used to make assertions about the quality of patient care.

This study about medical regulation in Missouri details the numerous errors in evaluating the care provided by Dr. Antoine Adem. The state medical board tried to discipline the cardiologist's medical license for allegedly providing negligent and unsafe patient care. Unfortunately, what this article highlights, is that it was not Dr. Adem who failed ot use his skills and knowledge in the duties of the profession, but it was the members of the Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts who failed to demonstrate competent medical knowledge and sufficient skills to properly evaluate the medical care provided by their licensees. If a physician on the medical board is unable to evaluate the care provided by a licensee, then they may pose a danger to the public due to their incompetence and, at the very least, should be second-guessed.