Skip to main content

Home/ healthcare regulation and scandals/ Group items tagged peer-review

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Brett Snodgrass

Clinical peer review - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views

en.wikipedia.org/...Clinical_peer_review

medical license quality physicians physician licensure healthcare regulation professional regulation Board of Registration for the Healing Arts medical license Board of Medical Examiners Board of Examiners in Medicine Antitrust patient safety medical boar

shared by Brett Snodgrass on 23 Feb 16 - Cached
  • Sham peer review i
  • "incompetent peer review
  • Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Missouri state medical board
  • mistakenly concluded that the cardiologist was repeatedly negligent and was a danger to the safety of the public.
  • Brett Snodgrass on 23 Feb 16
     
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
Brett Snodgrass

Dr Social - Mishler v Arizona Medical Board 3919 - 0 views

drsocial.org/...3919

healthcare regulation social arizona medical license Board of Registration for the Healing Arts Board of Medical Examiners patient safety Board of Examiners in Medicine professional regulation peer review peer-review injustice corruption fraud deceit obst

shared by Brett Snodgrass on 23 Oct 15 - Cached
  • t Dr. Mishler, and that complaint was subsequently found to be unjustified, the Board purposely scrutinized Dr. Mishler's charts to find evidence with which to discipline Dr. Mishler.
  • Board used its own rules of confidentiality as an excuse to obstruct Dr. Mishler's access to evidence, it violated the same policy with respect to Dr. Mishler's confidential reports.
  • Brett Snodgrass on 23 Oct 15
     
    In 1993 Dr. Mishler, a neurosurgeon was forced to go to court against the Arizona Board of Medical Examiners secondary to their unscrupulous and unethical conduct. The Arizona Medical Board obstructed peer
Brett Snodgrass

Mathews v. Lancaster General Hosp., 87 F. 3d 624 - Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit 1996 -... - 0 views

scholar.google.com/scholar_case

healthcare HCQIA healthcare quality improvement act hospital Court of Appeals court appeal appeals preponderance of evidence plaintiff summary judgement peer review sham peer review congress federal law doctor physician professional regulation medical lic

shared by Brett Snodgrass on 19 Oct 15 - Cached
  • Dr. Robert Mathews
  • He practices as a corporate partner with anothe
  • George Kent.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Dr. Kent was performing spinal surgery at Lancaster General. Dr. Mathews was listed as a co-surgeon for the operation. During the procedure, a high speed drill slipped and tore the patient's esophagus.
  • 27 of the 208
  • Mr. Robert Katana, President and CEO of Columbia Hospital, discovered the application did not contain a reappointment reference from Lancaster Genera
  • unity from 632*632 monetary damages under § 11111(a) of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. The district court also granted summary judgmen
  • Brett Snodgrass on 19 Oct 15
     
    Interesting and complex case. Surgical privileges at hospitals vary markedly from most other physician privileges
Brett Snodgrass

Damning report exposes NHS secrecy in breast cancer scandal - Telegraph - 0 views

www.telegraph.co.uk/...-in-breast-cancer-scandal.html

ebola virus disease in west africa ebola 2013 ebola 2015 ebola 2014 ebola virus craig spencer ebola Ebola Virus disease patient safety professional prevention Healthcare medical license healthcare regulation report nhs secrecy cancer scandal telegraph Boa

shared by Brett Snodgrass on 31 Mar 15 - No Cached
  • ,100 women who had surgery for breast cancer at Solihull Hospital and Good Hope Hospital in Sutton Coldfield have been recalled by the trust because they may need further treatment after undergoing botched procedures by surgeon Ian Paterson.
  • Brett Snodgrass on 31 Mar 15
     
    healthcare scandals, breast cancer scandals, VA Scandal, Medical Board Regulation, Excellence and many failing, sham peer review and the abuse of trust.
Brett Snodgrass

Yes, It Is Time to Rethink Postgraduate Training Requirement... : Academic Medicine - 0 views

journals.lww.com/..._Postgraduate_Training.15.aspx

medical license quality physicians physician licensure healthcare regulation professional regulation Board of Registration for the Healing Arts medical license Board of Medical Examiners Board of Examiners in Medicine Antitrust patient safety time postgra

shared by Brett Snodgrass on 25 Feb 16 - Cached
  • it demonstrates that for those reported to medical boards, the peer review process disciplines those with less training or the inability to qualify for or pass certification requirements.
  • Brett Snodgrass on 25 Feb 16
     
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
Brett Snodgrass

Quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.pdf - 0 views

state medical board MO SBRHA licensure physician physicians doctors regulation medical regulation medical license medical licensure Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

shared by Brett Snodgrass on 04 Mar 16 - No Cached
  • his report, from Missouri, describes the repeated failure of the State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (SBRHA) in distinguishing safe and effective coronary artery stenting from unnecessary stenting.
  • state medical boards (SMBs
  • d to ensure that only competent physicians are practicing medicine and that those physicians act in a professional manner
  • ...23 more annotations...
  • According to Chaudhry et al., physicians are given due process by SMBs [1,9]. However, this report of fraudulent or fraud-like regulation by the SBRHA demonstrates that licensees are not always afforded the “luxury” of due process.
  • This report describes the numerous efforts to discipline interventional cardiologist, Antoine Adem, MD, by the Missouri (MO) State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (SBRHA)
  • The SBRHA cited no peer-reviewed literature or scholarly work in support of their claims of negligent patient care.
  • legislatively establish
  • “to punish or penalize in order to train and control
  • ried to conceal the exculpatory deposition of Dr. Tobis
  • The SBRHA
  • scientifically unmeritorious claims alleging unsafe patient care in court
  • ntentionally mischaracterized the medical records reviewed by Dr. Kern
  • filed blatantly dishonest
  • definition of discipline
  • is it concerning that none of the eight doctors on the SBRHA demonstrated sufficient medical knowledge to either know that Dr. Adem’s provision of care was appropriate or to learn that it was appropriate
  • The physicians of the MO SBRHA have repeatedly demonstrated
  • misrepresentation
  • ignoranc
  • attempted concealme
  • regulatory miscondu
  • fraud
  • ineffective communication
  • gross negligence
  • Further investigation and study of regulatory misconduct by SMBs is critical to determine its extent and impact.
  • Missouri SBRHA.
  • Brett Snodgrass on 04 Mar 16
     
    This article provides novel insight into the quality of medical regulation by the Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts. This article raises critical questions about the efficacy and integrity of a state medical board and suggests that further study is needed to evaluate the extend of regulatory misconduct.
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20▼ items per page