Skip to main content

Home/ healthcare regulation and scandals/ Group items tagged rule

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Brett Snodgrass

94 F.3d 652 - NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opi... - 0 views

  • United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
  • Mishler's original complaint alleged the malicious deprivation of his constitutionally-protected property right to obtain official verification of the existence of his license
  • licensing tribunal must be impartial and cannot act on the basis of personal bias.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Each party to bear its own costs. Both parties' requests for attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 are denied.
  •  
    It took 10 years of litigation to address the corruption and dishonesty of the state medical board. The state medical board members used the state's authority to pursue strictly personal agendas and they maliciously deprived Alan J. Mishler, MD, the good neurosurgeon of his constitutional rights. 
Brett Snodgrass

Improvement in quality - State Medical Board Commits Honest Actions - 0 views

    • Brett Snodgrass
       
      Almost all of these cases are completely archived except for one file - that file is usually the ruling by the judge. In this case, someone archived the ruling that rebuked the Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts on every one of their 137 charges. However, the claim can still be found at https://archive.org/details/Medical-Board-vs-Paskon. #Healthcare 
  • Case No.:   #02-1491 HA Title:  State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts vs. Paskon, M.D., Seth
  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
Brett Snodgrass

Mishler v. State Bd. of Med. Examiners, 849 P. 2d 291 - Nev: Supreme Court 1993 - Googl... - 0 views

  • While the Board withheld documents from Dr. Mishler on the expressed basis of its policy of confidentiality, it violated that policy when it forwarded confidential material, including the transcripts of Dr. Mishler's conversations with an investigator, to Dr. Mishler's neurosurgical colleagues.
  • Finally, even though the Board had the right to obtain the records and Dr. Mishler did not, the Board attempted to shift the burden for the preservation of evidence to Dr. Mishler.
  • In short, we conclude that the Board's actions and the proceedings against Dr. Mishler constituted a disturbing abuse of its power.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Therefore, we reverse the disciplinary order of the Board in its entirety and dismiss all proceedings against Dr. Mishler with prejudice.
  • The Board's power was not exercised for the proper and commendable purpose of protecting 297*297 the public from incompetent and negligent physicians. Instead, the Board wielded its power to ruin the career of an outspoken physician while simultaneously protecting a possibly negligent or incompetent practitioner who had questionable billing procedures.
  • Also, while the Board used its own rules of confidentiality as an excuse to obstruct Dr. Mishler's access to evidence, it violated the same policy with respect to Dr. Mishler's confidential reports.
  • Despite the absence of this evidence—office records, X-rays, and diagnostic films— at the hearing,
  • the Board disciplined Dr. Mishler.
  •  
    The Nevada state medical board demonstrated egregious abuse of its power and placed patient safety at risk in doing so.
Brett Snodgrass

American Telemedicine Association Petitions State To Not Limit The Practice «... - 0 views

  • the Texas State Board of Examiners of Professional Counselors
  • recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling could leave the board open to federal antitrust suits i
  • N.C. State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Mental Health Professional Shortage Areas
  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
Brett Snodgrass

Dr Social - Mishler v Arizona Medical Board 3919 - 0 views

  • t Dr. Mishler, and that complaint was subsequently found to be unjustified, the Board purposely scrutinized Dr. Mishler's charts to find evidence with which to discipline Dr. Mishler.
  • Board used its own rules of confidentiality as an excuse to obstruct Dr. Mishler's access to evidence, it violated the same policy with respect to Dr. Mishler's confidential reports.
  •  
    In 1993 Dr. Mishler, a neurosurgeon was forced to go to court against the Arizona Board of Medical Examiners secondary to their unscrupulous and unethical conduct. The Arizona Medical Board obstructed peer
Emma Sanan

CMS's price transparency rule is to make healthcare costs transparent - Zignaai - 0 views

  •  
    "Insights into reimbursements are a critical function for healthcare organizations. Reimbursements vary significantly by geography, market-centricity, coverage of services. ZignaAI has gathered all the contracted rates by provider and payer for 1000+ services across the nation and this can be used to evaluate reimbursements by lines of business and geographies."
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20 items per page