Skip to main content

Home/ healthcare regulation and scandals/ Group items tagged arizona

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Brett Snodgrass

Dr Social - Mishler v Arizona Medical Board 3919 - 0 views

drsocial.org/...3919

healthcare regulation social arizona medical license Board of Registration for the Healing Arts Board of Medical Examiners patient safety Board of Examiners in Medicine professional regulation peer review peer-review injustice corruption fraud deceit obst

shared by Brett Snodgrass on 23 Oct 15 - Cached
  • t Dr. Mishler, and that complaint was subsequently found to be unjustified, the Board purposely scrutinized Dr. Mishler's charts to find evidence with which to discipline Dr. Mishler.
  • Board used its own rules of confidentiality as an excuse to obstruct Dr. Mishler's access to evidence, it violated the same policy with respect to Dr. Mishler's confidential reports.
  • Brett Snodgrass on 23 Oct 15
     
    In 1993 Dr. Mishler, a neurosurgeon was forced to go to court against the Arizona Board of Medical Examiners secondary to their unscrupulous and unethical conduct. The Arizona Medical Board obstructed peer
Brett Snodgrass

Mishler v. State Bd. of Med. Examiners, 849 P. 2d 291 - Nev: Supreme Court 1993 - 0 views

scholar.google.com/scholar_case

healthcare regulation professional regulation Board of Registration for the Healing Arts medical license Board of Medical Examiners Board of Examiners in Medicine patient safety Arizona medical board AZ healthcare quality improvement act HCQIA Court of Ap

shared by Brett Snodgrass on 21 Oct 15 - Cached
  • When we look beyond the label of the discipline given to Dr. Mishler to the true nature of the facts, we conclude that the discipline was unwarranted. The Board's power was not exercised for the proper and commendable purpose of protecting 297*297 the public from incompetent and negligent physicians. Instead, the Board wielded its power to ruin the career of an outspoken physician while simultaneously protecting a possibly negligent or incompetent practitioner who had questionable billing procedures.
  • In short, we conclude that the Board's actions and the proceedings against Dr. Mishler constituted a disturbing abuse of its power.
  • Therefore, we reverse the disciplinary order of the Board in its entirety and dismiss all proceedings against Dr. Mishler with prejudice.
  • Brett Snodgrass on 21 Oct 15
     
    In 1993, the Arizona Supreme Court overturned all the of the AZ Medical Board's claims v. Dr. Mishler with prejudice. The Board's actions against Dr. Mishler constituted a disturbing abuse of its power.
1 - 2 of 2
Showing 20▼ items per page