EFF, Human Rights Watch, and Over 70 Civil Society Groups Ask Mark Zuckerberg to Provide All Users with Mechanism to Appeal Content Censorship on Facebook
World’s Freedom of Expression Is In Your Hands, Groups Tell CEO
San Francisco—The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and more than 70 human and digital rights groups called on Mark Zuckerberg today to add real transparency and accountability to Facebook’s content removal process. Specifically, the groups demand that Facebook clearly explain how much content it removes, both rightly and wrongly, and provide all users with a fair and timely method to appeal removals and get their content back up.
While Facebook is under enormous—and still mounting—pressure to remove material that is truly threatening, without transparency, fairness, and processes to identify and correct mistakes, Facebook’s content takedown policies too often backfire and silence the very people that should have their voices heard on the platform.
Politicians, museums, celebrities, and other high profile groups and individuals whose improperly removed content can garner media attention seem to have little trouble reaching Facebook to have content restored—they sometimes even receive an apology. But the average user? Not so much. Facebook only allows people to appeal content decisions in a limited set of circumstances, and in many cases, users have absolutely no option to appeal. Onlinecensorship.org, an EFF project for users to report takedown notices, has collected reports of hundreds of unjustified takedown incidents where appeals were unavailable. For most users, content Facebook removes is rarely restored, and some are banned from the platform for no good reason.
EFF, Article 19, the Center for Democracy and Technology, and Ranking Digital Rights wrote directly to Mark Zuckerberg today demanding that Facebook implement common sense standards so that average users can easily appeal content moderation decisions, receive prompt replies and timely review by a human or humans, and have the opportunity to present evidence during the review process. The letter was co-signed by more than 70 human rights, digital rights, and civil liberties organizations from South America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, Africa, and the U.S.
1More
1More
Google Is Now Under Attack by 'Robo DMCA' Takedown Requests - 0 views
2More
WordPress Demands $10,000 For DMCA Takedown Censorship | TorrentFreak - 1 views
3More
WordPress Wins $25,000 From DMCA Takedown Abuser | TorrentFreak [# !! NoteS] - 1 views
2More
Strike Becomes Totally Dynamic With No Torrents to Takedown | TorrentFreak - 1 views
1More
BPI Hits Record Breaking 100 Million Google Takedowns | TorrentFreak - 0 views
1More
Civil Society Groups Ask Facebook To Provide Method To Appeal Censorship | PopularResis... - 0 views
1More
Fail: Anti-Piracy Outfits Send Takedown Request For Non-Existent Torrents - TorrentFreak - 0 views
1More
Anti-Piracy Outfits Caught Fabricating Takedown Notices - TorrentFreak - 1 views
1More
Takedown, Staydown Would Be a Disaster, Internet Archive Warns - TorrentFreak - 0 views
1More
Internet Archive Seeks to Defend Against Wrongful Copyright Takedowns - TorrentFreak [#... - 0 views
2More
RIAA Says YouTube is Running a DMCA Protection Racket - TorrentFreak - 0 views
1More
Lawrence Lessig Wins Damages For Bogus YouTube Takedown | TorrentFreak - 1 views
2More
Court Orders Warner Bros. to Reveal Flawed Anti-Piracy Technology | TorrentFreak - 1 views
2More
Why Record Labels Want Kim Dotcom's Album Taken Down | TorrentFreak - 1 views
2More
Google Asked to Remove 18 'Pirate Links' Every Second - TorrentFreak - 0 views
2More
Google Refuses MPAA Request to Blacklist 'Pirate Site' Homepages | TorrentFreak - 0 views
2More
Copyright Law as a Tool for State Censorship of the Internet | Electronic Frontier Foun... - 1 views
2More
Music Group DMCA Notices Reveal Coffee Hatred | TorrentFreak - 0 views
2More