Skip to main content

Home/ Ethique à WIC 5/ Group items tagged Pro

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Elior Yona

Pro-Testing Group Backs Oxford Animal Research Lab : NPR - 0 views

  • it's so obvious to most people that there are benefits from animal experiments, and those who might speak out, that is people who actually do work in animal research, have, quite rightly, been very worried about whether they were putting themselves and their families at risk.
  • But Stein says despite that, he and others have finally decided they must speak out. He points out that penicillin was first isolated at Oxford, tested on 20 mice in a lab just near his. Vaccines have been developed here too that have saved millions of lives, he says. Oxford scientists are now working on a cure for malaria. All have involved testing on animals.
  • xford scientists are now working on a cure for malaria. All have involved testing on animals.
  • ...2 more annotations...
    • Elior Yona
       
      Example of people speaking out and protesting for pro animal testing.
    • Elior Yona
       
      Here we can see that Oxford has found medication by testing it on animals which is necessary so that humans can take it as well.
  •  
    Here is a very well reliable website. Even though most of the information is not so beneficial for my group (pro), there is still some small examples and points that can help us along the way.
anonymous

Animal testing should always be allowed! - 1 views

    • anonymous
       
      Here are some pro we can use as rebuttle
  • but also animal lives are saved because of animal testing.
  • Many of the medications and procedures that we currently use today wouldn’t exist
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Many argue that the lives of animals may be worthy of some respect, but the value we give on their lives does not count as much as the value we give to human life.
  • lifesaving medical breakthroughs that are the result of animal testing
  • open heart surgery, organ transplants, effective insulin, vaccines for deadly diseases
  •  
    Testing on animals brought so much for human health that i should be allowed. Some great rebuttle points we can use.
anonymous

Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons - About Animal Testing - 2 views

  • ids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine.
  • treatments
  • cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • and treatments
    • anonymous
       
      reason why its so important.
  •  
    Why is animal testing so important. Advancement in our medical field. Great for our points.
Matthew Rodin

Considering the pros and cons of "torture" » Columns » Rush... - 3 views

  • But just for the sake of discussion, let’s bring the whole issue closer to home. Suppose your son or your daughter is, for some reason, the target of kidnappers and that they’ve put your child in a hidden location with a bomb scheduled to go off if you don’t pay them a million dollars. Now, suppose you have one of the kidnappers in custody. What would you be willing to do, assuming you couldn’t get the money, to find out where your child was being held and get him or her away from the bomb? Whoops, you can’t slap the kidnapper! That would be torture! You can’t even threaten to shoot him if he doesn’t tell you what you need to know! Again, that would be torture! Do you think you might be inclined to take whatever action necessary to save your child? Or would you let your child die to avoid torture? The world is, and always has been, a vicious place and its fine and grand and noble to talk about never using torture or the threat of torture – in the abstract. I would contend, however, that if the life of your child or your spouse or your best friend was on the line, you might not look on a slap as the unlawful infliction of severe physical pain in quite the same light. In the abstract, we can call it torture. When the lives of loved ones are at stake, I submit that being slapped around seems relatively mild – but I could be wrong.
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      La plupart de l'article est pour le groupe de Hagit et Marie-Lise mais il y a des bonnes points pour le coté "pour" (notre côté) aussi!
    • Hagit Malikin
       
      matthew, cette article est vraiment pour votre groupe. il n'y a pas d'element pour la notre , je crois
Elior Yona

Animal Testing Pros - 0 views

    • Elior Yona
       
      we can use this sentence as an example to diseases that have been cured with the help of animal testing.
  • helped in the refinement of procedures
  • But it usually starts to make more sense when someone in the family or you yourself start suffering from a life-threatening disease.
  • ...1 more annotation...
    • Elior Yona
       
      we can use the example with the family members for the rebuttal.
Nighat Ali

Top 10 Pros and Cons - Prostitution - ProCon.org - 0 views

  •  
    Dans cette site on peu trouver des argument pour et contre
Elior Yona

Discovery Institute - Bioethics - Articles/News - Pro-Animal or Anti-Human?: - 0 views

  • While it is true that medical researchers have developed some alternatives to animal use in recent years, such as computer simulation and the use of human-cell lines, these tools are merely useful supplements and complements - not replacements - to research with animals.
    • Elior Yona
       
      This is a very good point for my group. Here we can clearly see that other forms of medical and scientifical testing can never be seen as replacements.
  • prevent a pandemic
  • As a result of these animal studies, WHO researchers have announced that the coronavirus is, without a doubt, the cause of SARS.
    • Elior Yona
       
      Obviously, since the scientists didn't even know what caused SARS, testing on animals let them figure this out. With an epidemic like SARS you can save millions, and this was the case.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • which means that either animals or humans must be used
  • what does honesty matter when the cause of ending human hegemony over animals is so important and just?
  • . While it is true that medical researchers have developed some alternatives to animal use in recent years, such as computer simulation and the use of human-cell lines, these tools are merely useful supplements and complements - not replacements - to research with animals.
  • ent years, such as computer simulation and the use of human-cell lines, these tools are
Matthew Rodin

Animal Experimentation: Debatabase - Debate Topics and Debate Motions - 4 views

  • Animals have the right to be treated as beings of value in themselves
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      Encore une fois, la valeur de l'égalité même entre des espèces différentes!
  • the end of cruelty to animals
  • animals are not routinely treated well by animal experimenters
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • millions of animals die each year in experiments, others are often not adequately anaesthetised and are abused by handlers and experimenters.
  • ew breakthroughs have been made as a result of animal experimentatio
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      Ca montre que l'expérimentation animale produit une pourcentage minimale de succès!
  • There has been a catalogue of errors and failures in animal testing,
  • Human beings share about 99% of their genes with chimpanzees and only slightly fewer with other monkeys. As a result, the reactions of these creatures are a very good guide to possible reactions of human patients. Even lower down the scale, other animals share the same basic physiology with humans. Furthermore, it would be immoral to risk the life of a human being when a medicine or procedure could instead be tested on a non-human animal. In fact, most animal experiments are done on animals that are nothing like hum
  • Scientifically, as well as morally, most animal experimentation is to be rejected - the reaction of a mouse to a substance is no guide to human reactions
  • The advent of genetic technologies has made possible all sorts of new and horrific acts of animal exploitation
  • t is only acceptable to test human medicines on human beings if they give their consent. Non-human animals are never able to give such consent
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      "Animals have the right to be treated as beings of value in themselves" -L'égalité!!!! C'est une bonne valeur pour l'argumentation. Besoin de plus de statistiques...
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      "Millions of animals die each year in experiments, others are often not adequately anaesthetised and are abused by handlers and experimenters" -C'est LE point le plus concrète du débat CONTRE l'expérimentation animale. Besoin de faits avec sources, par contre.
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      "The advent of genetic technologies has made possible all sorts of new and horrific acts of animal exploitation" -Le fait que la technologie évolue continuellement est un bon point pour nous car il y a plusieurs méthodes ou les animaux ne doivent pas être mal traités!
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      "There has been a catalogue of errors and failures in animal testing." -Le fait qu'il y a une très grand nombre de fautes dans l'expérimentation animale est un argument qui va caser tous ceux de l'autre équipe. Si vous voulez tester des médicament POUR les humains, tester-les SUR les humains, et non pas sur d'autres espèces qui vont réagir différemment!
  • There has been a catalogue of errors and failures in animal testing,
  •  
    C'est une bonne outil pour les deux équipes qui sont en débat contre ou pour l'expérimentation animale.
Daryl Bambic

The Pursuit of Happiness - 10 views

Where is the resume and the highlighting?

happiness pros

Matthew Rodin

Torture in Interrogation: Debatabase - Debate Topics and Debate Motions - 3 views

  • he Geneva Conventions do not apply to interrogation of terrorists and suspected terrorists held by U.S. soldiers because they are not prisoners of war. They are illegal, enemy combatants, not subject to such protection.
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      The fact that the Geneva Conventions do not apply in the interrogation of terrorists is a big PRO!
  •  
    C'est un site web qui bénéfit les deux groupes. Un liste de pour et contres.
1 - 10 of 10
Showing 20 items per page