Skip to main content

Home/ ETC677 Spring 2009/ Contents contributed and discussions participated by Jeanette Layton

Contents contributed and discussions participated by Jeanette Layton

Beth Summerhill

Eval group 5 - 12 views

ETC677 Group5 Treatisepaper
started by Beth Summerhill on 14 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
  • Jeanette Layton
     
    Grade 4.5
    Loved the first sentence, it was a great way to get started, good argument for constructivist learning. The history also added to the paper and definitely created a stronger argument in the end. The only criticism I have is a formating thing, the last section used headings throughout but the rest of the paper did not, this created a small feeling of disconnect for me, I think that utilizing heading would have helped threader throughout the paper. Good Job.
Beth Summerhill

Eval group 4 - 18 views

ETC677 group4 Treatisepaper
started by Beth Summerhill on 14 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Beth Summerhill

Eval group 3 - 16 views

ETC677 Group3 Treatisepaper
started by Beth Summerhill on 14 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Beth Summerhill

group 2 treastie paper - 44 views

ETC677 group2
started by Beth Summerhill on 03 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
  • Jeanette Layton
     
    5 Powerful argument that was well articulated and organized.
    4 Powerful argument that was somewhat well articulated but could have been a bit more organized.
    3 Good argument, but could have been better articulated and been a bit more organized.
    2 Weak argument, that could have been better articulated and organized.
    1 Weak argument that lacked articulation and organization.
    0 Treatise was not available

    Comments & Feedback

    4 This paper was very insightful, it was full of resources and details about online learning. I do feel it could have been a little better organized to express the main argument about the possibilities of online learning.
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20 items per page