Skip to main content

Home/ elearning 2.0/ Group items tagged intentional learning

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Abhijeet Valke

50 Years of the Kirkpatrick Model | Upside Learning Blog - 0 views

  • In the fifty years since, his thoughts (Reaction, Learning, Behavior, and Results) have gone on to evolve into the legendary Kirkpatrick’s Four Level Evaluation Model and become the basis on which learning & development departments can show the value of training to the business. How has the model evolved over fifty years, is it still relevant? As designers of learning, have we applied the model with Don’s intent?
  •  
    Read this post from The Upside Learning Solutions Blog sharing details about The 50 Years of the Kirkpatrick Model
Nigel Coutts

Assessment and Student Agency - Better Together - The Learner's Way - 0 views

  •  
    As with many things in education, the outcome achieved will be a result of all that we do. Efforts to promote and empower student agency, voice and choice certainly falls into this category. We might have the best of intentions but unless each of our messaging systems align, we are unlikely to achieve success. So where do our efforts go wrong and what else might we change so that student agency is genuinely a part of our learning environment?
Graham Atttwell

Knowledge-at-work: Boundary objects and KM - 5 views

  •  
    " Boundary object (BO), originally introduced by Starr (1989), is a concept to refer to objects that serve an interface between different communities of practice. Boundary objects are an entity shared by several different communities but viewed or used differently by each of them. As Star points out, boundary objects in an organization work because they necessarily contain sufficient detail to be understandable by both parties, however, neither party is required to understand the full context of use by the other - boundary objects serve as point of mediation and negotiation around intent. Boundary objects are flexible enough to adapt to local needs and have different distinct identities in different communities, but at the same time robust enough to maintain a common identity across the boundaries to be a place for shared work. Boundary objects are not necessarily physical artifacts such as a map between two people: they can be a set of information, conversations, interests, rules, plans, contracts, or even persons. It is around BOs that Communities of Practice (CoPs) often gather. BOs are 'used' by members of different communities in very different ways, although the representation is shared. BOs are an important class of knowledge artifacts. They are center stage in the dynamics of knowledge exchange. BOs are also known as CISs (common information spaces). Examples: Reports are a classic example of traces as boundary objects that the professionals and other members share. Faxed documents and email massages are also the boundary object among distributed members. Information spaces, where particpants gather to exchange information, co-ordinate activites and create knowledge are another example of BOs A library catalog, an order entry process, travel assistance request form, an organizational knowledge map, i.e. one of the products from your knowledge mapping project! Mapping BOs: Boundary objects are a very useful way to structure and
Pam Hill

Common Core Right and Wrongs - 2 views

resources e-learning web2.0

started by Pam Hill on 11 Mar 13 no follow-up yet
vishwanath123

67 percent of the high number of security breaches reported than five years back. - 0 views

  •  
    Like always, even the last year wasn't any bad for hackers! They were busy targeting and attacking major cities, state and local governments, businesses, hospitals, and schools around the globe. They used all forms of cyberattacks, including ransomware, BEC, phishing, and many others, to get hold of their malicious intent.
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20 items per page