Skip to main content

Home/ Technology in Teacher Education/ Group items tagged quantitative

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Evrim Baran

http://punya.educ.msu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Koehler_Shin_Mishra_2011.pdf - 4 views

punya.educ.msu.edu/...Koehler_Shin_Mishra_2011.pdf

shared by Evrim Baran on 25 Mar 13 - No Cached
  • Evrim Baran on 25 Mar 13
     
    Here is a review of the TPACK measures: How do we measure TPAKC: Let me count the ways
  • Matti Pirttimaa on 25 Mar 13
     
    This is very good article, which well describes the state of taking into account the reliability in the research and analysis. We all should take this seriously. On the other hand, which are the ways good enough to consider reliability of the measures? I think this is not a simple question indeed. There is an interesting conversation chain in the Methodspace about these things. There are many viewpoints about the topic: http://www.methodspace.com/group/qualitativeinquiry/forum/topics/reliability-measures
  • Evrim Baran on 25 Mar 13
     
    Matti, yes these issues are very important. In my qualitative research, I like to use the measures of trustworthiness by Lincoln and Guba instead of reliability and validity which emerged from the quantitative tradition. See http://www.angelfire.com/theforce/shu_cohort_viii/images/Trustworthypaper.pdf
Ceren Ocak

MEASURING THE TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (TPACK) OF IN-SERVICE TEACHE... - 0 views

dide.ilei.sch.gr/...syn_icicte2010_doukakis.pdf

shared by Ceren Ocak on 25 Mar 14 - No Cached
  • Ceren Ocak on 25 Mar 14
     
    An example from the field of computer science, they used quantitative survey using a questionnaire with closed-ended questions to measure TPACK
Mine Önal

http://sf.co.ua/12/08/wallpaper-2158386.jpg - 6 views

sf.co.ua/...wallpaper-2158386.jpg

technology education

shared by Mine Önal on 03 Mar 16 - No Cached
  • Mine Önal on 03 Mar 16
     
    An infographic on technology AND education. This infographic compares 2002 and 2012 in internet usage. Quantitative (the what) and qualitative (the how and why) perpectives.
  • ...1 more comment...
  • Ecenaz Alemdağ on 03 Mar 16
     
    We can also compare Internet usage in 2012 and 2015. For example, in the infographic, it is indicated that the number of Facebook in 2012 users is 900 million. The number of Facebook users in 2015 is about 1,500 million (Statista, 2016). These numbers show that how Internet usage increases dramatically.
  • Ceren Korkmaz on 03 Mar 16
     
    I love how it shows the most searched items. You can clearly see what the trends were back then.
  • sebahatgok on 05 Mar 16
     
    Seeing the enormous increase in the number of people using Facebook (from 3 to 900 million users), time spent on the Internet (46 minutes to 4 hours) made me think back about Punya Mishra's (at SITE Keynote) comment on making learning process a part of student's daily life. e.g. a class discussion or course content carried out on Facebook which can increase student participation. Inserting education to top trend websites or applications might be a useful idea to reflect upon.
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20▼ items per page