Skip to main content

Home/ Dr. Friedman's AP Government/ Group items tagged mass

Rss Feed Group items tagged

paigedeleeuw

Democracy in the age of narrowcasting - BlueOregon - 2 views

  • The large number of candidates in each party -- with front runners like Hillary Clinton challenged by a younger generation and veterans like John McCain fading -- creates a fluid situation that has some voters nostalgic for successful politicians of the recent past.
  • That is unlikely to happen. McCall and Reagan were men of their own time and that time has passed. McCall and Reagan were creatures of a mass media culture created largely by three television networks that replaced mass circulation magazines by the 1960s.
  • Both men were successful because they knew how to appeal to the mass audience television created. It is not a coincidence that both McCall and Reagan began their careers as broadcasters.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Former congressman Les AuCoin read it and asked me, “So how are we going to govern the country if everyone is operating on different facts?”
  • I responded, “I don’t know.” A decade later, one answer is obvious. We are not governing the country. We have two sets of leaders from at least two different worlds. They talk past one another. They appear incapable of communicating with each other and exhibit little respect for those who differ. It is more acute among Republicans than Democrats. Nonaffiliated voters are usually ignored.
  • Hillary Clinton and John McCain are practicing mass media politics in a world of narrowcasting. McCain is fading. If Clinton is nominated, she might become our last mass media president.
  • Barrack Obama may have something to offer. He is appealing to a diverse group -- younger and broader politically -- that seems to defy the deliberately circumscribed demographic categories of narrowcasting. We’ll see. Of one thing I am sure. We will not see another Tom McCall or Ronald Reagan. The conditions that allowed these men to communicate so successfully with the voters no longer exist.
  •  
    This article gives examples of narrowcasting in our American politics. It gives examples of our Presidents that have been affected by it. 
  •  
    Great article, I did not realize that narrowcasting had such an effect on the voters outlook. It is interesting that someone that is not a participant in specific party can get so lost in politics because broad ideas are no longer being discussed compared to narrow ideas that are biased to one side of the debate.
  •  
    This is a very percise article about narrowcasting. It exemplifies very well what we are discussing in class and gives awesome examples on what narrowcasting is, especially in politics. It also breaks down how to identify different types of narrowcasting and how the media may be potentially trying to manipulate Americans.
janicebi98

Vice President Biden Acknowledges 'Immense' Jewish Role in American Mass Media and Cult... - 2 views

  •  
    It is interesting to see the role of mass media in different culture within United States.
  •  
    I find this interesting because in the last chapter we talked a lot about how the U.S and our culture is shaped by this "melting-pot". This article almost echoes that and how the media has sort of given this group of Americans credit for their contribution.
sebasgm

Narrowcasting Kills Broadcast Marketing - 2 views

  • 0 years ag
  • polar opposites
  • masses and likewise marketed them in that way
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • Those days are gone.
  • highly fragmented marketplace.
  • highly personalized fashion.
  • Rule No. 1:
  • Narrow your target market to a specific niche versus trying to be all things to all people
  • Rule No. 2:
  • ithin your niche
  • Rule No. 3:
  • Gone are the days of casting a wide advertising net.
  • Brands that successfully market in the new economy will forgo the desire to appeal to the masses
  • greater profitability.
    • sebasgm
       
      Although this has to do more with business, it can be applied to politics as narrowcasting shows the same results in politics.
    • sebasgm
       
      The article explains how trying to broadcast to the masses proves to be less profitable, as narrowmarketing can be taken advantage of due to our technological era. 
  •  
    Summarizes the benefits of narrowcasting and how it is much more efficient than broadcasting.
  •  
    It's interesting that this article says narrowcasting is the dominant method of marketing in today's markets. I agree with the writer in that narrowcasting is more effective.
danielacon

Narrowcasting? - Convenience Advertising - 1 views

shared by danielacon on 30 Oct 14 - No Cached
  •  
    Broadcasting is said to be conventional. The article says that narrowcasting is based on the post modern idea that mass audiences do not exist.
janicebi98

60 percent of Americans don't trust their mass media - poll - RT USA - 0 views

  •  
    it is hard for citizens to trust on the operated information.
  •  
    it is hard for citizens to trust on the operated information.
kyrranielson

Broadcasting -- Encyclopedia Britannica - 1 views

  • roadcasting, electronic transmission of radio and television signals that are intended for general public reception, as distinguished from private signals that are directed to specific receivers.
    • kyrranielson
       
      Definition of Broadcasting
  • Sound broadcasting in this sense may be said to have started about 1920, while television broadcasting began in the 1930s.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • The first known radio program in the United States was broadcast by Reginald Aubrey Fessenden from his experimental station at Brant Rock, Mass., on Christmas Eve, 1906.
  • he first commercial radio station was KDKA in Pittsburgh, which went on the air in the evening of Nov. 2, 1920, with a broadcast of the returns of the Harding-Cox presidential election.
  • Government regulation Although the growth of radiobroadcasting in the United States was spectacularly swift, in the early years it also proved to be chaotic, unplanned, and unregulated. Furthermore, business arrangements that were being made between the leading manufacturers of radio equipment and the leading broadcasters seemed to threaten monopoly. Congress responded by passing the Radio Act of 1927, which, although directed primarily against monopoly, also set up the agency that is now called the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to allocate wavelengths to broadcasters. The government’s attack on monopoly resulted eventually in four radio networks—the National Broadcasting Company, the Columbia Broadcasting System, the Mutual Broadcasting System, and the American Broadcasting Company—while the FCC permitted orderly growth and ensured the survival of educational radio stations.
    • kyrranielson
       
      Government Regulation: FCC, Radio Act of 1927
  • commercial firms that regarded broadcasting primarily as a means of point-to-point communication.
  •  
    I liked the fact that you introduced a definition. It was a nice refresher to see what it is that is being discussed, and then to be given examples. I thought it was really interesting to see just how much people are affected daily by the idea and motives of broadcasting. Most of the time we are being influenced not really knowing what it is that is actually going on. It really forces someone to stop and think about what is being broadcasted to them via t.v. and the radio.
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20 items per page