Skip to main content

Home/ DISC Inc/ Group items matching "Other" in title, tags, annotations or url

Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url

Sort By: Relevance | Date Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Rob Laporte

Should you sculpt PageRank using nofollow? | MickMel SEO - 0 views

  • Home About Contact RSS Feed   « Google releases Ad Manager A little more about Placement Targeting in AdSense » Should you sculpt PageRank using nofollow? I’ve seen a few posts (Dave Naylor, Joost de Valk) discussing this over the last few days and thought I’d share my view of it. Both posts bring up the same analogy, attributed to Matt Cutts: Nofollowing your internals can affect your ranking in Google, but it’s a 2nd order effect. My analogy is: suppose you’ve got $100. Would you rather work on getting $300, or would you spend your time planning how to spend your $100 more wisely. Spending the $100 more wisely is a matter of good site architecture (and nofollowing/sculpting PageRank if you want). But most people would benefit more from looking at how to get to the $300 level. While I agree in theory, I think that’s a bit oversimplified.  What if you could re-allocate your $100 more effectively in just a few minutes, then go try to raise it to $300? Sculpting PageRank is one of those things that can earn a nice benefit in a short period of time, but you can keep tweaking forever for progressively lesser and lesser gains.  See the chart on the left. For example, you probably have links on your site for “log-in”, “privacy policy” and other such pages.  Go in and nofollow those.  How long did that take?  Two minutes?  That alone probably brought as much benefit as it will to go through every page and carefully sculpt things out. Knock out a few of those links, then spend your time trying to work on getting $300.
Rob Laporte

NoFollow and PageRank Sculpting is it Worth the Effort - 0 views

  • For some websites using nofollow and pagerank sculpting is a complete waste of time, energy and resources. For other websites there may be some moderate level of benefit, and for some websites ignoring pagerank sculpting may be costing you traffic and sales.
Rob Laporte

Google Changes Course on Nofollow - Search Engine Watch (SEW) - 0 views

  • This week at the SMX Advanced conference in Seattle, Cutts joined the discussion around nofollow during the duplicate content session. According to Outspoken Media's Lisa Barone: A debate broke out mid-session when Matt Cutts got involved about whether or not nofollow is still effective. Of course, as soon as it got hot, all search representatives got very tight lipped about who said what and what they really meant. As far as I could, Matt Cutts did NOT say that they ignore nofollow, but he DID hint that it is less effective today than it used to be. Later, Cutts addressed the issue again in his You&A keynote. When asked about PageRank sculpting, Cutts said that it will still work, but not as well. Basically, using nofollow will still prevent PageRank from passing from the linking page through the nofollowed link. But that PageRank is no longer "saved" to be used by other links on the page. It just "evaporates," according to Cutts. Rand Fishkin at SEOmoz has some visual aids to help describe the process. This change mainly affects those SEOs that have tried to optimize their pages using the nofollow tag for PageRank sculpting. It's safe to say that most site owners have no idea what PageRank sculpting is, which is probable a good thing, since it can quite easily be done wrong and cause more problems than it solves.
Rob Laporte

Official Google Webmaster Central Blog - 0 views

  • Message Center warnings for hackable sites Thursday, October 16, 2008 at 8:28 AM Recently we've seen more websites get hacked because of various security holes. In order to help webmasters with this issue, we plan to run a test that will alert some webmasters if their content management system (CMS) or publishing platform looks like it might have a security hole or be hackable. This is a test, so we're starting out by alerting five to six thousand webmasters. We will be leaving messages for owners of potentially vulnerable sites in the Google Message Center that we provide as a free service as part of Webmaster Tools. If you manage a website but haven't signed up for Webmaster Tools, don't worry. The messages will be saved and if you sign up later on, you'll still be able to access any messages that Google has left for your site.One of the most popular pieces of software on the web is WordPress, so we're starting our test with a specific version (2.1.1) that is known to be vulnerable to exploits. If the test goes well, we may expand these messages to include other types of software on the web. The message that a webmaster will see in their Message Center if they run WordPress 2.1.1 will look like this:
Rob Laporte

BIZyCart SEO Manual - Controlled Navigation - 0 views

  • How The Robots Work Without getting into the programming details, the robots and web crawlers basically follow the following steps: On arrival, the robot pulls out all of the readable text it is interested in and creates a list of the links found on the page.  Links set as 'nofollow' or 'disallowed' are not added to the list.  If there are too many links, the robot may take a special action based on that. While the first robot completes processing the page, another robot script is launched to follow each of the links.  If there are ten links, there are now eleven robots running. Each of those robot scripts loads the page they were sent to and builds another link list.  Unless told otherwise, if there are ten links on each of those pages, one hundred additional robots get launched. Before going to the next page, the robots check to see if that page has already been looked at.  If already indexed that day, they cancel themselves and stop. The number of robots keeps expanding until all of the links have been followed and the site's web pages have been indexed or avoided. You can see that on some sites, thousands of robot processes can be taking their turns to work a web page.  There is physical limit on how much memory is available on the server.  If the number of active robots exceeds that, they have to be canceled or memory corruption will occur. If you let the robots run in too many directions, they may not finish looking at every web page or the results from some pages may get scrambled.  You are also subject to the number of robots on that server that are looking at other web sites.  Poorly managed robot servers can end up creating very strange results.
Rob Laporte

NoFollow | Big Oak SEO Blog - 0 views

  • And while the business networking aspect is great, I’m writing to tell you it can be useful for your SEO efforts too, specifically link building. You may not know this, but LinkedIn does not employ the nofollow attribute on its links, like most other social networking sites. So that means we can use LinkedIn responsibly to build some nice one-way links to our sites and blogs. Even better your employees can use this to build some SEO-friendly links to your company site.
  • So the days of parsing links onto high PageRank Flickr pages are over. Or are they? No. Let’s examine why in list form. Let’s examine how you can use the remaining scraps of link juice from Flickr in your SEO campaigns. 1.) Flickr has not added nofollow to discussion boards. For those of you who liked to scout out high PageRank pages and just drop your link as a comment to the photo, which could be accomplished easily if you owned a link-laundering website, you can still do this in the Flickr group discussion boards. Flickr has not yet added nofollow tags to those, and given the preponderance of discussions that revolve around people sharing photos, you can just as easily drop relevant external links in the discussion and reap link juice benefits. 2.) Flickr has not added nofollow to personal profile pages. If you have a personal profile page, you can place targeted anchor text on it, point links at it, and receive full SEO benefit as it gains PageRank. 3.) Flickr has not added nofollow to group pages. If you own a Flickr group, you can still put as many links as you wish on the main group page without fear of them being turned into nofollow. Many Flickr personal profile and group pages gain toolbar PR just by having the link spread around in-house, so it’s not that hard to make those pages accumulate PR. Google seems to be very generous in that regard. There’s a lot of PR to be passed around through Flickr apparently. So, the glory days of Flickr SEO may be over (unless Yahoo does the improbable and flips the switch back), but Rome didn’t burn to rubble in a day, so we might as well make the most of Flickr before it completely collapses.
Rob Laporte

Selling text links ads thorugh TLA or DLA result in Google penalty? - 0 views

  • Can selling text link ads in the sidebar using TLA or Direct-Link-Ads result in a Googlge penalty? I use to use TLA before for one of my sites but stopped using them for the fear of Google dropping the sit because i heard a few rumors on webmaster forums of this happening. Is this concrete or not? Are people still using TLA or DLA or some other similar? C7Mike#:3930956 4:52 am on June 11, 2009 (utc 0) Yes, you may receive a penalty for purchasing links that pass PageRank. See Google's Webmasters/Site owner Help topic for more information: [google.com...] Automotive site#:3930991 6:42 am on June 11, 2009 (utc 0) Well, I was actually going to use one of thoose to sell and not purchase. Anyway, I am going to apply to BuyandSellAds and see if I get accepted there, but I heard they mostly accept tech related sites. C7Mike#:3931237 2:25 pm on June 11, 2009 (utc 0) You may receive a penalty for both buying and selling paid links that pass PageRank (see [google.com...] I have had a few sites lose their PR because they published links through TLA. However the content was still good enough that advertisers have continued to purchase links on those pages through TLA inspite of the lack of PR, and at a substantially lower rate.
Rob Laporte

Will Selling Links via Text Link Ads SLAM your PageRank? - Webmaster Central Help - 0 views

  • Will Selling Links via Text Link Ads SLAM your PageRank? Report abuse uploadjockey Level 1 1/6/10 I have read the FAQs and checked for similar issues: YESMy site's URL is: http://www.uploadjockey.comDescription (including timeline of any changes made): Removed Text Link AdsLast we started to sell links via text-link-ads.com for some additional income.I cannot say for certain that this caused the problem, but it seems like it did. Our PageRank has dropped from a PR4 to a PR0 in less than a year.Our traffic has dropped from over 75k+ unique hits a day to just barely 20k+Am I missing something? Is there some other violation that I could be missing that is killing our ranking results?Thanks
Rob Laporte

SEO & Link Building: The Domain Authority Factor - Search Engine Watch (SEW) - 0 views

  • Authority Comes With Age The main ingredient of authority is time. Websites gain authority by behaving themselves for some time, having links pointing to the site for a longer period, and having other authority sites linking to them.
  • Subdomains start out with the same authority as their www parents, but when they start out linking intensively to low or negative authority websites they can lose theirs without affecting the rest of the domain too much. This effects the choice between using subdomains or subdirectories, because activities within a directory influence the entire (sub)domain it's on.
  • Links from authorities aren't easily acquired because they're careful when linking out. Use the Bing operator "linkfromdomain:authority.com" to discover what they already link to. Discover why those sites are being linked to and, by emulating that strategy, you might get great authority links.
Rob Laporte

There is no penalty for buying links! - 0 views

  • There is no penalty for buying links! There, I said it. That’s what I believe is true; there is no such thing as a ‘you have been buying links so you should suffer’ penalty. At least, not if you do it correctly. I’ll make some statements about buying links that probably not everybody will agree on, but this is what I consider to be the truth. If you don’t publish your link buying tactics yourself and if your website’s link profile doesn’t contain >90% paid links, then: Buying links cannot get you penalized;Buying links from obvious link networks only results in backlinks with little to no search engine value;Buying links ninja style will continue to get you killer rankings;Selling links can only disable your ability to pass link juice or PR (but you might want to read this);Google will never be able to detect all paid links Just about every time the topic finally seems to be left alone, someone out there heats up the good old paid link debate again. This time, Rand Fishkin (unintentionally) causes the discussion to emerge once again. By showing the buying and selling link tactics of several websites on SEOmoz’ blog (this info has been removed now), he made it very easy for the Paid Link Police to add some more websites to the list of websites to check out while building the Paid Link Neglecting Algorithm. Several people got all wound up because of this, including (at first) me, because these sites would more than likely receive a penalty (just checked, none of them has been penalized yet). However, it is almost impossible for Google to penalize you for buying links for your website. At least, not if you didn’t scream “Hey, I’m artificially inflating my link popularity!” on your OWN website. David Airey penalized? Jim Boykin analyzed his penalty earlier and the same thing happened here. In some cases, it may seem that certain websites have been penalized for buying links. What in fact happened, is that the link juice tap of some obvious paid links has been closed, what resulted in less link juice, followed by lower rankings. In most other cases, you can buy all the links you want and not get penalized. You could buy the same links for your competition, right? And if Google states that Spammy Backlinks can’t Hurt You, paid backlinks probably can’t hurt you either. This basically is the same thing. The worst thing that can happen is that you buy hundreds of text links that only provide traffic. And, if you managed to buy the right ones, there’s nothing wrong with that.
Rob Laporte

Official Google Webmaster Central Blog: Using site speed in web search ranking - 0 views

  • If you are a site owner, webmaster or a web author, here are some free tools that you can use to evaluate the speed of your site:Page Speed, an open source Firefox/Firebug add-on that evaluates the performance of web pages and gives suggestions for improvement.YSlow, a free tool from Yahoo! that suggests ways to improve website speed.WebPagetest shows a waterfall view of your pages' load performance plus an optimization checklist.In Webmaster Tools, Labs > Site Performance shows the speed of your website as experienced by users around the world as in the chart below. We've also blogged about site performance.Many other tools on code.google.com/speed.While site speed is a new signal, it doesn't carry as much weight as the relevance of a page. Currently, fewer than 1% of search queries are affected by the site speed signal in our implementation and the signal for site speed only applies for visitors searching in English on Google.com at this point. We launched this change a few weeks back after rigorous testing. If you haven't seen much change to your site rankings, then this site speed change possibly did not impact your site.
Rob Laporte

Live Search Webmaster Center Blog : SMX East 2008: Unraveling URLs and Demystifying Domains - 0 views

  • Another interesting statistic from this session is something that Sean Suchter from Yahoo! provided — all other things being equal, a searcher is twice as likely to click a short URL than they are to click a long URL.
Rob Laporte

Eyetracking: Why We Watch Some Web Ads and Not Others - TIME - 1 views

  •  
    This falls into the realm of "neuromarketing".
« First ‹ Previous 121 - 140 of 806 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page