Skip to main content

Home/ DISC Inc/ Group items tagged Facebook

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Rob Laporte

Intentional Targeting: Search vs. Facebook - Search Engine Watch (SEW) - 0 views

  •  
    Social Intent vs. Search Intent More importantly, Facebook ads not only fail to gauge what a user's current intent might be, but they fail to acknowledge what Facebook know a user's intent is. Essentially, most Facebook users log on to socialize, not buy. In this respect, Facebook ads can make you look a lot like the guy who goes around a cocktail party trying to sell insurance. Social intent is probably one of the main reasons that Facebook's average CPM ranges somewhere between 13 and 53 percent below the industry standard. Indeed, as ClickZ reported, Facebook ads get half the clicks of network banners and the average click-through rate (CTR) for Facebook ads in 2009 was 0.063 percent and 0.051 percent in 2010. Conversely, the average CTR on AdWords is around 2 percent. That's 20 times the industry standard and almost 40 times that for Facebook ads. This is probably because many search sessions revolve specifically around making a purchasing decision -- maybe not buying right then and there, but deciding how the user will buy when they're ready. And when they are ready, there's a decent chance they'll return to Google to recall that product or purchasing decision they arrived at during previous sessions. Context is Everything Given Facebook's position in the marketplace, this isn't to say that Facebook ads should be ignored by marketers. Indeed, Facebook has become such mainstream channel, that it can't be ignored by certain advertisers. As this Webtrends study points out: ... industries that are fun to discuss with our network are seeing higher CTR. ... Brands that are social get a higher CTR, which translates into better engagement metrics: Post Quality Score, EdgeRank, Feedback Rate, and others. In turn, Facebook rewards such behavior with a lower cost-per-click and greater visibility in the News Feed. It's the marketers and/or campaigns that are driven by results, however, that should think twice before investing too much into Facebook -- especially if
Rob Laporte

April US Social Networking Traffic Down 16% from '07 - MarketingVOX - 0 views

  •  
    April US Social Networking Traffic Down 16% from '07\n\nThe market share of April US visits to a custom category of 57 of the leading social-networking websites increased 3 percent from March - but was down 16 percent from April 2007, Hitwise reports - via MarketingCharts. MySpace.com led in traffic, receiving 73.82 percent of the market share of US visits in April.\n\nhitwise-social-network-sites-traffic-market-share-april-2008.jpg\n\n * Facebook ranked second by the market share of visits, with 14.80 percent, followed by MyYearbook, which received 1.33 percent.\n * US traffic to MySpace and Bebo, among the top 5, decreased 5 percent and 13 percent, respectively, compared with April 2007.\n * MyYearbook had the largest gain in market share in April 2008, increasing 475 percent compared with April 2007.\n * Facebook and BlackPlanet followed, increasing 32 and 15 percent, respectively.\n\nNew and Returning Visitors\n\nhitwise-social-network-sites-returning-traffic-april-2008.jpg\n\n * Among the top five social networking websites by market share, MySpace received 95 percent of its visits from returning visitors in April.\n * Facebook and MyYearbook.com followed with 93 percent and 90 percent, respectively, of traffic returning from within the previous 30 days.\n\nTime Spent on Network\n\nhitwise-social-network-sites-time-spent-april-2008.jpg\n\n * In April, the average time spent among all social networking websites increased 73 percent compared with April 2007.\n * Among the top five most-visited websites, MyYearbook led with users spending an average of 32 minutes and 54 seconds on the website.\n * Facebook had the largest growth in average time spent, increasing 57 percent in April 2008, to 20 minutes and 52 seconds, from 13 minutes and 19 seconds in April 2007.\n\nHitwise, a subsidiary of Experian, has issued a social networking report, "The Impact of Social Networking in the US," analyzing which industries are most affected by social n
Rob Laporte

Honey, Social Media Shrunk Big Business - ClickZ - 0 views

  •  
    Marketing Has Become Personal (Again) When the Big Guys want to look like Small Players, they make deep investments, mostly in social media. If you look at Coca-Cola's Facebook Page, for example, it doesn't look remarkably different from any other Facebook Page, even those created by tiny companies. On that Facebook Page, Coca-Cola -- one of the largest companies in the world and possibly the most recognized brand on the globe -- is presenting itself as not just small but also personal and approachable. In fact, if you are a fan of its page, you can write on its wall. Coke has videos of its fans and simple pictures of people enjoying a Coke. These aren't professional, glossy images but the sort of pictures we've come to expect online: a bit grainy, not well lit, and very real looking. The rule, and indeed the opportunity, of the new medium is to make your marketing personal. You need a bit of guts to do it. We all have a natural tendency to speak and act in ways we feel are professional when doing business, and this is true online as well. But social media is the single most important media space for brands right now, and its nature is different. If you are a big brand, you don't need to pretend you are small, but you do need to find ways to become approachable, engaging, and personal in the way that small brands do. Let's Get Small There are a few rules to follow when you try to get more personal in your marketing. Use these methods and you can start putting some real faces next to the brands consumers think they know: * Start with the current fans.This is really the great story of the Coca-Cola page. It was started by two guys who simply loved Coke, not by company itself. They amassed a following of brand loyalists, totally on their own. The company came to these guys and asked for the opportunity to help them out and keep them involved. Exactly what you would do if you were an actual human being, not a great big company more concerned with protectin
Rob Laporte

How Individuals Can Build a Robust Social Presence - ClickZ - 0 views

  •  
    How to Build a Robust Social Presence Get your basic data out there. For many professionals, the core of your social presence probably involves one or more of these: LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Each of these can be set up in less than five minutes and costs you nothing. Before jumping in, a few tips are in order: * When creating your profile, be sure to include a nice photo, and follow the steps suggested at each site to complete as much of your profile as you can. When you're considering adding, following, or contacting someone, think about the impact of missing or otherwise insufficient information. Business networking should not feel like you're living in a mystery novel. None of us has time for that, so think about the people who are looking at you. Make it easy for them to understand who are and what you do. * Thoughtfully add people to your network. I overheard someone on a plane last week saying "I have over a thousand people in my personal network but have no idea who most of them are." If the people in your network lack credibility, what's that say about you? These are your "friends," right? * On LinkedIn, seek out recommendations, but only from people who are qualified to give them. Five hundred professional connections without a single recommendation sends an unfortunate message. Likewise, a recommendation that starts out "I've never actually worked with Dave, but..." is useless, and detracts from social capital and personal credibility. * Participate. Leverage your ability to add or become friends, to post, and to comment to your advantage. Talk about your business, about news that relates to you or your profession, about things that are of interest to your audience. Do not shill or spam. * Be careful with questions like "What are you doing right now?" This common question -- in the context of business -- is a thought-starter, not a literal interrogative. The best response is less along the lines of "ea
Rob Laporte

RankBrain Judgment Day: 4 SEO Strategies You'll Need to Survive | WordStream - 0 views

  • The future of SEO isn't about beating another page based on content length, social metrics, keyword usage, or your number of backlinks. Better organic search visibility will come from beating your competitors with a higher than expected click-through rate.
  • In “Google Organic Click-Through Rates” on Moz, Philip Petrescu shared the following CTR data:
  • The Larry RankBrain Risk Detection Algorithm. Just download all of your query data from Webmaster Tools and plot CTR vs. Average Position for the queries you rank for organically, like this:
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • Our research into millions of PPC ads has shown that the single most powerful way to increase CTR in ads is to leverage emotional triggers. Like this PPC ad: Tapping into emotions will get your target customer/audience clicking! Anger. Disgust. Affirmation. Fear. These are some of the most powerful triggers not only drive click through rate, but also increase conversion rates.
  • No, you need to combine keywords and emotional triggers to create SEO superstorms that result in ridiculous CTRs
  • Bottom line: Use emotional triggers + keywords in your titles and descriptions if you want your CTR to go from "OK" to great.
  • Bottom line: You must beat the expected CTR for a given organic search position. Optimize for relevance or die.
  • Let's say you work for a tech company. Your visitors, on average, are bouncing away at 80% for the typical session, but users on a competing website are viewing more pages per session and have a bounce rate of just 50%. RankBrain views them as better than you – and they appear above you in the SERPs. In this case, the task completion rate is engagement. Bottom line: If you have high task completion rates, Google will assume your content is relevant. If you have crappy task completion rates, RankBrain will penalize you.
  • 4. Increase Search Volume & CTR Using Social Ads and Display Remarketing People who are familiar with your brand are 2x more likely to click on your ads and 2x more likely to convert. We know this because targeting a user who has already visited your website (or app) via RLSA (remarketing lists for search ads) always produces higher CTRs than generically targeting the same keywords to users who are unfamiliar with your brand. So, one ingenious method to increase your organic CTRs and beat RankBrain is to bombard your specific target market with Facebook and Twitter ads. Facebook ads are proven to lift mobile search referral traffic volume to advertiser websites (by 6% on average, up to 12.8%) (here’s the research). With more than a billion daily users, your audience is definitely using the Social Network. Facebook ads are inexpensive – even spending just $50 dollars on social ads can generate tremendous exposure and awareness of your brand. Another relatively inexpensive way to dramatically build up brand recognition is to leverage the power of Display Ad remarketing on the Google Display Network. This will ensure the visitors you drive from social media ads remember who you are and what it is you do. In various tests, we found that implementing a display ad remarketing strategy has a dramatic impact on bounce rates and other engagement metrics. Bottom line: If you want to increase organic CTRs for your brand or business, make sure people are familiar with your offering. People who are more aware of your brand and become familiar with what you do will be predisposed to click on your result in SERP when it matters most, and will have much higher task completion rates after having clicked through to your site.
  • UPDATE: As many of us suspected, Google has continued to apply RankBrain to increasing volumes of search queries - so many, in fact, that Google now says its AI processes every query Google handles, which has enormous implications for SEO. As little as a year ago, RankBrain was reportedly handling approximately 15% of Google's total volume of search queries. Now, it's processing all of them. It's still too soon to say precisely what effect this will have on how you should approach SEO, but it's safe to assume that RankBrain will continue to focus on rewarding quality, relevant content. It's also worth noting that, according to Google, RankBrain itself is now the third-most important ranking signal in the larger Google algorithm, meaning that "optimizing" for RankBrain will likely dominate conversations in the SEO space for the foreseeable future. To read more about the scope and potential of RankBrain and its impact on SEO, check out this excellent write-up at Search Engine Land.
Verilliance

18 Super Easy, Highly Effective Tips to Grow your Fans via Facebook Ads « Wil... - 0 views

  •  
    Very good guide on constructing winning Facebook ads.
Rob Laporte

Social Media - Google takes on Facebook - Internet Retailer - 0 views

  • Google+ will test whether the search giant can reach some of the 157.2 million consumers who accessed Facebook in May, according to web measurement firm comScore Inc. Those consumers are particularly valuable because they looked at 103 billion pages and spent an average of 375 minutes on the site. Consumers on Google sites, which includes YouTube, viewed 46.3 billion pages and spent 231 minutes on those sites. That helps explain how Facebook has been able to garner nearly one in three online display ads on the web, according to a recent comScore report.
jack_fox

Advanced Technical SEO: How social image sharing works and how to optimize your og:imag... - 0 views

  • It’s impossible to specify different images/formats/files for different networks, other than for Facebook and Twitter. The Facebook image is used, by default, for all other networks/systems). This is a limitation of how these platforms work. The same goes for titles and descriptions
  • The image size and cropping won’t always be perfect across different platforms, as the way in which they work is inconsistent.
  • Specifically, your images should look great on ‘broadcast’ platforms like Facebook and Twitter, but might sometimes crop awkwardly on platforms designed for 1:1 or small group conversations, like WhatsApp or Telegram.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • For best results, you should manually specify og:image tags for each post, through the plugin. You should ensure that your primary og:image is between 1200x800px and 2000x1600px, and is less than 2mb in size.
  • As an open project, the Open Graph is constantly changing and improving
  • these tags and approaches sometimes conflict with or override each other. Twitter’s twitter:image property, for example, overrides an og:image value for images shared via Twitter, when both sets of tags are on the same page.
  • the open graph specification allows us to provide multiple og:image values. This, in theory, allows the platform to make the best decision about which size to use and allows people who are sharing some choice over which image they pick. How different platforms interpret these values, however, varies considerably
  • Because each platform maintains its own rules and documentation on how they treat og:image tags, there are often gaps in our knowledge. Specific restrictions, edge cases, and in particular, information on which rules override other rules, are rarely well-documented
  • we’re choosing to optimize the first image in the og:set for large, high-resolution sharing – the kind which Facebook supports and requires, but which cause issues with networks which expect a smaller image (like Instagram, or Telegram) sharing.
  • In the context of a newsfeed, like on Facebook or Twitter, the quality of the image is much more important – you’re scrolling through lots of noise, you’re less engaged, and a better image is an increased chance of a click/share/like. 
  • When the ‘full’ size image is over 2mb file size, and/or over 2000 pixels on either axis, we’ll try and fall back to a smaller standard WordPress image size (or to scan the post content for an alternative).
  • If we can’t find a suitable smaller image, we’ll omit the og:image tag, in the hopes that the platform will select an appropriate alternative. Note that this may result in the image not appearing in some sharing contexts.
  • If the ratio exceeds 3:1 we’ll present a warnin (this is the maximum ratio for many networks)
  • For most normal use-cases, we’d suggest that you manually set og:image values on your posts via the Yoast SEO plugin, and ensure that their dimensions are between 1200x800px and 2000x1600px (and that they’re less than 2mb in size)
jack_fox

What You Need to Know About Open Graph Meta Tags for Total Facebook and Twitter Mastery - 0 views

  • All of the other major platforms, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Google+, recognize Open Graph tags. Twitter actually has its own meta tags for Twitter Cards, but if Twitter robots cannot find any, Twitter uses Open Graph tags instead.
  • The tags can affect conversions and click-through rates hugely
  • Adding Open Graph tags to your website won’t directly affect your on-page SEO, but it will influence the performance of your links on social media
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • if Facebook doesn’t find the og:title tag on your page, it uses the meta title instead.
  • og:typeThis is how you describe the kind of object you are sharing: blog post, video, picture, or whatever
  • In most cases, you will use the “website” value, since what you are sharing is a link to a website. In fact, if you don’t define a type, Facebook will read it as “website” by default.
  • og:descriptionThis meta data descriptor is very similar to the meta description tag in HTML. This is where you describe your content, but instead of it showing on a search engine results page, it shows below the link title on Facebook.
  • the picture you use as an Open Graph image can be different from what you have on your page
  • og:locale – defines the language, American English is the default
  • twitter:cardThis required tag works in a similar way to og:type. It describes the type of content you are sharing.
  • before you can fully benefit from Twitter Cards, you need to request an approval for your page from Twitter. Fortunately, this doesn’t take much time and can be done easily using their Card Validator
jack_fox

Wikidata 101 - Search Engine Land - 0 views

  • Wikidata contains entities, or Items, like “London” or “Facebook.” Each Item is assigned a unique identifier starting with a Q, like Q454390 for the TI-99. At the top of each Item is a label, description and aliases:
  • take a look at Items similar to the one you’d like to edit, and note the statement Properties used plus the kinds of Values and Qualifiers commonly accepted for those Properties.
  • My top recommendations for Properties that Organizations should supply/populate are headquarters location, official website, image or logo image, described at URL, Facebook ID, Twitter username, inception, industry and manufacturer (of).
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Wikidata insists upon entries being about notable concepts or material entities (people, places and things). For the most part, that means it is mentioned in the Wikipedia or you can describe the entity using third-party, publicly available resources
  •  
    "Wikidata contains entities, or Items, like "London" or "Facebook." Each Item is assigned a unique identifier starting with a Q, like Q454390 for the TI-99. At the top of each Item is a label, description and aliases:"
Rob Laporte

Social Interactions - Web Tracking (ga.js) - Google Analytics - Google Developers - 0 views

  •  
    working example of how to integrate Analytics with Facebook and Twitter buttons
1 - 20 of 97 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page