Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Group items tagged representation

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Govind Rao

Labour Relations Board decision attempts to clarify impact of Bill 18 on LPN representa... - 1 views

  • August 16, 2013 All BCNU’s current raid applications dismissed; union representation votes likely at many community health and long-term care sites
  • The B.C. Labour Relations Board issued a decision on August 16 that dismissed 48 raid applications filed by BCNU last fall, while setting out a framework for determining union representation for LPNs recently transferred into the Nurses Bargaining Association (NBA).
  • BCNU’s raid on LPNs in affiliate employers covered by the facilities subsector agreement – mostly long-term care sites – were dismissed by the LRB because these LPNs were subsequently moved into the NBA when the BC Liberals passed Bill 18 just before the spring election.
Govind Rao

Health arbitration set to start; Hearings to decide which unions will represent 4 group... - 0 views

  • The Chronicle-Herald Tue Dec 9 2014 Page: A5
  • Arbitration hearings to determine which health-care unions represent four segments of workers begin Tuesday and will include one more attempt by union reps to argue for a different model. The hearings follow unsuccessful mediation between the province and four unions regarding representation in the new provincial health board. Bill 1, which merges nine district health authorities on April 1, also calls for there to be only four bargaining units, with each union representing only one of those units. Unifor, the Canadian Union of Public Employees, the Nova Scotia Nurses' Union and the Nova Scotia Government &General Employees Union have argued that the move strips workers of their rights to determine representation. Under the legislation passed in October, some unions stand to gain thousands of new members while others could lose thousands of members. The hearings, scheduled to run until Sunday at a hotel near the Halifax airport, are expected to open with arguments on a charter rights challenge by CUPE. Depending on how that plays out, the focus would then shift to nursing. The other three newly created bargaining units are health care, clerical and service staff.
  • Wayne Thomas, CUPE's acute-care co-ordinator, said they will basically argue that arbitrator James Dorsey should be able to consider a bargaining association model, which would see the unions keep their respective members but bargain along the lines of the four units. "We're hoping that the door is open a crack to consider another alternative." Thomas said CUPE was buoyed by some of the comments in Dorsey's report following the mediation process. In the report, Dorsey noted he is essentially acting in place of the labour board and isn't just an administrator to rubber stamp the process. "The mediator-arbitrator is not simply an usher showing everyone preassigned seating," Thomas said. "The mediator-arbitrator's role is not simply to ensure the employers or the government get a desired outcome, no matter how much it might be preordained." NSGEU president Joan Jessome said her union continues to believe the most fair option is for all union members to vote on representation, although she said she would support a bargaining association model. If the charter challenges are unsuccessful and Dorsey does slot unions, Jessome said the NSGEU's position is not to push to represent any one group. Dorsey is expected to deliver his decision by Jan. 1.
Govind Rao

Grits should get a grip as health merger guru takes too many liberties - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Chronicle-Herald Sat Jan 24 2015
  • "... the nursing bargaining unit is composed of all unionized employees who occupy positions that must be occupied by a registered nurse or a licensed practical nurse." Dorsey explains his view of the "majoritarian principle," arguing that principles of democracy require a union to be supported by a majority of members to be certified. Of course, that is not the way our democracy works. It has been three decades since any party won more than 50 per cent of the vote in a Nova Scotian or Canadian election. And when one party has a plurality, but not a majority, of seats, it still gets to form the government. As a practical matter, only the clerical group (NSGEU) has a majority from one union. No matter. Dorsey tells us that "it cannot be the legislative intent in this restructuring for the first time in Canadian history to impose certification of three unions as exclusive bargaining agents for bargaining units of employees without majority employee support."
  • And "... no employer wants to bargain with a union ... that does not represent a majority of its employees." Any plain reading of the act tells us that was exactly the intent of the employer, because for three of the groups, there is no majority union. Both the IWK and the regional health authorities (RHAs) had plenty of opportunity to object. They did not. The NSNU has a majority of nurses (RNs and LPNs) at the IWK and in total. Dorsey estimates that the NSNU has 48.9 per cent of the nurses in the amalgamated authority. He appears to have searched everywhere for a pebble to stumble on and finds it there. It is crystal clear that the straightforward path to follow the act is by certifying the NSNU for those employees. Premier Stephen McNeil has eliminated this unnecessary impasse by combining the nursing units for the provincial health authority and IWK Health Centre into a single or common employer unit for bargaining purposes, without compromising the IWK's independence. Good.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Needless to say Dorsey, likewise, cannot abide allowing Unifor and CUPE, the two other unions, to represent the health-care and support groups since there is nothing close to a majority share of representation in either. Instead, he argues that each individual union local is a union for this purpose and invites them and the relevant NSGEU locals to fashion amalgamations. They seem to be amalgamations in name only: "(it) can also take the form of an amalgamation in which each of the former unions continues to exist, perhaps only with a change in name. There can be minor changes with the unions (by which he means the relevant union locals) continuing to operate with their pre-amalgamation structures and organization essentially unchanged." In other words it looks like a bargaining association, which the government has rejected, dressed up in different clothes. Worse, it preserves obsolete boundaries for no reason that benefits members.
  • Dorsey argues that the amalgamations meet the province's requirement for single bargaining agents, and that what he is proposing is "not a council of trade unions, not a bargaining association and not a joint structure of autonomous unions." Union leaders are getting a different message. They believe that they can keep their members after amalgamation. How can such an arrangement serve the interests of the new union's members? Since there is to be only one contract, why is there a continuing need for different locals? He invites the unions to create amalgamations for the health-care and support groups, but he does not exclude it for the others. The members of these new creations will not have voted for them - so much for majoritarian principles.
  • It's time for government to get a grip. It was not expecting this outcome. The process has already dragged on longer than it was supposed to, and no conclusions on representation have been reached. The unions may not reach an amalgamation agreement, or may present one that government views as unsatisfactory, but which Dorsey chooses to accept. The government must define clear timelines for a complete decision on representation to be reached, and specify the conditions it expects, including the degree of autonomy, in any new amalgamations that are proposed as candidates. The government has patiently and effectively moved this file along since the day it was elected. It should not let the project become derailed at this late stage.
Heather Farrow

Caution For Employers Dealing With Employees Exhibiting Suspected Mental Health Issues ... - 0 views

  • Mondaq Wed Aug 24 2016,
  • In Passamaquoddy Lodge v CUPE Local 1763 2016 NBQB 056 the Court of Queen's Bench upheld an original arbitration decision condemning an employer for suspending an employee pending the outcome of a psychiatric evaluation. The Facts
  • Mr. Lister worked in the maintenance department at a nursing home in St. Andrews, New Brunswick and was represented by CUPE, Local 1763. The employer had become concerned for Mr. Lister's mental stability, contending he was acting "erratic" and "non-predictable". The grievor also had a history of "causing trouble" for the employer and was the object of a police investigation for a non-work related incident.
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • In February 2012, Mr. Lister raised concerns with his employer and alleged the presence of asbestos on pipes in the nursing home. The Lodge brought in environmental consultants, but Mr. Lister questioned their qualifications and made statements challenging the accuracy of the expert advice they provided as to health and safety.
  • In March 2012, Mr. Lister attended a general staff meeting where he reportedly made inappropriate gestures and fell asleep. The employer then sent a warning letter to him, which was placed on his personnel file. A few months later, in the summer of 2012, Mr. Lister brought a tomahawk axe to work and, for this action, was suspended for 1.5 days as "progressive discipline." In
  • the Fall of 2012, Management called a meeting with Mr. Lister for which he declined union representation when offered. Mr. Lister was instructed by the Employer that he would not be permitted to return to work until he had a psychiatric evaluation. He was immediately suspended, indefinitely, without pay, and escorted from the property. Mr. Lister was ultimately assessed by a psychiatrist, who determined that he did not pose a danger to himself or others; however, he missed over twenty (20) days of work without pay before being cleared.
  • CUPE filed three (3) grievances, two of which were the subject of the judicial review, these were: (1) alleging that the employer violated the collective agreement by not having a union representative present at the suspension meeting; and (2) that the employer had violated the collective agreement by suspending the grievor pending a psychiatric evaluation, without valid reason and without pay. The (3) third grievance concerned the 1.5 day
  • suspension of Mr. Lister for bringing a tomahawk axe to work. On the third issue, the arbitrator concluded that the suspension was reasonable and the Lodge did not seek judicial review. The arbitrator held that the Lodge had violated the collective agreement by not ensuring a union representative had been in attendance at the meeting with Mr. Lister. He had been told that he did not need such representation, but he clearly did. The Lodge had also violated the collective agreement by suspending Mr. Lister without cause and for over 20 days, which was contrary to the collective agreement.
  • However, there was significant evidence that the suspension was, in fact, disciplinary. Letters had been issued by the employer previously warning Mr. Lister of further "disciplinary action", Mr. Lister was escorted from the premises and Union representation had been offered at the meeting. Further, the suspension resulted in the grievor suffering a financial penalty,
  • employer argued it did not intend to punish Mr. Lister and fully expected a psychiatrist would find him unfit to return to work; however, since Mr. Lister had no sick days left, he was simply "suspended" without pay, pending the evaluation.
  • The Decision On judicial review, the New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench upheld the arbitrator's refusal to accept the employer's argument that the suspension, due to mental health concerns was a "medical leave", and not a disciplinary action. The
  • as he was unable to access sick benefits and received no pay. Ultimately, the Court of Queen's Bench concluded that the arbitrator was justified in finding that the employer had disciplined Mr. Lister by suspending him and prohibiting his return to work pending a clear psychiatric evaluation, and that this was a violation of the collective agreement.
  • What This Means For Employers With the exception of certain safety-sensitive industries where a bona fide occupational requirement can be established, employers cannot discipline, suspend or dismiss employees suffering from a mental illness or disability. Employers have a legal duty under human rights legislation and/or collective agreements to accommodate all disability, up to the point of undue hardship. Unions, where applicable, also have legal duties within the
  • accommodation process and can be of assistance in navigating "difficult" employee behaviour, including mental health issues where such employees may pose a risk not only to themselves, but the broader workplace. Occupational health and safety legislation also requires employers to provide a safe working environment for their
  • employees. Under certain conditions, with the proper evidence and context, employers may need to remove an employee with a confirmed mental illness to protect against harm to others or themselves. In such specific circumstances, an employer might be justified in preventing an employee from returning to the workplace until medical clearance is confirmed. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Ms Leah Ferguson
  • Cox & Palmer Suite 400 Phoenix Square 371 Queen Street Fredericton NB CANADA Tel: 902421 6262 Fax: 902421 3130 E-mail: kbehie@coxandpalmer.com URL: www.coxandpalmerlaw.com
Govind Rao

CUPE Ontario | Windsor Regional Hospital workers join CUPE - 0 views

  • WINDSOR, Ont. – In a show of confidence for Canada's largest union representing 35,000 hospital workers in Ontario, Windsor Regional Hospital workers recently voted to join the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), in a representation vote triggered by the merger of programs at two local Windsor hospital sites, Windsor Regional Met and Ouellette campus (formerly Hotel-Dieu/Grace Hospital) into the Windsor Regional Met site.
  • CUPE will represent all 210 hospital workers, at both sites
Govind Rao

Rural areas have poor working conditions for paramedics, demonstrators say - Newfoundla... - 0 views

  • Jun 15, 2015
  • A small but fiery group of emergency responders took to the steps of Newfoundland and Labrador's legislature Monday to demand not only better pay, but better representation and schedules for people who are asked to get sick people to hospitals.
  • Several members of the House of Assembly came out to meet with the workers, who do not have any union representation. 
Govind Rao

What does the Bill 1 decision mean for Nova Scotia health-care unions? | rabble.ca - 0 views

  • By Ella Bedard | January 22, 2015
  • Monday, arbitrator James Dorsey released his decision on Bill 1, the Nova Scotia Bill which will change the labour landscape for Nova Scotia health-care workers.
  • Though Nova Scotia's Health Minister Leo Glavine rejected the bargaining association model as an unworkable solution, the unions say that Dorsey has now re-opened the possibility of multi-union representation.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • The explicit meaning of the 196-page decision wasn't immediately clear. However, in the hours after the announcement, all four health-care unions affected expressed their satisfaction with the ruling, which they say resembles the bargaining association model favoured by labour.
  • Yet he also acknowledges that the government does not have the authority to rearrange union membership to the extent that Bill 1 proposes, writing: "While the government has the right to wind up district health authorities and dismiss executives and managers in restructuring, it cannot reach across the table and assign new representational rights and responsibilities for independent trade unions or tell employees who will be their bargaining agent."
  • Dorsey's ruling states that in order for one union to be the sole representative for a bargaining unit, it has to have what's being called a "double majority" -- that is, a majority in both the regional health authorities and IWK Health Centre, which is a separate entity jointly administered by the three Maritime provinces.
  • The NSGEU plans to use the upcoming arbitration period to negotiate with CUPE to form an amalgamated health care unit for the clerical workers, said Jessome, who believes that that option is still available for the nurses too.
  • In an interview broadcast on Halifax-based radio station News 95.7, President of the Nova Scotia Nurses Union (NSNU) Janet Hazelton said that she is also open to a multi-union approach.
Govind Rao

24,000 healthcare workers in Nova Scotia still in the dark about union representation |... - 1 views

  • HALIFAX – CUPE Nova Scotia President Danny Cavanagh says, “Nova Scotians should be extremely concerned that their provincial government has categorically failed in its attempt to re-organize the health care sector.
  •  
    Feb 23 2015
Irene Jansen

M. McGregor and D. Martin. 2012. Testing 1, 2, 3. Is overtesting undermining patient an... - 0 views

  • the guideline committees that make recommendations do not appear to consider cost-effectiveness, opportunity costs, and the potential harms of decisions to broaden screening guidelines
  • Not only are we screening with widespread laboratory testing at younger ages, but our definition of disease is also shifting.
  • In BC, there has been a 13.9% increase per year in treatment rates for 8 chronic diseases, beyond what would be expected for the changing demographic characteristics of the population
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • Either British Columbians are rapidly becoming much sicker, or this increase in prevalence is a reflection of what Welch and colleagues describe as “looking harder” and “changing the rules.”
  • about one-third of the increasing cost of testing is related to physician adherence to guidelines
  • patients now often request particular tests
  • Earlier diagnoses and more aggressive treatments appeal to our self-definition as fighters of illness—and we all shudder at the successful lawsuit against the physician who did not screen
  • we use them as therapy of a sort, giving hope to the patient that we will find an explanation for the symptoms instead of admitting that we do not know and might never know the exact cause of the problem
  • At the highest level, there needs to be a broader evaluation of guidelines. Such evaluation needs to have representation from policy thinkers and health economists in addition to family doctors, other specialists, patients, and the public.
  • the opportunity costs of deciding to implement widespread laboratory testing for healthy people, compared with adopting population-based policies, such as 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week access to community recreation facilities and social housing, or free access to smoking cessation supports, should be debated.
  • Tests and repeat tests that are deemed to be of less benefit or not worth the opportunity-cost trade-off should be delisted.
Govind Rao

Hospital, nursing home workers hold roadside vigil to protest privatization - Infomart - 1 views

  • Miramichi Leader Wed Aug 26 2015
  • Wearing their now-familiar red shirts and clutching makeshift candles made of Tim Hortons cups and whatever else they could find, nearly 200 unionized workers, mostly from the city's two nursing homes and the Miramichi Regional Hospital, lined up along Water Street in Chatham Head Monday night to rally against further privatization in the public sector. The candlelight vigil was organized by Kevin Driscoll, the president of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) Local 865, which represents hospital staff in Miramichi.
  • A number of other locals joined in on the demonstration, including representation from CUPE 1277 and 1256 of the Miramichi Senior Citizens Home and Mount St. Joseph Nursing Home, respectively, CUPE 1190, which acts on behalf New Brunswick's highway workers, the New Brunswick Federation of Labour and staff from Hebert's Recycling. Driscoll, who works as a nursing unit clerk at the Miramichi Regional Hospital, said that workers are growing more disenchanted by the day as the provincial government continues to give the private sector a greater role in its health care and senior care system. He said CUPE staff felt they had to do something to draw attention to these issues and, with the hospital serving as the backdrop as night fell on the city Monday night, everyone agreed that gathering on the side of the road by candlelight would help convey their message.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • "It shows that people here really care about the Miramichi and it's too bad that politicians don't care about it as much," Driscoll said. "They want to privatize the nursing homes, they want to cut to the Education Department, their cutting the highway budgets and they're cutting to every service they can think of, so where are we going to go? They don't seem to think that matters." The Liberal government, come the fall, is expected to have a deal in place that will see all hospital food and cleaning services being outsourced to a private firm.
  • Government officials, including Health Minister Victor Boudreau have maintained that the changes are needed in order to help the province get its finances in order and will save the province millions of dollars through efficiencies that will be brought in under private management. Driscoll says those efficiencies, CUPE fears, are simply going to amount to job cuts at hospitals throughout the Horizon Health Network. The union learned from the province earlier in the summer that food and facilities management giants like Sodexo, Aramark and Compass Group are involved in the bidding process.
  • "If they privatize these services, then these corporations are going to come in and say 'you don't need all these people' ... we're going to cut because they're going to want to make at least a 20 per cent profit. Driscoll said the hospital is just one example of the trend toward the greater privatization of public services the union is seeing. Nursing home workers at Mount St. Joseph Nursing Home and the Miramichi Senior Citizens Home have been protesting at various points throughout the summer after learning the Department of Social Development would be using a private-public partnership (P3) model in building a new 280-bed nursing home that will replace both of the city's current facilities, which are run by a volunteer board of directors. Workers at both homes will have to reapply for positions at the new nursing home if that's what they choose to do and, with a private company running things, the membership has said it is concerned that those who do catch on at the new place could be subject to reduced pay and benefits.
  • The government is expected to open up a request for proposals (RFP) in the coming weeks to begin the process of determining which proponent will build and operate what will likely be New Brunswick's largest nursing home by the time it opens. Currently, each of the three privately run nursing homes in the province are owned by Shannex. The unions have also warned that the move to a P3 model would lead to a reduction in the level of community outreach programming offered to local seniors through things like Meals on Wheels and adult daycare. Tourism Minister Bill Fraser, the Liberal Miramichi MLA who advocated heavily for the new nursing home to be built and the man at the centre of much of the unions' ire, has shot down those concerns in previous interviews. Fraser has reiterated that regardless of whichever proponent emerges with the right to build and manage the structure, the initiative represents a major upgrade in terms of nursing home infrastructure.
  • He said the standards of care are dictated by the province and will remain, at the very least, on par with what has existed at the two current nursing homes over the last several years. Programs like Meals on Wheels, adult daycare and lifeline, would remain in place and potentially even enhanced and in terms of jobs, he said there will be provisions written into the RFP asking that priority be given to local applicants and that with an increase of 26 beds, even more staff will likely be required. As for pay and benefits, he said staff at two of the three Shannex properties have already unionized and the third was in the process of doing that.
  • Nursing home staff have called on the province to force the boards at the Mount and the senior citizens home to amalgamate together and operate the new facility using a model similar to what was undertaken in Edmundston when two nursing home boards melded into one in order to operate the new $48 million, 180-bed Residence Jodin. Danny Legere, the president of CUPE New Brunswick, was on hand for the vigil and urged the Miramichi workers to keep up the fight. "I want to congratulate the people of the Miramichi for taking a stand - the fight that you have started is a fight for all New Brunswickers," Legere said. "The militancy that you are showing is exemplary and it has to be carried on from one end of the province from one end to the other."
  • Andy Hardy, a Miramichi native and the president of CUPE 1190, said his sector is used to certain services being contracted out to private interests but when it comes to health and senior care, he said it was "flat out wrong." "You're looking after the most vulnerable people in that building right there," Hardy said. "When you privatize the food services and the cleaning services all it is is for profit - the service goes down and the profit goes up, and for nursing homes as well." Length: 1090 words
Govind Rao

Address huge public health coverage gaps - Infomart - 0 views

  • Guelph Mercury Thu Oct 15 2015
  • It's time to tackle root causes of health inequities As Canadians, we are justifiably proud of our publicly funded health-care system. It is, arguably, the single-most powerful expression of our collective will as a nation to support each other. It recognizes that meeting shared needs and aspirations is the foundation on which prosperity and human development rests. We can all agree that failing to treat a broken leg can result in serious health problems and threats to a person's ability to function. Yet, we accept huge inequities in access to dental care and prescription drugs based on insurance coverage and income. Although the impacts can be just as significant, dental care isn't accessible like other types of health care, and many Canadians don't receive regular or even emergency dental care. Many others have no insurance coverage for urgently needed prescription medications and may delay or dilute required doses due to financial hardship.
  • Demand for dental care among adults and seniors will only increase as the population continues to grow in Ontario. From 2013 to 2036, Ontario's population aged 65 and over is projected to increase to more than four million people from 2.1 million. It is time all Canadians had access to dental care. This necessitates federal and provincial leadership in putting a framework together to make this possible. Dental health problems are largely preventable and require a comprehensive approach for all ages that includes treatment, prevention, and oral health promotion.
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • Low-income adults who do not have employer-sponsored dental coverage through a publicly funded program - and most don't - must pay for their own dental care. Because the cost is often prohibitive, too many adults avoid seeking treatment at dental offices. Instead, they turn to family doctors and emergency departments for antibiotics and painkillers, which cannot address the true cause of the problem. In 2012, in Ontario alone, there were almost 58,000 visits to Ontario hospital emergency rooms due to oral health problems. Why is access to dental care essential now?
  • A person's oral health will affect their overall health. Dental disease can cause pain and infection. Gum disease has been linked to respiratory infections, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, poor nutrition, and low birth weight babies. Poor oral health can also impact learning abilities, employability, school and work attendance and performance, self-esteem, and social relationships. It is estimated that 4.15 million working days are lost annually in Canada due to dental visits or dental sick days. Persons with visible dental problems may be less likely to find employment in jobs that require face-to-face contact with the public.
  • Why is there such a difference in coverage? In short, dental care and pharmacare were not included within the original scope of Canada's national system of health insurance (medicare), and despite repeated evidence of the need to correct this oversight, is still not covered today. Instead, we are left with a patchwork of private employer-based benefits coverage, limited publicly funded programs, and significant out-of-pocket payments for many. Publicly funded dental programs for children and youth do exist for low-income families, including the dependents of those on social assistance. Most provinces and territories have some access to drug coverage, mostly for seniors and social assistance recipients, and there is some support for situations where drug costs are extremely high.
  • Pharmaceutical coverage in Canada remains an unco-ordinated and incomplete patchwork of private and public plans - one that leaves many Canadians with no prescription drug coverage at all. This has many negative consequences including: Three million Canadians cannot afford to take their prescriptions as written. This leads to worse health outcomes and increased costs elsewhere in the health-care system.
  • One in six hospitalizations in Canada could be prevented through improved regulation and better guidelines. Medicines are commonly underused, overused, and misused in Canada. Two million Canadians incur more than $1,000 a year in out-of-pocket expenses for prescription drugs. The uncontrolled cost of medicines is also a growing burden on businesses and unions that finance private drug plans for approximately 60 per cent of Canadian workers. Canada pays more than any comparable health-care system for prescription drugs. We spend an estimated $1 billion on duplicate administration of multiple private drug plans. Depending on estimates, we also spend between $4 billion and $10 billion more on prescription drugs than comparable countries with national prescription drug coverage plans.
  • Affordable access to safe and appropriate prescription medicines is so critical to health that the World Health Organization has declared governments should be obligated to ensure such access for all. Unfortunately, Canada is the only developed country with a universal health care system that does not include universal coverage of prescription drugs. From its very outset, Canada's universal, public health insurance system - medicare - was supposed to include universal public coverage of prescription drugs. The reasoning was simple. It is essential to deliver on the core principles of "access," "appropriateness," "equity" and "efficiency." Building universal prescription drug coverage into Canada's universal health-care system, based on the above principles, is both achievable and financially sustainable.
  • A public body - with federal, provincial and territorial representation - would establish the national formulary for medicines to be covered. This body would negotiate drug pricing and supply contracts for brand-name and generic drugs. Importantly, it would use the combined purchasing power of the program to ensure all Canadians receive the best possible drug prices and thereby coverage of the widest possible range of treatments. To patients, the program would be a natural extension of medicare: when a provider prescribes a covered drug, the patient would have access without financial barriers.
  • To society, universal access to safe and appropriately prescribed drugs and access to dental care will improve population health and reduce demands elsewhere in the health system. The single-payer system will also result in substantially lower medicine costs for Canada. In short, Canada can no longer afford not to have a national pharmacare program and a national dental care program. Disclaimer: The Guelph and Wellington Task Force for Poverty Elimination is a non-partisan organization. However, the poverty task force does have ties with two Guelph federal party candidates. Andrew Seagram, the NDP candidate, is a current member of the task force and Lloyd Longfield, the Liberal candidate, is a past member.
Govind Rao

Pulp union's raid applications dismissed by labour board | Hospital Employees' Union - 0 views

  • Newsletter February 17, 2014
  • The B.C. Labour Relations Board has dismissed applications by the Pulp and Paper Workers’ of Canada union to raid trades and maintenance workers at three hospitals. The decision was issued Friday. The Hospital Employees’ Union had argued that the raid would inappropriately fragment the larger HEU bargaining unit and that allowing raids of this nature would lead to instability within the health sector.
Govind Rao

New health and safety survey seeks union member input on working alone | Hospital Emplo... - 0 views

  • October 4, 2013
  • As the B.C. health services division of CUPE National, HEU encourages our members to fill out a new survey on the impact of “working alone” – an issue that’s been frequently raised by our community health and community social services members. CUPE’s National Health and Safety Committee – which has HEU representation – has identified working alone as a significant factor in unsafe workplaces.
Govind Rao

Health care is about more than money - Infomart - 0 views

  • New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal Sat Apr 12 2014
  • So who are the authors of this terrible news, is it a group with no vested interest? That's hardly the case - it comes from the Canada Health Coalition, a group whose board of directors reads as a who's who of national unions. The Chairwoman is Pauline Worsfold, of the Canadian Nurses' Union; the Vice-Chair is Barb Byers, the Executive Vice President of the Canadian Labour Congress. A quick read of the directors show representations from a broad cross section of labour, including the United Steelworkers, PSAC, CUPE, to name just a few. So what about the $715 million figure that is so often referenced? First, it is not a fact but a projection, and in my judgment a highly questionable one. Projections are based on assumptions and estimates, and these can be easily manipulated depending on the methodology.
  • Stephen Campbell is a columnist and host of Voice of the Province on Roger's TV. He can be reached at telegraph.campbell@gmail.com
Govind Rao

Horrifying occurrences, infuriating acts - Infomart - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Sat Apr 18 2015
  • Did you and I pay for Dr. George Doodnaught's legal defence? This question echoed through my head as I sat this week in the near-empty hotel room that holds the sad public hearings on sexual assault and patients. They are sad both in content and attendance, but I'll get to that thought later.
  • Doodnaught was convicted of sexually assaulting 21 female patients and sentenced to 10 years in prison last year. He was an anesthesiologist at North York General Hospital who, once he'd put female patients into a semi-conscious state, stuck his penis or tongue in their slack mouths and reached under their hospital gowns to grope their breasts. Two of Doodnaught's victims spoke before the health minister's task force this week.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • They are appalled he's appealed the decision. The court case dragged on for 76 days, with top criminal defence lawyer Brian Greenspan cross-examining the victims and bringing in an expert witness from Britain to testify that false erotic fantasies are common under sedation. Would they have to go through all that again? A few hours after the women had left, Michael Decter took to the lonely lectern.
  • Decter was Ontario's deputy health minister back in the early '90s. He now chairs the board of Patients Canada, among other things. He raised a little known fact: the Ontario government pays about 80 per cent of our doctors' insurance fees. That insurance, delivered largely by the Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA), is what pays their legal costs - not just in malpractice cases but in criminal and civil cases involving "sexual impropriety matters" related to their professional work, according to the CMPA website. Last year alone, we taxpayers spent $165 million on refunding doctors for the bulk of their medical liability fees.
  • Neither the CMPA nor Greenspan would confirm that the insurer - therefore, you and I - paid for Doodnaught's criminal defence in this case. It is possible he dismissed the CMPA-appointed lawyer and hired Greenspan himself. But, in principal, his legal costs should have been covered. What makes this even worse, Decter pointed out, is that we Ontario taxpayers do not pay for legal representation of victims. Not one of the 21 women Doodnaught sexually assaulted was provided a lawyer for counsel or to cross-examine Doodnaught. They were all considered witnesses, called into the courtroom only to give testimony. Of course, there was the Crown attorney, but his job was to represent the state and not each individual victim. That's not just the case in criminal court.
  • It's also how it works in College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario disciplinary hearings, where most complaints of sexual assault by doctors are heard. The college does not provide victims their own lawyer. The last Ministry of Health-appointed task force on the sexual abuse of patients recommended this change and that victims be granted "full party" status at disciplinary hearings. Fifteen years later, neither recommendation has been implemented. "It's further victimization," Decter said. "This creates a spectacularly unlevel playing field. The government has to be held accountable for funding one side of the process and not funding the other. Why is there no support for patients?" We should be outraged by this! And I was. But there was no one else in the room for me to commiserate with besides one victim who had already testified and a handful of ministry staff.
  • The fact is: few people know about the hearings. Ontario Health Minister Eric Hoskins named the task force back in December. But the ministry didn't bother to put out advertisements until last week. By then, two hearings had already happened. The Ministry of Health named three people to the task force's panel. But one, former Court of Appeal chief justice Roy McMurtry, stepped down for health reasons before the first hearing took place in February and the ministry still hasn't replaced him. All this makes a person sitting in an empty room listening to horrifying occurrences and infuriating facts ask some cynical questions. Like, why would the government want the task force to fail? Catherine Porter can be reached at cporter@thestar.ca.
Govind Rao

Hospital, nursing home workers protest privatization - Infomart - 0 views

  • New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal Wed Aug 26 2015
  • miramichi * Wearing their now-familiar red shirts and clutching makeshift candles made of Tim Hortons cups and whatever else they could find, nearly 200 unionized workers, mostly from the city's two nursing homes and the Miramichi Regional Hospital, lined up along Water Street in Chatham Head Monday night to rally against further privatization in the public sector. The candlelight vigil was organized by Kevin Driscoll, the president of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) Local 865, which represents hospital staff in Miramichi.
  • Driscoll, who works as a nursing unit clerk at the Miramichi Regional Hospital, said that workers are growing more disenchanted by the day as the provincial government continues to give the private sector a greater role in its health care and senior care system. He said CUPE staff felt they had to do something to draw attention to these issues and, with the hospital serving as the backdrop as night fell on the city Monday night, everyone agreed that gathering on the side of the road by candlelight would help convey their message. "It shows that people here really care about the Miramichi and it's too bad that politicians don't care about it as much," Driscoll said. "They want to privatize the nursing homes, they want to cut to the Education Department, their cutting the highway budgets and they're cutting to every service they can think of, so where are we going to go? They don't seem to think that matters."
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • A number of other locals joined in on the demonstration, including representation from CUPE 1277 and 1256 of the Miramichi Senior Citizens Home and Mount St. Joseph Nursing Home, respectively, CUPE 1190, which acts on behalf New Brunswick's highway workers, the New Brunswick Federation of Labour and staff from Hebert's Recycling.
  • "If they privatize these services, then these corporations are going to come in and say 'you don't need all these people' ... we're going to cut because they're going to want to make at least a 20 per cent profit. Driscoll said the hospital is just one example of the trend toward the greater privatization of public services the union is seeing. Nursing home workers at Mount St. Joseph Nursing Home and the Miramichi Senior Citizens Home have been protesting at various points throughout the summer after learning the Department of Social Development would be using a private-public partnership (P3) model in building a new 280-bed nursing home that will replace both of the city's current facilities, which are run by a volunteer board of directors. Workers at both homes will have to reapply for positions at the new nursing home if that's what they choose to do and, with a private company running things, the membership has said it is concerned that those who do catch on at the new place could be subject to reduced pay and benefits.
  • The Liberal government, come the fall, is expected to have a deal in place that will see all hospital food and cleaning services being outsourced to a private firm. Government officials, including Health Minister Victor Boudreau have maintained that the changes are needed in order to help the province get its finances in order and will save the province millions of dollars through efficiencies that will be brought in under private management. Driscoll says those efficiencies, CUPE fears, are simply going to amount to job cuts at hospitals throughout the Horizon Health Network. The union learned from the province earlier in the summer that food and facilities management giants like Sodexo, Aramark and Compass Group are involved in the bidding process.
  • The government is expected to open up a request for proposals (RFP) in the coming weeks to begin the process of determining which proponent will build and operate what will likely be New Brunswick's largest nursing home by the time it opens. Currently, each of the three privately run nursing homes in the province are owned by Shannex. The unions have also warned that the move to a P3 model would lead to a reduction in the level of community outreach programming offered to local seniors through things like Meals on Wheels and adult daycare. Tourism Minister Bill Fraser, the Liberal Miramichi MLA who advocated heavily for the new nursing home to be built and the man at the centre of much of the unions' ire, has shot down those concerns in previous interviews. Fraser has reiterated that regardless of whichever proponent emerges with the right to build and manage the structure, the initiative represents a major upgrade in terms of nursing home infrastructure.
  • He said the standards of care are dictated by the province and will remain, at the very least, on par with what has existed at the two current nursing homes over the last several years. Programs like Meals on Wheels, adult daycare and lifeline, would remain in place and potentially even enhanced and in terms of jobs, he said there will be provisions written into the RFP asking that priority be given to local applicants and that with an increase of 26 beds, even more staff will likely be required. As for pay and benefits, he said staff at two of the three Shannex properties have already unionized and the third was in the process of doing that.
  • Nursing home staff have called on the province to force the boards at the Mount and the senior citizens home to amalgamate together and operate the new facility using a model similar to what was undertaken in Edmundston when two nursing home boards melded into one in order to operate the new $48 million, 180-bed Residence Jodin. Danny Legere, the president of CUPE New Brunswick, was on hand for the vigil and urged the Miramichi workers to keep up the fight. "I want to congratulate the people of the Miramichi for taking a stand - the fight that you have started is a fight for all New Brunswickers," Legere said. "The militancy that you are showing is exemplary and it has to be carried on from one end of the province from one end to the other."
  • Andy Hardy, a Miramichi native and the president of CUPE 1190, said his sector is used to certain services being contracted out to private interests but when it comes to health and senior care, he said it was "flat out wrong." "You're looking after the most vulnerable people in that building right there," Hardy said. "When you privatize the food services and the cleaning services all it is is for profit - the service goes down and the profit goes up, and for nursing homes as well." © 2015 Telegraph-Journal (New Brunswick)
Doug Allan

CUPE argues bill streaming health-care workers into 4 unions is unconstitutional | The ... - 2 views

  • The first day of arbitration hearings between Nova Scotia’s health-care unions and the provincial government opened with a final attempt by CUPE to prevent unions from being assigned to designated bargaining units.
  • Arguing on behalf of CUPE, which filed a charter of rights protest against Bill 1, the legislation that merges nine health authorities, Susan Coen told arbitrator Jim Dorsey that he has the power to consider other options.
  • Although a lawyer for the health associations portrayed this as unions calling for the status quo, Coen noted that the four unions (CUPE, Unifor, Nova Scotia Nurses’ Union and Nova Scotia Government & General Employees Union) reached consensus on the association model through a lot of effort.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • The NSGEU, which has called for all union members to vote on representation rather than slotting, argued LPNs should be able to vote on what bargaining unit they are placed with. The other three proposed bargaining units are health care, clerical and support staff.
Govind Rao

Does unilateral government action threaten the future of medicare? - Healthy Debate - 0 views

  • by Steven Barrett (Show all posts by Steven Barrett) February 4, 2015
  • Three years ago, I commented on the then new (2012) OMA and Government agreement. I expressed scepticism at the time that the Agreement would truly result in the freeze (and indeed savings) the Government asserted that it would, especially without a hard or soft cap on utilization growth. As it turns out, at least according to the Government, the savings did not materialize. Hence, the Government proposed, and is now purporting to impose a cap on overall expenditures (given that the tentative agreement providing for such a cap has now been rejected by the OMA).
  • But another feature of that 2012 agreement was a separate agreement in which the Government and the OMA agreed to a process for negotiating future Physician Services. Under this process, which applied for the first time to this most recent round of negotiations, there is a period of bilateral negotiation, followed by assistance from a “Facilitator” who can make confidential recommendations to the parties. Then, if the parties are still unable to resolve their differences, the process provides for a second step – a “neutral conciliator” – who, if the parties can still not reach agreement, is empowered to issue a written report with non-binding public recommendations for resolving any outstanding issues. However, the 2012 agreement did not contain a mechanism for resolving any remaining impasse, should the parties not be able to reach agreement following facilitation and conciliation. Rather, the parties agreed that the Government could move to unilateral implementation of its proposals once the facilitation and conciliation phases (including any public report and recommendations) were concluded.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • What I do want to bring attention to is whether the Government’s right to unilaterally implement compensation changes, including hard or soft expenditure caps and fee reductions, might ultimately undermine physician support for our single-tier publicly funded health care system.
1 - 20 of 30 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page