Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Group items tagged england

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Irene Jansen

Don't try this at home! Lessons from England of what not to do to your health care syst... - 1 views

  • the National Health Service, which for decades had management overhead costs of 5%
  • The additional costs of this market split in England have increased overheads to over 14% of NHS spending – an extra  £10 billion per year .
  •  In England Independent Sector Treatment Centres set up by Labour to create a new private sector provider network, charge an average 11.2% above the standard NHS cost. But they cherry-picked only the easiest cases  – leaving the rest to the NHS. And they were given generous 5-year contracts, which paid them for a fixed number of operations, regardless of how few patients chose to use the service.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • The first Foundations were set up from the wealthiest, most successful hospitals, and have accumulated surpluses of £2 billion – while NHS hospitals which are not foundations face mounting financial problems. Now ministers want to let them make unlimited money from private medicine, while funding for NHS patients is being sharply reduced.
  • the damage done to hospital cleaning standards by Margaret Thatcher’s government putting cleaning and other support services out to tender in the 1980s
  • Two decades later hospitals are still struggling with the rising tide of infections and hygiene problems caused.
  • 100 hospitals have been built since 1997 using the “private finance initiative”
  • Some early PFI hospitals have already paid back double the cost of the hospitals, but still have 15-20 years to pay. Many PFI hospitals are closing beds and wards in the new hospitals and sacking staff to cut costs: some need rescuing by government.
  • Now services in the English NHS could be opened up by the new government to competitive bids by “any qualified provider”. But the private sector will only bid for services where it is certain of a profit.
Irene Jansen

Shocking pay cuts and worsening conditions imposed on NHS staff without consultation - 0 views

  • A leaked version of the final draft of a Consortium consultation into pay and conditions for NHS Staff in the South West of England (here) shows that without any consultation, and despite the opposition of all 15 health Trade Union & professional bodies in England, the Department of Health have pushed on with imposed pay and conditions cuts for the NHS in the South West of England. As a matter of fact, these punitive measures will be rolled out across the northern and midland parts of England in time.
  • over and above the already 2 year pay freeze (to 1%) that has been suffered by NHS staff
  • 28,610 NHS Staff have been sacked with a projected total number of 72,000 NHS job losses on the way
Heather Farrow

Antibiotic resistant gonorrhoea increases in England | The BMJ - 0 views

  • BMJ 2016; 353 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2219 (Published 19 April 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;353:i2219
  • Jacqui Wise
  • Public Health England has warned that a strain of gonorrhoea that is resistant to the antibiotic azithromycin has now been found in the West Midlands and the south east, after first emerging in the north of England in November 2014.1Since September 2015, 11 cases of azithromycin resistant gonorrhoea have been confirmed in the West Midlands and the south of England. Five of the …
Heather Farrow

Tory plans for NHS privatization revealed | Physicians for a National Health Program - 0 views

  • By Alex Scott-SamuelThe BMJ, August 5, 2016
  • July 2016 saw the very quiet publication of two key documents charting the route to the privatisation of the NHS in England. Firstly, from NHS England, came Strengthening Financial Performance and Accountability in 2016-17. This is the latest set of instructions on the implementation of NHS chief executive Simon Stevens’s Five Year Forward View (5YFV). The 5YFV is increasingly coming to resemble one of Stalin’s Five Year Plans from the 1950s. As the new guidance makes clear, Stevens’s latest collectivisation strategy, the Sustainability and Transformation Plans (STPs), is being rigidly imposed across England.
Heather Farrow

Emergency departments in England report worst waiting times ever | The BMJ - 0 views

  • BMJ 2016; 352 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2179 (Published 15 April 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;352:i2179
  • Anne Gulland
  • Hospital trusts in England have reported their worst waiting times in accident and emergency departments since monthly data began to be collected.Figures published by NHS England on Thursday 14 April showed that 87.8% of patients were seen within four hours in all emergency departments in February: the worst performance since monthly data became available in August 2010. 1 The figure was below the target of 95% and lower than the 92% reached in the same month last year. This was the second month in a row that the proportion has been the lowest ever, with 88.7% …
Irene Jansen

Far more could be done to stop the deadly bacteria C. diff - USATODAY.com - 0 views

  • The bacteria is linked in hospital records to more than 30,000 deaths a year in the United States
  • William Jarvis, who spent 17 years heading the health care infection division at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "We know what to do (to lower rates). It's not rocket science. And we know the barrier is cost."
  • more than 9% of C. diff-related hospitalizations end in death — nearly five times the rate for other hospital stays
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • In England, the government requires hospitals to report all C. diff cases, underpinning a regulatory campaign that has slashed infections more than 50% since 2008. A new C. diff reporting rule for U.S. hospitals isn't scheduled to take effect until 2013.
  • England and other European countries also require health care institutions to have antibiotic control programs and meet targets for reducing C. diff. There are no such rules for U.S. facilities: The federal government doesn't track antibiotic use in hospitals, nursing homes and other care settings, and there is no penalty under Medicare and Medicaid for facilities that have high C. diff rates.
  • Thirty-four states now require hospitals to publicly report their rates of infections, but fewer than a quarter of those include C. diff
  • Reporting requirements for nursing homes are even less common.
  • Hospitals have cut housekeeping budgets up to 25% in recent years, according to the Association for the Healthcare Environment, an arm of the American Hospital Association. And the group's surveys show that many hospitals spend as little as 18 minutes cleaning a patient's room. That's well below the 25-30 minutes the group's studies have identified as optimal.
  • Other health care infections have been stemmed
  • Strategies to combat C. diff are more complicated and costly. Successful initiatives often require interdisciplinary teams.
  • Though infection control programs are shown to save facilities money in the long run, Jarvis, the former CDC infection control chief, says administrators often balk at the upfront investments because they worry about operating margins."Saving money is not the same as making money," he adds.
  • In a 2009 survey of 2,000 infection prevention specialists from U.S. hospitals, 41% said their facility had cut spending on infection control.
  • The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has begun reducing reimbursement to hospitals for care tied to certain health care infections it deems preventable, such as those related to catheter use. But C. diff is not on that list.
  • It's difficult to hold facilities accountable for C. diff because it can be impossible to know where a patient was infected
  • That hasn't been a roadblock in England, where hospitals must meet strict targets for reducing infection rates or face sanctions. In fiscal 2011-12 through March, the country had just 18,000 C. diff cases — 17% below the prior year.
Irene Jansen

NHS franchising: the toxic world of globalised healthcare is upon us | Allyson Pollock ... - 0 views

  • In 2012, parliament in England passed a law effectively ending the NHS by abolishing the 60-year duty on the government to secure and provide healthcare for all. From 2013, there will be no National Health Service in England, and tax funding will increasingly flow to global healthcare corporations. In contrast, Scotland and Wales will continue to have a publicly accountable national health service.
  • NHS hospitals and services are being sold off or incorporated; land and buildings are being turned over to bankers and equity investors. RBS, Assura, Serco and Carillion, to name but a few, are raking in billions in taxpayer funds for leasing out and part-operating PFI hospitals, community clinics and GP surgeries that we once owned.
  • The great NHS divestiture, which began in 1990 with the introduction of the internal market and accelerated under the PFI programme, now takes the form of franchising, management buyout and corporate takeovers of our public hospitals. Virgin has been awarded £630m to provide services to vulnerable people and children in Surrey and Devon. Circle has been given the franchise for NHS hospital Hinchingbrooke and is now struggling to contain its debts. London teaching hospitals are merging to give them greater leverage for borrowing and cuts.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Former NHS hospitals, free to generate half their income from private patients, will dedicate their staff and facilities to that end, making it impossible to monitor what is public and what people are paying for.
  • Billing, invoicing, marketing and advertising will add between 30% and 50% to costs compared with 6% in the former NHS bureaucracy.
  • some of HCA's American hospitals are under investigation for refusing care and performing unnecessary investigations and treatment, including cardiac surgery. A decade ago it paid the federal government $1.7bn to settle fraud charges, while former chief executive Rick Scott – now the Republican governor of Florida – managed to avoid prosecution.
  • Unitedhealth, which is currently providing services to the NHS, paid hundreds of millions of dollars in settlement of mischarging allegations in the US; Medtronic paid $23.5m for paying illegal kickbacks to physicians to induce them to implant the company's pacemakers and defibrillators; GlaxoSmithKline and Abbott paid $4.5bn in fines relating to improper marketing and coercion of physicians to prescribe antidepressants and antidementia drugs respectively. Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Eli Lilly have all paid large fines for regulatory breaches.
Irene Jansen

Four common meds send thousands of seniors to hospital - USATODAY.com - Jack's posterous - 0 views

  • Nearly half (48 percent) of the 100,000 hospitalizations occurred among adults 80 and up, according to the study, published in the Nov. 24 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. Nearly two-thirds (66 percent) were the result of unintentional overdoses.The four medications, used alone or together, most often cited:The blood thinning medication warfarin (Coumadin, Jantoven), which is used to treat blood clots, was involved in 33 percent of emergency hospitalizations.Insulin, used to control blood sugar in diabetes patients, was involved in 14 percent of cases.Antiplatelet drugs such as aspirin and clopidogrel (Plavix), which are used to prevent blood clots, were involved in 13 percent of cases.Oral hypoglycemic agents -- diabetes medications taken by mouth -- were involved in 11 percent of cases.With antiplatelet or blood thinning drugs, bleeding was the main problem. For insulin and other diabetes medications, about two-thirds of cases involved changes in mental status such as confusion, loss of consciousness or seizures.
Govind Rao

BMJ Group blogs: BMJ » Blog Archive » Sarah Gregory: What can we learn from h... - 0 views

  • by BMJ
  • 31 Mar, 14
  • England is not alone in facing the implications of an ageing population with changing patterns of illness. To inform the work of the independent commission on the future of health and social care in England, I have spent the past few months looking at how other countries are responding to these challenges. By comparison with other OECD countries, two features of the English system stand out. First, we have an unusually defined split between our health and social care systems. By comparison, many countries have developed a funding system for social care that complements their funding for health. For example, Germany, France, Korea, and Japan have all introduced insurance for social care to complement their systems of health insurance. Second, we are at the lower end of the range for public spending on social care, although it is difficult to establish direct comparisons as we do not report on social care funding to the OECD. The UK spent 1.2 per cent of GDP on long term care in 2012/13, while the highest figure reported to the OECD was 3.7 per cent (in the Netherlands).
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Sarah Gregory is a researcher in health policy at The King’s Fund.
Govind Rao

Private firm gets £400m contract to run NHS administrative services in Englan... - 0 views

  • 2015; 350 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3421 (Published 23 June 2015) Cite this as: 2015;350:h3421
  • Zosia Kmietowicz
  • Capita, one of the biggest outsourcing companies in the United Kingdom, has been announced as the “preferred provider” of a £400m (€560m; $630m) contract to provide back-office administrative support services to the NHS in England.Anglian Community Enterprise, a social enterprise that currently provides community services in northeast Essex, supported Capita’s bid and will act as a “subcontractor” to the company, NHS England has said.The contract is for primary care support services, including the management of medical records, prescription payments, and administrative support to GPs, dentists, opticians, and pharmacists.The contract will run for 7-10 …
Govind Rao

State funding of elderly care in England has fallen by 40% in five years | The BMJ - 0 views

  • 2015; 350 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3253 (Published 12 June 2015) Cite this as: 2015;350:h3253
  • Caroline White
  • England has seen an “unprecedented” fall over the past five years in the number of people aged 65 or over who receive social care packages, despite a rise in the need for such services, delegates to a seminar on the care of older people heard on 9 June.Speaking at the Westminster Health Forum’s keynote seminar on improving care for older people in London, José-Luis Fernández, principal research fellow and deputy director of the Personal Social Services Research Unit at the London School of Economics and Political Science, said that care packages funded by local authorities in England for people aged 65 or over had plummeted since 2009-10.“There has been a very steep decrease in the absolute numbers of people receiving services over the past five years,” he said. “When you control for the demographic effect, where more people are in …
Irene Jansen

Allyson Pollock, David Price and Louisa Harding-Edgar January 2013 Briefing paper - the... - 1 views

  • The democratic and legal basis for the NHS in England was abolished by the Health and Social Care Act 2012. The impact of this fundamental change is already being felt, ahead of the shift to the new market system in April 2013.  
  • The Act ended the Secretary of State’s duty to secure or provide health services throughout the country, a duty that had been in force since 1948.
  • The Act breaks up the universal system that has served us for over sixty years, and reduces the NHS to a stream of taxpayer funds and a logo for the use of a range of public and corporate providers of services.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • This briefing explains what the government is doing and why an urgent bill to reinstate the NHS in England is required. 
Irene Jansen

Briefing paper - the NHS reinstatement bill | openDemocracy - 0 views

  • The democratic and legal basis for the NHS in England was abolished by the Health and Social Care Act 2012. The impact of this fundamental change is already being felt, ahead of the shift to the new market system in April 2013. 
  • The Act ended the Secretary of State’s duty to secure or provide health services throughout the country, a duty that had been in force since 1948.
  • This briefing explains what the government is doing and why an urgent bill to reinstate the NHS in England is required. 
Doug Allan

Ontario hospitals: Time to move into the 21st century - The Globe and Mail - 1 views

  • Ontario pays for most of its hospital care using the same global budget “lump sum” approach it has used since the late 1960s. Meanwhile, the rest of the industrialized world has spent the last thirty years moving to funding models that pay hospitals based on the types and quantities of patients they treat. Forward-thinking countries are already shifting to the next generation in health care funding: paying for care that stretches beyond the walls of the hospital.
  • These sorts of issues have pushed countries like Sweden and England to move from global budgets to a per-patient funding approach that pays hospitals through fixed prices for each type of patient based on the complexity of treatment required. Per-patient funding motivates hospitals to treat each case more efficiently and to increase the number of cases they treat in order to increase their revenue.Under this approach, hospitals begin to admit more patients and discharge them more quickly. More patients are treated for the same number of beds.
  • Elsewhere, countries that have used per-patient funding for years, like the United States and England, are now wondering if it’s time to move on. Traditional hospital-focused patient funding does a good job of buying more surgeries, but it doesn't do much to address the challenge of co-ordinating care across health care providers.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Ontario faces a tough challenge ahead: do they expand traditional hospital-focused per-patient funding to try and reduce stubborn wait lists?
  • By introducing per-patient funding approaches that also integrate payments across hospitals, physicians and community care providers, Ontario can begin to tackle the triple challenge of access, cost and quality rather than passing the buck from one health care sector to the other.
Irene Jansen

Too much is spent on older people's healthcare and too little on their social care, MPs... - 0 views

  • The respected economist Andrew Dilnot, chairman of the Commission on Funding of Care and Support—the body that recently reviewed the funding system for care and support in England—emphasised that the current system was in dire need of an overhaul
  • The Dilnot inquiry, which reported in July (BMJ 2011;343:d4261, doi:10.1136/bmj.d4261), recommended a cap on individuals’ personal contributions to the costs of social care of around £35 000 (€41 000; $55 000) over their lifetime. When that cap was reached, people would be eligible for full state support.
  • At the moment, the means tested threshold at which point people are required to fund the full costs of their care is £23 250, but the commission recommends increasing this to £100 000.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Mr Dilnot said that the imbalance in the amounts of public money currently spent on social care for older people in England (around £8bn a year) and on healthcare (£50bn) was wrong
  • There is a barrier because of the way the systems work at the moment: the lack of pooled budgets
  • we are not looking after the market as a whole, we are not getting the diversity and choice that we should expect, and we are not even always giving the right level of sustained support to those who are delivering the care. It is bust in every dimension.
  • anticipated white paper on social care next April
  • The inquiry continues.
Irene Jansen

MPs are urged to end inaction on social care reform | BMJ - 0 views

  • A coalition of experts has called on politicians of all parties to agree urgent reforms of adult social care in England
  • have written to the Daily Telegraph urging “fundamental and lasting reform” of a system that they say harms society, the economy, and the dignity of elderly and disabled people (http://tgr.ph/tIkRRk).
  • The signatories warn that an estimated 800 000 elderly people are being left without basic care and as a result are “lonely, isolated and at risk.” Others face losing their homes and savings because of soaring care bills, while disabled people are deprived of the support they need to live independently.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Signatories to the letter include Hamish Meldrum, chairman of the British Medical Association, Brendan Barber, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, and representatives of the British Red Cross and leading health insurers.
  • The current coalition government is expected to produce a white paper on social care by April in response to recommendations from the independent Dilnot commission into the funding of care and support, published in July 2011 (BMJ 2011;343:d4261, doi:10.1136/bmj.d4261).
  • Andrew Dilnot, an economist, recommended a new partnership model under which people would pay up to a maximum £35 000 (€42 000; $55 000) towards the cost of their care and be eligible for full state support beyond that.
  • He has since said that the country’s economic woes should not be an excuse for inaction and argued that it was “nonsense” for anyone to suggest that reform would be too expensive to implement (BMJ 2011;343:d7689, 28 Nov, doi:10.1136/bmj.d7689).
Irene Jansen

Minimum safe staffing levels may be set for emergency departments and elderly care ward... - 0 views

  • The public inquiry into the high number of deaths at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust is expected to recommend that minimum staffing ratios be set for total numbers and the skills mix of doctors and nurses in accident and emergency and elderly care wards in England to ensure the safety of care.
  • counsel to the inquiry, Tom Kark QC, said “that consideration should be given to the production of model staffing guidelines for certain types of wards and departments against which the Care Quality Commission should assess the acceptability of staffing.”
  • Mr Kark pointed out that the real danger in accident and emergency services at Mid Staffordshire was understaffing, inadequate training, and poor governance.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Brian Jarman, director of the Dr Foster Unit at Imperial College London, told the inquiry that hospitals with poor staff ratios had higher hospital standardised mortality ratios.
  • more doctors per bed
  • the Care Quality Commission made it clear that it does not want to see minimum staffing ratios
  • Mr Kark said that although he recognised that the number of patients on some wards often changed, making the setting of minimum staffing ratios a complex business, certain wards were less susceptible to such change and would benefit from some guidance, particularly elderly care wards and accident and emergency departments.
  • guidelines are merely that and one-off failure to comply would be unlikely to attract disproportionate attention from the regulator
Irene Jansen

BBC News - Plans for NHS in England an unholy mess, say journals - 0 views

  • Changes to the NHS in England have created an "unholy mess", the editors of three leading journals have said.
  • suggests an independent commission be set up to oversee changes in the future
  • the major NHS unions have called for the bill underpinning the changes to be scrapped
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Last week the medical royal colleges, which set standards in the NHS, nearly joined them in opposing the plans, before deciding against the move following last-minute pleas by ministers.
  • if the bill completes its passage through Parliament in the coming months the new system will go live in April 2013.
  • Under the plans, groups of GPs will take charge of much of the NHS budget from managers working for primary care trusts, while more competition with the private sector will be encouraged.
Irene Jansen

Competition-Based Reform of the National Health Service in England: A One-Way Street? b... - 0 views

  • The Conservative-led government in the United Kingdom is embarking on massive changes to the National Health Service in England. These changes will create a competitive market in both purchasing and provision. Although the opposition Labour Party has stated its intention to repeal the legislation when it regains power, this may be difficult because of provisions of competition law derived from international treaties. Yet there is an alternative, illustrated by the decision of the devolved Scottish government to rejectcompetitive markets in health care.
CPAS RECHERCHE

NHS: Hospital Corporation of America that donates to Tories handed huge contract - Mirr... - 0 views

  • By Andy Lines 15 Comments Controversial American health firm that donates to Tories handed huge NHS contract 3 Sep 2013 00:00 It is already at the centre of a massive row after being accused of overcharging the NHS by millions of pounds in a damning report // Vital skill; Brain surgeon at work Getty A contract to treat NHS patients with brain tumours has been awarded to a controversial American healthcare firm that is a donor to the Tory party.
  • Hospital Corporation of America
  • HCA has given the Tories at least £17,000 since they came to power.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • Labour MPs are particularly angry because London’s University College Hospital – one of the best NHS brain treatment centres in the country – has been told to stop treating brain cancer patients and send them to HCA.
  • Patients who were being treated there have been told to move to Barts. NHS England have told UCHL that they won’t pay for any more NHS patients to be treated there because they’ve signed a contract with two private hospitals – one of which is HCA
  • HCA has a chequered history in the US and has been fined more than $1billion for mis-selling healthcare.
  • A senior hospital source told the Mirror: “The radiotherapy community is very concerned about the way NHS England is handing out contracts for NHS patients.
  • HCA is already at the centre of a massive row after being accused of overcharging the NHS by millions of pounds in a damning report released last week.
  • HCA, along with two other private hospital groups, was at the centre of a scathing report from the Competition Commission last week which showed that between 2009 and 2011 they overcharged by up to £193million
1 - 20 of 79 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page