Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Group items tagged diagnostics

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Govind Rao

User fees threatened for patients across Canada if court challenge negotiations fail to... - 0 views

  • Canada Newswire Mon Sep 29 2014
  • TORONTO, Sept. 29, 2014 /CNW/ - As Ontario's new Health Minister Dr. Eric Hoskins sits down with provincial and territorial Health Ministers for their fall meeting this week, experts and patient advocates hope that he'll carry a strong message. Across Canada advocates are calling on the B.C. Health Minister to hang tough on the Medicare court challenge which threatens open season on patient user fees for surgeries, diagnostics and other procedures. The case was scheduled to begin on September 8, but lawyers for both Brian Day, owner of one of the largest private clinics in Canada, and the B.C. government asked the court for a delay in order to negotiate a settlement. Negotiations are now happening behind closed doors and the court date is delayed until March 2015.
  • Following a provincial audit in 2012 which revealed that Day was charging hundreds of thousands of dollars in unlawful user fees to patients, Day filed a Charter Challenge to nullify the laws that he was violating. His case aims to bring down the laws that protect single-tier Medicare and forbid clinics like his from extra-billing patients and charging user fees for care that currently must be provided without charge under the public health care system. The litigation has far-reaching implications for the entire country. Day's clinics were first exposed by patients who complained they were unlawfully billed for medical procedures. The B.C. government responded by trying to audit the clinics. Day refused to let in auditors until forced by a court order, and even then the clinics did not fully comply with auditors. Auditors had access to only a portion of the clinics' billings and only one month's worth of data. Nevertheless, what they found was astonishing. In a period of about 30 days, patients were subject to almost half a million dollars in user charges. The five patients who brought the initial legal petition have had their trial delayed while Day's Charter Challenge to the laws upholding single-tier Medicare is heard. They are still waiting for redress.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • "In order to protect patients, the B.C. government must hold private clinic owners and operators accountable when they break the laws prohibiting extra-billing and user fees," said lawyer Steven Shrybman, a partner at Sack Goldblatt Mitchell who is acting for the B.C. Health Coalition and Canadian Doctors for Medicare, intervenors in the court challenge. Shrybman is well-known for his successful Supreme Court challenge against Ontario's attempted sale of Hydro One and the recent election fraud cases in Federal Court. "Though the challenge was launched in British Columbia, it has the potential to bring two-tier care to Canadians across the country," he warned. "Advocates of public health care from Ontario and across the country are calling on the B.C. government to take a tough stand in these negotiations. These are the laws that uphold Medicare and defend patients," said Dr. Ryan Meili, Vice-Chair of Canadian Doctors for Medicare. "A simple slap on the wrist encourages more violations in provinces from coast to coast."
  • The problem is already creeping into Ontario, according to Natalie Mehra, executive director of the Ontario Health Coalition, where the government is proposing to expand private clinics. "Patients are being confused by private clinic operators who are manipulating them into paying thousands of dollars for health care services that they have already paid for in their taxes," she warned. "The public should know that you cannot be charged by a doctor or private clinic operator for surgery, diagnostic tests or any other medically necessary hospital or physician service. Extra user fees charged to sick and elderly patients are unlawful and immoral and governments should be delivering that message." Advocates warned that this court case should also raise alarm bells in Ontario's government about the dangers of private clinics. At risk is our public health system in which access to health care is based on need, not wealth. SOURCE Ontario Health Coalition
Govind Rao

What will the "sharing economy" mean for health care? - Healthy Debate - 0 views

  • by Will Falk (Show all posts by Will Falk) May 27, 2015
  • This is the “sharing economy”.
  • An under-appreciated feature of the return of sharing, however, is the impact on government— not only as regulator, but also as a deliverer of public services. Though a strict definition of the sharing economy does not translate perfectly into publicly provided programming, its key principles— creating trust through feedback, community collaboration, scheduling efficiency, asset optimization, and payment settlement— are well-suited to entrepreneurialism in public sector delivery models, including in healthcare.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • One early indicator is the resurrection of the house call.
  • Now, there is a mass of mobile app developers swarming to revitalize this home-based care model. Pager, for example, is the brainchild of sharing economy pioneer and Uber co-founder Oscar Salazar. It markets itself as allowing users to see a doctor within two hours in the patient’s home, office, or hotel room. Companies like @mendathome, @HealApp, @medicast, and firstlineapp.com deliver similar services and are creating access and price competition.
  • In 2014, Uber delivered free nurse-administered flu shots to customers in Boston, New York, and Washington. Another company is seeking to enable hospitals to easily rent-out their bulky and unused medical equipment or, conversely, temporality access specialized equipment quickly and without the sizeable expense of purchasing.
  • As decentralization takes hold and more care moves from institutions and medical offices into the home, how will we deal with our overbuilt capacity? 
  • Sharing economy models of diagnostics are emerging both for clinicians and for their patients.  Figure1 is a Toronto mobile health start-up and peer to peer network that has created an “Instagram for doctors”, allowing medical professionals to seek input on complex cases by posting relevant images and information. And well established websites like CureTogether.com and PatientsLikeMe.com have fostered a peer coaching culture that lets patients share stories of treatment regimes and generate real-time research networks.
  • More recently, @Crowdmed has launched a crowd-sourced diagnostic service that uses “medical detectives” to better characterize rare and complex conditions.
  • How long will it take before hospitals start leveraging their idle operating room and facility hours to generate revenues and improve the timeliness and quality of procedures (AirOR)? We can already request a personal support worker or registered nurse through start-up services like eAdvocate and myPSW. We should expect established providers to emulate these start-ups, just as the traditional taxicab companies have started to emulate Uber. CCACs, for example, may use sharing economy-like services to match patient needs with clinicians and patient support workers.
  • allows for the home to become the site of much more care.
  • Can we trust clinical professionals to self-organize within their scopes of practice?
  • Will Falk is the Managing Partner – Health Industries at PwC Canada, an Executive Fellow at the Mowat Centre and an Adjunct Professor at the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. Follow Will on Twitter @willfalk
Govind Rao

More budget pain for hospitals; Quebec orders them to cut $150M in 'unnecessary' tests ... - 0 views

  • Montreal Gazette Wed Jul 29 2015
  • The Quebec government is ordering hospitals and other health facilities to slash $150 million from their budgets for medical tests, imaging scans and procedures to patients that it has judged are not "pertinent to care," the Montreal Gazette has learned. In total, the Health Department is aiming to chop $583 million in spending through so-called optimization measures. And in a bizarre twist, the government has decided that it won't provide hospitals funding for next year's leap year day, Feb. 29, which will fall on a Monday, saving it $64 million.
  • t's up to hospitals to cover the shortfall on that day out of their own already diminished budgets. One of the biggest cutbacks will take place at the McGill University Health Centre, which last year was forced to cut $50 million from its budget. It must now reduce its spending by an extra $21 million. Of all the "optimization measures," the most controversial is compelling doctors to stop ordering tests the government now considers "unnecessary" in the context of austerity. Patient-rights advocates and managers in the health system are warning that this sets a dangerous precedent, opening the door to ageism and the prospect of clinicians no longer performing tests for people above a certain age. Reducing the number of tests in the public system could also result in an increase in the number of tests in private clinics. Health minister Gaétan Barrette has said he plans to propose legislation in August that would permit private clinics to start charging patients fees for some tests and procedures that would otherwise be covered under medicare in the public system.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • Paul Brunet, president of the Conseil pour la protection des malades, expressed concern about the potential unintended consequences of the government's costcutting measures. "Oh yeah, certainly patient care will suffer," Brunet said. "Longterm care facilities are going to take most of the hit. We know that." Some institutions, however, have signalled to the government that they won't cut the number of medical tests. "At this stage, it's out of the question to re-evaluate the pertinence of medical tests for patients," said Joëlle Lachapelle, a spokesperson for the Centre hospitalier de l'université de Montreal.
  • (A standard complete blood count test, for example, costs a hospital $5.77, while a private clinic will charge more than $60 for it. Private insurance would cover most, if not all, of the latter fee.) The CHUM must cut $15.4 million in its 2015-2016 budget, and of that sum, $11.3 million is supposed to come from an optimization measure called "pertinence of care and physical health services." Lachapelle said the CHUM will focus on reducing overtime rather than cutting the number of tests and procedures. Joanne Beauvais, Barrette's press attaché, denied that the government is pressuring hospitals to cut patient care.
  • "We are not cutting funding for care, but implementing measures to help clinical professionals provide better care by foregoing tests and procedures that are expensive and shown not to result in either improved recovery or better diagnostics," Beauvais responded in an email. "We expect the progress we will be making over the next year to yield recurrent savings of $150 million." The $583 million in "optimization" savings breaks down as follows Cutting $220 million in payroll costs by abolishing 1,300 management positions. Avoiding "unnecessary" (Beauvais's word) tests and procedures, saving $150 million. Not funding leap year day: $64 million.
  • Persuading hospitals to team up in buying goods and services to save $35 million. Additional "compressions" that are unspecified: $114 million. The CHUM will have to cut through attrition 15 managers out of 337. The MUHC, in contrast, will have to cut more than 100 managers out of 459. A cloud of fear and anxiety has descended over the managerial ranks at both the CHUM and MUHC. Ian Popple, a spokesperson for the MUHC, said the reduction in the number of managers will be carried out over three years. "Part of the reduction will be done by attrition as managers leave or retire," he explained. "Other reductions will have to occur by transforming some manager positions into professional-level positions (that pay less) in order to meet the ministry target. We are looking at every option, but there remains a shortfall that is requiring ongoing work to address."
  • Beauvais dismissed the notion that the government is actually making cuts: "These are not cuts. Quebec cannot afford the kind of growth rate in health-care spending we experienced over the past decades, and the system is clearly able to do more with less. The best-performing teams in the network prove it. Since the health-care budget keeps growing, those measures are not cuts. They are a strong inducement to everyone in the system to improve their game." Quebec has budgeted $32.8 billion this fiscal year on health care, an increase of 1.4 per cent, but less than the 5-per-cent annual hikes of previous years. aderfel@montrealgazette.com twitter.com/Aaron_Derfel
  • The McGill University Health Centre has not yet figured out where it will have to cut to make up the $2.5-million leap-year day shortfall. • VINCENZO D'ALTO, MONTREAL GAZETTE FILES / Of all the "optimization measures" that Quebec is imposing, the most controversial is compelling doctors to stop ordering tests that the government is now considering "unnecessary."
Govind Rao

Private MRIs wrong prescription - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Leader-Post (Regina) Mon Oct 26 2015
  • In the final sitting of the legislature before the spring election, Premier Brad Wall's government plans to pass Bill 179 to facilitate private user-pay MRIs in Saskatchewan. As a longtime family doctor, I see this as a cynical political move that caters to public fears about long wait lists for imaging, but which will actually work to make things worse for patients who truly need an MRI.
  • There is very clear evidence that, far from relieving pressures in the public system, offering a separate stream for the wealthy to jump the queue actually lengthens public wait lists. This has been shown over and over again, whether it be with cataract surgery, diagnostic imaging or surgical procedures. MRI is no different.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • In Alberta, where private MRI facilities advertise and operate, the median wait time for an MRI is much longer (80 days) than in Saskatchewan (28 days). Furthermore, the wait has lengthened in the public system in Alberta since privatized facilities came on the scene. The explanations are complex, but siphoning human capacity (doctors and technologists), as well as other resources, from the public system into the private and more lucrative stream plays a big role. So does the market generation of increased demand by deceptive advertising and promotion of privatized services.
  • Medical tests should be ordered in accordance with evidence-based guidelines about their usefulness and indications. Patient access to MRI is currently prioritized in Saskatchewan health-care facilities on the basis of medical need, from Level I (a life-threatening diagnosis or treatment requiring MRI within 24 hours) to a Level IV (stable patients needing long range diagnosis or management allowing for delay of 30-90 days).
  • This system works and prioritizes appropriately. While patients sometimes feel that an urgent MRI will make a difference to their outcome, this is rarely the case. When it is the case, patients are prioritized and get urgent access. Allowing private MRI's based on ability to pay and jump the queue will trample this well-developed, equitable system. It will allow the wealthy or anxious to bypass this system and result in two-tiered care.
  • We live in a society obsessed with health. Selling fear of sickness is profitable. But access to MRIs is not our most urgent health-care need. To suggest otherwise is to obscure the social and economic determinants that define who is healthy and who is not, and to further shift resources away from the sick towards the worried well.
  • The Wall government and the private MRI operators that will profit from this legislation have proposed a two-for-one deal, suggesting that one public MRI scan will be done for every private MRI performed. Don't be fooled. This will not get around the problem of prolonging public wait lists since it will siphon resources from the public system. If we really need more MRIs, why not increase capacity in the public system instead?
  • While MRI can be a useful tool, when inappropriately used it can lead to overdiagnosis or "false positives." This then triggers a costly cascade of subsequent investigations or interventions to reassure either physician or patient MRI technology has important limitations, and frequently finds unrelated non-significant abnormalities that frighten patients. For example, 90 per cent of healthy individuals over 60 years of age with no symptoms of back pain show degenerative abnormalities on MRI. Similarly, the vast majority of adults over 50 show knee damage on MRI and only clinical assessment by a doctor identifies whether or not these findings are significant. Early MRI has not been shown to improve outcomes in low back pain and may actually make for worse outcomes. A doctor examining for red flag symptoms can identify the very small number of patients for whom an MRI is useful.
  • Many MRI scans are therefore unnecessary. Allowing patients to purchase an investigation they don't need wastes resources, bypasses the role of an informed health-care provider, and may in the end actually harm patients with needless investigations and interventions. Physicians are engaged in initiatives to "choose wisely" in testing. Throwing the door open to investigations based on ability to pay, rather than medical need, flies in the face of sensible approaches to health resources.
  • And the queue-jumping is not just limited to getting an MRI. It will extend to preferential and quicker access to treatment options, such as specialist care and surgery based on the MRI results if positive.
  • Let's promote greater equity, not less, and preserve health care based on need, not two-tiered care based on ability to pay. Let's trust health-care providers to counsel patients about the right test at the right time and to prioritize patients appropriately. The marketplace has no role in these decisions.
  • Dr. Sally Mahood is a Regina family doctor and an associate professor, Family Medicine, University of Saskatchewan.
Irene Jansen

M. McGregor and D. Martin. 2012. Testing 1, 2, 3. Is overtesting undermining patient an... - 0 views

  • the guideline committees that make recommendations do not appear to consider cost-effectiveness, opportunity costs, and the potential harms of decisions to broaden screening guidelines
  • Not only are we screening with widespread laboratory testing at younger ages, but our definition of disease is also shifting.
  • In BC, there has been a 13.9% increase per year in treatment rates for 8 chronic diseases, beyond what would be expected for the changing demographic characteristics of the population
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • Either British Columbians are rapidly becoming much sicker, or this increase in prevalence is a reflection of what Welch and colleagues describe as “looking harder” and “changing the rules.”
  • about one-third of the increasing cost of testing is related to physician adherence to guidelines
  • patients now often request particular tests
  • Earlier diagnoses and more aggressive treatments appeal to our self-definition as fighters of illness—and we all shudder at the successful lawsuit against the physician who did not screen
  • we use them as therapy of a sort, giving hope to the patient that we will find an explanation for the symptoms instead of admitting that we do not know and might never know the exact cause of the problem
  • At the highest level, there needs to be a broader evaluation of guidelines. Such evaluation needs to have representation from policy thinkers and health economists in addition to family doctors, other specialists, patients, and the public.
  • the opportunity costs of deciding to implement widespread laboratory testing for healthy people, compared with adopting population-based policies, such as 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week access to community recreation facilities and social housing, or free access to smoking cessation supports, should be debated.
  • Tests and repeat tests that are deemed to be of less benefit or not worth the opportunity-cost trade-off should be delisted.
Irene Jansen

Medical tests at private clinics raise 'concern' for equal access, inquiry told - 1 views

  • A public inquiry looking into the issue of queue-jumping in Alberta's health-care system got underway Monday with testimony from a health law expert, who suggested the availability of diagnostic tests at private clinics poses a concern to the principle of equality of access.William Lahey, a professor at Dalhousie University in Halifax
  • Section 3 of the Alberta Health Care Protection Act deals with queue-jumping by making it illegal to accept money or a service to provide priority access to an insured medical service.
  • The commission's lead counsel, Michele Hollins, described the testimony from Lahey and health consultant Jim Saunders as a way to "set the scene" before actual witness testimony begins Tuesday.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • "Alberta's private clinics do not offer as extensive a range of user-pay surgical interventions as the private clinics in some other provinces, particularly British Columbia and Ontario," said a report prepared by Saunders
Irene Jansen

Shilling for private health care - thestar.com - 0 views

  • Some hospital procedures are paid by OHIP. Most are paid out of global budgets. Each and every procedure is paid for by OHIP in a private clinic — an incentive to do more than medically necessary.
  • government pays about 50 per cent more to have tests done in the private sector than in a hospital according to a 2008 consultants report.
  • Last year Ontario hospitals were being allocated $260 per hour to perform MRIs. Hospitals do an average of 1.5 MRIs per hour. Canada Diagnostics, a private for-profit MRI company that operates clinics in British Columbia, Alberta and Quebec, states on its website that it charges between $900 and $1,600 for an MRI.
Irene Jansen

Public inquiry probes Calgary cancer screening clinic: Steward | Toronto Star - 0 views

  • a public inquiry into queue jumping in the public health-care system reveals all sorts of interesting data about a state-of-the-art colon cancer screening clinic associated with the University of Calgary’s medical school.
  • patients who were clients of a boutique private clinic, a privilege for which they paid $10,000 a year, were booked for screening colonoscopies almost instantaneously. Other patients usually waited two to three years for the widely promoted procedure.
  • In his book Seeking Sickness, Alan Cassels of the University of Victoria points out that colon cancer screening by stool sample or colonoscopy only reduces deaths from 8.83 per thousand to 5.88 per thousand, or about 3 per thousand.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • “It seems to be preferential access for well people while the sick suffer,” says Wendy Armstrong, a researcher with the Consumer Association of Alberta, which has intervenor status at the public hearings.
  • it performs 18,000 colonoscopies a year
  • The clinic was established after two wealthy Calgarians — John Forzani and Keith MacPhail — donated $2.7 million for pricey technology, the U of C donated some space in a brand-new building, and the health region (medicare in other words) committed to $70 million worth of funding.
  • Billed as the largest colonoscopy clinic in Canada, it boasts six pre-assessment rooms, six endoscopy rooms, 24 recovery beds and is staffed by 55 health professionals.
  • Alberta Health Services now covers the entire cost of the Forzani-Macphail Colon Cancer Screening Centre
Irene Jansen

Health ministers mull more home care | The Chronicle Herald - 0 views

  • TORONTO — Provinces and territories will likely have to expand home care as a way to deal with the demographic deluge of aging Canadians, two premiers said Friday during a gathering of provincial health ministers.
  • Provinces and territories will likely have to expand home care as a way to deal with the demographic deluge of aging Canadians, two premiers said Friday during a gathering of provincial health ministers.
  • An aging population was at the top of the working group’s agenda as a major concern because it’s consuming more health-care dollars, said P.E.I. Premier Robert Ghiz.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • There aren’t enough nursing home beds to accommodate the surge of seniors needing care, so home care may be the solution, said Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall.
  • The working group, which Ghiz and Wall both lead, is also making progress on lowering the cost of prescription drugs, they said.
  • Several provinces and territories reached a deal in January to team up when purchasing six widely used generic drugs, which will collectively save them about $100 million a year, Wall said.
  • They’re also looking at brand-name drugs and will have more to say about it in July at the Council of the Federation meeting in Niagara-on-the-Lake
  • The provinces have agreements for seven brand-name drugs and they’re negotiating prices for 13 others, said Ontario Health Minister Deb Matthews.
    • Irene Jansen
       
      bulk purchasing agreement among the provinces covering 27 prescription drugs. There are approximately 6500 prescription drugs on the Canadian market, with about 80 new drugs coming on to the market each year. So only about 6475 drugs to go - this year. CF
  • The working group also talked about “appropriateness of care” — ways to make the health-care system more efficient and cut down on soaring costs. “The radiologists in this country have said 10 to 20 per cent of diagnostic imaging is probably not required,” Wall said.
  • There might be other suggestions from providers, in terms of cataracts
Doug Allan

Staff protest layoffs - Infomart - 0 views

  • The 58-year-old was one of more than 31 registered practical nurses and several registered nurses affected by the cutbacks.
  • The hospital are dealing with a $14-million deficit and must balance its books by 2014.
  • Sue McIntyre, president of CUPE Local 139, said non-nursing staff could be next.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • North Bay Regional Health Centre prepares to cut $12 million from its budget by March 2014. Diagnostic clinics and labs are under threat of privatization and mental health services that have served this community since 1957 are under siege."
  • We still don't understand how the hospital can cut more than $1 million a month without hurting patient services," she said.
  • The postcards read Stop the Cuts to North Bay Regional Health Centre."
  • There will be a number of years of flat funding," he said.
  • When asked if non-nursing positions are being looked at next, Smits said, we're having to take a look at the entire organization."
  •  
    Nursing cuts part of $14 million in cutbacks
Irene Jansen

Groups call for blanket coverage for medical imaging (Montreal Gazette) - 1 views

  • However, Quebec radiologists are against universal coverage for the tests.
    • Irene Jansen
       
      Interesting, MQRP (CDM partner) is calling for public subsidies for medical imaging in private clinics while Quebec radiologists want more investment in hospitals. Explanation?
  • Patients should have access based on their health needs, not their financial means, Alain Vadeboncoeur, head of Quebec Doctors for Medicare (Médecins québécois pour le régime public)
  • the wait times for ultrasounds, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT scans can be as long as two years in hospitals, while the same services are available in less than 24 hours in private clinics. For patients without private insurance, MRIs done outside of a hospital can cost between $700 and $1,000.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Four health associations representing Quebec doctors and medical students are demanding the province cover medical imaging done in private clinics.
  • “We propose (the government) invest this money in the public network to make it more productive so more tests are done with existing resources. Start by maximizing the use of equipment in hospitals, which are often limited due to chronic underfunding,” association president Frédéric Desjardins said in a statement.
  • Quebec Health Minister Réjean Hébert said he is open to extending coverage, in particular for ultrasounds.
Govind Rao

Skateboarders scare as they show off skills ; Don't accept Trenton hospital cutbacks: c... - 0 views

  • The Peterborough Examiner Mon Oct 19 2015
  • QUINTE WEST -Natalie Mehra was blunt with her assessment of the proposed cost-cutting measures facing Trenton Memorial Hospital. On a scale of one to ten, Mehra rated the severity of cuts at nine. "They are setting the ground work for the demise of the hospital. There will be no future in it," said the executive director of the Ontario Health Coalition. But the Coalition wants Quinte West and Brighton to keep fighting back, even harder than in previous years. "I am a bit worried because people get tired of fighting back. But our (the Coalition) message is that when you push back hard enough we can often win. Every community should be demanding long term stability when it comes to their hospitals. The bottom line is there should be a basket of good services available in every hospital," said Mehra.
  • The Coalition and Our TMH are planning a massive day of protest set for Friday, Nov. 13 at Trenton's Centennial Park beginning at 12- noon. Mehra said the protest will include the involvement from people from across eastern Ontario from Perth to Brockville and west to Quinte West and the Peterborough region. "We're asking community volunteers, residents, nurses, and medical staff to be there. It's extremely important," said Mehra. Trenton Memorial isn't the only small hospital that's being hit.
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • "Hospitals across the Southeast LHIN face a devastating restructuring plan that's all about cuts and centralizing services," said Mehra. Mehra described relocating complex continuing care beds to TMH as nothing more than a smokescreen. Retaining cataract surgery at TMH is also misleading. "The plan is to elimin
  • ate cataract surgeries at hospitals and move the service to private clinics," she same. The same goes for complex continuing care beds. Mehra said the ultimate plan is to relocate those beds to facilities outside hospitals. "Another kicker is losing half the acute care beds at TMH," said Mehra.
  • Mehra said other hospital across the province are, and have faced, a similar pattern to what's taking place at TMH. She also noted that hospitals in Ontario are chronically under-funded compared to other provinces. Mehra said hospitals in Welland, Fort Erie, Port Colborne, Niagara on the Lake and Niagara Falls are being gutted and face possible closure. Hospitals in those communities are part of the Niagara Health System.
  • "The first phase includes removing, diagnostics, surgical services and acute care beds, followed by replacing emergency rooms with urgent care centres," said Mehra. The final phase is closure. Mehra said amalgamated hospital systems have never worked. She used Quinte Health Care and the resulting yearly service cuts at TMH as a prime example.
  • "The current funding model has never worked. It means those hospitals face deficits every year. Virtually all hospital are under stress because the plan is to reduce the scope of services, resulting in the fact that residents will have to travel a lot further," said Mehra. The end result is that smaller hospitals inside large amalgamations are being "completely" gutted. But the local community, said Mehra, shouldn't give up hope. The Coalition has kept a watchful eye on Quinte West and Brighton, and its community hospital.
  • "Our TMH has done a fantastic job of generating great ideas that are constructive. They have great integrity and have done a great job of rallying the community," said Mehra. On that front, Mehra said the idea of a one-stop health centre and community operated hospital with inpatient beds has the potential to provide a "robust" range of care to tens of thousands of residents. Mehra said a proposed veteran's care centre is a natural extension of that plan. The idea has received attention from national party leaders during the federal election campaign.
  • But is that enough to convince the province, and those bureaucrats in charge at the LHIN and QHC? Ultimately, said Mehra, it depends on how hard the community pushes its agenda. De-amalgamating from larger hospital corporations wouldn't be precedent setting.
  • Mehra said smaller hospitals in Georgetown and St. Joe's Island (near Sault Ste. Marie) have successfully divorced from larger corporations. "But it's up to the community to raise a huge stink with the province and present a good plan," said Mehra. Mehra suggested Trenton Memorial, if it were locally owned and operated, form a coalition with other independently run hospitals such as Napanee, Campbellford or Northumberland.
  • "The bottom line is people have to fight for what they want. They have to stand up and be heard," said Mehra. Local organizers want that fight to continue in Trenton on Nov. 13. -The Trentonian
healthcare88

CUPE Saskatchewan launches medical technologists and technicians survey to hear from yo... - 0 views

  • Oct 25, 2016
  • The CUPE Saskatchewan Health Care Council Medical Diagnostic Technologists and Technicians Committee has developed a survey to get more information about how workload and staffing issues are affecting members at work and at home. 
healthcare88

Time to revisit Canada Health Act - Infomart - 0 views

  • Waterloo Region Record Tue Nov 1 2016
  • We're paying some of the highest costs in the world for health care and we've got a middle-of-the-road health-care system." - Jane Philpott
  • On Oct. 18, the provincial health ministers met in Toronto and pushed for restoration of the previous six per cent annual increase in federal transfers in a renewed Health Accord. Federal Health Minister Jane Philpott refused, but promised extra funding targeted to home care, mental health and system innovation. But many provinces balked. As Quebec Health Minister Gaetan Barrette stated, "We are being asked to do more with less. All provinces and territories will have to make difficult choices."
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • Ontario Health Minister Eric Hoskins predicted that the reduction in the annual "escalator" to three per cent would result in a "declining partnership." Yet considering Ottawa contributes only 23 per cent of the average provincial health budget, the three per cent difference in the annual "escalator" translates into a reduced rate of increase of only 0.69 per cent! Much of this is mere political bluster! Is it not finally time to revisit the Canada Health Act and fine-tune it?
  • As Konrad Yakabuski has stated (Globe and Mail, Oct. 19), "As long as the provinces remain bound by the Canada Health Act, which constrains their ability to dramatically alter the way health care is paid for and delivered, any new conditions on the use of federal transfers are only likely to further weigh down an already overly bureaucratic system."
  • When it was passed in 1984, it was understood that the federal government would pay half of health costs. Now it covers less than a quarter. Thanks to Ottawa's admission of refugees and migrants, overall growth of an aging, sicker population, new diseases, and new technologies, the provinces must shoulder an increasing burden.
  • Yet as Bacchus Barua (Ottawa Sun, Oct. 21) has stressed, more efficient health care systems in Europe allow a greater role for the private sector, use co-payments and user fees (with exemptions for the poor and elderly) and fund hospitals according to activity, not by global budgets, which have been frozen in many provinces.
  • Philpott has vowed to do more than just "open the federal wallet." She admits that "innovation" is required. Yet governments are being constrained by blindly adhering to certain parts of the CHA. Despite denials by politicians, a "two-tier" system has always existed. Federal prisoners, WSIB patients, members of the military and RCMP, politicians and professional athletes usually obtain more timely care - often at private facilities.
  • For those not a member of a "special group," the main option for timely care may be to go to the United States. This provides employment to American doctors and nurses and profits to U.S. hospitals. Would it not make more sense to allow all Canadians to spend their after-tax discretionary income on their own health in their own province?
  • Frozen hospital global budgets have caused excessive wait times for knee and hip replacements as operating rooms are often not functioning at full capacity. According to a 2013 survey, 15 per cent of Canadian surgeons considered themselves underemployed and 64 per cent cited poor access to ORs. Hence if orthopedic surgeons had access to additional "private" OR time, wait times could be shortened. If hospitals were permitted to operate electively on Americans and other foreign patients, this would bring in extra revenue for hospitals and relieve the strain on provincial health ministries.
  • MDs could be required to work - perhaps 25 to 30 hours per week - in the public system in order to receive government reimbursement for malpractice insurance. Most MDs would confine their practice to the public system. They deserve fair treatment. Thus Philpott should amend the CHA to mandate binding arbitration when provincial negotiations fail.
  • When the premiers meet with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in December, besides discussing funding of the new Health Accord, they need to revisit the CHA and begin putting forth proposals as to how best to amend and modernize it. Where wait times are excessive, certain diagnostic services and surgical procedures should allow for private access for all Canadians - not just a select few.
  • This would utilize expensive equipment and provide new employment for nurses, technicians and surgeons. It would provide extra revenue - from both inside and outside the country - that would help to keep universal public health care sustainable and accessible for all Canadians. Ottawa should then enforce all sections of the CHA on all provinces and territories.
  • Ottawa physician Dr. Charles Shaver was born in Montreal. He graduated from Princeton University and Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. He is currently chair of the section on general internal medicine of the Ontario Medical Association.
healthcare88

KPMG to look for 'waste, inefficiency' in Manitoba's health-care system | CTV News Winn... - 0 views

  • The firm will look at whether services are being provided at a reasonable cost, if they're producing good results and if expectations are being met. (File Photo)
  • November 1, 2016
  • WINNIPEG – The consulting firm KPMG LLP has been awarded a government contract to find ways to eliminate waste in Manitoba's health care system and improve its efficiency and responsiveness. The province says the government, regional health authorities, Diagnostic Services of Manitoba, Cancer Care Manitoba and the Addictions Foundation of Manitoba will be included in the Health Care Sustainability and Innovation Review.
Heather Farrow

Health-care funding model failing, Atlantic premiers agree - Nova Scotia - CBC News - 1 views

  • Immigration, energy and health-care among hot topics at gathering in Annapolis Royal
  • May 16, 2016
  • The four Atlantic premiers have found a way to save money by joining forces to buy diagnostic health-care equipment, but say what they really need is a new deal with Ottawa to ensure adequate health services. During a meeting that wrapped up Monday in Nova Scotia's Annapolis Royal, the premiers discussed topics such as immigration and energy as well as the need to address health care in the region.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Thinking outside the single-pay box | Tom Brodbeck | Columnists | Opinion | Winn - 0 views

  • Manitoba Health Minister Kelvin Goertzen is considering allowing Manitoba to become the sixth province in Canada to let people buy MRI scans — and other diagnostic tests like CT scans — directly from private clinics.
  • Goertzen visited Saskatchewan last week on a fact finding mission to get a closer look at some of the health care reforms they've made in recent years. And one of the things that piqued the rookie health minister's interest was the move by the Saskatchewan government to allow private clinics to sell MRI scans to patients, while still providing services to the public sector.
  • "If there's evidence that's provided that says that that can work in Manitoba, I would be doing Manitobans a disservice not to look at it," said Goertzen. Critics opposed to private clinics say it's unfair for anyone to get quicker service for a medically necessary test just because they have the ability to pay. That's ideology. That's not evidence-based decision making.
Heather Farrow

Medical tests: Why 'no news is good news' can be dangerous - Healthy Debate - 0 views

  • September 8, 2016
  • Canadians saw the worst-case scenario of a disjointed health care system in 2012, when Greg Price died after a series of missed communications. One of the key problems was a missed test result. After a doctor at a walk-in clinic found a mass in his abdomen that he worried could be cancer, he ordered an urgent CT scan.
  • Continuity of Patient Care study from The Health Quality Council of Alberta
Govind Rao

Alberta Health Services privatizing Edmonton labs - Edmonton - CBC News - 1 views

  • Dec 11, 2013
  • Alberta Health Services is going ahead with its plan to privatize all of its diagnostic lab services in Edmonton. The health authority announced Wednesday that a request for proposal has been issued for a private provider to establish a single $3 billion lab for the Edmonton Zone. The new lab will replace hospital labs operated by AHS and Covenant Health as well as the services provided by DynaLIFE.
Irene Jansen

The effect of for-profit laboratories on the accountability, integration, and cost of C... - 1 views

  • increased for-profit delivery has led to decreased transparency
  • Using for-profit laboratories increases the cost of diagnostic testing and hinders the integration of health care services
  • In 2012, Canadian governments will pay private corporations over a billion dollars (a conservative extrapolation from recent spending in Ontario, Manitoba, Alberta, British Columbia, and Saskatchewan)1 for medical laboratory services, making them among the most privatized of Canada’s essential medical services.
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • Three multinational companies—LifeLabs, Gamma-Dynacare and CML HealthCare—will receive over 80% of this money.
  • since private sector corporations are substantially protected by law from the public disclosure of “confidential business information,” increased for-profit delivery has had the effect of decreasing transparency
  • The experience in Alberta and Saskatchewan provides some indication of the potential harm integration poses for private providers. Over the 15 years since all laboratory services were integrated under the control of the regional governments, the role of for-profit laboratories in Alberta has been significantly diminished, and in Saskatchewan for-profit laboratory provision has effectively ended.
  • the argument for using public sector institutions, primarily hospitals and public health laboratories, for all laboratory services is straightforward
  • “there is massive reserve capacity in the hospital laboratories … a fully staffed evening shift could absorb the private laboratories’ workload without difficulty.”
  • Excess capacity in either the public or private sector is paid for with public funds and, aside from the redundancy necessary to accommodate fluctuations in demand, is a waste.
  • the Canadian health care system could save a minimum of $250 million per year by moving all publicly funded medical laboratory work into an integrated public non-profit medical laboratory system
  • added benefits of facilitating the integration of medical records, staff, and administration, and of improving public accountability
‹ Previous 21 - 40 of 119 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page