Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Group items tagged Saskatchewan

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Govind Rao

Privatization accelerated under Sask Party: report - Infomart - 1 views

  • The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) Fri Oct 9 2015
  • A policy think tank is bringing attention to what it sees as an "acceleration" of privatization under the Saskatchewan Party, something the deputy premier dismisses as "fearmongering." A new report by the Saskatchewan office of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives documents what it considers to be more than 50 instances of privatization, or at least announced plans for it, in the past decade, from the sale of Crown subsidiaries to public-private partnerships to the contracting out of public services. The office's director and report author, Simon Enoch, called the reco d "quite substantial - a lot more than I think the average citizen would suspect."
  • Enoch said that despite studies showing strong public support for Crown corporations, the "subterranean privatization agenda going on really hasn't seemed to activate the public." He suspects that's because much of the privatization that's occurred has been below-the-radar, such as that of the Information Services Corporation or hospital laundry services. He said the issue is likely to pick up steam as the government wades into more well-known areas like liquor stores and MRIs. "I would fully expect to see them attempt a major privatization should they win a new mandate in the next election," Enoch said. The trend hasn't gone unnoticed by the Saskatchewan Federation of Labour. Its president, Larry Hubich, said the report "reaffirms what we've known. We've been saying for quite a while that there's a creeping privatization agenda that's almost being carried out in stealth." He added that privatization is "risky and costs taxpayers more in the long run."
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • In that vein, Enoch said in the report that accountability and transparency have been the first victims of privatization in Saskatchewan. "What it also means is that hard-working Saskatchewan people are losing good jobs," Hubich said. The report argues that in many instances, privatization has not delivered on the promises of "lower-cost, yet also higher-quality and more responsive services than the public sector." NDP MLA Trent Wotherspoon agreed the government seems to "use privatization at every turn," which he called short-term thinking that is not in the best interest of the province, driving up the cost of living and giving away quality jobs. "There's a large and growing concern across Saskatchewan about what's next," he said.
  • Deputy premier Don Mc-Morris dismissed the report as "fearmongering." "The basis of their argument is all around fear, trying to scare people to think that nobody else can deliver these services except government employees," he said. "That just isn't the record here in Saskatchewan or really anywhere else in North America." McMorris touted the growth Saskatchewan has seen under his party. "We'd never want to go back to the type of thinking that this organization is trying to profess," he said, referring to the idea that "privatization is an absolutely terrible word." He emphasized as one example how surgical wait lists have decreased with privatization. "They would have rather had people languish on long wait-lists than actually do something about it by using the private sector," McMorris said of the centre.
  • Privatization hasn't "necessarily" accelerated under the Saskatchewan Party, and future moves will be dictated by a common-sense approach, he said. While the report noted that several jurisdictions in Canada and around the world are bringing privatized sectors back into the public realm, McMorris pointed to the growing popularity of public-private partnerships in North America. "I wouldn't say jurisdictions are backing away," he said. McMorris was hesitant to say whether privatization would figure large in the 2016 provincial election, but Hubich and Wotherspoon said they think it will be a lightening rod. "I actually think it will define the next election," Enoch said. nlypny@leaderpost.com twitter.com/wordpuddle
Govind Rao

Close to 20,000 sign union's anti-P3 petition - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Leader-Post (Regina) Tue Nov 17 2015
  • Raise your hand if you've heard this phrase before: on time and on budget. Those five words are oft repeated as governments - in Saskatchewan and elsewhere - defend publicprivate partnership (P3) funding models. "On time and on budget has been a really powerful message," says Matti Siemiatycki, a professor of urban planning at the University of Toronto.
  • On Monday, the Saskatchewan Federation of Labour (SFL) delivered a petition to the government calling for the end of privatization. Close to 20,000 people signed the petition, which criticizes the government's use of P3s. Under the P3 model in Saskatchewan, nine elementary schools, a long-term care home in Swift Current, a hospital in North Battleford and the Regina Bypass are being built. SFL president Larry Hubich said the petition is one of the largest in the province's history, and is meant to help "raise awareness around the deals that are going on under the guise of public-private partnerships." Since arriving in Saskatchewan a few years ago, P3s have been controversial.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Recent polling suggests the majority of people living in this province support P3s, but, as demonstrated by the SFL's petition, there is still opposition. While still relatively new here - none of the P3-funded projects are completed yet - the controversy is not unique to Saskatchewan. Ontario and British Columbia have used P3s for much longer than Saskatchewan. The debate remains polarized across the country. "It really depends on how the deals are structured," he said. "There is no such thing as sort of 'the P3 model'. In fact, there's any number of different approaches and because of that it varies in terms of impact on both the construction side of the equation and then the operation and maintenance."
  • Instead of an ideological battle, which has largely dominated any discussion of P3s in Saskatchewan, Siemiatycki said each project should be evaluated by itself to decide whether or not a P3 model is the best option. "It's really not a cut-and-dry issue," he said. "It really depends on the experience in the jurisdiction and what specific deals are coming down the pipe." Where P3s have a longer history, Siemitaycki said public debate over P3s is already starting to change. "I think the debate is now shifting to under what conditions should we use them, and what specific model should be used," he said. dfraser@postmedia.com twitter.com/dcfraser
  • Bryan Schlosser, Regina Leader-Post / The Saskatchewan Federation of Labour delivered a petition at the Legislative Building on Monday. The petition calls for an end to privatization in Saskatchewan and criticizes the government's use of public-private partnership funding models.
Govind Rao

Brad Wall takes a hard, pre-election turn to the right - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Leader-Post (Regina) Tue Dec 22 2015
  • Whether the Saskatchewan government is choosing the right course with public private partnerships (P3s) or rejecting changes to the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) seems debatable ... or at least, a matter of one's political perspective. Notwithstanding (or perhaps because of ) the government's staunch defence of P3s - there were no fewer than four ministers recently touting a pricey Ernst and Young report on the $90 million taxpayers are allegedly saving on the new Saskatchewan Hospital at North Battleford - there are those who point to publicsector auditors who totally disagree with their private-sector accountant brethren on the value of such P3s.
  • Similarly, Saskatchewan Finance Minister Kevin Doherty appeared to be the lone voice at Monday's national finance ministers' meeting, where he opposed the federal Liberal campaign promise to change Canada Pension Plan contributions and benefits. "It's a payroll tax on the business community," Doherty said last week. "In very, very tight economic times like this, it might not mean the difference of laying offa staffperson or two. It might mean shutting down the entire restaurant."
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • The thing is, though, the Saskatchewan Party government opposed such "tax increases" in boom times as well, leaving one to wonder whether this government ever sees a time when low-salaried workers or the self-employed should get additional government support for their retirements. At a time of minimal wage increases, rising unemployment and growing part-time and service sector jobs found necessary by many trying to make ends meet, it does cause one to wonder whether now might be a time to set aside one's philosophical opposition to an improved CPP. In a somewhat similar vein, Doherty said he does support the Liberals' campaign promise to double infrastructure spending, but under the caveat that the Saskatchewan government be able to spend its share on P3 highways, water treatment facilities and even bypass projects and not on transit projects as the federal government would prefer.
  • It's common sense that Doherty should advocate Saskatchewan deciding for itself how best to spend infrastructure dollars. Furthermore, he has a point that while public transit may be more important for cities like Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal or even Regina and Saskatoon, "transit's not the top of our list" in Saskatchewan. But what Doherty and the Sask. Party seem to really be defending is the old federal government system under Stephen Harper's Conservatives that rewarded/subsidized governments for simply using P3 models (see: Regina sewage treatment plant) - whether the concept made any practical sense or not.
  • Doherty denies his government is "stuck" on P3s for ideological reasons, but the lengths his government has gone to demonstrate P3s work suggests quite the opposite. In fact, Premier Brad Wall seems to be swinging the Sask. Party hard to the right, just months before the April 4 vote. Be it his government's push for liquor store privatization or his recent caution on federal Liberal plans to quickly bring thousands of Syrian refugees to Canada (after being among the first leaders last summer to call on Ottawa to do more) or his hard line oil-sector support before and during the Paris climate summit, or Doherty's pronouncements on P3s and the CPP, this is a government marking its right-wing territory. It's odd timing for any government, given that in the months before an election most governing parties go out of their way to demonstrate how inclusive they are. Making it even odder is the fact that elections across the country this year - including that national vote we had on Oct. 19 - suggest an electorate that's moving to the left.
  • Wall and the Sask. Party's defence of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) dictates on the CPP, Harper's view on P3s or even pandering to the right's view on Syria at a time when the pendulum seems to be swinging the other way is a curious political strategy. We'll know about four months from now whether it was the right approach - or the one that gives the NDP the opening it has needed. Mandryk is the political columnist for the Regina Leader-Post.
Govind Rao

Health union says long term care patients at risk - Saskatchewan - CBC News - 0 views

  • One quarter of workers surveyed rated care in Saskatchewan as 'poor'
  • Jun 16, 2015
  • Karen Wasylenko addresses the media in Regina about concerns the union has about long term care in the province.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • A recent survey by the Health Sciences Association of Saskatchewan says its members are concerned about long term care in the province. 
  • The union released the survey results in Regina on Tuesday morning. It says understaffing in all of the province's health regions are putting patient lives at risk. 
  • The provincial ombudsman released a report about the state of senior's care in Saskatchewan last month. The ombudsman received approximately 90 complaints about care and made 19 recommendations.
Govind Rao

Get back in line, Mr. Premier - 0 views

  • October 17th, 2014 Simon Enoch
  • Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall once again stirred the privatization pot yesterday when he took to social media to ask: “Is it time to allow people to pay for their own private MRI’s in Saskatchewan like they can do in Alberta?” The Premier’s twitter trial balloon suggests the government will argue that allowing private, for-profit MRIs will help reduce wait times in the public system. The Premier himself added: “It does make sense that the wait list is going to shrink because those who want to pay will come off that public wait list and they’ll get their MRIs and thereby shortening the wait list for all, whether they want to pay or not.”
Govind Rao

Little change in wait times, reports find; New studies highlight Saskatchewan as an exa... - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Tue Dec 8 2015
  • Canadians continue to queue up for medical care with efforts to reduce wait times bringing limited improvements, say two new studies that come one month before federal and provincial ministers meet to begin negotiating a new health accord.
  • The pair of annual reports - one from the Wait Time Alliance, the other from the Fraser Institute - find little year-over-year change in the wait for medically necessary procedures. Where there is improvement, the report from the Wait Time Alliance finds the progress is "spotty" with access to care, dependent on where in the country you live and, at times, your age.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • The Alliance, a coalition of medical specialists, is calling on provincial and federal leaders to help fashion a "new national vision for health care," one that sets national benchmarks that go beyond the 2004 initiative that targeted five procedures: hip and knee replacements, cataract surgery, heart operations, diagnostic imaging and cancer radiotherapy.
  • We still don't measure nearly enough," said Dr. Chris Simpson, chair of the alliance and a former president of the Canadian Medical Association. "You can't fix what you can't measure."
  • At a time when more care is moving out of the hospital, Dr. Simpson said wait times for home care and long-term care beds should be monitored by all provinces, as should the number of patients in hospital because they cannot access these services.
  • When health ministers meet in January in Vancouver, Dr. Simpson said he hopes a partnership to establish such standards will be part of the discussion, rather than just the level of federal funding. "If we have made a collective mistake in the past, it is to say to the federal government, 'It's all up to you,' " he said.
  • The annual report card provides a snapshot of wait times across a range of measures gathered from provincially available information this summer. In doing so, it highlights the variation in the information available among provinces, and this year also notes that the federal government - responsible for delivering health care to First Nations, refugees, veterans, Canadian Forces and inmates in federal prisons - provides only limited data on its own performance.
  • The study, which gives a grade to provinces across a range of procedures, finds those provinces that got high marks last year - Saskatchewan, Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador - continue to do well.
  • Both studies point to the success of Saskatchewan in cutting wait times as evidence of what can be done with a focused effort and both note that the improvement came from more than increased funding.
  • In five years, the number of patients in Saskatchewan waiting more than six months for surgery dropped by 96 per cent, the Alliance report card finds, thanks to a $176-million investment over four years and also because of innovative practices. Bacchus Barua, a senior economist at the Fraser Institute and author of its wait-time study, said measures such as a pooled referral system helped give Saskatchewan the shortest wait times in the survey.
  • The report from the Fraser Institute is based on a survey of specialists and tracks the time between the initial referral and the appointment with a specialist as well as the time between seeing a specialist and treatment. At the national level, it found the median wait time from referral to treatment was 18.3 weeks, almost the same as the 18.2 weeks recorded in 2014, but almost double the 9.3 weeks recorded in 1993 when the survey began.
  • Across Canada, wait times have stabilized, but they have stabilized at a very high level," Mr. Barua said
  • Saskatchewan had the shortest total wait at 13.6 weeks and Prince Edward Island had the longest at 43.1 weeks, although the small sample size in PEI makes that result less reliable. Among specialties, the longest waits were for orthopedic surgery at 35.7 weeks and the shortest were for patients in line for radiation oncology at 4.1 weeks, the study said.
Govind Rao

4 political parties on healthcare and education in Saskatchewan - Saskatchewan - CBC News - 0 views

  • Which party aligns with your view?
  • Apr 03, 2016
  • Where do the Saskatchewan Party, the NDP, the Green Party and the Liberals stand on the issues that matter to you in the Saskatchewan provincial election? We break their platforms down on the topics of education and healthcare. These are highlights. For the complete party platforms, follow the links provided.
Heather Farrow

First Annual CUPE Saskatchewan Labour Day Ride for Respect | CUPE Saskatchewan - 0 views

  • Posted on July 22, 2016
  • This Labour Day, CUPE Saskatchewan is inviting members who ride motorcycle to join in the first annual Labour Day Ride for Respect on September 5, 2016. The Ride for Respect is dedicated to promote respect for workers and their rights. Participating motorcycle riders will travel between Labour Day celebrations hosted by unions in Regina and Saskatoon.
Heather Farrow

CUPE releases report on the state of long term care in Saskatchewan | CUPE Saskatchewan - 0 views

  • Posted on July 11, 2016
  • REGINA: A new report from the CUPE Saskatchewan Health Care Council shows that understaffing and workload are critical issues in continuing care in this province.
Govind Rao

Raise the Alarm: Yorkton joins day of action to call for a new Canada Health Accord < H... - 0 views

  • Mar 27, 2014
  • Yorkton: WHAT:&nbsp; Activists across the country are hosting events to educate Canadians about the Federal Conservatives’ refusal to negotiate a new Health Accord. In Yorkton, health care providers and community members will be picketing MP Garry Breitkreuz’s office. There will be a few speakers as well. WHY:&nbsp; The federal-provincial Health Accord expires March 31, 2014. Since 2011, Ottawa has refused to meet with the Premiers to sign a new Accord. Instead, the Federal Conservative Government plans to cut $36 billion from public health care. This will mean Saskatchewan will receive $100 million less every year for the next ten years for health care, which means less funding for quality patient care in Saskatchewan. WHEN:&nbsp; March 31 at 10:00 am. WHERE:&nbsp; In front of MP Garry Breitkreuz’s constituency office at 19 1st Avenue North, Yorkton. There are four events happening on March 31 in Saskatchewan as part of the national day of action for a new health accord. Learn more here:&nbsp; http://healthcoalition.ca/. For more information contact:&nbsp; Tria Donaldson, National Communications Representative, CUPE Saskatchewan at 306.531.6247
Govind Rao

Option to pay for MRIs coming - Infomart - 0 views

  • Yorkton This Week Wed May 20 2015
  • New legislation introduced will give patients the ability to choose to pay privately for a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan in Saskatchewan. "Reducing wait times and giving patients more choice over their own care decisions is a high priority for the people of Saskatchewan," Health Minister Dustin Duncan said. "Wait times for many services are still too long. Our government is committed to moving forward with new and innovative solutions to barriers that prevent the very best in patient access and satisfaction."
  • The new legislation will allow for the creation of regulations that will require private clinics to provide a second scan to a patient on the public wait list at no charge every time a scan is provided to someone who chooses to pay for their own MRI. A physician referral will still be required to obtain an MRI scan. This arrangement is similar to agreements that are in place that allow for the Saskatchewan Roughriders and the Worker's Compensation Board (WCB) to purchase MRI scans. In both agreements, the Roughriders and the WCB pay for an additional scan for a patient on the public wait list. "The requirement for a private clinic to cover a second scan on the public wait list will increase fairness and access," Duncan said. "We are once again leading the way with an innovative, made-in-Saskatchewan approach to reducing wait times." Following passage of the Act and the establishment of regulations, private-pay MRI services could be offered in existing private MRI facilities as early as the spring of 2016. This model will be evaluated after one year in order to ensure it is meeting the goals of improving access to safe, high quality care.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • As of March 31, 2015, there are an estimated 4,000 - 5,000 patients waiting for MRI services in Saskatchewan.
Govind Rao

Winning bidder chosen for Sask. Hospital P3 - Infomart - 0 views

  • The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) Tue Jul 7 2015
  • The Saskatchewan government has chosen the companies that will build a new joint psychiatric hospital and jail in North Battleford. And for the second time in a month, the government has selected the winning bidder for a public-private partnership project without releasing the cost of the project. "The P3 model is the right choice for delivering this leading-edge project in the most cost-effective and timely way," SaskBuilds Minister Gordon Wyant said in a Monday government news release. The government and winning partnership of companies intend to finalize and sign the contract for the design, build, maintain, and finance agreement this summer, the news release says.
  • The new 188-bed Saskatchewan Hospital will replace the centuryold North Battleford building that residents say is decrepit and lacks privacy. Tacked on to the new hospital will be a 96-room correctional centre for inmates who have mental health problems. The two groups won't be mixing together, the government has said. The buildings are scheduled to open by spring 2018.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Access Prairies Partnership was the winning bidder. The consortium includes: Graham Design Builders Carillion Canada Gracorp Capital Advisors Carillion Private Finance Kasian Architecture Interior Design and Planning
  • WSP Canada The Opposition New Democratic Party slammed the selection in a Monday news release, saying none of the major players are Saskatchewan companies. The businesses involved are based in the United Kingdom, Quebec, B.C., and Alberta. "Giving it to an international consortium with no Saskatchewan involvement is literally sending hundreds of millions of dollars to other economies instead of bolstering our own with this project," NDP deputy leader Trent Wotherspoon said in the news release. The government says the project will create more than 1,500 jobs in Saskatchewan. SaskBuilds and external financial advisers say the P3 model will save money, even over the course of 30 years of loan payments. The NDP says these value-formoney assessments are flawed and skewed to make P3 options seemmore favourable. The cost of the project is a secret for now because releasing the information "could harm the province's negotiating position," says the news release.
  • The government also picked a winning bidder to construct 18 joint school buildings in Saskatoon, Warman, Martensville and Regina without releasing the price or signing the final contract.
Govind Rao

Accelerating Health System Transformation in Saskatchewan: Lessons Learned from the Sas... - 0 views

  • 13/01/2015
  • In 2010, the Saskatchewan government set out to “transform the surgical patient experience” through an ambitious multi-year, system-wide strategy. While the Saskatchewan Surgical Initiative (SkSI) placed strong emphasis on wait time reduction for elective surgery, the breadth of the initiative also gave priority to quality, safety, patient experience, and sustainability.
  • Through the systematic exploration of a single policy case study—the SkSI—this research identifies the critical factors that facilitate and inhibit major health system change. The main results demonstrate that achieving large-system change, within the context of the SkSI specifically, requires a complex and interdependent set of strategies, processes and organizational arrangements.
Govind Rao

Doctors v. government: the first major fight over pay - 0 views

  • CMAJ March 17, 2015 vol. 187 no. 5 First published February 9, 2015, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4990
  • Roger Collier
  • Part II: Today’s contentious negotiations echo those from the battle over medicare a half-century ago Doctors refuse to compromise, says one side. The government cares more about its budget than patients, says the other side. Doctors have rejected a “very fair offer,” says a provincial health minister. Patients can’t wait for the government to balance its books, says a medical association. You know, this all sounds mighty familiar.
  • ...17 more annotations...
  • Much of the rhetoric thrown around today in scuffles between governments and physicians might ring a bell for students of medical history. More than 50 years ago, doctors were also accused of being too stubborn to accept changes to pay structure, and a provincial government was also charged with putting fiscal concerns before patient needs. Of course, if that old saying holds any merit — “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it” — perhaps a refresher is in order. There seems, after all, to be a little bit of history repeating itself.
  • The origin of conflict between provincial governments and physicians can be summed up in one word: medicare. It therefore dates back to midnight of July 1, 1962, when the Saskatchewan Medical Care Insurance Act passed into law, introducing the first universal, government-run, single-payer health system to North America. All of one minute later, most of Saskatchewan’s doctors went on strike.
  • tually, to be precise, the fighting between the government and doctors in Saskatchewan began a couple of years earlier, during the 1960 provincial election. Premier Tommy Douglas had made universal health care the main peg of his re-election campaign. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan fiercely opposed the idea, contending that government interference in medicine would do far more harm than good.
  • A public battle ensued, pitting doctors against politicians. Debates were held, pamphlets were circulated, pledges were signed. Did the whole affair stay civil and free of propaganda? Well, you could say that. But only if you enjoy being wrong.
  • Let’s start with some of the literature circulated by opponents of medicare. One pamphlet, Political Medicine is Bad Medicine, was chockablock with scary warnings and seasoned with a liberal sprinkling of words in all-caps for emphasis. Red Tape! Skyrocketing costs! Inferior care! The premier’s plan “proposes a PERMANENT INFLEXIBLE GOVERNMENT SCHEME at a high cost” that would subject medicine “to POLITICAL considerations bearing no relation to your NEEDS.”
  • Then there was the infamous flyer — later used by Premier Douglas to shame his opponents, according to Saturday Night magazine — that suggested many doctors would flee the province if the medicare bill passed. “They’ll have to fill up the profession with the garbage of Europe,” read one excerpt, a quote from an anonymous doctor taken from the Toronto Telegram. “Some of the European doctors who come out here are so bad we wonder if they ever practised medicine.”
  • Later, some in the anti-medicare camp acknowledged that mistakes were made, passion had trumped reason, and the medical profession had suffered for engaging in political mudslinging. “Many doctors concede privately that they went too far, that the campaign lost them prestige in their communities,” reported Saturday Night magazine.
  • Of course, the premier was no stranger to rhetoric himself. In fact, according to some political commenters of the time, he was a master of the form. He accused the province’s physicians of using “abominable” and “despicable” tactics and pedalling “scurrilous trash.”
  • In the end, Douglas and his party, the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, won the election and pushed ahead with their health system plan. The doctors and government set aside their differences and all lived happily ever after. Yeah, right.
  • Medicare was coming to Saskatchewan — that battle was over — but physicians still weren’t cooperating with the government. They focused their efforts on changing sections of the proposed medicare act, specifically those that granted the government almost unlimited power to control the practice of medicine.
  • There was no provision for negotiation. The doctors would simply have to do what the government told them to do, and be paid what the government said they would be paid,” Dr. Marc Baltzan (1929–2005), a Saskatoon nephrologist and former president of the Canadian Medical Association, wrote in a 1984 article in Canadian Family Physician entitled, “Doctor/Government Fee Negotiations in Canada.”
  • After the act became law, unchanged, the province’s physicians closed their offices, though they still provided emergency services in hospitals. The standoff lasted 23 days, ending only after both sides compromised and signed the Saskatoon Agreement. The deal amended the act to ensure doctors would maintain their independence and could, if they wanted, opt out of medicare and bill patients directly.
  • The deal was brokered by Lord Stephen Taylor, a British doctor and politician who helped implement the National Health Service in the United Kingdom. Later, reflecting on his Saskatchewan adventure, Taylor wrote that much of the animosity between the two parties arose because they did not understand each other at all. The government did not anticipate how much their plan would threaten the autonomy of a proud profession. Physicians “could not believe that the government was composed of honest and responsible people.”
  • Taylor, a man of both medicine and government, chose to take a dispassionate view of the conflict. “I see honest men on both sides, well motivated but mystified by the actions of their opponents.”
  • Decades later, debate over another act — the Canada Health Act, federal legislation adopted in 1984 — again showed just how differently government and physicians can view a change to how doctors are paid. This time, the government was putting an end to extra billing by physicians. But according to Baltzan, as mentioned in his Canada Family Physician article cited above, this was merely a “political euphemism” for banning a patient’s right to be reimbursed by the government when billed directly by a doctor.
  • In his lament over the passing of the “deceitful bill,” Baltzan suggested that it was important to revisit the original fight over medicare in Saskatchewan because “it shows that there is nothing new under the sun: it contains all the elements of physician–government confrontation that have been replayed again and again during the Canada Health Act debate.”
  • Now, more than 30 years later, it might not be a stretch to say there is still nothing new under the sun regarding negotiations between doctors and government. When things go bad, as they have in Ontario, both sides sometimes resort to a little time-tested rhetoric. Then again, though some of the messages sound familiar, other elements of physician–government showdowns have changed since 1962. For one, doctors back then didn’t have Twitter accounts.
Govind Rao

Saskatchewan can expect to suffer after hospital laundry privatization | rabble.ca - 1 views

  • By Ella Bedard | February 3, 2015
  • A new CCPA Saskatchewan report by University of Winnipeg economists concludes that privatizing provincial laundry services may garner some short-term savings but at long-term costs. In 2013, Saskatchewan's government announced that it would be replacing five publicly owned hospital laundries. Sometime this year, those regional services will be replaced with a private centralized laundry services operated by Alberta-based K-Bro Linen, which will establish a single plant in Regina to serve the entire province.
  • The report finds that laundry plant closure in Prince Albert alone will result in 74 jobs lost, causing a decline in labour income of $2.5 million in the region, and a decline in regional GDP of $3.7 million. "It's a decent paying job, it's Monday to Friday, and there are a lot of couples that work here, so they are both going to lose their jobs," said CUPE Local 3736 president Anita Labossiere, whose union represents 74 workers at North Sask Laundry in Prince Albert, one of five locations that will soon be closed.
Govind Rao

CUPE calls on health ministry to review MRI legislation; Health care must be based on n... - 0 views

  • The Leader-Post (Regina) Tue Dec 22 2015
  • The Canadian Union of Public Employees Saskatchewan is asking the federal health minister to review the Wall government's Bill 179, which permits private userpay MRI facilities in the province. The bill was passed by the government on Nov. 4 with the goal that it would be proclaimed in February before voters head to the polls in April.
  • Under the bill, when a patient elects to pay for an MRI out-ofpocket, the private clinic that does that MRI must provide a free scan for someone on the public wait-list.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • Last week, CUPE Saskatchewan sent a letter to Health Minister Jane Philpott requesting her to review the provincial legislation to determine if it violates the Canada Health Act and, if it does, that she instruct the Saskatchewan government to comply with the act.
  • Philpott was not available for an interview Monday, but emailed the Regina Leader-Post the following statement: "Our Government will work in close collaboration with our provincial and territorial partners to build constructive relationships. Our priority is to ensure all Canadians have access to health care."
  • CUPE Saskatchewan president Tom Graham says the union consulted with lawyer Steven Shrybman and it is his opinion that Bill 179 violates the Canada Health Act. "Health care needs to be provided on need, not the ability to pay," Graham said. "We think there are solutions that can be done within the system that don't require people to dig into their pockets to get an MRI."
  • CUPE sent the letter to Philpott days after the Saskatchewan Medical Association (SMA) raised concerns that the provincial government's decision to allow people to pay privately for MRIs was "a hasty policy." In a letter to physicians, SMA president Dr. Mark Brown said the organization opposed the move and told Health Minister Dustin Duncan that at the end of October. Brown said the legislation allowing people to pay privately for MRIs runs contrary to the fundamental principle of medicare.
  • (Bill 179) is privatizing our health-care system as far as we're concerned ... It's a slippery slope," Graham said Monday. "We already pay for health care in this province and in this country and now we're being asked to pay twice if you want it faster." Private MRIs in Alberta have not reduced wait times, he said.
  • "Their wait times are worse than ours and in Quebec, it's the same thing, " Graham said. "We're really quite concerned about it and we'd like the federal government to basically direct the government here to follow the Canada Health Act." In past interviews, Duncan has said people leave the province for MRIs now. The legislation is a way to level the playing field and provide some benefits for the public system.
  • I think they need to put the resources in where they are needed," Graham said. "It's a matter of getting MRI machines and technicians and scheduling it - it's as simple as that. I don't know why we have to get into these elaborate, complex schemes ... We should be enhancing our system, not taking it apart."
Govind Rao

New legislation restricts access to services; The change in the federal government will... - 0 views

  • The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) Mon Nov 23 2015
  • There is nothing novel about providing some medical services in a private practice setting in Saskatchewan. Imaging services, such as X-rays and ultrasound, are already provided that way. What is novel is to legislate that these services will be privately paid for.
  • The Canada Health Act requires that medicare finance all "medically necessary" physician services. The intent of the act is that services be distributed on the basis of medical necessity rather than ability to pay. There is no doubt that the new Saskatchewan legislation will restrict access to services if private MRIs are not covered by medicare. Of course, enforcement of the federal Health Act is subject to ministerial discretion. The Saskatchewan government, when it drafted its legislation, was probably confident that the former federal minister would be discreet. It is highly doubtful that the new federal Liberal government will take the same view
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • But Saskatchewan's Health Minister Dustin Duncan seems to believe that a novel feature in their "model" will make it palatable: MRI providers will be required to provide a "public" MRI for each private MRI sold. There is great fog around this stipulation. MRI clinics in Alberta and British Columbia provide a menu of services, just like an auto repair shop. Of course, it is difficult to identify prices for Canadian MRIs because their websites, while advertising "competitive" prices, ask you to contact them. The United States is more "competitive." For example, Ohio law requires hospitals to publish their prices. The website for medcentral.org lists more than 40 items in its MRI price list.
  • Here is my question: If a Saskatchewan MRI provider does a foot scan for a private patient, does it then have to do a foot scan for a public patient? How will this be monitored? Also, when does the public patient get her foot scan? If a paying patient is standing in the door, does the MRI provider say, "Sorry, you have to wait till we provide the public foot scan that we owe?" How is this monitored? Does the government pay for the patient from the public list? If so, at what price?
  • Is this simply a revenue guarantee in disguise? Undoubtedly Bill 179 provides for wide ministerial discretion. Can we bank on the minister being discreet? This model is bizarre. If the provincial government is seeking ways to provide more MRIs without having to incur the upfront capital costs and to remove the operating costs from its budget, then just negotiate MRI fees in the physician fee schedule, as currently occurs with other imaging services.
  • However, it might quickly become obvious that the private modality cannot compete with cost effective public provision. Glen Beck is emeritus professor of health economics at the University of Saskatchewan.
Govind Rao

New essential services legislation doesn't erase harm done to Saskatchewan workers | Na... - 0 views

  • New proposed essential services legislation introduced by the Saskatchewan&nbsp;Party government on October 15&nbsp;does not erase the harm done to tens of thousands of Saskatchewan workers who were stripped of their right&nbsp;to collective bargaining for seven years, according to Bob Bymoen, President of the Saskatchewan Government and General Employees' Union (SGEU/NUPGE).
  • 21&nbsp;Oct. 2015
Govind Rao

A look at the MRI plan - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Leader-Post (Regina) Mon Oct 19 2015
  • The government announced changes to Saskatchewan's MRI process in the spring, and Premier Brad Wall has made it a priority to push the legislation through the house. The new system will allow people to pay a private clinic for an MRI, effectively skipping to the front of the queue. In return, the clinic will have to provide a second, free, MRI to the public system. Health Minister Dustin Duncan says it will chip away at ballooning wait times and provide more options to patients, but critics say the plan will create a two-tier health system and won't lessen waits at all. Here's a look at the government's plan.
  • The business case One of the biggest questions around the legislation is this: Will any private clinics bite? As Bryan Salte from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan points out, between the investment in people and equipment, setting up a private clinic is "an expensive proposition," and he's "not sure it's a guaranteed way to make money." Duncan says government is "not going to force anybody to do this." At the end of the day, Duncan says, private clinics are "going to have to determine for themselves whether ... from their point of view, it's a sound business idea."
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Wait times Currently, MRI wait time trends are hard to figure out. Because there has been no consistent record-keeping, requests for data are met with several caveats. Looking at raw numbers, waits in 2014 were anywhere from within 24 hours for a Level 1 priority patient, to 287 days for a Level 4 patient. Current wait times also differ markedly between health regions - bad news if you're in Saskatoon, where for the past few years, average waits for all but Level 1 patients have been longer than in Regina. In 2014, for example, patients waited 10 days for a Level 2 scan in the Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region, compared with 19 days in the Saskatoon Health Region. Level 3 waits were 58 days in Regina and 86 in Saskatoon, and Level 4 waits were 96 and 120 days respectively. Duncan admits part of that might come down to overuse of diagnostic imaging - something the Saskatchewan Medical Association and government are working on.
  • That's backed up by the fact that in the past eight years, the number of publicly funded scans in Saskatchewan has more than doubled and there are more MRI machines, but it hasn't made a dent in wait times. Health policy analyst Steven Lewis can't see the new approach reducing waits, because the only way you do so "is if demand stays constant while you're increasing capacity - and that never happens." Duncan is convinced the new approach "will help toward wait times," but Dr. Ryan Meili, a family physician in Saskatoon and vicechair of Canadian Doctors for Medicare, disagrees. As evidence, Meili points to Alberta. It has private MRIs, he says, yet it "has the longest wait times for MRIs in the country." Erosion of public health?
  • You would expect Meili to be ideologically opposed to the privatization of MRIs - after all, he ran for NDP leadership and is a vocal opponent of privatizing any aspect of health care - but he also has "evidence-based" objections. "It starts to just further reinforce this idea that we need to privatize care, piece by piece, and it erodes confidence in the system," he says. Duncan argues that paying out of pocket for MRIs already "happens in Saskatchewan today" when people head to Alberta or the U.S. for a scan. The provincial health system doesn't stop them, he says, but "we don't get any benefit from people doing that." Duncan says at least this way, "the public system will get a scan for each one paid for out of pocket."
  • Because MRIs are generally a diagnostic tool, Lewis says the biggest risk in the change is that people who need a scan and pay out of pocket will end up getting treatment sooner than those who don't pony up the cash. "It's troublesome on so many levels," he says. egraney@leaderpost.com Twitter/LP_EmmaGraney
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Structural deficit is today's Saskatchewan reality | Regina Leader-Post - 0 views

  • We have cyclical resource revenues in Saskatchewan. Of this, there is no dispute. How cyclical they truly are will again be demonstrated when Finance Minister Kevin Doherty presents today’s 2016-17 budget. Hopefully, he will not repeat the mistakes of his predecessors who consistently inflated revenue projections at budget time and wound up overseeing a deficit budget that year.
  • Wall said&nbsp;on Monday that the 2016-17 Saskatchewan budget will have $1 billion&nbsp;less revenue than last year. This is obviously not comforting, because it translates into the Saskatchewan Party&nbsp;government’s third-straight deficit budget and sixth deficit&nbsp;in nine years. But by acknowledging this problem at budget time —&nbsp;instead of playing the game of high-balling resource revenues and presenting a deficit at year’s end —&nbsp;we at least are seeing early signs that the government gets that its deficits are no longer cyclical, but&nbsp;structural in nature.
  • Consider how its supposed big cost-saver in health —&nbsp;the John Black and Associates lean model —&nbsp;has produced no tangible evidence of actual savings, but plenty of evidence that it it has created a new bureaucracy within the already-bloated health bureaucracy. In Regina, there are now no fewer&nbsp;than 36 government/health region employees with the term “Kaizen” in their title —&nbsp;JBA’s lasting legacy of lean — including six Kaizen directors, 12 Kaizen specialists, lean specialists, workflow specialists, directors, Kaizen promotion office specialists, surgical Kaizen specialists, communication specialists, “Kanban” specialists, conference administrators, standard work and replication specialists, measurement specialists and certification and training specialists.
1 - 20 of 368 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page