Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Group items tagged Quebec

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Govind Rao

They won't show restraint; Canada's provincial governments are struggling with debts an... - 0 views

  • National Post Wed Apr 15 2015
  • However, the fact that the Ontario government currently borrows about $20 billion a year despite its own balanced budget law shows how easily such rules are flouted. The federal budget will remain balanced not because of this law, but because the government has capped its future liability for health care transfers and pension obligations and begun the long, arduous process of reining in the compensation of its employees.
  • Structural deficits exist in Canada, but at the provincial not the federal level. The provinces already are mired in large debts and deficits, even before the real tsunami hits from soaring health care spending for an aging population. The token restraint offered by Alberta and Quebec in their recent budgets shows that the provinces are not yet willing to tackle the fundamental reforms needed to how they deliver education and health care and the outrageous compensation their employees receive. The provinces' desperate need for revenues is why none even bother pretending that the various carbon tax proposals currently circulating will be revenue neutral, as intended by their naïve academic proponents, leaving us with a more burdensome and not a more efficient tax regime.
Govind Rao

'Chaos' ahead of MUHC move; Support staff to hold protest over 'lack of organization,' ... - 0 views

  • Montreal Gazette Thu Apr 9 2015
  • With just over two weeks to moving day, hundreds of Royal Victoria Hospital employees say they don't know what jobs they will be doing at the new superhospital. The hospital is not prepared, said Mary Ann Davis, secretary general of the McGill University Hospital Centre Employees' Union, representing 4,800 staff at the MUHC. "And it's totally unnecessary." While no move is easy, she said, such "chaos" so close to moving time is causing staff additional stress and turning lives upside down.
  • The $1.3-billion superhospital on the Glen site in Notre-Damede-Grâce is to open on April 26. Under a tightly run schedule starting at 7 a.m., an estimated 200 patients will leave the grounds by ambulance or medicar, one every three minutes - until everyone is transferred and the hospital shuts down at about 5 p.m. But the next day's operation remains a great mystery, union officials say. What is in store for a large chunk (an estimated 30 per cent) of the 1,900 workers in housekeeping, clerical, laundry and food services, transportation and other support staffcurrently on the job at the Royal Vic? Many don't even know what department they will be going to, she added. An estimated 200 union members are expected demonstrate at the Royal Victoria Hospital on Thursday at noon to highlight "a lack of organization." It will be the first of three demonstrations held - including a picket line on moving day - unless their concerns are addressed.
Govind Rao

Let Blood Services lead the way - Infomart - 0 views

  • National Post Tue Apr 14 2015
  • I magine having to choose between putting food on the table or buying necessary medication. Research suggests this is the case for one in 10 Canadians who can't afford to fill their prescriptions. Canada is the only country with universal health care that does not also have universal drug coverage. Even for those who do have private or public drug coverage, there are discrepancies in what and who is covered from province to province. Canadians also pay more for drugs than citizens in almost any other Western nation. These are just a few of the arguments that have reignited calls for a national pharmacare program. It is not a new concept, but one that is gaining traction as leaders are turning over every stone to "bend the cost curve" in health care downward. In a recently published study in the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ), health economists and researchers concluded a universal drug program could actually save Canadians billions of dollars. Great savings are achieved by pooling provincial and territorial needs and resources to increase buying power, eliminate duplication and establish a platform for collaboration and cost-sharing. If health-care leaders are looking for proof that provinces and territories can do more together than they can on their own when it comes to the provision of life-saving and enhancing drug therapies, they need look no further than the blood system they created close to 20 years ago.
  • Many are aware that since its creation in 1998, Canadian Blood Services has been in the business of collecting, processing and distributing blood components in all provinces and territories outside Quebec. But few realize we have also been running a national formulary of biological drugs, providing universal and equitable access to plasma-derived medicine at no cost to patients for nearly two decades. Our organization has sole responsibility for managing a national portfolio of plasma-derived products and their synthetic alternatives worth about $500 million a year. These life-saving pharmaceuticals are used to treat people with hemophilia and other bleeding disorders, patients with inherited and acquired immune disorders, burn and trauma victims, and many others. A national, scalable, cost-shared infrastructure and logistics network ensures the right product gets to the right patient, at the right time.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Our approach to managing this drug portfolio is based on best practices in public tendering. This means we provide a competitive, transparent mechanism to achieve best pricing. In fact, governments are benefiting from Canadian Blood Services' success in negotiating an estimated $600 million in savings over five years through 2018 - a testament to the value of pan-Canadian buying power and proof of concept of one of the arguments in the CMAJ study. Some detractors of tendering suggest it can put supply at risk by placing all the purchaser's eggs in that one proverbial basket. However, in our process, we avoid single-sourcing whenever possible, not only to encourage competitive pricing, but to ensure security of supply. Carrying multiple brands of a product, purchasing them in smaller, diverse lots, and negotiating a dedicated and guaranteed "safety stock" are all measures we take to mitigate risks to supply disruption.
  • We have also focused on product choice by incorporating stakeholder (physician and patient) input where appropriate in our tendering processes. Through our medical directors, we provide expert advice when a physician has a patient-based issue that could benefit from an additional specialist perspective - added value for patients and health systems. We also independently qualify new suppliers and audit them periodically, adding another layer of vigilance and product safety for patients. We are often aware early on of supplier issues in bringing products to market or maintaining adequate Canadian supplies, which helps to mitigate the risk of shortages. Because of our governance structure, once a plasma-derived drug is accepted in our portfolio, it becomes available in all jurisdictions. This practice effectively reduces geographic or financial barriers to care, and is consistent with the principles of universal access informing the Canada Health Act and medicare. Equitable access also encourages consistency of practice, and fosters pan-Canadian dialogue on best practices for optimal product utilization. Canadian Blood Services collaborates with health-system leaders, including governments, transfusion medicine physicians and others, to help ensure appropriate utilization and to further control costs.
  • By offering our experience, we are not proposing Canadian Blood Services should bulk-purchase other drugs or that our model is a "cookie cutter" solution to apply to national pharmacare, in part or in whole. Rather, we are suggesting there are important lessons from our 17 years' experience that can be leveraged, and that a national drug program is not only possible - it is already being done, with significant benefits to patients and health system funders. A system that ensures no Canadian patient is left unable to afford life-saving medication, while at the same time driving down system costs, is not only good politics, it's good policy. National Post Dr. Graham Sher is CEO of Canadian Blood Services.
Govind Rao

Crossed wires at MUHC; Electrical problems, nurse shortage could lead to surgery delays... - 0 views

  • Montreal Gazette Fri Mar 20 2015
  • The wiring of the new operating rooms at the MUHC's $1.3-billion superhospital is not adequate to run a key piece of surgical equipment, the Montreal Gazette has learned. The hospital is also facing a shortage of trained operating room nurses. MUHC officials are rushing to fix the problems before the superhospital opens on April 26 in Notre-Dame-de-Grâce, but the number of elective surgeries could be affected during the first few months - causing increases in wait times, a staffmember who works in the ORs said. "In practical terms, they won't immediately be able to have the same number of planned surgeries," added the source, who agreed to be interviewed on the condition his name not be published because he is not authorized to speak to the media.
  • "They're going to ramp up the number of cases over several months. It may take longer than they expected strictly because they won't have the personnel available." The move to the superhospital on the site of the former Glen railway yard is a huge undertaking. It involves transferring thousands of patients and stafffrom the Royal Victoria, Montreal Chest and Montreal Children's hospitals to one site. It also involves training employees at the Glen site and calibrating thousands of pieces of medical equipment. The MUHC was supposed to take possession of the new complex from design-build contractor SNC-Lavalin on Sept. 30, but both sides wrangled over cost overruns of $172 million. As a result, the MUHC didn't actually get the keys for the facilities until Nov. 7, causing delays in the activation of equipment.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • The superhospital was built as a public-private partnership to avoid cost overruns. Under the terms of the agreement, SNC-Lavalin was bound to respect all the technical specifications during construction, including the wiring. Operating room staffrecently discovered that the heart-lung perfusion machines - which are used during coronary bypass surgery - require 20 amps of electricity, but the wiring that was installed in the ORs is not the correct gauge. During bypass surgery, a perfusionist stops the heart, pumping and oxygenating the patient's blood with a perfusion machine. "The perfusionists are running around wondering whether they can change the breaker or if the wiring will all need to be changed," the source said. "We don't know yet."
  • MUHC officials did not confirm or deny the wiring problem or staffing shortage, but alluded to both issues in an email statement on Thursday - two days after the Montreal Gazette requested a comment. "We are working to finalize a number of infrastructure adjustments required prior to the move of the RVH site on April 26," the statement said. "At this time we have every reason to believe that the operating rooms and clinical spaces at the Glen will be ready to accept patients on the day the hospital opens. Our team has been hard at work over the past months setting up our new facilities, identifying deficiencies and coordinating with our private partner to make the necessary modifications." Ian Popple, a spokesperson for the MUHC, said the wiring issue "is one of those things that's on the list." "There's a list of stuff, and all the changes that are going to be required to get the OR patientready by April 26 are going to get done. That's what they've assured us. Of course, patient safety is key."
  • The MUHC plans to hire at least 15 nurses for the Glen operating rooms, 15 nurses for its emergency room and 30 nurses for the postoperative recovery room. "One of the problems is that they did not post these positions early enough," the source said, adding it takes six weeks to train the nurses to work in the new ORs and gain familiarity with the location of instruments and equipment. "They should have foreseen this," he added. "They should have posted the positions much earlier. It's not as if they didn't know this was coming." The MUHC statement acknowledges that hiring and training should be "further advanced" at this point, but pins some of the blame on funding delays by the provincial government.
  • "The nursing recruitment process at the MUHC is continuous. We are always actively looking to recruit nurses and even more so at this time of transformation. ... Over 100 new positions have been posted and we have already positioned a number of experienced staffto begin training in time for the opening of the Glen site." "It should be noted that a gradual ramping-up to full capacity was always planned for the Glen," the statement adds. "We cannot predict how long it will take to reach full capacity in the operating rooms, but we are naturally focused on achieving this goal as rapidly as possible. Ideally, recruitment and training would be further advanced, but we have moved as fast as possible while remaining within our current financial parameters while we await confirmation of our Year One budget." Richard Fahey, the MUHC's director of public affairs, has suggested that the implementation of Bill 10, the government's reform of the health-care system that became law last month, might have added to the delays in approving the budget. aderfel@montrealgazette.com Twitter.com/Aaron_Derfel
Govind Rao

CUPE calls on health ministry to review MRI legislation; Health care must be based on n... - 0 views

  • The Leader-Post (Regina) Tue Dec 22 2015
  • The Canadian Union of Public Employees Saskatchewan is asking the federal health minister to review the Wall government's Bill 179, which permits private userpay MRI facilities in the province. The bill was passed by the government on Nov. 4 with the goal that it would be proclaimed in February before voters head to the polls in April.
  • Under the bill, when a patient elects to pay for an MRI out-ofpocket, the private clinic that does that MRI must provide a free scan for someone on the public wait-list.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • Last week, CUPE Saskatchewan sent a letter to Health Minister Jane Philpott requesting her to review the provincial legislation to determine if it violates the Canada Health Act and, if it does, that she instruct the Saskatchewan government to comply with the act.
  • Philpott was not available for an interview Monday, but emailed the Regina Leader-Post the following statement: "Our Government will work in close collaboration with our provincial and territorial partners to build constructive relationships. Our priority is to ensure all Canadians have access to health care."
  • CUPE Saskatchewan president Tom Graham says the union consulted with lawyer Steven Shrybman and it is his opinion that Bill 179 violates the Canada Health Act. "Health care needs to be provided on need, not the ability to pay," Graham said. "We think there are solutions that can be done within the system that don't require people to dig into their pockets to get an MRI."
  • CUPE sent the letter to Philpott days after the Saskatchewan Medical Association (SMA) raised concerns that the provincial government's decision to allow people to pay privately for MRIs was "a hasty policy." In a letter to physicians, SMA president Dr. Mark Brown said the organization opposed the move and told Health Minister Dustin Duncan that at the end of October. Brown said the legislation allowing people to pay privately for MRIs runs contrary to the fundamental principle of medicare.
  • (Bill 179) is privatizing our health-care system as far as we're concerned ... It's a slippery slope," Graham said Monday. "We already pay for health care in this province and in this country and now we're being asked to pay twice if you want it faster." Private MRIs in Alberta have not reduced wait times, he said.
  • "Their wait times are worse than ours and in Quebec, it's the same thing, " Graham said. "We're really quite concerned about it and we'd like the federal government to basically direct the government here to follow the Canada Health Act." In past interviews, Duncan has said people leave the province for MRIs now. The legislation is a way to level the playing field and provide some benefits for the public system.
  • I think they need to put the resources in where they are needed," Graham said. "It's a matter of getting MRI machines and technicians and scheduling it - it's as simple as that. I don't know why we have to get into these elaborate, complex schemes ... We should be enhancing our system, not taking it apart."
Govind Rao

Share of health spending on doctors increases - 0 views

  • CMAJ December 8, 2015 vol. 187 no. 18 First published November 9, 2015, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5191
  • Carolyn Brown
  • After years of erosion, doctors’ share of health spending has rebounded to levels last seen in the 1980s, according to the Canadian Institute for Health Information’s (CIHI’s) annual release of national health expenditure data. But it comes from a pie that is slowly shrinking, as health spending has not kept pace with inflation and population growth.
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • Figures compiled in CIHI’s database over 40 years show the share spent on physicians hit an all-time high in 1988, then slowly declined until 2007, when it turned around, growing at about 2.2% annually. It now accounts for 15.5%, comparable to levels seen in the late 1980s. Hospital spending has decreased from 45% of total health spending in the mid-1970s to just under 30% today, whereas drug spending has been increasing since the mid-1980s to account for just under 16% of spending.
  • “The guild has done a great job of protecting our income,” Dr. David Naylor said, referring to medical associations’ success in negotiations with governments. “But wouldn’t you expect [the share of spending on physicians] to drop a little?” Naylor, past president of the University of Toronto and chair of the Advisory Panel on Healthcare Innovation, spoke at a panel discussion on the CIHI findings, held Oct. 29 in Ottawa.
  • He said the “constancy of focus on doctors, drugs and hospitals … speaks to the stasis in the system. If anything, it’s in a state of arrested development.” While overall health spending has gone up in dollar terms, amounting to $6105 per capita in 2015, it has declined as a proportion of gross domestic product (GDP). After the 2008–2009 recession, health spending fell from 11.6% of to an estimated 10.9% of GDP today. When inflation and population growth are taken into account, health spending also shows a decline.
  • The first half of this movie seems similar to what happened in the 1990s,” said Don Drummond, an economist at Queen’s University. He said that in the 1990s, government austerity led to a decline in health spending, but a return to a good economy resulted in health spending growing “much faster than economic growth.”
  • In regard to the similar spending decline after 2011, Drummond asked “did we create efficiencies or just cut off the money and create pressure?” Drummond and Naylor clearly think that efficiencies are lacking. The solution, said Naylor, is integrating services, including home care and virtual care. “There’s not a single province that has taken steps in that direction.”
  • CMA President Cindy Forbes agreed. “We need integrated, appropriate and high-quality care.” She gave the example of a patient in an acute care hospital discharged to community care and later moving to palliative care. “The patient goes through three different systems. They all have their own budgets and caregivers. These silos have to be broken down so it’s one system.”
  • She stressed the need for a national seniors’ strategy to address a population that is aging and living longer, often with complex, multiple diseases. Integrated services could address the patients needing an alternative level of care who currently occupy 20% of beds in acute care hospitals, she said. “They are not ‘bed blockers,’” she said. “They are waiting for long-term or home care.”
  • Naylor also thinks changing the way physicians are paid is part of the solution. “The fee schedule is full of perverse incentives. It doesn’t create ‘integrative quarterbacks.’ There should be rewards for good prescribing and shorter hospital stays.”
  • Wide variations in the price tag for health care among provinces and territories also stood out in the data. Costs in Canada’s provinces range from $5665 per person per year in Quebec to $7036 in Newfoundland and Labrador. (In the territories, costs are much higher.) Seven provinces devote more than 40% of their budget to health, of which two devote more than 45%.
  • Demographics and geography account for some of the variation, according to Brent Diverty, CIHI’s vice-president of programs, especially costs to transport critical cases from remote areas. However, panellists expressed concern about inequalities in quality of care and access.
  • “People who are covered for a drug in one province are not covered in another,” pointed out Forbes. “Especially cancer drugs, which are expensive.”
  • Naylor added, “There’s a huge challenge for the [federal/provincial/territorial ministers] to understand this variation. We need to unbundle why these disparities occur. How do we get to a common higher ground as Canadians?”
Govind Rao

Le SCFP-Québec joint sa voix à celles qui demandent à Trudeau de tenir sa pro... - 0 views

  • 20 janvier 2016
  • Les ministres de la Santé du Canada se réunissent avec leur homologue fédéral aujourd’hui et demain à Vancouver. Le SCFP-Québec demande au gouvernement du Québec et au gouvernement fédéral de Justin Trudeau de conclure rapidement un nouvel Accord sur la santé avec les provinces.
Govind Rao

Ministers begin talks on prescription drugs - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Thu Jan 21 2016
  • Provincial and territorial health ministers have agreed to begin talks on improving access to prescription drugs, and are asking the new federal government to join the discussions. The move, which gained the support of health ministers during a meeting in Vancouver on Wednesday, is the first step toward the possible inclusion of a national pharmacare plan in a new health accord, said Ontario Health Minister Eric Hoskins, who introduced the proposal. Mr. Hoskins, who has long pushed for more equitable access to pharmaceuticals, said the current negotiations on a new health deal provide a unique opportunity for governments to consider what a Canadian pharmacare plan might look like.
  • Such a plan might be a combination of public and private insurance, he suggested, that could start with an agreement among governments about what prescription drugs to cover. "I like to believe we have a generational opportunity to really create a visionary document," Mr. Hoskins said in an interview on Wednesday. While there is no guarantee that Canadian governments can agree on a national drug plan, he said, they need to try. "It would be unfortunate if we didn't take advantage of the opportunity and at least do the hard work to look at the possibilities and to have the courage to dream and to think of the bigger vision." A working group set up by the provinces will look at improving "equitable and appropriate access to pharmaceuticals based on evidence," according to a release issued after the closeddoor meeting.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Provincial and territorial health ministers began two days of talks on Wednesday, and federal Health Minister Jane Philpott will join them on Thursday. The meetings are the beginning of what is expected to be a year of intense talks aimed at negotiating a new deal on health that will set national standards and deliver the stable funding the Liberals promised during the election campaign. The federal Health Minister has indicated she wants to steer the talks away from dollars at this stage of the negotiations, but B.C. Health Minister Terry Lake said on Wednesday that is not likely.
  • "You can't talk about health care without talking about dollars," he said. "It consumes 43 per cent of many of our provincial budgets." The first day of the talks covered a range of topics, from physician-assisted dying to access to drugs for rare diseases to newborn screening, according to a summary released afterward. While the topic of supervised injection sites was not specifically discussed, Quebec Health Minister Gaetan Barrette said in response to a journalist's question that his province will soon follow B.C.'s lead. Insite, a supervised injection facility, has operated on Vancouver's Downtown Eastside since 2003, and a second site has just received federal approval to operate in the city's west end. "We've watched the Insite project with great interest, and it works. We're in favour of this type of initiative," Mr. Barrette said.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Patients go private to alleviate wait times for surgery - 0 views

  •  
    Una Ginnane spent two frustrating years in a wheelchair after doctors at five Montreal hospitals refused to give her a new hip at her age because she was deemed too fragile. "I had to go private, to have a new hip, and I can assure you I don't have the money," said 90-year-old Ginnane, who took out a line of credit on her Montreal home last year to finance her hip replacement. In June, Ginnane paid $19,000 for an operation at a private clinic that lasted 40 minutes. Once she woke up, Ginanne got off the gurney and walked. "I was in a wheelchair for 20 months," said Ginnane, who says her only regret is not going to a private clinic earlier. (click on link to read full story)
Govind Rao

Private interests poised to move in - Infomart - 0 views

  • Calgary Herald Wed Dec 2 2015
  • In his mandate letter to Health Minister Jane Philpott, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau tells her to "strengthen our publicly funded health-care system." He will meet with premiers.
  • A new health accord is to be negotiated. Health Minister Sarah Hoffman has started upgrades to Alberta's neglected infrastructure. All good news that will help HMS Health Care remain afloat. But, there are woodpeckers at the waterline.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Strong and continuing interventions by federal and provincial governments are needed. In British Columbia, the Dr. Brian Day court case, seeking more private healthcare access, could undermine our publicly funded system. In Quebec, by legislation and failure to enforce the law, practitioners have been favoured over patients and a two-tier system is forming.
  • Excessive wait times create these issues. Provider greed then exploits the opportunities created when governments fail to act. Such waits are like a cancer in our system. Canadians deserve better. Ralph Coombs, Calgary Ralph Coombs was CEO of the Foothills Hospital from 1973 to 1991.
Govind Rao

MUHC solves riddle of sewage overflow problem - Infomart - 0 views

  • Montreal Gazette Thu Dec 3 2015
  • It might sound far-fetched, but officials at the McGill University Health Centre now believe that too many tampons being flushed down toilets in one concentrated area of the superhospital is the main cause of the sewage backups that flooded the birthing centre last August.
  • When it opened on April 26, the superhospital at the Glen site consolidated onto a single floor women's clinical activities that used to be scattered on different floors and buildings of the old Royal Victoria Hospital on University St.
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • For reasons that made sense clinically, the MUHC decided to house on the sixth floor of the Glen site the birthing centre, ambulatory health, the breast clinic, the newborn nursery as well as the pre-and postpartum units.
  • But in retrospect, it appears that the MUHC and design-build contractor SNC-Lavalin did not anticipate that the superhospital's plumbing system would have to handle a higher volume of flushed feminine hygiene products on one floor.
  • And instead of increasing the water flow, SNC-Lavalin installed low-flow toilets to reduce water usage by 30 per cent to achieve environmental LEED certification. What's more, instead of angling some of the sewage pipes to prevent potential blockages on the sixth floor, the pipes were laid at standard angles.
  • "This was a floor that was designed for the female patient population," said Ian Popple, a spokesperson for the MUHC. "We couldn't have anticipated these issues. A lot of the other plumbing problems have been resolved. It's just this one area where we have to tweak things to make sure we resolve it for good."
  • Plumbers who snake the drains on the sixth floor have kept pulling out sanitary napkins as well as brown paper. "What's causing the blockages in these areas are still the pads and the brown paper," Popple added. "That's the floor where you have a large number of women's toilets and where larger, thicker pads get lodged in the pipes."
  • The private consortium in charge of the $1.3-billion superhospital has readjusted the angles of some of the pipes as well as replaced some of the flush valves to increase water flow. Maintenance employees are also flushing the toilets several times on a nightly basis to boost water circulation and avert a buildup of material in the pipes. Although the MUHC public affairs staffaffixed stickers next to 1,000 toilets at the superhospital urging people not to flush "foreign objects" like tampons and paper towels, some users are still doing so.
  • Sewage floods did occur on the 10th and eighth floors of the facilities in Notre-Dame-de-Grâce, but the major problem was detected on the sixth floor. Since the peak of the sewage overflows in late August, the number of flood calls has been reduced by 75 per cent. The MUHC is also considering installing electric hand dryers in some staffbathrooms, but paper towels will likely still be used in public ones for infection-control reasons.
  • At one point, MUHC officials suspected that employee sabotage might have been to blame for the sewage floods, but Popple said there were only a couple of instances where suspicious items were found in pipes.
  • PHIL CARPENTER, MONTREAL GAZETTE FILES / Plumbers who snake the drains on the sixth floor have kept pulling out sanitary napkins and brown paper.
Govind Rao

'Another barrier' blocks access to care; Parents upset that parking costs $25 at privat... - 0 views

  • Montreal Gazette Tue Dec 1 2015
  • Parents who are being directed to a private children's clinic in Notre-Dame-de-Grâce by the Mc-Gill University Health Centre are upset that they now have to pay a $25 fee for parking in addition to being charged for certain allergy and blood tests.
  • The MUHC Users' Committee contends that the parking fee at 5100 de Maisonneuve Blvd. constitutes a "barrier to care," given that parents are already being asked to pay fees for tests that used to be covered under medicare at the former location of the Montreal Children's Hospital on Tupper St. The outdoor parking lot is part of a property at that is being managed by the MUHC.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • What is especially disturbing, said Amy Ma, co-chair of the central users' committee, is that the above-ground parking lot was constructed 30 years ago, and so there is no justification for charging such a high fee. In contrast, the MUHC is charging the same rate for its new underground parking lot that opened at the superhospital's Glen site in April, arguing that the higher fees are necessary to pay back a $266-million loan for the lot's construction. "Recently, I was talking to a parent who had to bring her child to the newly opened external clinic of the Children's at 5100 de Maisonneuve," Ma said. "In addition to having to pay $25 for an allergy shot, she also had to pay $25 for parking. The $25 for parking ... is just mind-boggling because it's not even a brand-new, multi-storied parking garage.
  • "It's definitely going to add yet another barrier in terms of access to care," Ma added. In September, Quebec's ombudsman vowed to investigate "excessive" parking fees at the $1.3-billion superhospital following a formal complaint by the users' committee. The MUHC levies patients and visitors $25 after 90 minutes of parking - the highest rate of any hospital in the province. On Aug. 1, the MUHC also "harmonized" its parking rates to $25 after 90 minutes at the Montreal General and Montreal Neurological hospitals. Previously, the rates were $19 after 90 minutes.
  • Despite this harmonization, the users' committee found that a patient who parked at the Montreal General and the Glen site on the same day was charged $50. The ombudsman warned that such doubledipping is "abusive and shows a lack of inter-hospital coordination." A report by the ombudsman's office on Oct. 27 recommended that the MUHC "revise" its parking rates by Monday so that the fees "do not hinder the right of an individual to access to health care." The ombudsman's delegate, Léa Préfontaine, did not recommend by how much the rates should be lowered.
  • A week before the report, the MUHC lowered the maximum rate for express parking at the superhospital to $30 from $50 for cars parked between 61 minutes and 24 hours. But the $25 fee for general parking has not been changed. In fact, the hospital network raised the fees for employee parking by $120 a year, going from a monthly rate of $105 to $115. What's unusual about the parking at 5100 de Maisonneuve is that it does not fall under the jurisdiction of the MUHC, since it's a private facility. On Oct. 13, the Brunswick Medical Group opened "The Children's Clinic" at that address. The clinic is staffed by doctors from the Montreal Children's Hospital that is part of the superhospital complex.
  • Parents who go there must present their children's medicare card before each consultation. If a child is in need of an allergy or blood test, the parent is offered one on the spot for a fee, or can go to the hospital and wait for one that would be covered under medicare. Shortly after the Montreal Gazette reported that children were being charged fees for tests at the private clinic, Health Minister Gaétan Barrette ordered the MUHC to remove its signs from the building. He also demanded that the MUHC cancel as soon as possible a 30-year lease it signed with the Royal Victoria Hospital Foundation regarding the property.
  • an Popple, a spokesperson for the MUHC, confirmed that the hospital network is managing the parking lot at 5100 de Maisonneuve through a private company. Popple added that the "MUHC plans to announce modifications to its parking policy over the coming week," but declined to provide details. aderfel@montrealgazette.com twitter.com/Aaron_Derfel
  • DAVE SIDAWAY, MONTREAL GAZETTE / The parking at 5100 de Maisonneuve Blvd. does not fall under the jurisdiction of the MUHC.
Govind Rao

Valeant deal will save U.S. $600 million; Agreement with Walgreens leads to price reduc... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Wed Dec 16 2015
  • Valeant Pharmaceuticals plans to deliver up to $600 million (U.S.) in annual savings to the U.S. health-care system starting next year after agreeing to cut the prices of several of its drugs as part of distribution agreements with the popular Walgreens retail chain. The Quebec-based company said it will drop wholesale prices for branded prescription-based skin-and eye-care products by 10 per cent.
  • The price cuts under the 20-year agreement with one of the largest American drug chains will be introduced in six to nine months, with the potential for other therapeutic treatments being added to the program. Walgreens will also distribute more than 30 of Valeant's branded products at comparable generic prices, starting in the second half of 2016. The average price decrease is expected to be more than 50 per cent, with reduced prices ranging between 5 and 95 per cent.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • The price cuts don't apply in Canada where Valeant doesn't have similar distribution agreements with pharmacy retailers such as Shopper's Drug Mart, Jean Coutu or the Rexall Group. Valeant's pricing practices have been under investigation by U.S. authorities, including Congress, since the company dramatically hiked prices for some specialty products this year.
  • The company has also come under fire as the result of a civil suit by a small U.S. pharmacy that shed new light on Valeant's distribution agreements and practices. "We have listened and we've taken positive steps to respond," Valeant chairman and CEO Michael Pearson said in a news release Tuesday, a day before he's scheduled to hold a conference call with industry analysts.
  • The distribution agreement with Walgreens - a chain with more than 8,000 retail outlets - follows Valeant's decision to sever ties with mail-order pharmacy Philidor Rx Services. That relationship came to light as a result of a court battle between Valeant and another mail-order pharmacy. Valeant says the Walgreens agreement will be used as a model for distribution deals with independent retail pharmacies. After losing 73 per cent over the past few months, Valeant's shares closed up nearly 16 per cent in Tuesday trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange.
Govind Rao

Healthier allies; Can the feds and provinces play nicer about health care? - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Sat Oct 24 2015
  • Mr. Trudeau has promised to convene a first-minister's conference on health care to establish funding and priorities for the decade ahead. That could be a very expensive meeting. The last time one was held, in 2004, Liberal prime minister Paul Martin agreed to increase funding by 6 per cent a year - three times the rate of inflation - for 10 years. The provinces agreed to spend the money in priority areas, such as improving patient wait times, and to report on their progress. Most of those pledges fell by the wayside. In essence, the provinces took the money and spent it as they saw fit.
  • The Tories had committed to increasing health funding at the same rate as the gross domestic product. Mr. Trudeau is committed to spending more, given that the population is aging and health-care costs continue to rise. A return to the 6-per-cent escalator would increase federal spending by something like $35-billion over 10 years.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • One big problem with the proposed summit: it could lead to increased tensions if the feds try to attach strings to how the provinces should spend any new money. The provinces have reason to worry: In the 1980s and nineties, as the federal fiscal situation deteriorated, Ottawa contributed less and less to the public health-care system, while prohibiting provinces from pursuing private-sector alternatives.
  • In the first years of the last decade, as the fiscal situation improved, the Liberal federal government was prepared to offer more robust funding, but insisted on new national standards for health-care delivery in exchange. Provincial governments resisted that federal intrusion in their jurisdiction. The struggle culminated in that 2004 first-ministers meeting in which the premiers browbeat the new Martin government into those massive increases in spending.
  • If Mr. Trudeau attaches conditions to increases in federal health care transfers, expect Quebec to demand that it be allowed to opt out of any program, but still get all the money. Expect Alberta to demand the same. It's called asymmetrical federalism, and it can quickly get ugly. Another major problem is that, given other Liberal spending commitments in infrastructure, fighting global warming, postsecondary education and so much else, the finance minister, whoever he or she may be, might not be able to balance the federal budget by the end of the mandate, as Mr. Trudeau has promised.
  • The Liberals have also promised to work with the provinces on a pharmacare strategy, which would inevitably involve funding for subsidized prescription drugs for low-income seniors.
  • If increased health-care commitments - along with everything else in the Liberal platform - cause federal finances to deteriorate to the point that Ottawa is running an entrenched structural deficit, the national debt will increase. At the same time, Canada's credit rating will start to decay, interest payments on the debt will consume more of the budget, and people will start saying, "Like father, like son."
  • To avoid that, Mr. Trudeau will have to rein in provincial expectations. But there is a political price to be paid for convening first-ministers conferences and then failing to meet the premiers' demands. It's why Stephen Harper avoided them.
Govind Rao

NunatsiaqOnline 2015-10-22: NEWS: Nunavik health workers prepare to strike - 0 views

  • October 22, 2015
  • More than 1,400 health and social service staff to walk off the job Oct. 26
  • Hundreds of health care and social service workers in Nunavik have voted to strike Oct. 26, one of a number of strike days planned to put pressure on the Quebec government during contract negotiations.
Govind Rao

Time for feds to enforce Canada Health Act as extra billing, user fees on rise | - 0 views

  • By RYAN MEILI
  • Wednesday, March 30, 2016
  • Extra billing in Ontario, private MRIs in Saskatchewan and user fees in Quebec: violations of the Canada Health Act are on the rise across the country. Canadian doctors are concerned about the impact of this trend not only on their patients, but on our public health care system as well.
Govind Rao

Poll finds assisted-dying limits wanted; Canadians feel minors and those suffering from... - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Thu Apr 7 2016
  • A majority of Canadians do not want minors or people with mental illnesses and psychiatric conditions to be given access to doctor-assisted dying, a new Nanos Research/Globe and Mail poll has found.
  • The poll suggests Canadians would prefer that the federal government follow a restrictive path as it decides which patients have the right to end their suffering in a medical setting. While there is no doubt that doctorassisted dying will become legal, there is a continuing debate about exactly who will have access, and under which conditions.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • The government's proposal will be tabled in "coming weeks," she said, adding "there are many elements that need to be considered as we work to achieve the best possible solution for Canada on this highly sensitive and complex issue." The Supreme Court of Canada struck down the Criminal Code ban on doctor-assisted death in February, 2015, and suspended the ruling's effect for one year.
  • Both ideas were promoted by a recent parliamentary committee into the matter, which will influence the government's coming legislation. "Our government is committed to developing an approach that strikes the best balance among a range of interests, including personal autonomy, access to health-care services, and the protection of vulnerable persons," said Joanne Ghiz, a spokeswoman for Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould.
  • The poll of 1,000 adult Canadians found an overall disagreement with the idea of giving access to doctor-assisted dying to people suffering from mental illness or psychiatric conditions. The proposal was opposed by 51.8 per cent of respondents, while 42.4 per cent of respondents agreed with it. The opposition was even greater to granting access to assisted dying to 16- and 17-year-olds. The proposal was opposed by 58.8 per cent of respondents, while it was supported by 36.2 per cent of respondents.
  • The Trudeau government asked for an extension after last year's election, and must now bring in a law by June 6. In February, a committee of MPs and senators recommended to provide assisted dying to Canadians suffering from both terminal and non-terminal medical conditions that cause enduring and intolerable suffering. More controversially, the committee opened the door to assisted dying for youth under 18, calling on the government to address the issue of "mature minors" within three years of the initial law. The committee added that patients with mental illnesses or psychiatric conditions should not be excluded from eligibility as long as they are competent and meet the other criteria set out in law.
  • The Conservative MPs on the committee argued the proposals went too far at the time, and now feel vindicated by the poll's findings. Conservative MP Gerard Deltell said his group followed the example of Quebec where the government, after six years of consultations and studies, opted to restrict the right to doctorassisted dying to consenting adults. "The issues of minors and people with mental illnesses raise major problems," Mr. Deltell said in an interview. "At what point does someone suffering from a mental illness offer his or her full and complete consent? It's impossible. ... Same thing for minors."
  • Still, committee chair and Liberal MP Robert Oliphant said the proposals included "huge safeguards" to prevent any abuse against vulnerable persons who do not want to die. He added that on minors and people with psychological issues, the committee wanted to avoid setting arbitrary criteria and decided to leave clear powers in the hands of doctors. "Will two physicians confirm competency, that the person has capacity, and that the illness is irremediable and grievous, and that the suffering is intolerable to the individual?" Mr. Oliphant said in an interview. "We felt that was the appropriate way to go." The poll also found that 75 per cent of Canadians agreed that doctors "should be able to opt out of offering assisted dying," compared with 21 per cent who disagreed.
  • The Nanos Research random survey, conducted by telephone and online between March 31 and April 4, offers a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.
Govind Rao

Jeffrey Simpson: Still stuck on the health-care treadmill; More than a decade and billi... - 0 views

  • heglobeandmail.com Fri Apr 8 2016,
  • JEFFREY SIMPSON
  • The year was 2004. Paul Martin was prime minister. A set of premiers different from those of today sat with him to negotiate what became a 10-year, $41-billion investment in health care, indexed yearly at 6 per cent. Their accord aimed at many targets, but one stood out - waiting times. Why? Because they were unacceptably long, a blight on the country's beloved health-care system. They also seemed to be the sharpest point of public anxiety about the system.
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • They allocated billions of dollars for five kinds of procedures, all disproportionately afflicting seniors who, after all, vote in elections more than young people and use the health-care system more. The procedures were: hip and knee replacements, hip-fracture repairs, cataracts, and radiation. More than a decade and billions of dollars later, how are we doing? What did all that money and effort produce? In a nutshell: middling results. Initial data were released in 2006. From then until 2015, some improvements occurred, according to a recent report (www.cihi.ca») from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Between 2011 and 2015, wait times shrank for some procedures in some provinces, but increased for other procedures elsewhere.
  • One challenge is obvious: the population is aging. Ergo: more need for cataracts, more falls causing hip fractures, more joints giving out, more youthful athletic injuries becoming painful in later years. Aging puts governments on a treadmill. More money and improved allocation of medical resources result in more procedures but demand keeps growing. For example, between 2011 and 2015, 25 per cent more hip-replacement operations were done, but the number of patients being treated within "benchmark" time frames actually fell.
  • What are these benchmark time frames? Governments establish them to measure progress or lack thereof, based on what medical experts think are appropriate times to wait before procedures are undertaken. The benchmarks are rather generous and can be irritating to patients in pain. They are also somewhat misleading. The hip and knee benchmarks are six months. That period measures only the time between when surgery is recommended and the surgery occurs. It does not measure what is often the most aggravating part of the health-care system: getting an appointment with a specialist who might then recommend surgery.
  • Combine the two waiting times - see a specialist, have surgery - and Canada's record looks less than average compared with other advanced industrialized countries. One challenge plaguing the Canadian system for joint-replacement surgeries is the endemic fight for operating time in hospitals. Orthopedic surgeries have to be slotted into ORs, which are needed for emergencies, life-threatening problems, very complicated surgeries for cancer or neurological procedures. Orthopedic surgeries, except for hip fractures that have to be repaired swiftly, can wait, and wait.
  • Here's a telling irony. A surplus of orthopedic surgeons now exists in some parts of Canada. There's not a surplus of surgeons versus demand for their services but rather versus the OR time they are allocated. In other words, more surgeries could be done because surgeons are available but operating-room time is not. The result is that some young surgeons are going to the United States or working part-time. Trying to fit surgeons and patients into hospital OR allocations on a timely basis is made more difficult by the straitjacket of the Canadian system or at least the view, bordering on secular theology in some quarters, that everything must be done in a public hospital rather than in private clinics operating under funding arrangements with the state.
  • Saskatchewan has used this method - private delivery of publicly funded and regulated services - which partly explains why that province finishes first in the CIHI report for timeliness of procedures. Quebec also used this system, until the Liberal government, led by a neurological surgeon (current Premier Philippe Couillard), ended the experiment.
  • If the results are so-so in recent years for the five procedures identified in 2004, CIHI numbers suggest backsliding for diagnostic imaging. For six provinces that provided data, waiting times for MRIs increased "significantly" as they did for CT scans. Waiting times for cancer surgeries have remained stable.
  • Dryly and accurately, CIHI repeats what everyone who thinks about the future of health care knows: "With a growing and aging population in Canada ... demand for priority procedures will likely continue to increase."
Heather Farrow

Lawsuit to reignite health-care debate; Cambie Surgery Centre's practice of billing pat... - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Wed Aug 31 2016
  • Brian Day, a crusader for greater private health-care access, will be in a Vancouver courtroom next week for the start of a lawsuit challenging provincial rules that pertain to his clinic's practice of billing patients for procedures offered in the public system. While the hearing challenging B.C. regulations that ban private care for medically necessary services is expected to last six months, a bullish Dr. Day said in an interview on Tuesday that victory is inevitable "because we're right." The hearing begins next Tuesday in B.C. Supreme Court. On one side is the Cambie Surgery Centre, which describes itself as Canada's only free-standing hospital of its kind, as well as patients who are listed in the lawsuit as plaintiffs. On the other side is British Columbia's Medical Services Commission and the provincial Health Ministry.
  • The case promises to reignite a debate whose last major legal test occurred in 2005, when the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that a Quebec ban on private health care was unconstitutional. Dr. Day is the medical director at the Cambie clinic, which specializes in anthroposcopic surgery and allows patients to pay out-of-pocket rather than wait for care in the public system. The provincial government has previously audited the clinic and alleged its billing practices were illegal, though for years it did little to actually intervene. Dr. Day and his patients argue that restrictions on private care are unconstitutional. The orthopedic surgeon and past-president of the Canadian Medical Association said he is motivated by a key belief. "You should not suffer or die because of a wait list," he said. "Access to a waiting list is not access to health care." The B.C. government says it is simply enforcing the law.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • "The priority of the Medical Services Commission and the Ministry of Health is to uphold the Medicare Protection Act and the benefits it safeguards for patients in this province," B.C. Health Minister Terry Lake said in a statement on Tuesday. "We expect and require these clinics to come into full compliance with the law, and we remain fully committed to seeing out this case to its resolution." The ministry said it could not comment further because the case is before the courts. But the federal government is also watching the proceedings closely and has sought intervenor status in the case. In a statement from Ottawa, Health Canada said many provisions of the B.C. legislation mirror those of the Canada Health Act, "making this case of significant importance not only to British Columbians, but to all Canadians."
  • Given that Canadians "overwhelmingly" support universally accessible health care, "any challenge to a principle so fundamental to our health-care system is of significant concern to the Government of Canada." During a federal Liberal caucus retreat in Saguenay, Que., last week, Health Minister Jane Philpott said the case and the prospect of health-care privatization are a cause of "concern" for her. "I think I have made it very clear on repeated occasions that our government is committed to firmly upholding the Canada Health Act. The Cambie case deals specifically with that, with the provision of services," she told reporters. "It's fundamentally important to the health-care system in the entire country, not just in British Columbia, that we make sure that medically necessary services are universally insured and there are no barriers to access of those services." Ms. Philpott acknowledged that some health-care services in Canada are delivered privately, citing physiotherapy, which is largely carried out in private clinics because it is not included under the Canada Health Act.
  • But she said anything similar to a user fee is a barrier to people being able to receive medically necessary care. Ultimately, Dr. Day said, the law, facts and evidence are on the side of his argument that Canadians would best be served by a "hybrid" health-care system. "I kind of hope the judge doesn't hear that, and our lawyers would be nervous to hear that, but that's what I believe," he said. Within that system, public hospitals would offer private services and private hospitals would offer public services. He said he also wants to see competition between and within the systems. "Competition breeds excellence," Dr. Day said. © 2016 The Globe and Mail Inc. All Rights Reserved.
« First ‹ Previous 421 - 440 of 442 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page